Tumgik
#Duchess of Sussex
Text
Tumblr media
Harry & Meghan ❤
Source: Lennie.illustration
32 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Reblog and text if you want to be my submissive slave
23 notes · View notes
saintmeghanmarkle · 3 days
Text
Queen Camilla cuts off Eugenie and Beatrice by u/EleFacCafele
Queen Camilla cuts off Eugenie and Beatrice Allegedly, Queen Camilla has decisively cut off Princesses Eugenie and Beatrice, the daughters of Prince Andrew, amid allegations that they leaked sensitive family information to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.The scandal comes at a tumultuous time for the royal family, as King Charles faces health challenges and the monarchy strives to maintain a unified front. A senior courtier expressed severe disapproval of the princesses' actions, as reported by the Globe magazine, stating, "Camilla has totally cut Bea and Eugenie off, depriving Harry and his American wife of their main pipeline for inside information. The decision to isolate the princesses is seen as a move to safeguard the institution's integrity and confidentiality."https://ift.tt/QOfrEKF archived post link: https://ift.tt/zWZkmSU author: EleFacCafele submitted: April 20, 2024 at 03:50PM via SaintMeghanMarkle on Reddit disclaimer: all views + opinions expressed by the author of this post, as well as any comments and reblogs, are solely the author's own; they do not necessarily reflect the views of the administrator of this Tumblr blog. For entertainment only.
18 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
Sad he's had to share it but gorgeous to see nonetheless.
"The original Jpeg without the black and White grade, I expect a full apology and retraction from @MailOnline @Telegraph @victoria_ward No trees or meadows were moved or swapped, this is the image straight out of camera. Also that is a Jacaranda Tree, not a willow tree." - Misan Harriman.
160 notes · View notes
sussex-sweetheart · 3 months
Text
The British press has started saying Harry and Meghan gave Charles cancer... I'm honestly surprised it took them this long to start this bullshit again. 😌
166 notes · View notes
yongyuan-st · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
A Kiss for mama ❤️
2K notes · View notes
kuwtsussexes · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Prince Harry and Meghan, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex at the Bob Marley: One Love movie premiere in Jamaica | Jan 23, 2024
186 notes · View notes
thatssosussex · 1 month
Text
H + M
THE LOOK OF LOVE
🥹😍🥰😭🦋🦋🦋🥺👉🏽👈🏽
🎶: Cleo Sol - Golden Child (Jealous)
92 notes · View notes
sbrown82 · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media
☕️☕️☕️
130 notes · View notes
jasmine-corner · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Harry and Meghan out in Montecito
220 notes · View notes
candicebella · 9 days
Text
Tumblr media
Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex — Royal Salute Polo Cup in Miami, Florida (4/12/24).
59 notes · View notes
theiconicmeghanmarkle · 11 hours
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Melissa McCarthy on Meghan: "She's a smart, interesting woman that has her own life, which, for some reason, is incredibly threatening to some people… I've never once been threatened by someone who is amazing. I just think how inspiring. It's really on the people throwing the hate." 
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
21 notes · View notes
snarkytiara · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
This Robert Jobson?:
Tumblr media Tumblr media
100 notes · View notes
saintmeghanmarkle · 6 days
Text
Comment in the Standard: How dare Montecito millionaire Prince Harry demand our tax money to cover his legal costs
This subject matter cannot be covered too much for my taste.
Tumblr media
Emphasis and comments by me:
Prince Harry’s latest court defeat in his rightly unsuccessful bid to overturn the decision to refuse him guaranteed Met police protection after he pulled out of royal duties might seem like a trivial battle over legal fees.
But in fact the duke’s failed attempt to pass 50 to 60 per cent of the costs incurred by the Home Office in fighting his unmerited claim tells us much about the preening prince and his selfish disregard for virtually anyone other than himself, his equally self-obsessed wife, Meghan Markle, and his children. [No one else matters of course. It is all about them.]
