#Gilty gear | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

grox · 2 months

Text

Man I am not listening to no song about bridget from gilty gear

41 notes · View notes

whatsnewpanda · 1 year

Text

Band Übersicht

Folge 1: -Dual Alter World "Alter Ego (2019)" -Kaqriyoterror (Architect) "Ensemble Berserk (2022)"

Folge 2: -Shingeki - Shinshi Todoroku, Gekijou no Gotoku "Ragnarock (2020)" -Candye <3 Syrup "Idol Can Dye Sick Rock !! (2018)"

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Zukünftige: -Abingdon boys school -Adam Lilith -AKB48 -Ailerenam -Asian kung-fu generation -Atarashii gakkou no leaders -Babybeard -Babymetal -Band Maid -Blood Stained Child -BPM15Q -Bradio -BRIDEAR -Broken by the scream -Cluppo -Code of Zero -Deadlift Lolita -Deathnyann -Deviloof -DEXCORE -Doll$Box -Fate gear -Fear, and loathing in Las Vegas -Flow -Gacharic Spin -Gagapiero -Galneryus -GILTY×GILTY -Hades -Hanabie. -High and Mighty color -Hinatazaka46 -Icecream scream -Kalafina -Kana-boon -Ladybaby -LiSA -Little by little -Lovebites -Luna Haruna -Maximum the hormone -Miis -NecryTalkie -Nemophila -Ningen isu -Nobodyknows+ -Onmyoza -Orange Range -Passcode -Raise a suilen -REIRIE -Rip Slyme -Rottengraffty -Scandal -Seatbelts(?) -SEKAI NO OWARI -Show Ya -Shumatsu no stella -SiM -Sound Horizon/Linked Horizon -Stereopony -The GazettE -The Pillows -Trident -Uchikubigokumon-Doukoukai -Unlucky Morpheus -UVERworld -Versailles -Wagakki Band -Wagamama rakia -World Order -Yousei Teikoku -Yukue shirezu tsuredzure -Zenbu Kimi no Sei da -Zerosankuchuari/Zero Sanctuary

#podcast #music #musik #japan #japanisch #japanese #metal #rock #pop #rap #hiphop #edm #liste

1 note · View note

trueshredguitar · 2 years

Text

bidget gilty gear :D

#i see her and she makes me happy i love her :)#i dont even go there but i go HEE HEE BIDGET

1 note · View note

matsuko7771 · 3 years

Photo

#gilty gear #Anji Mito

47 notes · View notes

ludvikskp · 6 years

Photo

Commission

#guiltygear #gilty gear #kykiske #illustration #fanart #digitalart #pinting #ludvikskp #carscter #artistsontumblr

1 note · View note

gear-project · 4 years

Note

Where can I finde a resume of Gilty Gear history? If been reading here and there but I'm a bit confused....

I would suggest going over the Guilty Gear Timeline for starters, but if you still need a broader explanation:

Here’s a Mythology summary of external events that triggered everything.

Here’s a summary of the main story.

Here’s a summary of the story from each game’s perspectives.

And if that’s not enough, read the Expanded Timeline tag that explains just about anything in more depth.

For anything else, check out the FAQ and Index.

