Scavenging Ooze
In nature, not a single bone or scrap of flesh goes to waste.
Artist: Austin Hsu
TCG Player Link
Scryfall Link
EDHREC Link
33 notes
·
View notes
love that neither hr nor my manager nor i actually know what my goddamn salary is
12 notes
·
View notes
Astronomy #Space #Espace #Astrometry
0 notes
people say the worst SI unit is the mole. "ohhh but it's just a number it doesn't even have anything attached it doesn't deserve to be an official unit" BZZZ WRONG
the worst unit is the candela. the candela is stupid.
what's the candela, you ask? well, it measures the brightness of light
"oh that sounds reasonable" you say, "just measure the energy or power emitted!" nope. they would not do anything nearly so simple. a lightbulb emitting a watt of yellow light is more candelas than a lightbulb emitting a watt of red light.
"ok that's weird" you say, "but maybe they're adjusting for that somehow? maybe it measures number of photons?" again, that would be far too reasonable. a lightbulb emitting a fixed rate of yellow-light photons is more candelas than the same rate of purple-light photons.
but what are they even measuring then? what else is there to measure? clearly they ran out of ideas while making up units, because what they're actually measuring is the SUBJECTIVE BRIGHTNESS OF LIGHT TO THE HUMAN EYE. the candela is STUPID
a reasonable question to ask is: how would you even measure the brightness of light to the human eye? aren't a lot of human eyes different? don't different things look bright in different circumstances? aren't there colorblind people in the world?
surely the General Conference on Weights and Measures, which spent millions precisely calibrating magnetic quantum flux to avoid basing the kilogram on a random block in France, has a clever solution!
no. no they don't. the candela is stupid.
as far as I can tell, what you do is you first measure how much light of each wavelength comes in. Then you multiply each measurement by a "luminosity function", which measures brightness to the human eye:
you will notice that there are multiple functions shown in this diagram. the SI system has five of these, for different lighting conditions. do your lighting conditions not exactly follow one of the Five Official Standardized Lighting Conditions? guess you're out of luck then.
and whose eye are we using? why, the Official Standardized CIE Photometric Observer, of course: the "ideal observer having a relative spectral responsivity that conforms to a CIE-defined spectral luminous efficiency function for human vision"
(and no I can't show you this function because the fine people of the ISO put it BEHIND A PAYWALL. who puts measurements determining a fundamental SI unit BEHIND A PAYWALL. the candela is stupid)
all right, so we're measuring a fundamental unit using a (nonexistent) idealized observer in one of five random lighting conditions. how did they find the values for this? i'm...not entirely sure. but here's a glimpse, based on a few of the most recent studies I found used for this:
"...heterochromatic (minimum) flicker photometric data obtained from 40 observers (35 males, 5 females) of known genotype..."
"To obtain an estimate of the mean L-cone fundamental, we weighted [weird variables] according to the ratio of 0.56 L(S180) to 0.44 L(A180) found in the normal, male Caucasian population...and averaged them together"
that's right, our Official Objective Brightness Unit is probably sexist and racist. none of the other SI units have a chance to be sexist and racist. a meter is a meter in every country on Earth. 6.022*10^23 For Women is still 6.022*10^23. but the candela is-- probably-- the white man's candela, because you can absolutely bet that genetic drift around the world gives different values for this stuff.
in summary: my opinion, as you might have guessed, is that the candela is stupid. hopefully you agree with me after reading this that we need to completely eradicate it from the planet. failing that could we at not give it the same level of officialness as the meter or the kilogram?
599 notes
·
View notes
Peugeot VERA 01, 1981. The first of a series of Vehicule Econome de Recherche Appliquee concepts designed to maximise economy. The VERA 01 was based on the Peugeot 305 but has aerodynamic modifications that reduced the car's 0.44 CD down to 0.32. It was fitted with an experimental 1306cc 62hp 4 cylinder turbodiesel engine and was capable of travelling 91.2 miles on a gallon of fuel.