That’s because when the Duke of Sussex, as he still wants to be called despite ditching his royal role, wasted yet more of the High Court’s time in arguing for the taxpayer to fund at least half of the hundreds of thousands of pounds that the Home Office was forced to spend on the case, what he was really doing was trying to pass on a large chunk of the bill to ordinary taxpayers. [Sponging off others is quite on brand.
That’s right: instead of having the decency to accept that he’d have to pay up when he lost, the Montecito multimillionaire, for whom the legal expenses will be loose change, wanted taxes paid by everyone ranging from people on the minimum wage to bus drivers, cleaners and pensioners to cover his costs. It’s frankly contemptible. [Does he think it is his birthright to have the peasants pay for his temper tantrums?]
It's notable too that yesterday’s costs order by the High Court judge, Sir Peter Lane, reveals that Harry, who is so protective of his own privacy (when it suits him), managed to breach a confidentiality agreement made as part of the litigation by emailing “certain information” that was meant to be secret to one his lawyers and the MP Johnny Mercer. The prince might have apologised for the error, but the costs order refers to the “seriousness of the breach” and it was at best a sloppy mistake that added to the Home Office costs that he was trying to avoid. [What were you up to Harold?]
Harry’s whole case was, of course, misconceived from the start and it’s worth recapping why.
He asserted that the decision in 2020 by security experts on the Government’s Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures, known as Ravec, that he should no longer receive publicly-funded police protection in Britain because of his move abroad should be overturned.
The supposed reasons were that the committee had allegedly failed to take into account the impact of a successful attack on the prince and had also acted unreasonably, unfairly and with a lack of transparency.
It was nonsense for the prince to think that he knew better than a panel of experts informed by the latest security advice from the police and intelligence agencies. [This man has a very high opinion of himself.] The High Court unsurprisingly dismissed Harry’s claim on all grounds, finding that there was no reason to overturn the Ravec panel’s decision. It had in fact left open the possibility of occasional police protection for the prince when in Britain, if there was evidence in future of a sufficient threat to his safety.
An attempt by the prince to persuade the courts that a later offer by him to pay for police protection should have been accepted was also rebuffed. Yet another judge dragged into Harry’s interminable litigation ruled it would be wrong to allow the wealthy to receive a service from the limited pool of specialist Met protection officers that a less affluent person could not afford.
That too was the correct and inevitable decision. Police protection officers are highly skilled specialists, trained at significant public expense, who exist only in restricted numbers and who are required to safeguard those facing the highest risks such as working royals, Cabinet ministers and prime ministers current and former, not others like Harry wanting the comfort blanket of protection they don’t need.
In short, every argument put forward by Harry was flawed and rejected by the courts. It’s a sign of his delusion that even the succession of earlier rebuffs from the judiciary didn’t stop him basing his attempt to get off a big chunk of the Home Office’s costs in fighting the litigation on the fantasy claim that he’d achieved “partial success” in his legal action. [He learns nothing from his experiences.]
Maybe that was how Harry viewed it. After he all, he told the world in his biography Spare that “there's just as much truth in what I remember and how I remember it as there is in so-called objective facts”.
But it simply wasn’t true, as yesterday’s High Court costs order reminded him.
It pointed out that Harry had “comprehensively lost” and that there was “no merit” in his claim of partial victory with his judicial review argument failing “on all of the pleaded grounds.” [Harold is a big loser.]
It was the obvious outcome from the start and the claim should never have been brought. His inevitable defeat was deserved and now it’s time for the penny-pinching prince to pay up.
👉 How dare Montecito millionaire Prince Harry demand our tax money to cover his legal costs | Evening Standard (archive.ph)
post link
author: Von_und_zu_
submitted: April 17, 2024 at 10:53AM via SaintMeghanMarkle on Reddit
disclaimer: all views + opinions expressed by the author of this post, as well as any comments and reblogs, are solely the author's own; they do not necessarily reflect the views of the administrator of this Tumblr blog. For entertainment only.
73 notes · View notes
harryandmeghansussex · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
Meghan.
📸 Misan Harriman.
174 notes · View notes
sussex-sweetheart · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
86 notes · View notes