spaghettioverdose

[spaghettioverdose]

[spaghettioverdose]

[spaghettioverdose]

[spaghettioverdose]

I have 76 pages of cookie clicker on my phone

keep going. you can start deleting family pictures if you need more space

[spaghettioverdose]

But what if I was ouppy...

I am a person of many extreme contradictions so really I'm a pretty balanced person overall when you average it

[spaghettioverdose]

Very few things about myself and my identity are fully consistent and set in place in my mind except that like I'm a girl and a cat :3

I am a person of many extreme contradictions so really I'm a pretty balanced person overall when you average it

[spaghettioverdose]

Except for when I'm very not balanced

I am a person of many extreme contradictions so really I'm a pretty balanced person overall when you average it

[spaghettioverdose]

I am a person of many extreme contradictions so really I'm a pretty balanced person overall when you average it

[spaghettioverdose]

DJ Fleabag in the house! Everyone! Raise your paws if you have fleas, had fleas or will have fleas! WOOO LET'S FUCKING GOOO!!!

[spaghettioverdose]

yeah sure why not

[spaghettioverdose]

3 am is the new 12 am

#REAL

[spaghettioverdose]

everyone say thank you to transgender women

[spaghettioverdose]

It's interesting how Democratic Socialists and Anarchists make the same fundamental error but take it to the exact opposite conclusions. Both of them see the State as being devoid of class character: for DemSocs this means that the machinery of the Bourgeoisie State can be kept fundamentally intact and peacefully redirected towards the task of building socialism, while for Anarchists this means that the fundamental injustices of society are inherent to any form of State; not only must the Bourgeoisie State be destroyed but also any new State must be prevented from taking it's place.

They both fail to realise that the fundamental purpose of a state is as an instrument to resolve class antagonisms by allowing the dominant classes to exert power over the subjugated ones. History has shown time and time again that the Proletariat must built a state that serves their interests if they want to take and maintain power over the Bourgeoisie. A state created by Bourgeoisie interests will only ever serve the Bourgeoisie, while as long as there are antagonistic classes in society the Class that cannot or will not build a state in their interests will become subject to the one that does. Treating "The State" as some detached entity that only exists for it's own sake just won't get you anywhere

[spaghettioverdose]

Don't know why this needs to be rehashed but "authoritarianism" does not exist as a meaningful political category or avenue of critique and saying "it's not actually anticommunist it's just anti-authoritarian" is literally the basis of "leftist" anticommunist mythmaking for like 100 years lol

[spaghettioverdose]

Don't know why this needs to be rehashed but "authoritarianism" does not exist as a meaningful political category or avenue of critique and saying "it's not actually anticommunist it's just anti-authoritarian" is literally the basis of "leftist" anticommunist mythmaking for like 100 years lol

[spaghettioverdose]

no dogs go to heaven not as a general rule but because in the entire history of dogs every single one has been guilty of mortal sin. there was one dog once that everyone up there thought was gonna make it but right before she died she desecrated the eucharist with full awareness and clarity of intention

[spaghettioverdose]

#crunchy cat