156 notes
·
View notes
なんで欧米に必ずと言っていいほどスラムがあるか考えてみるといい
超貧困を少数押し付けるのが欧米、少数だけ極端に低いから貧困率は高くなりにくい
日本は逆で割と保護や還元が低所得者向けになっとるし健康保険とか最たる例
ジニ係数も税還元考慮無しだと0.44と高い方から10番以内だが、税還元考慮有りだと0.34と先進国最下位級
平均年収の10倍以上の人口比なんて日本は欧米の1/2以下しかないし
平均年収と中央値の差も92%とG20で最小なんよ、欧州85~75%、アメリカ67%だからな。
ただし日本のシステムはみんなで均等に貧困を負担して押し付けないから、貧困率が上がってしまう
日本も弱者切り捨ててスラム化させてしまえば貧困率改善するぜ?やっちゃならん事だとは思うが
アメリカの低所得者「貧乏過ぎて電気代も家賃も払えない、食料購入にも苦労している」米国でも広がる格差 | FX2ちゃんねる|投資系まとめ
200 notes
·
View notes
Going Batty for the Little Brown Bat
The little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus) is a species of mouse-eared bat that lives throughout North America, from northern Canada to the southern United States. They are most commonly found in deciduous forests, but they also roost in man-made structures or caves; anywhere warm and dark.
M. lucifugus is aptly named, as it’s a relatively small bat. At most, individuals weigh 12.5 g (0.44 oz) and have a wingspan of 27 cm (10.6 in). Females are typically larger than males. The color of their fur can range from tan or red to dark brown, though the fur on their stomachs is lighter than the rest of their body. In addition to their large ears, which gives them a great hearing boost, the little brown bat has exceptional eyesight and is sensitive to ultraviolet light. However, they lack a Jacobson’s organ, which in other animals is used to detect moisture-borne odor particles.
Like other bats, the little brown bat is primarily nocturnal, emerging at dusk and feeding intermittently throughout the night. Individuals emit about 20 calls per second while in flight, and use the corresponding information to avoid obstacles and detect prey. They feed exclusively on insects, including mosquitoes, beetles, and flies, and in a single night an individual may consume over 2/3 of its body weight in food. Because their source of food is generally seasonal, little brown bats are only active in the warmer months of the year. When the temperature drops to 0 °C (32 °F), individuals will enter a state of torpor, in which their heart rate may drop as slow as 8 beats per minute.
Mating takes place in the fall, just before the hibernation season. Males and females gather together in large groups to roost, in a behavior known as swarming. During this period, colonies average around 9,000 individuals; the largest recorded had over 180,000. Both sexes mate with multiple partners, and homosexual pairings are relatively common. This behavior continue throughout the hibernation period, and individuals will pair indiscriminately with active and torpid bats. Once mated, female bats store their sperm for the following spring; they then carry their pregnancies for 50-60 days. Each female gives birth to only one pup, which weighs about 30% of her body weight.
Pups grow rapidly, opening their eyes and ears within a few hours of being born and becoming completely weaned at 26 days old. After this, young transition to feeding solely on insects, though they may receive help from their mothers while learning the best techniques for catching prey. Females are sexually mature at only one year old, and males mature at two years old. Once they reach maturity individuals will leave to form their own roosting groups. In the wild, a little brown bat can live up to 34 years; however, many bats are predated upon by owls during the active season, and by raccoons while hibernating.
Conservation status: The IUCN has rated M. lucifugus as Endangered. Their primary threat is a fungus-caused disease known as white-nose syndrome; this disease is particularly harmful to the little brown bat due to their large congregations during the mating and hibernation period.
If you like what I do, consider leaving a tip or buying me a ko-fi!
Photos
Jason Corbett
Joseph Johnson
Rick Reynolds
201 notes
·
View notes
Ring by Yael Designs In 18k White and Yellow Gold Featuring A 5.02 Carat Green Tourmaline and 0.44 CTW Diamonds
Photo Courtesy: Yael Designs
Source: jckonline.com
28 notes
·
View notes
Pestilence Demon
"I have schemed too long to be supplanted by dead gods. If I cannot have this world, no one can."
Artist: Justin Sweet
TCG Player Link
Scryfall Link
EDHREC Link
33 notes
·
View notes
0.44.
[ <<prev ] [ first ] [ next>> ]
patreon - kofi
60 notes
·
View notes
ATLA Book 2 Character Stats
One thing I have been wondering for a while is how many lines of dialogue each character has in ATLA. I recently figured out an easy way to calculate it, so here are the stats for Book 2. You can find the stats for Book 1 here.