7 notes · View notes

orbemnews · 3 years

Link

Opinion: Why Janet Yellen is wrong on corporate tax rates Some economists argue that a tax hike on multinational corporations could be just the cure. Joseph Stiglitz of Columbia University and other economists recently penned an open letter to President Biden saying the United States must support “a global minimum tax on multinationals,” which would establish a floor for how low countries could set their corporate income tax rates. This would put “an end to harmful tax competition between countries” and reduce “the incentive for multinationals to shift profits to tax havens,” they argued. These economists have found backing from Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen who has said nations that lower their corporate tax rates are embarking on a destructive “race to the bottom.” But imposing a global minimum tax on the world’s corporations would significantly curb countries’ autonomy in using tax policy to stimulate investment, while also setting a ceiling for global productivity and the speed at which we can recover from today’s pandemic-driven downturn. As talks between policymakers and governments at the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) — where over 130 countries are negotiating changes to international tax rules — continue, leaders must ask whether this is an appropriate response to a world trying to restart its engine. The answer? Yellen and Stiglitz have it backwards. Most countries aren’t racing to the bottom, they’re racing to the middle. Tax Foundation research shows that, for the past decade, the worldwide average of corporate tax rates has plateaued in the mid-20% range. Moreover, the OECD has found that the corporate income tax is the most harmful tax for economic growth. Keeping tax rates competitive will help economies rebuild faster and stronger. After 30 years with one of the highest corporate tax rates in the developed world, the United States sharply reduced the federal corporate tax rate to 21% from 35% in 2017. But the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act didn’t start the race to zero; it simply brought our corporate tax more in line with that of our competitors, making the United States a more attractive place for business. Supporters of a new global minimum tax point out that it’s a way to level the playing field, but it’s an excuse for the countries at the OECD to pick who wins and who loses new business as the world rebuilds. Imagine if the big tech companies decided to level the playing field with “minimum prices” that froze out lower-priced competition. Consumers would be the losers because companies would no longer be able to compete to produce good products cheaply, just as taxpayers would be the losers if governments set a global minimum tax. Competition is good in business and in tax policy. A new global minimum tax and rewriting of other international tax rules would not impact each country equally. High-tax countries, like France, where their corporate rate is currently 28.4%, would stand to gain from this policy, while places like Ireland and the United States, which have lower, more competitive rates and are home to more large multinational companies, especially those earning high profits, would face larger tax hikes that could motivate companies to leave. If one goal of the current OECD negotiations and Secretary Yellen is to raise new revenues to help address the global pandemic, a policy that redistributes revenues from one country to another and relies on increasing the tax burden on investment does not seem to fit the task. Not to mention, the United States already has its own version of a minimum tax. The Global Intangible Low Tax Income (GILTI), enacted as part of the 2017 tax cuts, operates as a minimum tax on profits of US multinationals. Expanding that policy on a global scale will only burden the very businesses that stand to help the United States and the rest of the world rebuild. One rationale behind a new global minimum tax is to stop tax avoidance — or what is known as “anti-base erosion.” The United States worked to address this issue in the 2017 tax cuts by lowering the corporate tax rate and adopting rules like GILTI. While the approach wasn’t perfect, it was progress in stopping base erosion. Companies brought revenues parked overseas back to the States, but the reform failed in making the tax code simpler. These policies designed to enforce tax collection are burdensome and complex, throwing sand in the gears of cross-border investment by making it more expensive for businesses to expand and run global operations because they would face higher taxes. As talks at the OECD continue, leaders must ask whether this is an appropriate response to a world trying to restart its engine. Last year tested the world’s mettle and proved its resilience. But it also revealed fragilities within our economies. If countries want to promote competitiveness, we should do everything we can to encourage that, so we can all rebuild more quickly. The desire of leaders like Yellen and others across the world to set a new global minimum tax runs the risk of starting a different and much more harmful “race to the bottom” — slower economic growth. Source link Orbem News #corporate #Janet #opinion #Opinion:WhyJanetYelleniswrongoncorporatetaxrates-CNN #perspectives #Rates #Tax #WRONG #Yellen

0 notes

dipulb3 · 3 years

Text

Opinion: Why Janet Yellen is wrong on corporate tax rates

New Post has been published on https://appradab.com/opinion-why-janet-yellen-is-wrong-on-corporate-tax-rates/

Opinion: Why Janet Yellen is wrong on corporate tax rates

Some economists argue that a tax hike on multinational corporations could be just the cure. Joseph Stiglitz of Columbia University and other economists recently penned an open letter to President Biden saying the United States must support “a global minimum tax on multinationals,” which would establish a floor for how low countries could set their corporate income tax rates. This would put “an end to harmful tax competition between countries” and reduce “the incentive for multinationals to shift profits to tax havens,” they argued.

These economists have found backing from Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen who has said nations that lower their corporate tax rates are embarking on a destructive “race to the bottom.”

But imposing a global minimum tax on the world’s corporations would significantly curb countries’ autonomy in using tax policy to stimulate investment, while also setting a ceiling for global productivity and the speed at which we can recover from today’s pandemic-driven downturn.

As talks between policymakers and governments at the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) — where over 130 countries are negotiating changes to international tax rules — continue, leaders must ask whether this is an appropriate response to a world trying to restart its engine.

The answer? Yellen and Stiglitz have it backwards. Most countries aren’t racing to the bottom, they’re racing to the middle. Tax Foundation research shows that, for the past decade, the worldwide average of corporate tax rates has plateaued in the mid-20% range. Moreover, the OECD has found that the corporate income tax is the most harmful tax for economic growth. Keeping tax rates competitive will help economies rebuild faster and stronger.

After 30 years with one of the highest corporate tax rates in the developed world, the United States sharply reduced the federal corporate tax rate to 21% from 35% in 2017. But the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act didn’t start the race to zero; it simply brought our corporate tax more in line with that of our competitors, making the United States a more attractive place for business.

Supporters of a new global minimum tax point out that it’s a way to level the playing field, but it’s an excuse for the countries at the OECD to pick who wins and who loses new business as the world rebuilds. Imagine if the big tech companies decided to level the playing field with “minimum prices” that froze out lower-priced competition. Consumers would be the losers because companies would no longer be able to compete to produce good products cheaply, just as taxpayers would be the losers if governments set a global minimum tax. Competition is good in business and in tax policy.

A new global minimum tax and rewriting of other international tax rules would not impact each country equally. High-tax countries, like France, where their corporate rate is currently 28.4%, would stand to gain from this policy, while places like Ireland and the United States, which have lower, more competitive rates and are home to more large multinational companies, especially those earning high profits, would face larger tax hikes that could motivate companies to leave.

If one goal of the current OECD negotiations and Secretary Yellen is to raise new revenues to help address the global pandemic, a policy that redistributes revenues from one country to another and relies on increasing the tax burden on investment does not seem to fit the task.

