Tumgik
#Corporate funding
Text
3 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
3 notes · View notes
vakilkarosblog · 4 months
Text
Who is eligible for CSR funding?
Tumblr media
Introduction: Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has become a pivotal aspect of business practices, emphasizing a company's commitment to contributing positively to society. CSR funding is a powerful tool that enables businesses to invest in social welfare projects and sustainable development initiatives. For Section 8 microfinance companies, eligibility for CSR funding is crucial for their growth and impact. In this article, we delve into the key aspects of who is eligible for CSR funding and its implications for Section 8 Microfinance Company Registration.
Who is eligible for CSR funding?
Companies Falling Under the CSR Mandate:
As per the Companies Act, 2013, certain companies are mandated to spend a portion of their profits on CSR activities. These companies include those with a net worth of rupees 500 crore or more, or a turnover of rupees 1,000 crore or more, or a net profit of rupees 5 crore or more during a financial year.
CSR Policy Compliance:
Eligibility for CSR funding is contingent upon the formulation and execution of a CSR policy by the concerned company. This policy should outline the areas of focus, the manner of implementation, and the monitoring process of CSR initiatives.
Registered Section 8 Companies:
Section 8 companies, including microfinance entities, are eligible for CSR funding if they comply with the prescribed regulations. Section 8 of the Companies Act pertains to non-profit organizations that are formed for promoting commerce, art, science, sports, education, research, social welfare, religion, charity, protection of the environment, or any other charitable objective.
Aligning with Schedule VII:
CSR activities must align with the activities specified in Schedule VII of the Companies Act. These include but are not limited to eradicating hunger, promoting education, ensuring environmental sustainability, and supporting healthcare initiatives.
Proactive Engagement and Impact Assessment:
Companies actively involved in CSR activities and demonstrating a positive impact are more likely to be eligible for funding. Regularly assessing the impact of CSR initiatives enhances the credibility of the company and its eligibility for continued funding.
Implications for Section 8 Microfinance Company Registration:
Enhanced Social Impact:
CSR funding enables Section 8 microfinance companies to extend their reach and impact within communities. This funding can support financial inclusion, livelihood enhancement, and empowerment of marginalized sections of society.
Compliance and Credibility:
For Section 8 microfinance companies aiming for CSR funding, adherence to regulations and the establishment of a robust CSR policy are critical. Compliance enhances the company's credibility and ensures a smoother registration process.
Diversification of Services:
CSR funding can empower Section 8 microfinance companies to diversify their services, offering a broader range of solutions to address the multifaceted challenges faced by their target communities.
Conclusion: Understanding the eligibility criteria for CSR funding is pivotal for Section 8 microfinance company Registration seeking to make a substantial impact on society. By aligning with regulatory requirements, formulating effective CSR policies, and showcasing tangible results, these companies can not only fulfill their social responsibilities but also strengthen their position in the realm of sustainable and socially responsible business practices.
0 notes
honeydewcorporation · 9 months
Note
No... the catgirl production market is already saturated. I'm sure someone will get there first, I don't think my effort will add anything. My experiments are more in line with, "side effects may include eventual partialized slime skin."
There’s an FDA approved mad scientist in my asks who needs funding for slimegirls; and I’m fully on board with such research
1 note · View note
foundationsearch · 1 year
Text
Corporate Funding Success Stories at Foundation Search
Though a variety of funding sources, such as individuals, corporate funding , government agencies, and private foundations, have consistently supported KCEE, an on-going decrease in giving by several long-time supporters is the primary motivator for KCEE to seek out new foundation partners. “We’ve been going to foundations for years, but are now trying to put more emphasis there, because of the funding we have lost,” Jim says.
Specifically, funding from two state agencies – the Office of the Kansas Bank Commissioner and the Office of the Kansas Securities Commission – has fallen, as much as 80%, due to a drop in fines from penalties, the source of funding from those government agencies. “Likewise, we have some significant corporate funding,” explains Jim, “but one of the things that has adversely affected us over the years, not just here in Kansas, but nationwide too, is tremendous consolidation of companies. We used to get a lot more funding from a lot more banks.”
0 notes
Text
2nd Amendment NRA asshole gets 25 yrs to life for murdering young woman who accidentally drove up his driveway!
Society can not function if everyone is armed and feels empowered to fire upon anyone for the slightest perceived infraction.
This is why the Russians heavily fund the NRA, to destabilize American society and keep us in endless turmoil that cripples us politically. This is part of a larger strategy called asymmetrical warfare. This is what you do when you can not assault an enemy directly with conventional military forces.
287 notes · View notes
susansontag · 10 months
Text
the history of postmodernism is a bit more convoluted I believe, but the idea that queer theory popped up overnight and really could be a well-funded psyop to some degree was I thought just the general consensus now. or anyways it’s still my belief. where was that guy’s article on how it was suddenly talked about as a coherent theory in the media and academics were rubbing their heads like, what is this?
