An Artist in Brooklyn - Part 1 (7 Chapters, 27k, M) - Steve Rogers/OMC
Steve Rogers was content to spend his life after Thanos away from the battlefield. After saving the world, he had no need for the life of a superhero. Instead he traded his shield for a canvas and set to work following his passion of creating art. With his friends and his creativity, Steve thought it couldn’t get any better.
Then one afternoon he walked into ‘Cleopatra’s Cafe’ and met Adem, and realized there was more that he was missing out on. Can he make a relationship work? Or will the never-ending call of being a hero get in the way…
1) See, I LIKE to think that the Planet Hulk AU, Captain America White, and the Cap movies all focusing so much on the importance of Bucky to Steve is all intentional on the part of Marvel to slowly start laying the groundwork for /possible/ future canon romance down the road, but the more cynical part of me wonders if this is all just happy coincidence OR Marvel just taking advantage of how popular this pair got again with Cap2 and queer baiting the hell out of it now for attention. (c)
I’m with you there, for sure.
In the comics, I know Brubaker had to really fight for bringing Bucky back. Bucky was dead - it an immutable fact of Marvel comics, like Uncle Ben. But he did and Brubaker went on to write Cap for years and its some of the best. But once Brubaker moved on, its like they didn’t know what to DO with Bucky after that.
His trajectory in the comics has been shaky to say the least. And his last title before Secret Wars - Bucky Barnes: The Winter Soldier - is a HUGE disappointment.
But like you said - CATWS really skyrocketed the popularity of Bucky. Just like, or maybe even moreso, than Loki’s resurgence after The Avengers. Bucky has been very prominent in Secret Wars - showing up in several titles including Civil War, The Runaways, Planet Hulk, and more.
And in response to that, the Bucky/Cap relationship has had a resurgence, too, and not just from the shippers. Ship them or not, Captain America and his constant pining for Bucky is now a running joke throughout the comic community:
So it’s been a while that I have felt so completely just shut down in a debate about comics. I guess I spend way too much time on Tumblr, but when I dared post something alluding to Steve Roger’s bisexuality on Facebook, man did I awaken the Beast.
Here’s the thing. “Tim” is a good guy. He’s super cool, and I miss him, a lot, as he lives far away. But I was just shocked that someone who usually so respects my opinions and views on thing how quickly my interpretations into Captain America were dismissed.
Why are “fangirls’,” especially queer fangirls’, opinion on things so irrelevant to CisHet Fanboys? In the course of the discussion, which I’ll get to below, he basically implies that he knows more about Captain America than I do - which isn’t to say he DOESN’T - I mean, he might. But why just the assumption that he knows more? Because he’s a guy? He said that he felt he could “offer some insight” in this discussion about Captain America because “he has almost an obsession” with Cap.
That’s nice, Tim. But did it EVER occur to you that I, also, have a “treasure trove” of knowledge about my favorite character, too? Why did he assume I didn’t have my own “treasure trove” of Cap comics at my disposal? We’ve never discussed comics before - he has NO IDEA the breadth and knowledge I have about any comics… I was just taken aback that the “Man” obviously knew more than the “girl” who was babbling on about this icon of Americana.
Anyway, here’s the conversation below… opinions? Again, the conversation started about me mentioning I interpret Cap as bisexual, and that that’s NOT the same as thinking he’s gay.
like the whole “who would win” argument that goes on all the time. It
all depends on the writer. They always lend a bit of the way they see
the characters they’re writing at the time. Take for example the run of
Cap after 9/11. It was a very raw version
of Cap. The writer took him in a direction that fit the mindset of many
Americans at the time fighting Muslim terrorists. In that run he had
flings with at least three women that I can think of off the top of my
head (Scarlet Witch, Namorita and I believe Agent Carter). In two of
these cases in particular he would have stayed with them had they not
moved on by their own choice.
far as the situation between he and Falcon in the movie, their meeting
was playful but in a friendly brotherly kind of way. They weren’t
necessarily checking out the car when Widow pulled up to get Cap.
but they weren’t necessarily checking out Natasha by that same
argument. Maybe Sam is bisexual, too. Or, you know, some people are
just so how it kind of transcends sexuality: like ScarJo.
for real - Marvel doesn’t hide who they consider the better
writers/helmsmen for certain characters. Ed Brubaker, for example, is
pretty universally reknown for being one of the best.
