Houses of Parliament from St Thomas Hospital at Night - Hubert Arthur Finney, n/d.
British, 1905-1991
Oil on board , 15 3/4 x 21 1/2 in. 40 x 54.5 cm.
170 notes
·
View notes
Why is modern architecture so ugly?
Is it a desire to be different? A hatred of classical styles? A want to separate your designs from previous eras? Or is it that we've become so detached from beauty we can't recognise it anymore?
If the Romans, Tudors, Victorians, and so on, could make such beautiful, awesome buildings centuries ago, why do we have to settle for concrete and stainless steel blocks today?
The startling difference between the Palace of Westminster and the Scottish parliament building is a perfect example of everything wrong with modern architecture. Built 250 years ago, Westminster is in many ways almost timeless in its design, and possesses the kind of majesty such a building should. The Scottish parliament, by comparison, is a blunt concrete box. What will it look like in a couple of centuries, if it even lasts that long? I can't see how this is supposed to be progress.
If architecture is a reflection of the era and society it was built in, then what does this say about our own?
16 notes
·
View notes
The Burning of the Houses of Parliament
J. M. W. Turner
16 notes
·
View notes
This is the Richard of Lionheart statue outside the Houses of Parliament. If you Google an old black and white picture of him from during the war then you'll see that his blade was bent about a third of the way up. This was caused by a German bomb that dropped in the yard, blowing out the big window behind. They briefly thought about leaving it bent as a symbol to show that democracy would bend but not break under attack, but in the end they thought it looked a bit daft and straightened it up.
130 notes
·
View notes
The magic of London with summer roses and a refurbished Big Ben
36 notes
·
View notes
The setting was appropriate in a number of ways. The current speaker, Lindsay Hoyle, reminded us that one of his predecessors, Thomas Hanmer, was a Shakespeare scholar who published his own edition of the plays in 1744. James Morris, MP and chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group for Shakespeare, stressed Shakespeare’s eternal political relevance. “He deals,” said Morris, “with the danger of tyranny, the narcissism of politicians, the thin dividing line between fantasy and reality.”
2 notes
·
View notes