There are 3186 total lines of dialogue in the season. They are divided up as follows:
Sokka 499 lines, 15.66%
Aang 492 lines, 15.44%
Katara 412 lines, 12.93%
Toph 242 lines, 7.60%
Iroh 181 lines, 5.68%
Zuko 169 lines, 5.30%(this increases to 194 and 6.08% if you include "Young Zuko")
Azula 92 lines, 2.89% (this increases to 103 lines and 3.67% if you include "Young Azula")
Jet 60 lines, 1.88%
Long Feng 46 lines, 1.44%
Kuei 40 lines, 1.26%
Pathik 37 lines, 1.16%
Chong 33 lines, 1.04%
Suki 31 lines, 0.97%
Joo Dee 29 lines, 0.91%
Ty Lee 29 lines, 0.91%(This increases to 31 lines and 0.97% if you include "Young Ty Lee")
Mai 28 lines, 0.88% (This increases to 29 lines and 0.91% if you include "Young Mai")
Xin Fu 27 lines, 0.85%
Zei 27 lines, 0.85%
With the more obscure characters below
Young Zuko 25 lines, 0.78%
Fong 22 lines, 0.69%
Young Azula 21 lines, 0.66%
Yu 19 lines, 0.60%
Ursa 18 lines, 0.56%
Wan Shi Tong 18 lines, 0.56%
Jin 17 lines, 0.53%
Lee 17 lines, 0.53%
Smellerbee 17 lines, 0.53%
Tong 17 lines, 0.53%
King Bumi 16 lines, 0.50%
Lao 14 lines, 0.44%
Guard 13 lines, 0.41%
Tho 13 lines, 0.41%
Due 12 lines, 0.38%
Ghashiun 12 lines, 0.38%
Ticket lady 12 lines, 0.38%
Ying 11 lines, 0.35%
Huu 10 lines, 0.31%
Song 10 lines, 0.31%
Yung 10, 0.313873195%
Captain 9, 0.282485876%
Dai Li agent 9, 0.282485876%
General Sung 9, 0.282485876%
Gow 9, 0.282485876%
Oyaji 9, 0.282485876%
Gansu 8, 0.251098556%
Hakoda 8, 0.251098556%
Kenji 8, 0.251098556%
Shuzumu 8, 0.251098556%
Fung 7, 0.219711237
General How 7, 0.219711237
Male student 7, 0.219711237
Pao 7, 0.219711237
Than 7, 0.219711237
The Boulder 7, 0.219711237
Trainer 7, 0.219711237
Mongke 6, 0.188323917
Quon 6, 0.188323917
Sela 6, 0.188323917
Tycho 6, 0.188323917
Ukano 6, 0.188323917
Fire Nation Man 5, 0.156936598
Lily 5, 0.156936598
Michi 5, 0.156936598
Moku 5, 0.156936598
Old man 5, 0.156936598
Ozai 5, 0.156936598
Roku 5, 0.156936598
Blue dragon 4, 0.125549278
Broadsword man 4, 0.125549278
Customer 4, 0.125549278
Earth Kingdom soldier 4, 0.125549278
Kyoshi 4, 0.125549278
Macmu-Ling 4, 0.125549278
Merchant 4, 0.125549278
Merchant #1 4, 0.125549278
Merchant #2 4, 0.125549278
Old Sweepy 4, 0.125549278
Pong 4, 0.125549278
Poppy 4, 0.125549278
Qin 4, 0.125549278
Scary prisoner 4, 0.125549278
Soldier 4, 0.125549278
Villager 4, 0.125549278
Azulon 3, 0.094161959
Fire Sage 3, 0.094161959
Florist 3 ,0.094161959
Guard one 3, 0.094161959
Ladies 3, 0.094161959
Male student #2 3, 0.094161959
Man 3, 0.094161959
Sha-Mo 3, 0.094161959
Ticket woman 3, 0.094161959
University student 3, 0.094161959
Unnamed Fire Nation boy 3, 0.094161959
Bato 2, 0.062774639
Brainwasher 2, 0.062774639
Cabbage merchant 2, 0.062774639
Captured agent 2, 0.062774639
Commander 2, 0.062774639
Girl with umbrella 2, 0.062774639
Guest 2, 0.062774639
Head of the Dai Li 2, 0.062774639
Huge round angry face 2, 0.062774639
Joo Dee replacement 2, 0.062774639
Joo Dees 2, 0.062774639
Koko 2, 0.062774639
Kyoshi Warrior #1 2, 0.062774639
Li 2, 0.062774639
Lo 2, 0.062774639
Oracle 2, 0.062774639
Pakku 2, 0.062774639
Pet store owner 2, 0.062774639
Sensitive ruffian 2, 0.062774639
Servant 2, 0.062774639
Song's mother 2, 0.062774639
Store owner 2, 0.062774639
Villager #2, 2 0.062774639
Villager #3, 2 0.062774639
Young Ty Lee 2 ,0.062774639
Adult guest 1, 0.03138732
Agent 1, 0.03138732
Audience 1 ,0.03138732
Boy's mother 1, 0.03138732
Earthbender guard 1, 0.03138732
