lawlibrary

[lawlibrary]

TEPA's still talking shit by the way.

646.9 (a) Any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or willfully and maliciously harasses another person and who makes a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family is guilty of the crime of stalking

(e) For the purposes of this section, “harasses” means engages in a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the person, and that serves no legitimate purpose.

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=646.9&lawCode=PEN

#nigger

[lawlibrary]

Aerial view of Tokyo

[lawlibrary]

CHAPTER 1.5. Invasion of Privacy [630 - 638.55] ( Chapter 1.5 added by Stats. 1967, Ch. 1509. )

630. The Legislature hereby declares that advances in science and technology have led to the development of new devices and techniques for the purpose of eavesdropping upon private communications and that the invasion of privacy resulting from the continual and increasing use of such devices and techniques has created a serious threat to the free exercise of personal liberties and cannot be tolerated in a free and civilized society.

The Legislature by this chapter intends to protect the right of privacy of the people of this state.

[lawlibrary]

646.9 (a) Any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or willfully and maliciously harasses another person and who makes a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family is guilty of the crime of stalking

(e) For the purposes of this section, “harasses” means engages in a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the person, and that serves no legitimate purpose.

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=646.9&lawCode=PEN

[lawlibrary]

CHAPTER 1.5. Invasion of Privacy [630 - 638.55] ( Chapter 1.5 added by Stats. 1967, Ch. 1509. )

631(a)

631. (a) Any person who, by means of any machine, instrument, or contrivance, or in any other manner, intentionally taps, or makes any unauthorized connection, whether physically, electrically, acoustically, inductively, or otherwise, with any telegraph or telephone wire, line, cable, or instrument, including the wire, line, cable, or instrument of any internal telephonic communication system, or who willfully and without the consent of all parties to the communication, or in any unauthorized manner, reads, or attempts to read, or to learn the contents or meaning of any message, report, or communication while the same is in transit or passing over any wire, line, or cable, or is being sent from, or received at any place within this state; or who uses, or attempts to use, in any manner, or for any purpose, or to communicate in any way, any information so obtained, or who aids, agrees with, employs, or conspires with any person or persons to unlawfully do, or permit, or cause to be done any of the acts or things mentioned above in this section, is punishable by a fine not exceeding two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500), or by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year, or by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170, or by both a fine and imprisonment in the county jail or pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170. If the person has previously been convicted of a violation of this section or Section 632, 632.5, 632.6, 632.7, or 636, the offense is punishable by a fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding one year, or by imprisonment pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 1170, or by both that fine and imprisonment.

[lawlibrary]

646.9.

(a) Any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or willfully and maliciously harasses another person and who makes a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family is guilty of the crime of stalking,

punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment, or by imprisonment in the state prison.

(b) Any person who violates subdivision (a) when there is a temporary restraining order, injunction, or any other court order in effect prohibiting the behavior described in subdivision (a) against the same party, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or four years.

(c) (1) Every person who, after having been convicted of a felony under Section 273.5, 273.6, or 422, commits a violation of subdivision (a) shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine of not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both that fine and imprisonment, or by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or five years.

(2) Every person who, after having been convicted of a felony under subdivision (a), commits a violation of this section shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three, or five years.

(d) In addition to the penalties provided in this section, the sentencing court may order a person convicted of a felony under this section to register as a sex offender pursuant to Section 290.006.

(e) For the purposes of this section, “harasses” means engages in a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments, or terrorizes the person, and that serves no legitimate purpose.

(f) For the purposes of this section, “course of conduct” means two or more acts occurring over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of “course of conduct.”

(g) For the purposes of this section, “credible threat” means a verbal or written threat, including that performed through the use of an electronic communication device, or a threat implied by a pattern of conduct or a combination of verbal, written, or electronically communicated statements and conduct, made with the intent to place the person that is the target of the threat in reasonable fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family, and made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat so as to cause the person who is the target of the threat to reasonably fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family. It is not necessary to prove that the defendant had the intent to actually carry out the threat. The present incarceration of a person making the threat shall not be a bar to prosecution under this section. Constitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of “credible threat.”

(h) For purposes of this section, the term “electronic communication device” includes, but is not limited to, telephones, cellular phones, computers, video recorders, fax machines, or pagers. “Electronic communication” has the same meaning as the term defined in Subsection 12 of Section 2510 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

[lawlibrary]

Is it important to you?

[lawlibrary]

Sometimes people don't want your own words to be valid, or treated as real.

They like it better when they can just dismiss you and write you off as crazy, so they don't have to change, or make any effort to help heal or problem solve.

People that would not be happy to find out that you were right, or that you solved the problem and healed yourself when noone else would,..

free to live your life healthy, on your own,

where the people that made you sick cannot influence you or your life's equations anymore.

without some outside influence bringing their toxic bullshit into your own life's equations.

