I sort by kudos and read until I lose the tab/get bored/get annoyed. Most of them, but not all summaries are appealing enough.
Another AO3 thing I’m curious about, how do yall decide if something is good enough to read? Usually I follow a rule of 1 kudos for every 10 hits. One because it’s easy math and two it’s yet to fail me. Thoughts? Do you just go for it and pray it’s good?
It's stupid that bread goes bad so fast. Bread should last ten million years on your countertop. You should be able to feed yourself off the same loaf of bread from the day you are born to the day you die. They should pass down bread between generations like a family heirloom. There should be remnants of still-good bread after the heat death of the universe.
Flowers have a long history of symbolism that you can incorporate into your writing to give subtext.
Symbolism varies between cultures and customs, and these particular examples come from Victorian Era Britain. You'll find examples of this symbolism in many well-known novels of the era!
His actions not only on the site but also his actions on twitter (seeking out predstrogen to further harrass her) are not only inexcusable but absolutely unacceptable for a CEO to be committing.
His actions have made it clear that he is basically elon musk but without the money and absolutely should not be in charge of a social media site that advertises itself as being queer friendly.
I don't know how tumblr's structure works with it's shareholders but for a CEO to use what is supposed to be his time off to commit unprofessional actions as the face of the company while harming it's public image and reputation in the process, well it seems like something shareholders should not be happy with.