Tumgik
#crunch
Video
| black bears monch apples by kilhambearcenter
| contains: monchin, cronchin, echoey crow calls
13K notes · View notes
eat-love-eat · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Strawberry Crunch Cake
1K notes · View notes
accecakes · 14 days
Text
Tumblr media
I WOKE UP AT 3AM TO DRAW THIS OUT BEFORE THE 'OL BRAIN RESTARTS 🥲
1K notes · View notes
ranmagender · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
Cuphead good
12K notes · View notes
theoutcastrogue · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
MATT: When I ask for persuasion or deception on your end, when someone's rolling insight on you, that's an opportunity for you to be honest and choose persuasion. That way, when the opportunity does arrive that you are deceiving somebody, the person that's rolling insight doesn't know whether you are or not.
AABRIA: I've taken that from you, by the way. I love that. I was like, persuasion or deception, don't say which.
MATT: Yeah, the player chooses, they just say a number, and then whether you're deceiving or you're not, if you succeed over them, then you get to give the information you want.
BRENNAN: That's slick as hell. And that's what I do now too. Stealing that right away.
MATT: We all steal from each other. Make us all better.
— Adventuring Party: All About The Ravening War S12E04: "The Mystic River Episode"
2K notes · View notes
sweetoothgirl · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Butter Crunch Chocolate Chip Cookies
4K notes · View notes
foodffs · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
LOUISIANA CRUNCH CAKE
Follow for recipes
Is this how you roll?
299 notes · View notes
crunchcasual · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
the urge to fix yourself when you aren't broken
Nimona on Netflix • Neon Gravestones by Twenty One Pilots • Comic by @lycaniums-room • Wild Geese by Mary Oliver
502 notes · View notes
fullcravings · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
Toffee Crunch Peanut Butter Buckeyes
246 notes · View notes
darkxsoulzyx · 1 year
Text
You’re Not Alone Anymore
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
718 notes · View notes
theoddsideofme · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
279 notes · View notes
Video
Cardboard Crunch by nataliapavlova116
6K notes · View notes
mirkokosmos · 9 months
Photo
Tumblr media
by Mirko Lalit Egger
197 notes · View notes
thegoodmorningman · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
"Choose" Joy!!!
103 notes · View notes
theoutcastrogue · 1 month
Text
That said, the D&D 3.5 Paladin was bad. It was badly designed, it had bad rules, and in conjunction with the other notoriously bad rule, alignment, it could cause havoc.
Now personally, I never had ANY problems with it in my tabletop games. I played paladins and loved it, and I loved it when other people played paladins, and it was great. But that's because, collectively as a group, we took ONE look at that terrible rule where the paladin's code of conduct prevents them from associating with Evil characters or "someone who consistently offends her moral code", and immediately went, "that's stupid, we ain't doing that, it would ruin the game".
We also didn't love the concept of alignment as a cosmic force, and didn't care for Usually Evil Goblins and Always Evil anything. And when a class's signature ability fully depends on whether creatures are capital E Evil, well that affects storytelling, doesn't it? But we all saw it the same way, and we were happily able to change it without any disagreements. In the end we had a Paladin… similar to 5e now that I think of it: completely ignore the Code's association clause, tailor the Code to personal stance or a specific Order, Detect only fiends and undead and the like, Smite anything you want, Fall only if you really fuck up, and never presume that just because you haven't Fallen yet everything you've ever done is justified and correct and anyone who disagrees with you is objectively wrong.
Basically, there were 2 options in 3.5. You either houseruled and/or handwaved things, and in matters of alignment interpretations erred on the side of "what makes the game go",
OR, you played with Rules As Written, and filled the forums with questions like "should the paladin fall?" (one such thread per week, conservatively), "we got into a fight over the Paladin, what to do?", "is it Evil to pick pockets? because we have a Paladin in the party", "the Assassin uses poison, shouldn't that offend my moral code?", and shit like that. Just... pointless strife, all the time. Again, never happened to me, but I was appalled to read about it, over and over and over.
People got intense with 3.5 Paladins (both pro and against) because it was BADLY DESIGNED and had BAD RULES. Its mechanics forced narrative choices on the entire table, and the only way to make it frictionless was having a party where no one wishes to explore a character's bad side ever, no one does things that aren't bad but WotC branded Evil™ in this or that splatbook, and everyone magically agrees all the time on "what is right and what is wrong" and "what is Lawful and what is Chaotic", which is simply impossible. The most subjective thing in the world (ethics!) was presented as an objective cosmic force, and how you interpreted it would determine how much damage the Paladin deals in combat, and whether the Paladin could keep associating with the party, and if the Paladin is still a Paladin. And all that in a game, let's not forget, whose basic, fundamental premise is "kill things and take their stuff". I'm sorry, this is tremendously stupid. It's the WORST design.
I know that for some people it worked as written, and good for them, but for the many many people it didn't work, well it's obvious why.
537 notes · View notes
morticry · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
hope you've got a fire extinguisher handy, it's YOUR kitchen on fire.
sketch page drawn for one of my favorite artists and a good friend, @officercrunchcontrol.
74 notes · View notes