435 notes · View notes
Text
2 notes · View notes
Note
It's really disheartening that Rick Riordan stance on the war I understand that he wants to be neutral on this stance but in my opinion by becoming neutral he only worsening the issue as many Palestines are dying that are mostly children, how the majority of Israeli are supporting the Genocide of Palestine, and how the government is trying so hard (but miserably failing) to justified the genocide. I will hold him accountable for what he said on this issue as during this period the choice is basically "you are with us or against us."
Part of me wishes he will realize what he said was wrong and understand the bigger issue that plays at hand. I will criticism for his actions as how can a man who promotes LGBTQIA and representation of minorities and disabilities in his books turn a blind eyes to Genocide of people. However we can only wait and see on his next move.
One last thing about your previous you said you don't group Riordan with other authors where do you would group him with? Also this is more on an opinion base answer but many people are boycotting companies that support Israel there as been another post on Twitter on boycotting authors. Rick Riordan happens to be one of them. Do you believed that he should be boycotted with other authors or he should be properly educated and apologized for his previous statement? If you believed he should be boycotted what do tou have to say to those who might have the mentality of "separate the art from the artist"
thank you for this ask, and i completely agree with you! it is extremely hypocritical of him considering what he preaches for in his books. i think he’s convinced he has properly addressed the apartheid by using very vague language that can be applied to anything, and in doing so, he’s addressed nothing really.
your first question on who i would group him with— probably other authors who are doing the exact same as him in their virtue signalling. i always like to link my other blogs to each other, so i don’t think it’s a secret that i have a red queen account and i’m pretty passionate about that. unfortunately, victoria aveyard is another fantasy author who has literally wrote a whole four-book series on the uprising against oppression but is now playing neutral in her address of the apartheid. rebecca yarros is in the same boat, although i haven’t read ‘fourth wing,’ fans have said there are large themes of oppression within the book. so if i had to group riordan it would probably be in the ‘i-like-to-write-about-it-for-profit-and-praise-only’ group.
in terms of boycotting, i think that’s a great idea! i would also like to remind everyone that the percy jackson tv show is coming out in a little over a month, but disney is a huge industry financially supporting israel as well ($2 million in funding), which is obviously far more damning than a poorly written address by one person. there is a boycott happening for disney as well— and the pjo show will be released on disney + . i implore everyone to not watch it on that platform!! personally i will be pirating it online (idk if i’ll get into trouble saying that here but lol oh well), because im pretty sure the boycott is only for withdrawing financial support, not simply consuming media.
i feel like separating art from the artist only works if that artist is… like, dead, and you’re using that art and its values as a historical insight to how the world was during its time. you can still like a piece of work that has a problematic artist, you can engage with the work (to an extent). but separating art from the artist barely works because either:
to engage with the art is to support the artist in some way, so that artist is making money based on your interaction with that (particularly in the case for singers and streaming of songs)
that artists’ views and values are so rancid that it’s literally embedded within the text itself. to ignore it is harmful.
harry potter is my all-time favourite example to use, because jkr is the scum of the earth, and her views are entrenched in her work. a lesser known example is sarah j maas and her books (she’s also not as dogshit as jkr, but then again, its not hard to be a better person than her). i’m not going to bag on these people for liking things by problematic people (would be hypocritical of me), i just think it’s cowardly not to address it when you come across it, or at least admit to it. to simply write things off as ‘separate to the artist’ is like purposefully turning off your critical thinking skills.
on whether boycotting or an apology is enough— if riordan did apologise and used specific language and not the nonsense he had in that blog, expressed his remorse for his ignorance and then actually did or said something to support the people of palestine then, yeah. that’s fine and that’s how we learn ig. but he should educate himself, too many activists, people from the arab community and especially palestinians are expected to be all-knowing and to educate everyone else on an already draining and personal tragedy. it’s been exhausting for me, i can’t imagine what they’re going through. if riordan (or anyone) needs to be educated, he should do it himself, and (at least in my opinion) i don’t think the info is very hard to find now. it’s just about weeding out the misinformation.
i think boycotting is a good idea as of now. it can serve to be a catalyst for self reflection for many people. also, as much as i hate most online discourses, talking about it online needs to happen. i don’t want these authors to forget, for a moment, about the ignorance they posted online during a time of international crisis.
174 notes · View notes
peapeapeapa · 2 months
Text
Fantastic Four
Tumblr media
117 notes · View notes
cspcrashing · 7 months
Text
🌱: careful even on vacation ?
⚖️: still insufferable even on your day off ?
🌱: no, i simply want to see your face and your hat is in the way.
⚖️(embarrassed) : ... spoiled, too, it seems.
Tumblr media
163 notes · View notes
nellasbookplanet · 2 months
Text
The funniest kind of critical role "critique" is always going to be the 'they present themselves as if they aren’t rich/a company no I will not give any examples' crowd. Like what does this even mean. They start literally every single episode with informing you they are professional voice actors. They have clearly advertised sponsors. They have an entire line of merch and an animated show. The production value of the set is bonkers. They run a charity foundation. Do you want them to start every episode with a blaring siren and a warning saying 'beware! company run content! we make money!!' Are you just angry that they are friends having fun as they make a living. Do you have any understanding of how money works.
104 notes · View notes