In the MCU - Marvel obviously LOVES the Russo Brothers/Marcus-McFeely
team. The Winter Soldier wasn’t the most financially successful of the
Marvel Movies but they snatched that quadro up to not only write/direct
CA:CW but Avengers: Infinity Wars 1 & 2.
in lots of cases you can generally deduce who they thing “nailed” the
character and who didn’t. Also, by how much ret-conning is needed.
how many women Steve has slept with doesn’t prove or disprove anything
about his true orientation - especially if he’s bisexual.
in the comics Sharon Carter ends up asking Steve to marry her because
she’s tired of waiting for him to. And his response was basically
Talk about a romance for the ages.
he had quite a few reasons not to marry her. She had turned much colder
after her trials and being left for dead and all that. She was a much
darker character and Steve never really found her to be the person he
had cared for before all that.
as his sleeping with women not proving anything, you’re right. It
doesn’t. It is however concrete evidence of his love of women.
Everything else is just people reading between the lines (which doesn’t prove anything) and the opinions of writers who enjoy the debate (like
the while Wincest thing). Source:
an almost unbroken collection of all things Captain America from 1988 -
2015 (excluding Avengers runs except in the case of major crossovers)
the end I wouldn’t care if he was bisexual, straight, gay, asexual. It
wouldn’t matter. But at this point his sexuality is pretty
straightforward unless there’s some serious retconning. Though after the
changes that were made to his origin story during his Fight Terror run
in the early 2000s, they can do anything they want. And in that case the
changes were well done. They reflected the climate of American society
at the time.
don’t think you’d have to do ANY retconning at all with Steve to have
him “come out” as Bisexual, or even closeted homosexual (honestly I
think he comes off as more coded gay in the comics than the movies,
even). I guess that’s my point - its not breaking
ANYTHING that’s happened in character if he comes out. Gay people
sleep with women all the time before they realize their sexuality. And
if he’s bisexual than the fact that he hasn’t slept with a man (yet)
doesn’t make him any less bisexual.
Another (queer) Friend: And
given he’s a character from the 40s, lends more credibility to this
being a character who had more of a reason to live in the closet or not
have a full understanding of the modern gamut of sexuality. Hell, I
barely knew what being bisexual was until
I was in my 20s. I was confused for a long time - thinking that the
only real options were straight or lesbian. That I couldn’t consider a
relationship with women because I’d been attracted to men in the past.
Or that my eye for women came from a sense of artistic appreciation
since I did appreciate drawing the human figure. Given the only
depictions of bisexual people in most mass media at the time is (and
unfortunately still is) characters like Oberyn or Jack Harkness that
literally sleep with just about anything with a pulse and consent - that
don’t stick to monogamous pairings…
is exactly why another reason Steve Rogers would be such a great
representation of being able to be bisexual AND monogamous (or at least
“Would be”. I agree. But it’s still just reading between the lines. Of
course Cap dreamed of Bucky. He was his best friend. He lost him and
that hurt him mentally. He could be lying to himself since the beginning.I know plenty of people who
either changed their minds about their sexuality later in life or had
been hiding their true emotions all along. It happens. And I wouldnt be
upset if that’s what they did with Cap. My only argument was that until
they actually do that it’s just wishful thinking. The smart thing to do
would’ve been to do that change during the run of the Ultimates but
unfortunately they made him a much more aggressive and bigoted Cap.
