Tumgik
Text
on otw's $2.5 million budget surplus: for fuck's sake do something with our money
the recent ddos attack on ao3 illustrated that the otw (@transformativeworks) has amazing volunteers who were able to get things up and running again after a cyberattack. and i’ve seen a bunch of different people urging others to donate to otw in light of the attack.
the problem? not only are the volunteers not going to get any of the money, but the otw likely isn’t going to do anything else with it, because they already have more than $2.5 million in budget surplus that they have not been transparent about with their members, and that they have no plans for.
yup. we’ve known for years that otw had at least $1 million in their “reserves”; they’ve said so at their last two public finance meetings in 2021 and 2022. but a few months ago, @manogirl and i went digging a little deeper because we suspected that there was even more. 
and we were right. from the documentation available, our estimate is that at the beginning of 2023, they had $2,585,841 that was not dedicated to any purpose. this does not include money they had budgeted to spend in 2023 on regular expenses. just extra. (keep reading to see how we got that figure.)
equally appalling? they have all this money and are barely earning any interest on it. satsuma on dreamwidth looked at their 2021 tax returns and found that only ~$10k of their money is held in an interest-bearing savings account, which resulted in them earning only $90.42 in interest income for 2021. the rest of it is not in interest-bearing accounts. it is just sitting there.
looking at all the crises and dysfunction that have been discussed and uncovered over the past few months - racist harassment and the three-year-old promise to hire a diversity consultant; the mistreatment of volunteers by the otw board both related to last year’s CSEM attacks, and, separately, mistreatment and racism towards chinese and chinese diaspora volunteers both in the past and recently with the closure of the otw’s weibo account; and of course, this latest ddos attack - all of this indicates that there is severe dysfunction within the org. and donors throwing more money at the organization clearly isn’t helping.
the otw board needs to get its shit together and hire people to help with these things. this is not a new idea - there’s been talk for years about hiring paid staff, and in fact, at their july 2021 board meeting, otw said they would be appointing a volunteer who would be known as the “paid staff officer”, to come up with a plan for hiring paid staff. (to be clear, the “paid staff officer” would be an unpaid volunteer.) it’s been two years since that commitment. they have not, to my knowledge, appointed that officer yet.
it’s infuriating, because otw’s “scrappiness” as an organization is constantly used to defend their obstruction of action on things like racism, and this ddos attack will be used to further that agenda as well. but otw doesn’t need to be scrappy. they are well-resourced and could be using that money to set up more sustainable systems, instead of burning out and mistreating their volunteers, and reneging on commitments to address racism and harassment.
at the very least, if they’re not going to do anything with their massive budget surplus, they should stop taking more of people’s money. but we’d rather they did something useful with it.
if you want to see this change, the otw finance commitee holds a public meeting where you can ask questions and give them feedback. last year it was in mid-october. you do not have to be an otw member to attend. i'll definitely be making noise about it once the date is announced, but you can also follow otw's socials.
one brief aside: at the time of posting, a lot of these links are not working because the otw's website is still down. i copied these links from a twitter thread i made in the past and they should all be correct, so you just may have to wait until the site is back up to look at them.
