Tumgik
Note
omg I haven’t been on this account in ages and saw this while lurking on my main and had to pull out my computer and log on just bc this anon irritated me so much. Anon why are you so pressed? Some people are more compatible with certain pets than others and more equipped to deal with different animal needs. Cats and dogs are both very needy and I love them both but dogs stress me out sometimes. They’re loud and sometimes too demanding. Every pet has needs. You sound so stupid and it’s obvious you don’t really know that much about pet welfare or you’d know that fishes have needs that you need to be very attentive to you if you want your fish to thrive. Many fishes, especially tropical ones, are way more high maintenance than mammals and will die if you look at them funny. There is no such thing a low maintenance pet if you’re caring for them properly.
Who cares even if a person does find super needy pets annoying?? It’s better that they recognize that so they don’t get a pet that doesn’t suit them.
it sounds like you find having an animal companion with needs to be a nuissance. maybe you would be better off with fish, or a pet rock.
omfg not being funny but some of you are such FREAKS. rabbits have a LOT of needs, arguably even more than cats. but she’s less annoying than my cat bc she doesn’t wake me up rlly early, or climb on my blinds, or knock things off the side, or meow at every door in the house for 10 mins straight
like i literally said “rabbits are less annoying than cats” that’s IT, and I’ve got FIVE rude anons about it??? get a grip all of you. you’re proving my point about cat people
24 notes · View notes
Text
“if you ban trans women from competing in women’s sports, you’ll wind up having to ban black women too” uh literally why would we have to do that. You bring black women into this because you know if the issue was just about males playing women’s sports, people would overwhelmingly decide that it’s ridiculous to allow that, even left-leaning progressives.
847 notes · View notes
Photo
Tumblr media
They have absolutely no clue about anything radfems believe. It’s honestly embarrassing.
516 notes · View notes
Text
imagine banning woman boobs only to blast every user of your website with non stop ball shaving ads
159K notes · View notes
Text
What really bugs me about the whole female only spaces arguments is that it’s not enough for them to have spaces that are inclusive of trans women AND spaces that are female only. Female only spaces are not allowed to exist. I know exactly how the argument goes too. One of them will compare it to some type of bigotry, i.e., “well people would still object to white-only spaces even if non-segregated spaces also existed.” Okay, but female people don’t oppress male people, it’s not the same. Even if the sexes were treated equally and male violence against women were to be eradicated, there would still be reasons why females may want to gather alone, participate in sports against other females, discuss female specific medical issues, etc., because the inherent physiological differences between human sexes are many, whereas the differences between races are very, very few. Races aren’t discrete groups with hard lines. A person can be mixed black and Asian, but not mixed male and female. The argument then becomes “well cis people are the oppressors of trans people, so it is a space for oppressors” except that female trans people would be welcome. Then it becomes a matter of “ok so you’d be fine with a trans man who has had bottom surgery and a functioning penis but not a trans women?” nice try but there are no trans men with penises that function like a male penis. It is not the same. Make you own safe spaces for trans women and make them as inclusive as you’d like. Visit any of the many existing spaces for women that do include trans women and leave female-only spaces alone.
1 note · View note
Text
Y’know back when I was still a TRA I really did think that radfems sent themselves anon hate because even though I was staunchly “anti-terf” and would block them when I saw them, I couldn’t imagine that someone would actually say that stuff to then. I certainly wouldn’t so why would anyone else? Now I know better. They really do send radfems anon hate, sometimes very violent hate!
1 note · View note
Text
Radfems are gender critical and believe that there are 0 genders and that the human female sex is an oppressed class. Not sure if trads believe in like inherent gendered souls or innate gender identity or whatever but they sure as hell believe in strict gender roles and gender conformity, which radfems do not. Try again
very cool how the gender binary in the emerging trad terf synthesis is like, there are two genders, the one that does bad things and the one that bad things are done to. the only thing in the world is immorality and it flows from unexperiencing agents to unacting experiencers.
99K notes · View notes
Text
"Princess Zelda would be a radfem" I'm going to kill you are you fucking insane. She is trans. Her knight is trans. No one in that franchise is cis. You goddamn underachieving hemoglobin.
