can the anti maskers have their protest literally anywhere other than in front of the LIBRARY
tomorrow i’m buying ingredients with my roommate so we can make pumpkin spice pancakes on sunday and i’m SO EXCITED
Over the past few months I have asked a male architect for ideas & drafts for the renovation of the farmhouse, and at every turn I am stunned by his utter disregard for any cleaning-related concerns. For example, he is very into the idea of having in the living-room a big, non-openable window near the ceiling—which, granted, looks pretty, like having a piece of blue sky when you raise your eyes, but immediately I’m like, with a high ceiling, how will I clean this? You can’t open it so you have to clean both sides separately, and you can’t easily reach either side. I’ll need a tool with an absurdly long telescopic handle. He says, a stepladder. I’m like, but I’ll need to carry it by myself to the living-room and the front of the house every time. “So?” So a very tall stepladder is heavy? And it will be hard not to get dirty water dripping down the wall. He reacts like he can’t believe he is being asked to bring the concept of dirty soap water into his grand designs, like these are base, trifling considerations, when to me it’s a crucial factor in the decision to add this decorative window.
Similarly we both agree on leaving most of the wood beams exposed because they’re old and beautiful, but when I ask if we ought to insulate in such a way as to cover every other one, so the remaining ones are farther apart and it’s harder for spiders to use them as ready-made anchors for their webs, he just looks disgusted, like “I am talking about Architecture and you bring up spiderwebs.” At this point I start to entertain the idea that men make horrible architects. You design someone’s house to give them a nice, convenient space to live in, not to make their life more difficult. A man who has never used a sponge in his life should not be allowed to graduate from architect school and that’s the end of it.
My mom is an architect and I can confirm . Male architects are overwhelmingly pretentious douches that half ass their projects
Im currently studying interior design and have been involved in the field in and off for a long time. I can’t even begin to tell you how many people live in ‘architecturally designed’ houses where the male architect was more interested in winning awards so he could upgrade his Maserati than designing something humans can actually live in.
Whenever I see fancy architecture, my first thought is nearly always “this is gonna be a bitch to heat”, closely followed by “that staircase looks terribly unsafe”.
I don’t understand why so many fancy architects don’t seem to consider, that people would have to live in that house. If you are an architect and people don’t actually want to live and spend time in your house, aren’t you a failed architect?
I live in a country where it rains 265 days of the year, and it irritates me immensely how many modern buildings locally have clearly been designed by architects who either don’t know this, or don’t care. Why would you ever design a flat-roofed building in this climate? There are so many new buildings here that look fine when it’s sunny, but are grey and depressing when it rains. And so many slightly less new buildings which are streaked with rust and mold because they’ve been rained on constantly for the last ten years, and the architect never considered what that would do to them.
Architects need to look to traditional building techniques. Houses in England have steep roofs for a reason. Houses in Israel have flat roofs for a reason.
I’ve seen what English weather does to a flat roof!
Best architectural disaster remains the French Library Bibliothèque nationale François Mitterrand
The building is slowly sinking into the ground
Because the architect didn’t take into account THE WEIGHT OF THE FUCKING BOOKS
My high school was an all glass cube wall place designed by a famous architect but the custom ordered and shaped glass was from a defunct company and less than 5 years later there were wooden planks replacing the glass floor tiles and wall panels in several places from normal ware and tear as well as a hurricane. The school was expensive to clean and teachers had to put up curtains in all the rooms or everyone in the hallways could just see into the classroom and people in the hallway would stare in like classrooms were fish aquariums.
If architecture doesn’t consider the consequences of a space being used and maintained over time it is ultimately more hubris than art.
My college has some acceptable 1950’s architecture, but the town around it is more fascinating
I disagree with the article wanting to abolish the skyscraper entirely, though, as there are many good art deco skyscrapers
Oh, thank God, a post where I can bitch about brutalism. Because fuck that shit. Where’s the joy? Where’s the adaptation to climate? Where’s the fucking comfort?
WHAT’S THE FUCKING POINT.
Read the second article lierdumoa posted above because it is the most delicious tea ever. I haven’t read such a good article in a while.
Oh, I did. The author gave ZERO fucks. The sarcasm, the burns. All very well-deserved. Also some awesome pictures of the Alhambra.
“Capitalism eats culture, and it makes ugly places. Money has no taste.”
My college library was regularly featured in architecture books as a peak example of its style. It also was designed as a single column with an open well in the center.
And if someone sneezed on the fouth floor, you could say bless you on the first.
Because what you want in a LIBRARY is a gigantic goddamn echo chamber that ran the entire length of the building.
Library designs are frequently awful. And architects never ask staff.
looking extra gay with my sweater vest cuffed jeans docs tote bag and iced coffee
* **** ** ** ** ****** *** ****** :(