intersectional-intersectionality

[intersectional-intersectionality]

Feminism is a psyop to convince beautiful young women to sacrifice their natural advantage in the dating market.

“You’re too young to settle down”

Translation: “Don’t use your peak attractive years to find a mate, there is enough competition already”

“Focus on your career”

Translation: “If us ugly women have to work, you should work to.”

“Don’t let them sexualise you”

Translation: “Don’t make me feel insecure about being less attractive”

“The Patriarchy is oppressing you”

Translation: “Don’t date men, date me, a woman instead”

“Older men just want to take advantage of you naive young women”

Translation: “Stop dating men my age, they have the resources that I need”

#feminism #attraction #women #Female mind games #Double speak #Reverse psychology

[intersectional-intersectionality]

How many transgender children have feminists and progressive-liberals aborted without concern?

#trans genocide #feminism #female murderers #this is what feminism looks like

[intersectional-intersectionality]

Community notes saving the day yet again

[intersectional-intersectionality]

[intersectional-intersectionality]

It's my 7 year anniversary on Tumblr 🥳

Seven years seems like an odd (no pun) number to celebrate. Isn't it usually 5 or 10?

#7 year tumblrversary #tumblr milestone

[intersectional-intersectionality]

You mean the same John's Hopkins that employed John Money, the man who coined "gender identity" and "gender roles". The man who is responsible for the inception of gender theory that is permeating all of society? The man who's theory was substatiated by an the phycho-sexual abuse of a mutilated twin boy after convincing his parrents to dress him as a girl for half his life?

Yeah. I could see them doing some despicable shit like that again.

fight the groomers 

[intersectional-intersectionality]

[intersectional-intersectionality]

Pro-Life Organizations That Don’t Fit Stereotypes

Pro-life feminist organizations:

- Feminists for Life

- Feminists for Nonviolent Choices

- New Wave Feminists

- Feminists Choosing Life of New York

Secular pro-life organizations:

- Secular Pro-Life

- Pro-Life Humanists

LGBT pro-life organizations:

- Pro-Life Alliance of Gays and Lesbians

Consistent life ethic organizations:

- Rehumanize International

- Consistent Life Network

Liberal pro-life organizations:

- Democrats for Life of America

Check out these great organizations before painting all pro-lifers with the same brush. The majority of us care about all humans, born and unborn. Feel free to add to this list if you know of any other great pro-life organizations that don’t fit stereotypes.

[intersectional-intersectionality]

[intersectional-intersectionality]

I can’t imagine why feministfairy struggles to talk to men! 

Seriously, I like how she thinks this is “levelling up”, when it’s actually levelling down. 

It’s becoming more childish and insular and sexist.

Even the original post is low-key begging for validation from other feminists.

And ignoring how many women also disagree with her.

[intersectional-intersectionality]

I've been coming to the conclusion that women don't actually have the ability to be empathetic. Sympathetic, sure, but not empathetic. And I say that because they only seem capable of understanding anything based on their own experiences and feelings.

To have empathy, you have to be able to take yourself and your personal feelings out of the equation and understand how another person feels about things solely from their perspective. Instead, what I find is most females promote empathy in others so those people will understand her perspective and feelings. But, empathy is supposed to be reciprocal, yet, when it comes time for the woman to hear the otherside and show empathy...👻. She got what she wanted and Brifaults law kicks in.

Also, you don't argue "at" people. Arguing is again a teo way street. One person gives their position and the net person counters with their position. But, again, what happens is one person presents her argument, and the other person needs to shut up and and stop being a mysogynist. That's what jappens when ypur idea of conversation devolves to everything being "discourse" instead of "discusion".

Maybe this is why that person is having so much trouble getting people to empathize. It's hard to empathize with someone who is intent on having a one sided interaction.

[intersectional-intersectionality]

[intersectional-intersectionality]

is it time for this conversation again already? The moment they think people have forgotten, tsk. Still waiting for the "He Too"movement to kick off, but that will be obliterated by the RADtards regurgitating that it's impossible for men to get raped because "men always want sex," so you can't rape the willing. Which is partly true, you can't rape the willing but men don't always want sex.

But, yeah. Rape is pretty much universally frowned upon in most civilizations. Sure, what is considered rape is clearly based on culture. Agin, the example being that many radfems don't believe it's possible to rape a man due to his physical advantages or "responses", while others believe differently, there are cultures that believe sex with an inebriated woman is not rape, whle left cultists belive it could be rape after one drink, even if she innitiated it, if she wasn't happy with the experience.

