Is it true that Kishimoto wanted to make a Sasuke movie but was forced to make the Boruto movie instead?
It's also sooo frustrating how Sasuke is barely featured in any of the 11 movies but is featured heavily in the posters.
7 notes
·
View notes
🤡:hiashi is a horrible father who abused hinata!
Meanwhile manga and The Last film hinata fans love so much:
hiashi NEVER abused hinata in any form at all.
N E V E R.
hinata fans lie about hinata “being abused by hiashi” to draw your attention away from the fact that hinata exploits (what is a real form of abuse) Neji and Ko as her slaves and uses them as her teachers and bodyguards.
hinata fans try to gaslight you into thinking that “hinata has a bad dad who hates and neglects her” so that they can trick you into sympathing with hinata.
By the way,even if hiashi really was an abusive father,like Gaara’s dad, this still would NOT justify hinata abusing Neji and Ko by using them as her slaves.
hinatafans are desperate to white wash hinata and to make her seem oh so innocent and oh so pure,so they lie,lie and lie some more.
hiashi being slightly strict to hinata one single time in the whole Naruto/Boruto franchise does NOT make him an abusive father.
hinata lost to hanabi,who is FIVE FUCKING YEARS YOUNGER!
Imagine that your child is worse in mathematics or any other school subject that someone who is 5 years younger: will you praise your child for failing?
Also,y’all are forgetting that this is a shinobi world full of political games and wars: hiashi is raising future clanhead,obviously he is forced to discipline his children and to pick a worthy candidate.
hiashi could and should have banished hinata to side branch and claimed her with caged bird seal,but he did not do so,he left hinata with all the sweet privileges of being in main Hyuga branch: owning slaves and using them as her bodyguards and teachers,having free access to the strongest Hyuga justu,being protected even against chunin exam rules; but without any responsibilities at all: hiashi dead straight tells hinata that she has no responsibility in the clan and can do whatever she pleases to.
Also,another lie hinata fans tell you:
🤡:hiashi forced hinata to become a kunoichi! hinata never wanted to be a shinobi,but was forced because of her clan!
hinata LOST her titul of heir and future clanhead to hanabi when she was 12.
hiashi TOLD HINATA TO DO WHATEVER SHW WANTS TO.
Nobody never forced hinata to do anything: unlike Neji and Ko,hinata is not enslaved with caged bird seal and is absolutely free.
hinatafans are so stupid that they don’t even understand their fav.
hinata wanted to be a kunoichi herself because she wanted to be with Naruto,that is why she even shamelessly stole Naruto’s ninja way and than abandoned it.
Stupid bitch and her stupid fans.
Ew.
77 notes
·
View notes
I think that saying Naruto doesn’t understand love (like The Last appeared to suggest) is a bestial assumption that desecrates the entire plot of the original manga.
Another bullshit (but this could be simply me psychoanalysing the main character way too much) is Sakura being so shocked about Naruto comparison between Love and Ramen.
His definition is not “nosense” at all: for Naruto ramen is care, comfort, his favourite food ‘cause remembers him about Teuchi, who was one of the few people caring about his well-being during childhood. Ramen takes good memories and it’s his mother’s favourite food as well.
In Naruto’s mind, ramen is Home.
So I think is really cruel to underestimate this concept as stupid (but is not strange at all that is Sakura, the most insensitive character of the show, who tries to change his mind).
So, the fact that he has to “re-think” a new idea of love to understand his feelings for Hinata is hilarious. Despite the genjustu thing, this feeling seems totally artificial.
But ramen, obviously, is not the only reason. AT ALL.
I’ve disliked the film. And maybe the concepts that they had tried so hard to resemantize are the only things making sense in canon.
Naruto belongs with Sasuke, and this is not casualties and doesn’t need any resemantization. Never.
PS: English is not my native language AND I’m typing using a smaalll phone, so please don’t be a nazi-grammar. ✨
PPS: yes, resemantization is an actual word usually used in historical-semantic or anthropological field and semantic studies.
273 notes
·
View notes