The four players on dndads each fall perfectly into the four ways of playing dnd
Matt: uses the mechanics to play pretend real hard in a way that is most beneficial to the group
Beth: is perfectly in tune with her character and makes very good, compelling character choices that are sometimes v upsetting
Will: is trying so hard to kiss his friends in fiction will someone please just give this guy a break
Freddie: playing 4-D chess with himself in a way that makes me cackle at his shenanigans
2K notes
·
View notes
Now don’t get me wrong, I absolutely think that from a moral standpoint Glenn made the better choice at the end of the trial- in fact I think one of the most tragic things about that scene (where we hear Glenn’s reasoning and all that) is that if you needed irrefutable proof that Glenn is both a good person and a good dad, there it was! But of course by that point it was already too late.
But… Sometimes I find myself thinking about… How to put this… If Nick had learned of his dad’s decision, do you think he might have… Taken it the wrong way? Do you think if Nick Close had learned that Glenn chose to give up being his dad, he would have understood this as the ultimate act of abandonment? Or that his dad didn’t see him as someone worth fighting for? Not that I think Nick would have wanted his dad to fight the dragon either per se, but… Well, maybe deep down some part of him would have, actually.
500 notes
·
View notes
"[] I'm speaking to my own experience here and I'm not sure how universal or not universal it is, but I think, with kids raised by boomers, boomer-adjecent people, especially people who tend to put people in sort of of binary boxes, you generally see anger rewarded in boys and sadness rewarded in girls. And what I mean by that is that anger as an emotion is an active, like, doable thing--feeling, and I think that men who feel angry are in some senses rewarded or seen as more masculine for being angry. [] And something I experienced when I was little was that it was ok for me to be sad, like that was chill, but being angry was a naughty thing. I was not allowed to be angry because that's a bad person thing, or whatever.
And I think that women are rewarded, or at least very much more accepted, to be sad rather than angry. I think ultimately what am I saying other than that people just freak out if you exit a certain binary box that you've been placed in. But I think that almost all anger that I see in the perpetual toxicity of men raising angry men raising angry men, is that there's a deep sadness below all of that."
- Beth May on Ron's sadness, Talking Dad ep. 59, Retail Therapy
556 notes
·
View notes
A misfits conversation that somehow gets veered towards parents
Lenore:I don't like my parents very much
Eulalie, innocently: Because of your daddy issues?
Lenore:How do you know about my daddy issues
Pluto: It's kinda obvious
Bernice: You do not get to talk Pluto, you aren't any better babes
Pluto: What! What does that mean
Duke: Mon minou allez, you constantly hide in your jacket and hair is constantly covering half your face at all times
Pluto: That's...
Pluto:That's fair
Lenore:Do good parents exist, I surely never met one.
Morella: I think so, some have to right?
Berenice: I'm sure they do, most of us haven't remembered our parents anyway, they could be saints.
The misfits:...
Eulalie, cheerfully: probably not
57 notes
·
View notes
why did i just see someone complaining abt ppl headcanoning dndads characters being neurodivergent. And technically they only mentioned ocd and autism specifically. But i suspect it is not just those (although ppl Were also talking about adhd and they didnt seem to have any problem with that! Hm. Wonder Why!)
dog consider that this is a Nonissue. "But but 😭. why are you talking about this in context of a dnd podcast and making them seem like fun character quirks" my brother in christ they literally said they relate to this character and ALSO have that so u KNOW why + even if they didnt it doesnt MATTER as long as they r not being weird abt it
As long as people are respectful (and the ppl theyre referring to Were!) there is quite literally nothing wrong with saying "hey i have xyz disorder and this character shows traits and has relationships that strongly imitate xyz disorder". OR EVEN "hey this character who has been through this traumatic thing probavly has xyz trauma related disorder." Or perhaps "Hey this character meets the criteria for/shows symptoms of xyz and interpreting them as such is a way to explore their character in a new light"
I would argue in fact that it is an issue to say "you arent allowed to talk about any of these in reference to characters because it's making a joke of them" or whatever. Dude people with ocd Exist. And.! people with literally anything else!. it is absurd to imply that mental illnesses/disorders cannot be considered and explored when interpreting stories. Like that is ridiculous
45 notes
·
View notes
Bro did not win second most employee of the month and kill four Emerituses to still be called “Cardinal Copia”
721 notes
·
View notes
glenn close got his masters in cuntology with a concentration in fatherlogical studies from the university of servington
68 notes
·
View notes
Tears literally blurring up my vision as i post this. This was hands down, one of the (if not) best episode we've been given so far and it was so worth the wait.
116 notes
·
View notes