#papers | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

s4dpngs · 1 month

Text

#png #aesthetic #grunge #soft #drugs #weed #joint #cat #papers #kidcore #pale #mine

280 notes · View notes

lost-fool-wandering · 2 years

Photo

I have scanned about 70 nice paper textures in a pretty good definition and you can find them all here in my google drive link.

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1IeCdPlEIK697r03qBH3Na_M0U8qR6fPO

And while the textures can be used freely for personal or commercial use, I would really appreciate any coins thrown my way.

https://ko-fi.com/leonaf

#texture #paper texture #paper textures #i might add more in future #papers #textures #free textures #watercolor paper #watercolour paper #art ref

3K notes · View notes

ofbakerst · 3 months

Text

#the resident patient #granada holmes #jeremy brett #david burke #sherlock holmes #watson #baker street #untidy #papers #gifs #my posts #queue

240 notes · View notes

somos-deseos · 1 year

Text

Cosas que importan 🤍

693 notes · View notes

catspngs · 5 months

Text

Books, Letters, Papers (3/?)

#books #letters #papers #pngs #transparent

187 notes · View notes

a-dinosaur-a-day · 7 days

Text

There should be a tool that takes a wikipedia article and downloads every thing it cites and puts it all in a nice little zip file for you

#wikipedia #research #academia #papers #paywall

96 notes · View notes

mapsontheweb · 6 months

Photo

Scientific journal articles published per 100,000 people.

Switzerland has the highest publication rate - 267 articles per 100,000 people.

by theworldmaps_

#maps #theworldmaps_#twsourced #papers #europe

164 notes · View notes

warandpeas · 1 year

Text

Recycled

Become a patron of the arts here.

View On WordPress

801 notes · View notes

andreamardel · 9 months

Text

#png #scrapbook #clipart #bulletjournal #papersdigital #cliparts #papers #frames #https://t.me/pngimagenesgratis

95 notes · View notes

cards-of-rose · 4 months

Text

°•○ study tip!! your outline ○•°

so in another post, i talked about how you formulate an essay and said i would discuss the structure of your outline in another post. here's that post!!

every outline must have 3 principal components: an introduction, a body, and a conclusion. and it's exactly how it sounds. your introduction introduces, your body has your arguments, and the conclusion concludes.

simple, right? i'll talk about each individually, then show you how to draft them into a good structural outline. it's honestly easy once you get the hang of it. it's just a formula, and you can apply it to any essay you have to write!

> body <

this is actually the first thing you start with. i'm sure everyone's said that you should start with your introduction. but think about this: you haven't written anything yet. what is there to introduce? you barely know what you're going to talk about!

start with the body first. use your thesis statement - those three points that sum up your entire argument in a sentence - and split up those three arguments into three points. let's say this is our thesis statement:

Light pollution is harmful to the environment because it brightens the night skies, wastes energy, and disrupts ecosystems.

in an outline, it might look something like this:

I. Introduction

II. Body

Main point 1 - brightens the night skies

Main point 2 - wastes energy

Main point 3 - disrupts ecosystems

III. Conclusion

easy, right?

next, you go under each main point and add 3 subpoints, just according to whatever you've researched. so:

Main point 1 - brightens the night skies

Subpoint 1 - disrupts circadian rhythm

Subpoint 2 - increases depression

Subpoint 3 - contributes to air pollution

and so on! depending on the length of your paper, these subpoints can either make up a paragraph, or can be split further into additional subpoints. whatever you need! you can include quotes, evidence, and anything else your prof wants in your paper.

this will make up almost all of your paper, so contine extending this until your outline is about half the length of your paper. for example, an 8-page paper should have a 4-page outline. remember that for papers, unless specified otherwise you won't want to use first-person or second-person pronouns. make sure to stay objective and present the evidence formally (although your outline can be as silly or stupid as you want, as long as it gives you something to work with).

now onto the conclusion!