now, to debunk some common excuses that people (not otw representatives, mind you, but just people on the internet who have decided to defend the org) give when confronted with how much money otw has:
MYTH: otw needs to keep $2.5 million in cash reserves in case of an emergency or unexpected revenue shortfall. REALITY: it’s true that nonprofits do need SOME cash reserves for those cases. typical practice is to have 3-6 months’ worth of operating expenses. otw’s current operating expenses are ~$520,000/year, so 6 months would be $260,000. (and, in fact, when i was told by an otw finance committee member that they had $1 million, they were intending 25% of that to be for emergencies, around $250,000). if you were being REALLY cautious, you could have reserves up to one to two years. but $2.5 million is enough for almost FIVE YEARS OF OPERATING EXPENSES. that is an absurd amount to be hoarding, especially when otw’s history of fundraising is that they always exceed their goals, and always make more money in donations than they need for their expenses within a given year. MYTH: they need this money for legal costs if they get sued. REALITY: otw gets most of their legal expenses donated, which is also not listed in their budget, but is in their audited financial statements. in 2021, the most recent financial statement we have, you can see on page 10 that they received just over $230k in donated legal expenses. they do budget some minor legal expenses yearly: in 2023 they’ve budgeted a little over $5k for “registration fees for conferences and hearings and funds set aside for legal filings if necessary, as well as an allocated share of newly adopted OTW-wide productivity tools”. however they do not have a history of even spending that much: in 2022, they had budgeted $4k for legal expenses and only spent $244 (see cell C29 of the budget spreadsheet). they have never been sued, and they do not appear to budget for litigation costs. and when, in the past, they’ve been asked about what their reserves are for (back in fall 2022 when the finance committee told me they had $1 million in reserves, even though this was patently false given their tax documents for 2021), litigation costs were not brought up.  MYTH: they just haven’t had enough time to figure out investment options. REALITY: they clearly have at least one savings account set up to generate interest, which only has $10k in it. even if they haven’t figured out a full investment portfolio, why wouldn’t they put more money in that account? in the u.s., the federal deposit insurance corporation (FDIC) insures bank accounts up to $250,000, so they should have at least that much in there. absurd. also, they have had plenty of time even for a larger portfolio. if you search “investment” on their site, you’ll see that they’ve been talking for YEARS about investing their reserves. more specifically, at both their 2021 and 2022 finance meetings, they said that they needed more time to research investment options. as usual, they have had far more time than they need.  MYTH: they need this money for new servers. REALITY: otw does in fact include expenses for new servers and server maintenance in their yearly budget reports. you can see this in their 2023 budget spreadsheet if you go to the sheet “program expenses” - under “archive of our own”, you’ll see server expenses. the $2.5 million is money that is EXTRA to their listed expenses and revenue in that spreadsheet.
finally, see below where we’ve given more context on otw’s budgeting and showed our work in coming up with these numbers.
showing our work
firstly, i should note for the record that i sent a message to the otw finance committee through the contact us form on the otw website on may 11, 2023 to ask them to state the amount in their reserves.
Tumblr media
it has been two months and i have still not received a response (which i find funny, because at the last otw board meeting in early july, the board specifically said to use that form to contact the finance commitee if we had questions about the 2023 budget), so @manogirl and i were forced to do our own math. we've had this work checked by a number of people, but of course we were only able to work with the information the otw has made publicly available.
a few things you need to know about the otw’s budgeting:
they release yearly budget reports on their website (here’s their most recent one, which shows what they project for 2023 and their “actuals” for 2022), but they do not include their surplus in this report - they only include the revenue and expenses for each year
they also provide both their yearly audited financial statements and their yearly tax returns (form 990s) on their reports & governing documents page, but currently, the most recent statements we have are from 2021
otw typically raises more money in donations than they need within a year, so their surplus is always growing 
they have used the term “reserves” in the past to talk about money, but we don’t know exactly what they mean by “reserves” - is there a dedicated account that they consider their reserves?
because of these uncertainties, the goal for @manogirl and i was was to figure out how much of a budget surplus OTW had at the beginning of 2023, and because we don’t know how they define “reserves”, we defined it as how much they had in liquid assets that were not being dedicated for a specific purpose in their budget. (liquid assets are anything that can be converted into cash quickly – e.g. not equipment like their servers, nor anything that would be held in a long-term investment account, etc)
the first document we looked at was their 2021 audited financial statement. the key number is on page 11, under the section on liquidity, where it lists their end-of-year liquid assets as $2,315,841.
Tumblr media
so at the end of 2021, they had over $2.3 million in liquid assets.
but since their 2022 audited financial statement isn’t up, we had to turn to their 2023 budget, and specifically, to their 2023 budget spreadsheet, where they show the “actuals” (what they actually raised & spent in each line item) for 2022 in column C. as i mentioned, they don’t list their reserves in this spreadsheet - only the revenue generated & expenses paid within that year, not anything carrying over from the previous year unless clearly outlined.
so at the bottom you’ll see that their net income (revenue minus expenses) in 2022 was $493,564.94, and that they then transferred $400,000 of that to the reserves sometime in 2022.
Tumblr media
and the remaining $93,564.94, their adjusted net income for 2022, presumably carries over to help pay initial expenses in 2023 before they started earning more revenue. they also transferred $130,000 of their reserves BACK to help with that at the start of 2023.