And so, the biggest take away and, probavly, the most important yhing to remember is that radfems are extreme gynocentric misandrists. No matter what the situation, they will always side with women over men (or at least what they percieve to be "women" because woman>man="man bad". And the only way to combat this (rape ideas specifically) is to promote a culture where rape is well defined and includes both sexes, a person can only be considered a victim if they can prove that a rape occurred, meaning they did not instigate the action, and/or facilitate access, and took action immediately after/within a reasonable time frame to report the crime for investigation to catch the culprit. And the rape can only legally be considered a "rape" if, after an investigation, enough evidence is presented to prove that it was indeed a rape. Any attempt to portray a sexual assault as a rape without that evidence, or based on hearsay, should be considered slander/libel and open one up to legal laibility.

However, that would put power and responsibility for ones actions in protecting themselves on the individual, eliminating any plausible deniability or frivilous and unsubstantiated claims that could be used to abuse the legal and social systems. If rape is really that serious, claims about it, false and real, should both come with severe penalties fro the wrongdoer.

This may have been a bit of a tangent. Idk.

love how it’s basically a hate crime now to say “hey, hookups with random strangers are dangerous and while nobody is at fault for being the victim of a crime, there are definitely behaviors you can avoid to minimize your risk of being assaulted or murdered.”

#Tangent #Rant #long

[intersectional-intersectionality]

I wouldn't go as far as to label every person who believes their hild is trans as an "abuser". I'd say a third of them are ignorant and confused, and a quarter or the rest are npc's, mindlessly drifting along, following the program. Of the rest of them, there is a majority of "true believers" who have bought completely into the cult rhetoric and think trans is a real thing. Meanwhile, the remainder would be people who don't believe trans is a real thing and are supporting the idea for clout, profit, and to fit in.

While it may all be abusive, only the last set of people are who I would qualify as actual "abusers", because they are knowingly commiting a detructive action. The first two sets can possibly be reasoned with and deterred, while the third set can not be reasoned with but, I don't believe they have any malicious intent, despite the harm being caused.

[intersectional-intersectionality]

Pro-Life Organizations That Don’t Fit Stereotypes

Pro-life feminist organizations:

- Feminists for Life

- Feminists for Nonviolent Choices

- New Wave Feminists

- Feminists Choosing Life of New York

Secular pro-life organizations:

- Secular Pro-Life

- Pro-Life Humanists

LGBT pro-life organizations:

- Pro-Life Alliance of Gays and Lesbians

Consistent life ethic organizations:

- Rehumanize International

- Consistent Life Network

Liberal pro-life organizations:

- Democrats for Life of America

Check out these great organizations before painting all pro-lifers with the same brush. The majority of us care about all humans, born and unborn. Feel free to add to this list if you know of any other great pro-life organizations that don’t fit stereotypes.

[intersectional-intersectionality]

It's been a while since I have seen a post worth commenting on. This is definitely one of thise posts.

As a linguist, etymologist, and academic, I too come from a position of authority on this matter. While the speaker in the comic is tehnically correct, they are also using this technicality as an entry point for injecting their own political agenda.

Are dictionaries "prescriptive"? Yes, the purpose of dictionaries is to tell people what words mean so they can use the right word in the right situation to communicate clearly and effectively.

In that capacity, dictionaries are also "proscriptive", meaning they limit what words can be used in certain situations based on their type, definition, and sometimes etymological make up.

But, are dictionaries, "descriptive"? Well, before we can address that we must confront the rabid elephant in the room. And that elephant is the idea that dictiinaries are based on opinions. That is absolutely nonsense. The words in a dictionary are not, or at least were not, arbitrarily added on the whim of some "white" people (which is racist to even bring up, making this entire comic an excercise in redefing something to defend their own actions and positions, using those very actions and practices). The vast majority of words in a dictionary are made up, sure. But every word is made up, in that respect. The meanings given to them were emparted by the person or people who crafted/coined the words for the specific purpose of describing a concept in order to clearly convey that idea to others. It was for the longet time a very serious affair and people used to take great pride in making a word that described a concept accurately. If an existing word could not be used to accurately describe a similar concept, they would use etymological rukes toncreate derivative words, because that made them easier to understand when people encountere them for the first time. Dictionaries were not simply peoples opinions of what words should be in them, they were essentially linguistic ledgers.

So, where does the idea that dictionaries are "opinion", come from. It comes from the very notion that dictionaries are or should be "descriptive ". See, because words were often crafted by people to describe new concepts and ideas, there were and still are times where different or similar words with similar definitions were introduced into public use at the same time. And whether those words were recorded in a dictionary were based on things like: whether someone paid, bribed, lobbied to have them included, the creator's social/authoritative status, or how popular in use they were (public "opinion"). After all, there is no point in including a word that nobody uses in a catalogue of words to use.