Not to mention, the United States already has its own version of a minimum tax. The Global Intangible Low Tax Income (GILTI), enacted as part of the 2017 tax cuts, operates as a minimum tax on profits of US multinationals. Expanding that policy on a global scale will only burden the very businesses that stand to help the United States and the rest of the world rebuild.

One rationale behind a new global minimum tax is to stop tax avoidance — or what is known as “anti-base erosion.” The United States worked to address this issue in the 2017 tax cuts by lowering the corporate tax rate and adopting rules like GILTI. While the approach wasn’t perfect, it was progress in stopping base erosion. Companies brought revenues parked overseas back to the States, but the reform failed in making the tax code simpler.

These policies designed to enforce tax collection are burdensome and complex, throwing sand in the gears of cross-border investment by making it more expensive for businesses to expand and run global operations because they would face higher taxes. As talks at the OECD continue, leaders must ask whether this is an appropriate response to a world trying to restart its engine.

Last year tested the world’s mettle and proved its resilience. But it also revealed fragilities within our economies. If countries want to promote competitiveness, we should do everything we can to encourage that, so we can all rebuild more quickly. The desire of leaders like Yellen and others across the world to set a new global minimum tax runs the risk of starting a different and much more harmful “race to the bottom” — slower economic growth.

0 notes

reneeacaseyfl · 5 years

Text

G7 urges tight regulations for digital currencies, agrees to tax digital giants locally

(Reuters) — Digital currencies such as Facebook’s planned Libra raise serious concerns and must be regulated as tightly as possible to ensure they do not upset the world’s financial system, Group of Seven finance ministers and central bankers said on Thursday.

Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire of France, which holds the rotating presidency of the G7 top world economies, told a news conference the group opposed the idea that companies could have the same privilege as nations in creating means of payment – but without the control and obligations that go with it.

“We cannot accept private companies issuing their own currencies without democratic control,” Le Maire said.

In a summary of the informal G7 talks in Chantilly, north of Paris, the French presidency said the ministers and governors had agreed that “stablecoins and other various new products currently being developed, including projects with global and potentially systemic footprint such as Libra, raise serious regulatory and systemic concerns”.

Governments are starting to worry that big tech companies are encroaching on areas that belong to governments, such as issuing currency. Facebook’s June 18 announcement of Libra heralded an effort to expand beyond social networking and move into e-commerce and global payments.

The G7 are concerned that Facebook’s ambitions for a digital currency might not only weaken their control over monetary and banking policies but also pose security risks.

“A global stablecoin for retail purposes could provide for faster and cheaper remittances, spur competition for payments and thus lower costs, and support greater financial inclusion,” European Central Bank board member Benoit Coeure, the chairman of the taskforce, told the G7 meeting.

Above: G7 finance ministers and central bank governors pose for a family photo, during the G7 finance ministers and central bank governors meeting in Chantilly, near Paris, France, July 17, 2019.

Image Credit: REUTERS/Pascal Rossignol

“However … they give rise to a number of risks related to public policy priorities including anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism, consumer and data protection, cyber resilience, fair competition and tax compliance.”

Digital taxes

The G7 also agreed that large tech companies such as Google, Amazon, Facebook or Apple can be taxed in the countries in which they make money, even without being physically present there.

They also agreed that there should be a minimum level of tax to discourage countries from competing in a “race to the bottom” to attract business from digital multinationals.

“A minimum level of effective taxation, such as for example the U.S. GILTI regime, would contribute to ensuring that companies pay their fair share of tax,” the chair summary concluded.

The U.S.’s Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income regime (GILTI) aims to subject overseas intangible income to 10.5% to discourage firms from shifting profits abroad to avoid the nominal U.S. corporate tax rate of 21%.

Using the GILTI regime could help allay possible U.S. fears that the new rules could discriminate against U.S. companies.

“We’re beginning to develop a framework … We feel very strongly that this should not just be geared at the U.S. digital companies,” U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin told journalists.

An outline of the new regime and its implementation is to be developed by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) by the end of the year, so that the details can be agreed by the end of 2020.

Several European countries including France, Italy, Britain and Spain have already introduced their own taxes on digital companies or plan to do so. Washington saw the French levy as discriminating against U.S. companies, and launched a probe that could lead to the imposition of tariffs on French goods.

Le Maire said Paris would keep its levy in place until the new, internationally agreed tax replaced it.

The meeting comes amid growing global economic uncertainty as U.S.-China trade tensions and slowing trade threaten to undermine a prolonged recovery.

(Additional reporting by Leigh Thomas, Myriam Rivet, Francesco Canepa and Michael Nienhaber; writing by Leika Kihara and Jan Strupczewski; editing by Mark John and Kevin Liffey)

Credit: Source link

The post G7 urges tight regulations for digital currencies, agrees to tax digital giants locally appeared first on WeeklyReviewer.

from WeeklyReviewer https://weeklyreviewer.com/g7-urges-tight-regulations-for-digital-currencies-agrees-to-tax-digital-giants-locally/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=g7-urges-tight-regulations-for-digital-currencies-agrees-to-tax-digital-giants-locally from WeeklyReviewer https://weeklyreviewer.tumblr.com/post/186395315262

0 notes

velmaemyers88 · 5 years