Tumblr media
so now we have the numbers we need to calculate the surplus (including reserves) at the start of 2023:
$2,315,841 (liquid assets at end of 2021) + $400,000 (transferred to reserve in 2022) - $130,000 (transferred from reserve in 2023) = $2,585,841 USD at the start of 2023
so that’s our math. otw had $2.5 million at the beginning of this year in surplus, in addition to around $223k (last year’s $93.5k in income and the $130k they transferred back from the reserves at the beginning 2023) to fund their expenses for the first half of this year. this does not even include the hundreds of thousands they raised in april 2023 during their fundraising drive.
okay the main part of our documentation is done, but if you want to read a little bit more about what @manogirl and i learned from doing this deep dive, here are a few additional thoughts/nuggets:
first of all, OTW is incorporated in the u.s. state of delaware, which is interesting because as @manogirl researched, delaware is a tax haven where 501c3 nonprofits don’t have to pay any business tax. plus, in many u.s. states, nonprofits have a limit on the amount of money they can keep without spending, but this too is not the case in delaware. of course, incorporating in delaware to take advantage of those benefits is not illegal! but it is very savvy, a characteristic that seems to have not continued with their financial management past their original incorporation lol
next, some more detail on their finances from their 2023 budget spreadsheet. let’s start with revenue.
the most interesting thing to me here is that while their spring and fall membership drive donations bring in the most, non-drive donations are also substantial. also their “total unrestricted net revenue received” is $975,638.36 in cell C16. however, for some reason, when they calculate their net income for the year, they use cell 12, “total unrestricted revenue” ($1,012,543.42) instead. the difference between those two cells is that cell 12 is the amount before their transaction fees are subtracted. but i have no idea why the transaction fees would be ignored when calculating their net income. is this an error?
next, their expenses, which came out to $518,978.48. not too much surprised me here except how low their legal advocacy spending still is, plus  the fact that they’d given francesca coppa a grant for her book on the history of fanvidding, lol. (i’ve written more about this; so has wistfuljane on dreamwidth if you scroll down a bit from here).
it’s also interesting to look at what they’ve budgeted (both the revenue & expenses they’ve expected going into the year) for 2022. in every revenue category, they have exceeded their goal, except for $50 in “other income”. and in most of their expenses categories they have overestimated their needs, except for going over about $700 in the transformative works & cultures, & about $500 for development. this just shows how much they are able to meet their yearly expenses (overestimated) with the revenue generated each year (underestimated), & still have substantial amounts left over (almost half of revenue transferred to reserves)
so that’s what we’ve found. if anyone else notices weird things in their budgeting, please let us know!
293 notes · View notes
Note
Lena putting on the Luthor knockoff iron man armor to top for Kara
Tumblr media
You did this, anon.
621 notes · View notes
Note
Thank you for speaking your truth because I feel the same way
🤝
3 notes · View notes
Text
I'm not a kids!fic person at all, it just isn't what I'm interested in exploring, but I do have a very strong opinion on the subject and it's that Kara would 100% be the one who carries.
19 notes · View notes
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media
almost.
2K notes · View notes
Text
"dream energy is very similar to nuclear energy" what
209 notes · View notes
servicetopkaradanvers · 2 months
Note
while Black voters are a core integral part of the progressive voter bloc, other communities including Latino voters do not vote in a bloc— because historically democrats have not made an effort to appeal to these communities. A collective “Asian vote” or “latino vote” isn’t really a thing, although they definitely have the potential to become a thing.
Additionally, religion in poc communities is a very nuanced subject as it relates to American conservatism…
that being said it’s important to remember how poc communities are impacted by partisan gerrymandering.
This as well ^ I appreciate the nuance check, anon! My post was very simplified for the sake of brevity/the context, but this is also important.
4 notes · View notes
servicetopkaradanvers · 2 months
Note
Tumblr media
@ursamage99 I don't want to put you immediately on the spot, but I also don't really want this reply to go unanswered because there are some points made here that are harmful and provably wrong. Mainly: "...there is a scary number of black and hispanic people who are just as fanatical...If it was just bigoted old whites Trump wouldn't have a leg to stand on."
This statement leans on a cultural narrative that exaggerates the role of communities of color in conservative election results. We see conservatives of color disproportionately platformed by both the Republican party and mainstream media because even though they are (for lack of better term) anomalies, they lend legitimacy to the idea that conservatism, as a platform, is not synonymous with racism. In reality, they are extremely few in number.
Exit polls and studies on voter demographics have proven year over year, time after time, that the core of American conservatism is whiteness. More than maleness, more than Christianity, more than education status. Pew Research Center has a good page breaking down their own survey on the 2016 election turnout which demonstrates this phenomenon.
