1. Just to be clear, I do appreciate you taking the time to discuss things in a civil and thought-out fashion.
It’s clear you put time and effort into your response, so thank you.
2. What other atheists have said and done is in no way related to what I say and do.
Atheism is not a religion or movement. It is simply the withholding of belief in any deities. The only thing all atheists are guaranteed to have in common is that they don’t believe in any gods.
We have no dogma, no manifesto, and no leader. As such, you cannot assume that what one atheist believes is what the atheist standing right beside them believes.
It would be like saying “Well, this one person who doesn’t believe in Bigfoot talks this way about my belief in Bigfoot, so all people who don’t believe in Bigfoot think the same way regarding XYZ”.
3. Atheists are not required to be reverential of anything related to religion.
We’re not members of the club, we don’t need to follow its rules.
To me, the Bible/Torah/Qu’ran/the Eddas/etc have the same status as The Epic of Gilgamesh, 1001 Arabian Nights, or an anthology of Grimm fairytales.
It’s just an old book. And I, therefore, treat it as such.
When I talk about a passage I see it as literary criticism of a work of fiction.
4. ...I’m talking in religious terms because I’m discussing theology and because I’m talking to religious people.
As someone with a formal background in linguistics, literature, storytelling, and communication, I know that to communicate effectively with someone you should adapt your language usage to fit what they understand best.
Know your audience, if you will. So I speak in the language of my audience.
Additionally, it’s not possible to have a conversation about theology without using religious terminology.
It also has the added bonus of showing the reader that I’m educated enough on the subject to be taken seriously; I’m not just some yahoo talking out my ass about things I don’t know the first thing about.
I point out absurd things in various religious texts and ask believers how they reconcile the absurd things claimed as truth in their religious texts with, y’know, reality, because I’m trying to get people to think critically about why they believe what they believe and whether they should continue to hold those beliefs.
Whether they change their minds is entirely up to them, and I don’t begrudge anyone who chooses to continue being *insert religious denomination here* so long as they genuinely take the time to consider why they believe what they do.
I hope fellow atheists do the exact same thing regarding their own beliefs, because critical thinking and self-reflection are important skills to exercise regularly.
However, as the only belief atheists are guaranteed to have in common is “I don’t believe any gods exist”, talking to the atheist community at large regarding their beliefs is kinda nigh impossible.
2. How I respond to someone’s response depends on how they responded to my question; if they took my question seriously and answered politely and in good faith, I try to respond in kind.
In fact, I try to be polite either way, because it often highlights how the person is being unreasonably and unnecessarily aggressive. I usually only turn nasty after a couple of exchanges if the person is still calling me names for no reason.
3. Make no mistake -- all other religions have just as silly (and horrific) stuff as Judaism, Christianity, and Islam do, including atheist religions.
I tend to stick to Abrahamic texts because
a) Abrahamism is the religious branch which affects me most directly.
b) Abrahamism is the most powerful branch of world religions (mostly due to Christianity and Islam, as outside Israel Judaism is typically a minority).
c) The modern non-Abrahamic religions I know well (e.g. Quimbanda & Santería) are tiny minorities -- and persecuted ones at that.
I try to not go after already-persecuted minorities unless they’re coming after someone else, both because it’s not cool to go after the already-powerless and because I know what it’s like to be a persecuted religious minority.
When it comes to Judaism, I don’t want to erase Judaism’s claim to the original texts nor be Christian-centric when the text doesn’t apply to just them, so when the question applies to Judaism as well I include it in the question too.
4. The fact that the goalposts can be moved, as you say, means people aren’t worshipping the deity in their holy book; they’re worshipping their own personal god idea.
And that’s fine.
But they can’t then claim to be a “Bible-believing Christian” or whatever if they don’t believe what’s in the damn Bible.
5. The fact that the goalposts can be moved, as you say, means the religion in question cannot be the word of a deity or inspired by a deity, because if it were the goalposts couldn’t be moved.
Anti-theism/religionism Mythconceptions
“Anti-theists/religionists want to force people to stop being religious”
To be fair and keep it 100, yes, I’m sure there are some. Every large group of people inevitably has its share of idiots.
However, I have yet to hear of any anti-theists/religionists who feel that way.
My personal experience has been that what theists/religionists call “forcing people to stop being religious” is actually “keep people from forcing their religion on others”.
We want people to stop being theists/religious, yes.
But of their own volition.
No ideal worth holding should have to be imposed on others.
People should hold it or reject it based on its merit alone.
I may be 100% against religion, but I would fight tooth and nail if someone was not being allowed to practice their religion in a way that didn’t affect others.
E.g. I’m 100% outright banning turbans, hijabs, and/or burkas.
To stop wearing it needs to be a personal choice, not a choice by the government or done out of fear of being accosted by some bigoted idiot while in public.
I’m 100% against pulling off someone’s religious clothing/symbols, be it a hijabi’s headscarf, a Sikh’s turban, a Christian crucifix necklace, or whatever else. If I were to see a hijabi’s headscarf being pulled off, I’d immediately offer them whatever I had on hand to help them cover up.
15 notes
·
View notes