So, should dictionaries be "descriptive"? They already are, technically. As I said, there is no reason to include a word that is not being used in popular dictionaries, so there are CONCISE dictionaries that contain a currated collection of the most commonly used words and their common definitions, while there still exist COMPLETE dictionaries that include all words in use and tyeir possible definitions. And that is pretty much how all dictionaries have always worked in just about every culture that was not under dictatorial or totalitarian rule.

And this is the heart of the issue. What the OP is advocating is that dictionaries and the mesnings of words should be completely arbitrarily managed. It's not that dictionaries are not objective, or at leat not that they don't strive to be, but that certain political groups would prefer to make them wholly subjective. And, if that is the case, the dictionaries would ttuly serve as in a prescriptive capacity. The words allowed to be used an their definitions would be based solely on the "public opinion" of what the words should mean, and that meaning is imparted from an authority other than the dictionary itself.

For example, the words racism & racists are currently in contention due largely in part to a political ideology attemptin to improperly redefine what racism means based on a (proper) racist framework that excludes their (proper) racist actions and beliefs from being properly identified as "racist".

If they truly believed that dictionaries were descriptive, then the entire comic falls apart because their definition of "racist" does not erase the prior understanding of "racist ", which is the argument they are referencing. Instead, their definition and all prior definition would apply because the desctionary only exists to record "describe" observed uses and not "proscribe" or "prescribe" any particular use or meaning. This would effctively render dictionaries useless as any misues or contradictory use of a word that experienced any notable trend worth recording word quickly render that word meaning less. And in the end, that is part of the plan. Once you render something like a wrod meaningless/useless, it creates a vuccum of meaning. And, at that point, an ambitious person or group can close off that vacuum by filling it with a concept of their choosing or leave it to scar over in hopes the concept will be lost forever.

Conclusion/tldr:

Dictionaries are multifaceted. They are part descriptive, prescriptive, and proscriptive. While concise dictionaries may be compiled based on common usage via public opinion and trend, most dictionaries are an objective collection of words and their intended meanings an uses unbeholded to any authority pther than the crafter of the word and established linguistic rules of the society. A dictionary that is purely descriptive is a dictionary that is vulnerable to arbitrary, totalitarian abuse and rendered ineffective and useless.

Don't let imbeciles like the op distract you with nonsensical word salad, trying to convince you that their words have meaning while telling you that words ultimately have no meaning, else you join them in being a fool.

#long #etymology #linguistics #dictionaries #meaning #historical revisionism #political revisionism #ideological revisionism #neologisms #language policing #post modernism #pomo #critical theory #dialectic of conflict #gatekeeping #nihilism

[intersectional-intersectionality]

Carol Robinson | [email protected]

A 23-year-old Birmingham woman has been convicted in the 2021 death of an innocent motorist who was killed during a street racing crash.

A Jefferson County jury found Carmesia Flannigan guilty of reckless manslaughter.

Killed in the March 21, 2021, incident was 52-year-old Brandy Ballard.

Flannigan took the stand in her own defense, saying she didn’t mean to kill anyone.

Ballard, a home health care worker and grandmother of five, was on her way to work just after 6 a.m. that Sunday when authorities say her 2007 Ford Focus was struck by a 2010 Chevrolet Camaro that crossed over the center lane of traffic.

Police and coroner’s officials said investigators believe the Camaro was racing another vehicle at the time of the deadly crash. The crash happened at 6:10 a.m. and Ballard was pronounced dead four minutes later. She was just two blocks from her home.

Flannigan was arrested the day after the deadly accident on charges of murder, leaving the scene of an accident with injury and unlawful possession of a controlled substance. She was released the following day after posting $175,000 bond.

The charges of leaving the scene and possession of drugs were dismissed.

“(Deputy district attorney) Misty Reynolds and I felt like we had a strong case for extreme indifference murder, but the jury chose to convict of a lesser charge and we respect the jury’s verdict,” said Chief Deputy District Attorney Joe L. Roberts.

At the time of her initial arrest, she was already awaiting trial on a first-degree domestic violence charge from earlier in the year and a burglary charge from 2020.

Following her release from jail after her initial arrest, Flannigan posted two separate Facebook Live videos laced with expletives blaming Ballard for the crash.

“That old ass lady swerved in my lane,’’ Flannigan said on the video. The videos were deleted from Facebook but were posted to YouTube and has had thousands of views.

Once her bond was revoked, Flannigan was taken into custody in April. She was captured in Atlanta by U.S. Marshals and extradited to Alabama.

Flannigan has been held in the Jefferson County Jail since her April 13, 2021, arrest.

A sentencing date has been set before Judge Pulliam for Nov. 28.

If you purchase a product or register for an account through one of the links on our site, we may receive compensation.