Tumblr media
This particular study does not control for religion; that's true! But the flagrant deficits between the races polled here still illustrate the point. Race is the primary determinant factor in how Americans vote as a collective. Suggesting that conservatives of color contribute to reactionary politicians entering office misses the forest for one small, sickly tree. The idea that we need to outnumber all of the "uneducated" people turns on its head when the vote split by race and education looks like this:
Tumblr media
I stand by my point from the original post: White libs and lefists would do well to internalize the reality that communities of color are the most consistent base for progressivism in America. Even while the Democratic party would prefer to deal in lip service to racial justice rather than working to improve the material conditions of the people who have kept them on the ballot for nearly a century.
the sexual tension between western mass and the fucking confederate flag
it is a hellscape out there. the thing that I desperately wish we (white americans) would grasp about """blue states""" is that all that classification means is that 35% of the total population still did very much vote for the Racism and Transphobia Is Our Only Policy candidate.
sonic the fucking hedgehog, at least for a moment in my time of need, made it too absurd not to laugh.
39 notes · View notes
servicetopkaradanvers · 2 months
Note
you got any recs for wlw let's players who do fromsoft games?
unfortunately I don't because I don't watch let's plays. sorry, anon!
4 notes · View notes
servicetopkaradanvers · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
thank you @beefcake-penguin for the commission!
768 notes · View notes
servicetopkaradanvers · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
much like Kara Danvers getting lovingly ambushed by Lena Luthor i am reduced to awed speechlessness by your unexpected but extremely appreciated support on ko-fi over the past few days. thank you so so SO much—your kindness & generosity are out of this world!!
After yet another vintage magazine illustration
578 notes · View notes
servicetopkaradanvers · 3 months
Text
just went back and read the comments on the two little fics I put up a couple years ago. very grateful for the nice words from you guys for real <3
18 notes · View notes
servicetopkaradanvers · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
☹️
3K notes · View notes
servicetopkaradanvers · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
Doodle Kara w some kryptonian tattoos
1K notes · View notes
servicetopkaradanvers · 4 months
Text
Big fandoms "die" because writers and artists and giffers get sick of being treated like content dispensers.
53 notes · View notes
servicetopkaradanvers · 6 months
Note
YES I MEANT SUPERGIRL LOL i dont even wanna say the shows name thats how mf bad it was
no yeah you're valid I'm usually the first person to get frustrated with fandoms emphasizing ships over every other aspect of a given work but in this case the source material is so irredeemably bad that. Yeah. There isn't a whole lot left other than those fictional women who really really really wanted to fuck nasty.
11 notes · View notes
servicetopkaradanvers · 6 months
Note
supercorp is literally the hellishest of the cw shows like. actually evil. why the fuck did we get basically nazi kara in a special instead of?????? idk??? ANYTHING ELSE?
supergirl is like a special hell created for gays who see Katie and Mel look at each other kindly and want that for themselves.
how was 70% of that show just. beyond bad? i cant even classify things as out of character because were these characters ever in character????
I'm assuming you meant Supergirl* as the first word there? (totally reasonable slip btw lmao)
But it sure is! Impressively bad! Any themes that might be drawn out from an honest engagement with the text boil down to ideas that are either genuinely childish or just straight up reactionary. And I get it, that's what happens when you try to make tv with some duct tape and a $20 that you found at the bottom of your backpack, but it really is amazing what the entertainment industry shits out to justify its continued existence.
It's even possible to make a "bad" work that is still ultimately entertaining because it leans into its own cheapness, it goes full camp, it gives its creative minds room to breathe, but SG doesn't even manage that. It brushes up against that sometimes, like "are these his nipples?", like Alex and Jonn having actual fun being their characters for the first time in years bc they were hopped up on Bravery Juice or whatever the fuck was happening, like Lex doing a little dance number in the Fortress. These moments are almost all the more heartbreaking because they're a window into a series that was still cheap, was still generally bad, but was ultimately FUN.
Like,
Idk,
COMICS, MAYBE??? CHEAP BAD AND FUN SOUNDS A LOT LIKE COMICS!!
I can't imagine finding anything to enjoy here if it weren't for the whole "two of our actors have so much chemistry it's leaking all over the show" thing. There's just so little worth saving.
20 notes · View notes