♡ LOVE IS ONLY A FEELING
PAIRING: nanami kento x f!reader
SYNOPSIS: who knew that gojo satoru would be the reason for a love story to brew when he intentionally gave y/n the wrong number to set her up with his best friend?
GENRE: friends (ish) to lovers, fluff, angst, hurt to comfort, social media au
WARNINGS: will be pointed out in every chapter
TAG LIST: send an ask or reply under this post <3
STATUS: ongoing
AUTHOR’S NOTE: hi again! my last smau was discontinued due to my lack of motivation and because life got in the way, but now i’m back with a new one and hopefully i’ll finish this. i’m however not making any promises because at the moment, i’m extremely unstable and this is my way to escape from reality, so i have no idea if i’ll want to throw this in the trash a week in because of impulses. but let’s at least try <3 also, the updates won’t be daily due to me only having two months left until i graduate and therefore have a lot in school, i hope that’s okay!
PROFILES ONE | PROFILES TWO
ONE - wrong number
TWO - you’re so boring
THREE -
FOUR -
FIVE -
tba…
285 notes
·
View notes
Mi café, está rola y a mover a México por qué ricos solo mis besos y los orales que doy.
3 notes
·
View notes
♡ LOVE IS ONLY A FEELING - YOU’RE SO BORING
ONE | MASTERLIST | THREE
PAIRING: nanami kento x f!reader
SYNOPSIS: who knew that gojo satoru would be the reason for a love story to brew when he intentionally gave y/n the wrong number to set her up with his best friend?
WARNINGS: none i think
TAG LIST: @scrappedup @peachesnoranges @bakarinnie @sweetpo1son @atsushirolll @sad-darksoul @sleepyxxhead @mitsuyakii @soilmayo @jesstuff @reiners-milkbiddies @giannitaa @cutiesarah @lysaray @wearetheexception @steleir @r0ckst4rjk @venjrnjrbhrr19 @haitanibros0007 @joonsvision @diogodxlot @callmekda @mizuspeaches @morgyyyyyyy @magewritesstories @carefree-flowerchild
194 notes
·
View notes
Today my therapist introduced me to a concept surrounding disability that she called "hLep".
Which is when you - in this case, you are a disabled person - ask someone for help ("I can't drink almond milk so can you get me some whole milk?", or "Please call Donna and ask her to pick up the car for me."), and they say yes, and then they do something that is not what you asked for but is what they think you should have asked for ("I know you said you wanted whole, but I got you skim milk because it's better for you!", "I didn't want to ruin Donna's day by asking her that, so I spent your money on an expensive towing service!") And then if you get annoyed at them for ignoring what you actually asked for - and often it has already happened repeatedly - they get angry because they "were just helping you! You should be grateful!!"
And my therapist pointed out that this is not "help", it's "hLep".
Sure, it looks like help; it kind of sounds like help too; and if it was adjusted just a little bit, it could be help. But it's not help. It's hLep.
At its best, it is patronizing and makes a person feel unvalued and un-listened-to. Always, it reinforces the false idea that disabled people can't be trusted with our own care. And at its worst, it results in disabled people losing our freedom and control over our lives, and also being unable to actually access what we need to survive.
So please, when a disabled person asks you for help on something, don't be a hLeper, be a helper! In other words: they know better than you what they need, and the best way you can honor the trust they've put in you is to believe that!
Also, I want to be very clear that the "getting angry at a disabled person's attempts to point out harmful behavior" part of this makes the whole thing WAY worse. Like it'd be one thing if my roommate bought me some passive-aggressive skim milk, but then they heard what I had to say, and they apologized and did better in the future - our relationship could bounce back from that. But it is very much another thing to have a crying shouting match with someone who is furious at you for saying something they did was ableist. Like, Christ, Jessica, remind me to never ask for your support ever again! You make me feel like if I asked you to call 911, you'd order a pizza because you know I'll feel better once I eat something!!
Edit: crediting my therapist by name with her permission - this term was coined by Nahime Aguirre Mtanous!
Edit again: I made an optional follow-up to this post after seeing the responses. Might help somebody. CW for me frankly talking about how dangerous hLep really is.
17K notes
·
View notes
What About The Kens?
I'm already seeing guys complain about the Barbie movie end, how they wanted Kens to be equal in Barbieland but were only given a small part on the Cabinet.
That's the point.
You're meant to feel bad for the Kens. Believe me, women aren't partying over the 'Returns to Matriarch' ending. Some will be, but the ones who also clocked the meaning behind it won't. Most women will also feel bad for Kens. Because it's an exact parallel to how women are treated in reality.
Men, you're meant to be upset. You're meant to question it. Because you're meant to feel it, and feel what that is like, so you can finally understand women. You're upset at seeing it in a movie, now imagine living it in reality. That's being a woman.
Kens were shit on so you could feel what it was like for women this entire time. Kens were being used as a placement so you could see yourself in a woman's shoes. A world dominated by the opposite sex. When Ken leaves, and sees male presidents (All men) for the first time, men being doctors and lawyers, etc, realising he is more than just a prop for Barbie, that was on purpose. Because that is the feeling that Barbie gave to women. It's why you cheer for him at first before he goes a little overboard.
It's exactly why the real world was an exaggerated Partriarchy and Barbieland an exaggerated Matriarchy. Neither wins. Neither is equal. None of them change for the better. It's why you should want women in the real world to be respected, and Kens in Barbieland to be respected.
The thing is, women also didn't win. Not in the real world. In Barbieland, yes, but not anywhere else. The real world didn't change. But you didn't notice, did you? That Gloria (The mother that helped Barbie) also didn't get a position on the Mattel board? It was still all men? Her idea was ignored until it made a profit, and the men will likely get the credit? She'll still just be the receptionist? The women representing the real world didn't get anymore opportunities, neither did the men in Barbieland.
I was hoping that Gloria would be offered a position on the board, and that the Barbie Cabinet would introduce another entire Cabinet to represent the Kens, but neither happened. They're complete mirrors.
But which one did you actually notice? Which did you actually care about? Now tell me again the ending was unfair. Because it was. For both parties. That's the point.
The difference is, Barbieland is fictional. You will walk out of the theatre with the reassurance that at least it's not real. Women won't. Women can't. Companies not giving women equal opportunities or voices isn't fictional, and that was just one example. There are no women presidents (USA at least) for us to go look at in the real world. We don't have somewhere to go to realise it could be different for us like Ken did. Barbie and make believe is all we had when we were kids, or even now.
You're supposed to be mad, just not at the movie.
8K notes
·
View notes