Especially if there's lots of money to inherit by your misfortune.

content warning prison and police violence - 7/18/23

Longtime disability rights activist and longtime prisoner in St Louis MO, Dawn Dziuba has been put under "partial guardianship" of a state administrator who's working to keep her incarcerated in a forensic ward. Because of her work to help other detainees in St Louis get due process, contacting lawyers about possible class action suits, and other 'jailhouse lawyering,' the state is cutting off her library access, threatening her with dangerous psychotropic drugs, and isolating her from her family. Some of her writing is here and a human rights alert was issued about her case by the Shield project. @bananapeppers @noncompliance @bioethicists These are her current needs / demands :

DAWN MUST BE ABLE TO: - Make her own medical decisions, including the decision to reject a powerful psychotropic drug. - Change or terminate her guardianship - Leave the ward in order to visit the library. - Enjoy unrestricted access to a computer and use of email account. - Be allowed to live independently

WHO PROFITS OFF DAWN'S GUARDIANSHIP? SEAN RAPP, (phone [phone]) is a ST. LOUIS PUBLIC ADMINISTRATOR who profits off the detention of Dawn and other disabled people.

We also need supporters to call: - Abigail Schweiger : 314-982-8294 [email protected] - Rachel Linneman, Program Director : 314-877-5971 [email protected] - Dr. Amy Taylor Medical Director (psychiatrist) : 314-877-0522 [email protected] TO DEMAND DAWN'S NEEDS , LISTED ABOVE, ARE RESPECTED!

It's probably a good idea to save these images since they might be deleted by the site. Reposts elsewhere would be hugely helpful. They want to be able to isolate her without people finding out what's happening. Information is also posted at https://mindfreedom.org/front-page/shield-alert-for-dawn-dziuba-in-st-louis-missouri/

[lawlibrary]

What was this system update for?

Was it broken? Or did it actually need improving upon?

Or did you need to make room for more plausible deniability shit to read into from other readers or viewers on a tumblr page?

The option of not having to cycle through the type-font makes life easier, it only needed a sample letter A or ABC, for it to work effectively without making room for underlying subliminal bullshit for others to read into, or interpret on their own expert analysis of the writer to then assert their analysis on others or what the author's selected type-font Means, as if symbolically, based on assumption.

#how NOT to defuse a volatile topic

[lawlibrary]

Criminal Threats

422-422.4

See those three periods? Those aren't hockey rounds.

[lawlibrary]

Password for Marcos Guest, a legal public business.

Nice ex-claymation point.

I'm not really clear on what this Means or What I was supposed to "compute", if anything. I didn't get the MEMO.

Hopefully the frog didn't die on that hike.

Probably swears on his life that he was just helping me carry my own cross to the goddamn crucifixion on "good" Friday.

[lawlibrary]

Get out and stick your nose in a flower. Teddy demands it! Here he is demonstrating how with a bougainvillea.

[lawlibrary]

CHAPTER 1.5. Invasion of Privacy [630 - 638.55] ( Chapter 1.5 added by Stats. 1967, Ch. 1509. )

630. The Legislature hereby declares that advances in science and technology have led to the development of new devices and techniques for the purpose of eavesdropping upon private communications and that the invasion of privacy resulting from the continual and increasing use of such devices and techniques has created a serious threat to the free exercise of personal liberties and cannot be tolerated in a free and civilized society.

The Legislature by this chapter intends to protect the right of privacy of the people of this state.

[lawlibrary]

Here's your dick picks.

[lawlibrary]

Law section

[lawlibrary]

The word "JUST" must have been in invisible ink.

Talk later or "to you"?

Or is it spelled 2U?

Monkey in the goddamn middle, no dogs about it.

She seems cool. Just talking with my neighbor and this stupid glitch in the system taunting me from the safety of whatever illegal hack access playing Nixon's Watergate behind the phone.

(Watch, he's gonna try to forward this and claim I'm talking shit or being a dishonest snitch behind their back. As SOMEBODY violates federal and state due process laws to get up in my shit looking for porn, since the church and clergy can't get their hands dirty with it themselves, otherwise they rot in Christian hell. Pedophilia? Bull motherfucking shit. You wish.

What is "JUST"? Yeah right. Then obey the fucking law and rules as stated upon the land or contract agreement.

Before we lose "your" way on "your" path,

I said she seems cool. The problem lies in this bugfucker in my electronics.

Were you expecting me to play dumb and look the other way as they rape my Constitutional Rights?

For what?

So I can be put in harms way and be a fucking plant for the dishonest asshole when some psycho flies off the handle?

I said don't interact with me dick. I'll find a way for others to see what you do snooping around in my life. Let them spread the "good news".

That's great. my brother tests missles for the US department of defense.

Still not getting in the door.

[lawlibrary]