Engineer 1, 0.03138732
Farmer 1, 0.03138732
Flyer distribution man 1, 0.03138732
Guard #2 1, 0.03138732
Guard two 1, 0.03138732
How 1, 0.03138732
Iio 1, 0.03138732
Katara (flashback) 1, 0.03138732
Kyoshi Warrior #2 1, 0.03138732
Lady on stage 1, 0.03138732
Lo and Li 1, 0.03138732
Longshot 1, 0.03138732
Lu Ten 1, 0.03138732
Man in the bar 1, 0.03138732
Old woman 1, 0.03138732
Older guest 1, 0.03138732
Palace woman 1, 0.03138732
Peasant girl 1, 0.03138732
Princess Yue 1, 0.03138732
Prisoner #2 1, 0.03138732
Red dragon 1, 0.03138732
Resistance fighter 1, 0.03138732
Resistance fighter #1 1, 0.03138732
Resistance fighter #2 1, 0.03138732
Royal messenger 1, 0.03138732
Sandbender #1 1, 0.03138732
Sandbender #2 1, 0.03138732
Second Engineer 1, 0.03138732
Shop owner 1, 0.03138732
Star 1, 0.03138732
Tea seller 1, 0.03138732
Team Avatar 1, 0.03138732
Terra Team leader 1, 0.03138732
Terra Team member 1, 0.03138732
The Hippo 1, 0.03138732
Third girl 1, 0.03138732
Train conductor 1, 0.03138732
Villagers 1, 0.03138732
Waiter 1, 0.03138732
Warrior 1, 0.03138732
Water Tribe warrior 1, 0.03138732
White Lotus member 1, 0.03138732
Young guest 1, 0.03138732
Young Mai 1, 0.03138732
Younger guest 1, 0.03138732
23 notes
·
View notes
Toastystats preview: F/F vs. M/M tagging
I discovered something unexpected while doing stats comparing F/F and M/M on AO3. One thing I was initially looking for was whether M/M fanworks were more likely than F/F fanworks to tag dark themes or explicit sex acts. It seemed like yes, they were -- but then I found out that, more generally, M/M fanworks use more tags on average than F/F fanworks. And given that, it's not too surprising that M/M is more likely to use most of the common AO3 tags than F/F is (whether the tag is dark, fluffy, or otherwise).
Still, I found a few AO3 tags that F/F was more likely to use than M/M. And I sorted a bunch of common AO3 tags from "Most likely to be used by M/M" to "Most likely to be used by F/F", shown above. The middle line indicates that a tag is equally likely to be used by M/M and F/F. Some of the darker and more explicit tags do indeed seem to be further toward the mostly-M/M end of the spectrum, but some of the ordering surprised me. (E.g., F/F is more likely to use "Smut," while M/M is more likely to use "Plot What Plot/Porn Without Plot." And F/F and M/M are nearly equally likely to use "Trauma" and "Coercion.")
I have a whole lot more F/F vs. M/M data to share soon, but I have questions for y'all first about this data:
does the above visualization makes sense? I'm worried it might be hard to interpret, so if you're confused, can you share anything about why?
are you are surprised by anything about the data?
any thoughts/theories/questions this data raises for you?
Below the cut -- additional explanations that might be useful when theorizing (e.g., about possible factors like background ships), along with raw data for the above graph.
A couple notes on interpretation: we shouldn't have to worry about the fact that F/F is often tagged when F/F is actually a background ship -- I tried to weed out all cases where the F/F or M/M tag of interest could possibly have referred to a background ship. Also, all of the above tags are used at least 1000 times on F/F works and at least 17K times on F/F and M/M combined... so these numbers shouldn't be *too* prone to the noise of really small numbers.