> conclusion <

the first sentence of your conclusion is the rewording of your thesis statement so your reader knows the argument is closing. kind of like a signpost, letting the reader know there won't be any more new information presented! really just one sentence.

after that rewording, then comes the important part: the significance. after you briefly summarize your argument in maybe one or two sentences, talk about why your argument's important! why it matters. this is really the part that will stick with your reader, and what will humanize your argument. in your body, you talk about the why and how that light pollution is bad. in your conclusion, you talk about how it affects the future, how it'll affect humanity as a whole, how it'll affect wildlife. where the trend of increasing light pollution will bring us.

and then the very last sentence is either a call-to-action (what can your reader do to help?) or a final punch relating to the significance. either way, there should be a strong final statement that resonates with the reader and leaves a strong impression in their mind. something like:

If this trend of brightening the night skies continues, it will not only destroy nature, but affect humanity past the point of any change.

a bit dramatic, but you get the point! :)

> introduction <

aaand finally, the introduction!! i know it may seem strange to leave this for last. but think about it - you've written your paper! you now have a full idea of where your paper's going! you already have a thesis statement! you have the significance in your conclusion! you can!! connect them!!

!!!

so connect them!!

reference the significance in the VERY FIRST sentence of your intro. that's your hook - what draws the reader in. sooo something like:

Many people consider city lights to be a fundamental aspect of life. After all, they provide light on dark roads, illumination on signs, and even beacons for airplanes. What many do not realize is that the light pollution these lights generate harm more than they help.

and then you insert your thesis statement. see? how easy is that? you basically already wrote your intro in your conclusion! this is just a continuation of that.

evidence -> significance -> problem.

and there you have it! once you know how to write an outline, it makes it SOO much easier to write your paper. by following this, you basically already have your paper written - at least in shortened form. you'll be able to write them in your sleep. <33

#studyblr #dark academia #study motivation #studying #writing #academia #study tips #light academia #papers #essay writing #essay #study blog #studyspo

41 notes · View notes

a-study-in-dante · 11 months

Text

May 12th, 2022 | Today in my article-writing misery I resorted to mindmapping what I have to write and which citations I'll use. It's bringing me back to the time I was a student and realized a few days befire the exam that I couldn't memorize anything I had been studying for week unless I wrote it down in mindmaps form, which to be honest was a productive type of procrastination... Let's hope this time it makes my life easier and my anxiety decrease 🤞

#my posts #studyblr #desk #litblr #gradblr #phdblr #mindmapping #mindmaps #papers #paper #W's adventures in Cambridge #i also went to a formal to think about something else! my social anxiety and awkwardness skyrocketed #because I was sitting next to complete strangers! so now i feel stressed AND miserable! good call good times

104 notes · View notes

birdsandproblems · 2 months

Text

Im fucking crying has anyone seen the AI diagrams in the Scientific Study yet?

So, there was a Paper published on the 13th February 2024.

It was published in Frontiers in Cell and developemental Biology, titled

"Cellular functions of spermatogonial stem cells in relation to JAK/STAT signaling pathway""

So far so good, right?

Not knowing anything about the topic, youd exepect a regular Paper: full of scientific theories hopefully to be confirmed and used to widen our human horizons with knowledge.

WRONG. 10 METERS RAT PENIS

Figure 1: Dissilced rat penis.

YES. This was a real picture included in the Paper. I think even without looking at rat dicks regularly (or if ever), you can /kinda/ guess this looks wrong.

If you dont know anything about rat dicks (dont blame you) seeing text like "iollotte sserotgomar cell" or "dck" or "di§locttal stem ells" should make you go hm. Mayhaps this may be wrong.

Another graphic shows the JAK/STAT signaling pathway.

This...is wrong. You cant read the labels. Its wrong and theres non existing symbols and letters and just imagine, imagine youre a newbie Student or scientist or even regular non-academic trying to read this.

Its teaches you nothing and only gives false information.

Of course, this paper passed /2 reviewers/ who said nothing is wrong with it!

This is absolutly unacceptable. Luckily the paper has been retracted now (16.02.2024)

But this is unacceptable. It should never have passed ANY reviewers and saying their job is to rate the scientific merit of the text without looking at the pictures is pure bullshit.

In a scientific papers, graphics and diagrams should have and need scientific merit and integrity, this is the whole point of writing it!

Shame on anyone for letting it get published and i wish the authors would have commissioned someone or even created graphics themselves- no matter how 'crude' or non aesthetic, any graphic drawn in a scientific manner is a thousand times better than AI. Please, stop using AI for important things like that.

I cant say much to the content of the text, but if this was a great paper- now its forever ruined as the Rat dick paper and i wouldnt trust any of the scientists working on it to have honesty and integrity on new papers. I wouldnt publish them.

Lazyness in academia is one thing, but this is just...so bad its sad.

Now, lets look some cells from the paper, shall we?