Light Of The World
The Light Of The World... He Came To Us. The Darkness Couldn't Put Out His Life-Light, Which Blazed Out Of The Darkness And Illuminated Our Lives. AweGOD.
“Everything was created through him; nothing—not one thing!— came into being without him. What came into existence was Life, and the Life was Light to live by. The Life-Light blazed out of the darkness; the darkness couldn’t put it out.” John 1:3-5
A Stabilized Identity
Good is bad and bad is good also translates into this: God Is Bad – Evil Is Good. Isn’t that the stanky recipe of this age of…
View On WordPress
1 note
·
View note
Arianna grande the home wrecker. Ariana grande the pick me, Ariana grande the narcissist, Ariana grande bitch you’re disgusting
You seriously hung out with the wife while you were fucking her husband?? Knowing you were the mistress? Then had the audacity to bond with the baby while you fucked his dad the night before while his mom had no clue. She found through the press?!?
Bitch you had us fooled that you were a girls girl. Can’t wait for someone to give you a piece of your own medicine.
And to the ari Stans who will find this offensive, idfc and you probably aren’t a girls girl either. And I hope someone else does the same thing to your partner like ari did!! I hope you’re blindsided and have no idea that your partner cheated on you with some pick me bitch. If you’re defending her idfc I’d rather hear it from her mouth but is that likely lmao no. She knows what she did. She knows she’s nasty.
13 notes
·
View notes
cancel culture
GNT2 originally started on TikTok. This was my first post:
So this was the initial catalyst for wanting to start this TikTok. It’s based on an assumption about God that’s incorrect so I wanted to comment. Canceling someone means removing them from a place of relevance and respect. And sometimes there's a cause for that. But here, that term ‘cancel’ is being misapplied. In Genesis, God creates the world, and it’s beautiful; He called it very good. Then he created Adam and Eve to take care of the earth. Adam and Eve had a perfect relationship with God and with one another. But God gave them a choice: either to trust that he was good and knew what was best for them, or to not trust him. And they chose to disobey him. So their souls were separated from God and since God is the giver of life and goodness, that was essentially death. Yes, God created Adam and Eve knowing they would sin but he also already had a plan for how to rescue them and restore their relationship with him. In Genesis 3, God says that one day, Eve’s offspring would be victorious against the being that deceived them, and that’s referring to Jesus who is God in the flesh and came to earth to take the punishment for our sins upon himself. God never abandoned or canceled humanity - he always had the plan of salvation in mind and he let us know as soon as sin entered the world. We can always turn back to him.e known.
2 notes
·
View notes
So I guess I’m doing a vaguepost here but I saw some old post from like a few years ago that I’ve been thinking about for a while now because I can’t agree with it from any angle no matter how hard I try.
It’s along the lines of : “I don’t care if someone has apologized or changed for something they said in the past, I don’t HAVE to forgive or trust them. You’re showing them more sympathy than me. It’s not a punishment, it’s a defense mechanism. Also, part of being a better person is just accepting this. ”
While I can understand this on the surface from an emotional standpoint and agree with its overall assertion - yes, you don’t have to forgive or trust anyone. You can have whatever opinion you want of them - it seems that this is really setting up an unfair precedent.
You can feel however you want, but so can everyone else. They don’t have to agree with you, and they don’t have to refrain from disagreeing with your stance openly. That’s how opinions work, it goes both ways.
If you’re saying that you get to make whatever criticism of them you want, even if it’s not valid anymore due to their current personality, then yes it IS just a punishment. Having a defense mechanism is good, but trying to critique them without any sort of rebuttal or further thought than how you feel is just unfair and I don’t support it.
The person in question also doesn’t have to just sit there and take it if they feel it’s unwarranted, nor do people who like them have to sit idly while they get lambasted. They’re allowed to defend themselves or someone else, and that doesn’t mean that they’re being “unsympathetic” or “more sympathetic” to them. They’re giving sympathy where it’s due, you’ve already got yours through their acknowledgement of wrongdoing, and you aren’t entitled to more simply for how you feel.
Honestly it’s not a big deal because I already know that what I’ve said is a popular sentiment, and it really doesn’t matter what some rando with basically no following said on this site, but the fact that I randomly encountered this type of thinking really bugged me. If people aren’t given some benefit of the doubt, then they’ll never get better and people who haven’t changed yet won’t even consider trying. It plays into a bunch of negative stereotypes about “cAnCeL cUlTuRe” to think like this and I really hate seeing it no matter how niche of a viewpoint it is.
Damn, didn’t think I’d write a mini essay immediately after waking up. Another autism moment for my neurodivergent ass lmao.
2 notes
·
View notes