Data used to make the chart
Header: tag name | % F/F using tag | % M/M using tag | A/A is X times more likely to use tag as B/B (A/A uses it more than B/B)
Whump | 0.16% | 0.39% | 2.4
Protectiveness | 0.85% | 1.81% | 2.1
Hurt | 0.93% | 1.94% | 2.1
Kinks | 1.12% | 2.30% | 2.1
Crack | 0.87% | 1.67% | 1.9
Torture | 0.46% | 0.84% | 1.8
Children | 0.56% | 0.99% | 1.8
Gore | 0.23% | 0.40% | 1.7
Plot What Plot/Porn Without Plot | 2.25% | 3.72% | 1.7
Not Beta Read | 1.76% | 2.63% | 1.5
Falling in Love | 1.12% | 1.62% | 1.4
Self-Harm | 0.63% | 0.90% | 1.4
Abuse | 1.82% | 2.57% | 1.4
Incest | 0.93% | 1.31% | 1.4
Cuddling & Snuggling | 1.56% | 2.15% | 1.4
Humor | 3.63% | 4.99% | 1.4
Birthday | 0.38% | 0.51% | 1.4
Supernatural Elements | 2.16% | 2.93% | 1.4
Badass | 0.37% | 0.50% | 1.4
BDSM | 3.94% | 5.32% | 1.4
Awkwardness | 0.65% | 0.86% | 1.3
Dark | 0.44% | 0.58% | 1.3
Marriage | 1.78% | 2.36% | 1.3
Light-Hearted | 3.13% | 4.12% | 1.3
Hatred | 0.51% | 0.66% | 1.3
Mythical Beings & Creatures | 2.01% | 2.58% | 1.3
Love | 5.95% | 6.74% | 1.1
Friendship | 5.01% | 5.64% | 1.1
Alternate Universe | 19.27% | 21.27% | 1.1
Holidays | 1.90% | 2.09% | 1.1
Trauma | 1.43% | 1.56% | 1.1
Coercion | 0.37% | 0.39% | 1.1
Horror | 0.45% | 0.47% | 1.0
Comfort | 0.95% | 0.97% | 1.0
Fluff | 23.98% | 24.17% | 1.0
Flirting | 1.20% | 1.20% | 1.0
Hugs | 0.38% | 0.37% | 1.0
Crossovers & Fandom Fusions | 1.56% | 1.52% | 1.0
Alternate Canon | 4.89% | 4.71% | 1.0
Polyamory | 0.71% | 0.67% | 1.1
Smut | 7.04% | 6.48% | 1.1
Slow Burn | 2.54% | 2.26% | 1.1
Post-Canon | 2.32% | 2.03% | 1.1
Romance | 6.42% | 5.49% | 1.2
Drabble | 2.59% | 2.21% | 1.2
Prompt Fill | 0.70% | 0.59% | 1.2
Pre-Canon | 0.77% | 0.59% | 1.3
One Shot | 3.85% | 2.66% | 1.4
LGBTQ Themes | 7.77% | 4.44% | 1.7
Gender Related | 3.52% | 1.45% | 2.4
351 notes
·
View notes
also scav 2281. this guy looks VERY distressed
SCAVENGER I.D #2281
Hex codes
Eyes: # ff6a4c #1f0d12
Head/hand: # 1f0d12
Body: # 210e0a
Belly: #2f1611
Personality traits
Aggression: 0.01
Bravery: 0.02
Dominance: 0.26
Energy: 0.04
Nervousness: 0.52
Sympathy: 0.44
Other traits
Dodge: 0.46
Mid: 0.06
Melee: 0.09
Block: 0.00
Reaction time: 0.26
80 notes
·
View notes
Road traffic death rate in the US vs Europe
by u/flyingcatwithhorns
Source:
https://www.iihs.org/topics/fatality-statistics/detail/state-by-state
https://transport.ec.europa.eu/news/preliminary-2021-eu-road-safety-statistics-2022-03-28_en
https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/topic-details/GHO/road-traffic-mortality
Edit: Found the data for a few countries for fatality rate per 100 million vehicle kilometres travelled (higher = worse)
Iceland 0.21
Norway 0.21
Sweden 0.26
United Kingdom 0.34
Germany 0.37
Switzerland 0.39
Slovenia 0.40
Ireland 0.41
OECD median 0.41
Australia 0.44
Finland 0.46
Canada 0.47
France 0.50
New Zealand 0.66
United States 0.83
Czech Republic 0.99
https://www.bitre.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/international_comparisons_2020.pdf, page 20/34
192 notes
·
View notes
i like seeing recipe channels on youtube. and it's like
"You can make this for 5 dollars :)"
BITCH WHERE DO I FIND 0.44 DOLLARS OF RICE. Oh yeah lemme go and fucking buy 0.20 USD of potatoes. i don't think that's possible bitch.
12 notes
·
View notes