17 notes · View notes
Note
cranky bc no terf gf with a tight vag and bangin tits, huh
Please tell me why I, a female, would give a shit about whether or not a woman has a "tight vag" lol cranky cause your concept of sex revolves around PiV, huh
2 notes · View notes
Note
Choke
Lawl
0 notes
Text
I’m reading House of Leaves right now and it’s good but let me tell you, one the main characters is an extremely unlikable man. In fact, I hate him. The parts he “wrote” are in a different font and every time I see a passage coming in that font I start rolling my eyes. God, not this guy again. He has a sexual encounter with like every named woman he meets and they are described in way more detail than what the book requires. I don’t think the author knows how to write women. Choice phrases like, “her breasts bouncing around like giant pacmen.” I’m enjoying the story but god, you have to just roll your eyes at certain things and move on.
I recommend the book 2001: A Space Odyssey by Arthur C. Clarke and the three follow up novels. Clarke is one of the greatest minds in science fiction to ever live. He was a brilliant man, and he was gay. He had a fantastic sense of humor and his writing style is captivating. And the book makes the movie make sense!
I also recommend the Southern Reach trilogy (Annihilation, Authority, and Acceptance) by Jeff Vandermeer. Easy reads with a fantastic writing style. I tore through these books. The first one was loosely adapted into a film of the same name, but the book is far better and the plot diverges significantly. Great female characters.
I try to read 3-5 books on feminist theory/essays/writings a year, and another 20-30 books for pleasure alone.
So far I've read 1 for pleasure and reading 1 for feminist theory, presently.
This isn't a resolution but I just wanted to tell you guys, because I think its so important to keep reading a source of fun and enrichment as well as using it for self betterment.
1K notes · View notes
Text
girls be like “i’m not gonna make it” and then make it
36K notes · View notes
Photo
Tumblr media
Historic Villages of Shirakawa.
51K notes · View notes
Text
Alright watched video 2 first because video 1 is an hour long, and nothing in there about how she’s funding the deaths of innocent children. Also nothing I haven’t heard before. I agree with some things, but others I don’t, and some are flat out incorrect. “Nobody is saying sex isn’t real” yes they are, trans people are constantly saying that sex is a construct or a spectrum. Jamie even says sex isn’t binary, which is false. There is variation both within and between the two human sexes, but there are still only two sexes. I’m not going to bother talking about any of the other points because they’ve been said again and again and again and my point here is that I’m trying to find this supposed evidence that JKR is using her money to fund the deaths of children.
Of course, they blocked me.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
What a way to admit you’ve got nothing. It’s so crazy to me. They’re like “listen to trans people!!” and we’re like “ok well we’ve been listening actually, can you explain this so we can listen to your explanation?” and they block you. What they really mean is “listen and mindlessly agree and do not ask any questions.”
30 notes · View notes
Text
Got immediately blocked so I can’t @ them so if someone else would that’d be lovely.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Didn’t ask why her rants are bad. Didn’t ask how it harms the community. I asked how she specifically funds the deaths of innocent children with her money. That’s a pretty specific thing. I understand perfectly why trans people do not like what she said. I want to know exactly what she’s doing with money that is funding children’s deaths. And you know what sure fuck it I’ll watch those videos. Hopefully there’s an explanation in there somewhere.
Of course, they blocked me.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
What a way to admit you’ve got nothing. It’s so crazy to me. They’re like “listen to trans people!!” and we’re like “ok well we’ve been listening actually, can you explain this so we can listen to your explanation?” and they block you. What they really mean is “listen and mindlessly agree and do not ask any questions.”
30 notes · View notes
Text
Of course, they blocked me.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
What a way to admit you’ve got nothing. It’s so crazy to me. They’re like “listen to trans people!!” and we’re like “ok well we’ve been listening actually, can you explain this so we can listen to your explanation?” and they block you. What they really mean is “listen and mindlessly agree and do not ask any questions.”
30 notes · View notes
Text
I love observing men who are pathological liars. I know one who says he can smell ghosts and diseases and depression and also that he regrows adult teeth like a shark
Tumblr media
Oh wonder what they have to say..
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
🤦🏻‍♀️
763 notes · View notes