Me: But again, to call it “wishful thinking” actually borders on insulting
- because queer people are forced to choke down and ENDLESS stream of
heterosexual couples that have little to zero chemistry in virtually
EVERY form of media out there - but since “straight” is the default
setting in media, lots of queer characters have to be coded. Its a sign
of the times - but not necessarily wishful thinking.
read about the Steve/Bucky, Steve/Tony, or Steve/Falcon (three very
homoerotic relationships Steve’s had in his comic run) as say that its
“he’s straight and to think otherwise is reading between the lines” is a
very straight-washed way of viewing media.
no evidence that specifically points to Steve NOT being bisexual. Go
ahead - name one. The point is, you can’t. Having sex with women
doesn’t disprove it. I’ve never seen a single comic panel where he is
obsessively forced to say “I’m not bisexual!” As I mentioned before,
there have been villains in the past who try to use his machismo against
him, virtually saying that the reason he’s all “manly man man” is to
hide the reality from people - that deep down he’s queer.
if you subscribe to the “writer’s intention” idea (which in itself is
debatable , there’s a whole theory in literature about what people
INTERPRET the media as is just as valid, if not moreso, than the
writer’s intention) then we don’t know for sure? Brubaker has hinted,
though not explicitly stated, that he authored Cap with a queer bent.
He certainly seemed excited about the slash fiction coming out after The
Winter Soldier (which he was consulted on, and even appeared in one of
the scene). But the point is, when Brubaker was writing comics he
wouldn’t have been “allowed” to write Cap as queer, even if he wanted
to. But he got damned close.
yes its an AU, but as I’ve mentioned, too, Planet Hulk has virtually
canonized Stucky… so at least on one world out there they are
together. And while AU’s are generally just that - alternate universes -
the idea is generally accepted that they are generally the same “soul” -
just put into different worlds/circumstances/etc.
Another (queer) Friend: Here’s
the thing, too. Ultimately, this is a fictional character who
regardless of if they kill him of or not, eventually, he’ll be back.
Times change. Eventually, someone’s going to pull that trigger and
explore that route that has been speculated on
literally for decades. This is the most popular pairing in the MCU
(above canon ships, and on a list that only has two gay pairings in the
top ten): http://www.mtv.com/news/2219082/avengers-ships-ranked/
This has been popular in comics, especially since retconning Bucky in
the Brubaker run to be only a couple of years younger than cap.
They’ve at the very least canonized the fact that the most important relationship in Steve’s life has been Bucky.
isn’t speculating the actual sexuality of a real person. I honestly
believe it’s inevitable, just a matter of when or in what context.
now, nobody’s insulting you in a debate over a comic book character.
Look elsewhere if you want to play the victim. I think you’re incorrect
and have years of evidence not proving his sexuality but proving that
it’s something that hasn’t been explored.
you also say I was a sexist because I don’t care about the remake of
Ghostbusters? Or a racist if I don’t like Obama? I’d hope not. Maybe I
just don’t like remakes because i prefer original material. Maybe I
don’t like someone’s political stance on issues.
you don’t agree with the opinion of someone debating your claims that’s
one thing. But don’t claim that I’m insulting you because I disagree
didn’t say you were insulting me, I was just pointing out that its
dangerously close to being insulting to suggest that a
queer-interpretation of a fictional character is “wrong” and the
straight one is “right” when there’s really no definitive way to prove
his sexuality either way.
that queer people are always just “reading between the lines” or that
they have “wishful thinking” because they interpret something
differently is the kind of stuff queer people have to deal with in media
ALL the time. And its tiring.
Its tiring that ALL characters in media are assumed straight by default.
tiring that the only way queer characters GET represented in media most
of the time is through coding, especially in media marketed towards a
younger audience, like comics.
