Tumgik
#inferior
orderlyconduct · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
salaam
19 notes · View notes
lagrimas-del-alma · 2 months
Text
Agresión verbal lo vivo día a día, se sorprenderían si dijera que es mi padre? Si es que se le debe llamar así a una persona misogina,machista, que siempre debe tener la razón y si ve que no la tiene, te empieza a tratar mal?....
Fácil es decir pero lárgate de esa casa, no puedo, no tengo los medios, no he encontrado trabajo, por más que busque la manera de ganar dinero no me resulta, me agota mentalmente está situación..
7 notes · View notes
paydolphritler · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
7 notes · View notes
fieriframes · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
[GONNA GRILL THESE UP. SO YOU PUT A LITTLE COLOR, AND INFERIOR. HOLD THAT IRON. INFERIOR. GOTTA HAVE BEER IN THERE. THEN WE GRAB OUR RIBS.]
8 notes · View notes
mbti-notes · 4 months
Text
Anon wrote: Hello MBTI Notes, I am INTJ F 35. I have read through your blogs and its very very helpful.
Can you please explain how in general developed INTJ will look like? I have gone through INTJ ego development but if you can explain bit more specially of Se part, it will be helpful. I really hope I am not asking too much here.. and troubling you. Reason I am asking this question is, I feel my Se is coming out in form of good taste in asthetics, perfumes, styling etc. But, I'm not very athletic or sport loving person.
And most important, people perceive me as low energy person. I'm healthy person and do not face any issue with energy level as such. But in social setups, I have quite damenor. I don't feel too excited or too shocked easily. It takes really enormous deal of things to take out that level of emotions in me .
Just want to confirm my understanding of inferior Se. Thanks in advance!
--------------------
You seem to be missing and misunderstanding some important points. Firstly, everyone is a unique example of their type and uses their functional stack in their own unique ways. Therefore, unless you possess a working crystal ball, you cannot know how your personality development will turn out in the future, assuming you succeed in realizing its fuller potential. This is not something someone can just tell you, teach you, or explain to you, as that would actually take you away from individuation. It is something you must discover on your own, as you journey through life in your own way.
Secondly, as explained in the study guides, there are important reasons for functions to be arranged in a stack and developed in a particular order. Trying to develop the inferior function is generally a bad idea as long as the functions above it remain underdeveloped.
Imagine you're learning to swim in a giant body of water that goes from very shallow at the coast to very deep at the center. The dominant function lies in the shallow waters, so it's easy to see it clearly and get to it without any danger. But the inferior function lies at the deepest point, so what would happen if you just decided to dive into the water there, without having learned to handle that depth? Best case scenario, you'd tread water (your development stalls). Worse case scenario, you'd drown (lose yourself in inferior grip). Either way, you'd be no closer to actually accessing that inferior function sitting down there at the greatest depths.
Since I have witnessed many a person "drown" because they got too far ahead of themselves, I don't discuss inferior function development unless a person can prove to me beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are genuinely ready for it psychologically. Review the paragraph you wrote about your demeanor, energy, emotions, etc. There is compelling evidence that Fi development is inadequate. By association (since functions work in dyads), Te is also implicated.
When your middle functions remain underdeveloped, your understanding of Se cannot be anything but extremely superficial, in exactly the way you described. Continue to develop your middle functions and it should gradually and naturally allow you to have more and more access to the inferior function in due time. As far as I can tell, inferior function development is not something you purposely need to attend to at this point. If you feel inexplicably compelled to do it, it would be important to examine why, as there might be a deeper issue at work.
10 notes · View notes
altri-menti · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media
Source ➺ inferior
16 notes · View notes
kinkycuckqueanxo · 7 months
Note
do you have a cuckcake?
Nope 👎🏻
11 notes · View notes
antiqua-lugar · 2 years
Text
I want to contribute to the "are classics accessible?" discourse going on around now by saying:
guys, don't be scared of classics, they are not that deep.
the classics are...a list. of notable works. which are notable for various reasons.
that's it.
are they deep and full of meaning? some are, others were written because the author had bills to pay. are they complicate and full of purple prose? some are, others are just people dueling each other, dealing with an alien invasion, hanging with pirates, looking for marriages or touring germany on a bike. are they impossible to understand without historical context? some are, others will explain the context to you whether you want it or not in way too many details or need no context at all except a vague idea of the time and place.
I say this as someone who went to a technical high school and was kinda scared of classics because I thought only intellectual people read those - meanwhile I was a dumbass who didn't even understand the point of poetry (it's still not my favourite genre, not gonna lie), I completely understand the struggle. but also I hate the fact that we scare ourselves off from reading classics because of this idea that classics are Superior Books Mere Mortal Can't Comprehend when most of the time they are not.
You read Alice in Wonderland or Peter Pan? Congratulation, that's a classic. Pride and Prejudice? Congratulation, that's a classic. Treasure Island? Congratulation, that's a classic. Dracula, thanks to Dracula Daily? Congratulation, that's a classic. Any of Wilde's fairy tales? Congratulation, that's a classic. The Chocolate Factory? Congratulation, that's a classic.
Did you dislike them or hated them or thought they were pointlessly convoluted?
That's absolutely normal. No one likes every classic ever because "classics" are just books considered notable. It doesn't say anything about genre, style, time period, location, author's background, and whether the author put too many adjectives in it because they paid them by the word.
If you don't wanna read classics, don't. But if you want to and are just scared, don't be. I used to be scared of Shakespeare and then I found out he wrote for the general public so they would give him money and his plays have been interpreted and performed so many times in so many different ways that I couldn't really "get it wrong" if I tried.
Also if you wanna tackle stuff that it's genuinely too hard for you... There are reader's guides. There are edition with notes. There are videos on YouTube.
It's all up to you! But if it's something you want, don't give up simply because you, like me, think you are a dumbass.
77 notes · View notes
betterthanher3 · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media
If you’re inferior, best to embrace it
15 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
"let's stop believing that our differences make us superior or inferior to one another."
2 notes · View notes
dk-thrive · 5 months
Text
“Elizabeth and I considered ourselves above such condescension. Rather, she was above it, too intelligent and empathetic to succumb to such simplistic and racist thinking, whereas I considered myself below this condescension, too much of nothing to regard myself better than anyone else.”
— Isle McElroy, People Collide: A Novel (HarperCollins, September 26, 2023)
4 notes · View notes