I’m just trying to point out is that - its open to interpretation. You
don’t have to agree. But you can’t claim to be “right” and the queers
are “wrong” when it really IS a matter of how you consume the media.
said that I was right and all queers were wrong but this is like
getting into a conversation with a religious person about the existence
of God. Lack of evidence doesn’t mean you get to just put what you want
there to fill the gap. I stated earlier
that I’d be perfectly fine with what they do with him.
the evidence of him already exhibiting the tendencies to this point is
utterly nonexistent. Like the example of him living in a gay area of a
city. I live in a predominantly bigoted and racist area of my state but
that doesn’t make me the same. It’s not evidence.
agree and have many times stated that there is a real lack of variety
in media in general. We’re making strides, though maybe not quickly
enough. When DC changed Alan Scott I felt that it was a publicity stunt
and just tossing something out there to appease people, but they did it
and it ended up being well constructed. They proved they weren’t ready
to make that leap however when they wouldn’t allow Batgirl to marry her
want more variety. I want people to have a hero that represents
something about them that they can identify with. But I want it to be
done properly and not by taking things out of context to try to force it
the end I have a treasure trove of information about the character,
bordering on obsession. At this point I could write a book on the
character so I thought I could lend some of this to the conversation.
this is where we essentially disagree. I could write a book on the
character, too. I AM obsessed with Captain America and frankly, I think
you’re wrong to say that there’s no evidence in the existing canon.
There are PANELS and PANELS and PANELS of him saying/doing things that can be interpreted as homoerotic. With Bucky, and Tony, and with Falcon.
You read them as straight/platonic. Okay, fine.
But others read them differently - again Steve Rogers has been a mini little gay icon in comics for DECADES.
you can’t just say “There’s no evidence!” There IS evidence. There
are tons of interactions with him and Bucky, or him and Tony, that can
be read with homoerotic overtones.
do we know for sure? He’s slept with women. Presumably even fallen in
love with women. That doesn’t mean he’s not queer. He could be deeply
in the closet, or (in my opinion, more likely) he could be bisexual.
don’t stop being bisexual because you’ve never been with, or are not
currently with, someone of the same gender. For example, I have a
friend who identifies as as bisexual man, but he’s never so much as even
dated a guy. It doesn’t mean he isn’t bisexual.
again, just because they haven’t explored any sexual relationships with
men doesn’t mean that his feelings for Bucky are strictly platonic.
You and I can read the same panel and you get “mentor/mentee” vibes. I
read the same panel and get “he’s his emotional center”.
hardly EVER (I’d like to say NEVER, but being as I haven’t recoded
EVERY instance in every comic when he’s talking about Bucky) refers to
Bucky as anything other than his partner or his friend. He doesn’t tend
to say things like “He’s like a son to me” or “I love him like a
brother” like you see a lot, for example, with Batman and Robin.
Again, that’s not evidence that he feels anything more than platonic. But its also not evidence that he isn’t.
the point I’m trying to make. You keep saying “Its just not there,”
and my point is, “Yes, it is.” Your “straight” reading/interpretation
of the character isn’t any more valid than my queer
reading/interpretation of the character.
Another (CisHetMale) Friend: Devil’s advocate: you can’t prove a negative, so you might as well say
there’s zero evidence that I’M not bisexual as well. And plenty
of evidence that I am (appreciate male forms, have said repeatedly that
Chris hemsworth is hot, have pulled the hair of men or hit them for
their (and my) enjoyment, etc). So nobody can accurately say he’s not
bisexual. I just don’t think he is because “reasons”, and those reasons
might be because I’m looking at him from an outdated perspective and
because I’m oblivious to the signs. Meh.
Like I said. Cap fights for all Americans. Gay, straight, male, female, and bisexual and everything in between.
that vein, I would like to see how he reacts to being hit on by a
transgender person sometime. Just to see. It would be very interesting,
no matter what he does.
Me: No, you can’t prove a negative. But you, as a real person and not a fictional character, can self-identify as
straight. Captain America has never so concretely defined his
sexuality. Also, we're talking about fictional characters,
too, whose mental workings are being interpreted by the reader, and
depending on your theory on literature; that’s more the “true”
interpretation than what the author “intended.”
that’s kind of the point. You can read Cap as queer, or you can read
him as straight. One is not a “better” or “more canon” interpretation
than the other.
So there you have it? Am I reading too much into it? Am I just dead wrong, or is really THAT hard for people to just sit back and LISTEN to what marginalized people (in this case, a queer woman) have to say?