Far from rejoicing, Anne’s execution haunted the ambassador for weeks to come, as he struggled to comprehend who was responsible for her judicial murder.
Anne’s death was, to the ambassador, utterly unnecessary, and he wrote, “May God permit that this may be his [Henry’s] last folly.”
“the English Messalina, or Agrippina”
“certain facts concerning the Messalina [...] heard her say that she could not imagine who could have made her lose the King's favour and love save me, for she pretends that from the very moment of my arrival at this court, the King no longer looked upon her with the same eyes as before. I confess that I was rather flattered by the compliment, and consider myself very lucky at having escaped her vengeance; for kind-hearted and merciful as she is, she would without remorse have cast me to the dogs”
“ I told her besides that although the device of the lady who had preceded her on the throne was "The happiest of women," I had no doubt she herself would fully realise that motto. “
“That God looked more into the intentions than into the deeds of men, and now she had a better opportunity than when the King's concubine was alive, since there was a question of depriving the bastard (Elizabeth) and making her (Mary) heir to the Crown.”
“Cromwell said to me about a week ago that the great and almost excessive love and affection that the English have always shown for the Princess has so increased of late, especially since the arrest of the concubine”
so...what’s the grounds for this assertion? the grounds are, apparently, a very generous interpretation of chapuys being bent out of shape that elizabeth wasn’t, contrary to reports he’d apparently received, declared to be the daughter of henry norris and anne boleyn-- because this would have effectively disbarred her from the english throne forever, meaning mary’s chances at gaining it would ostensibly become greater (or at least, that if mary remained a bastard in status, she would still outrank elizabeth insofar in at least indisuptably having henry viii’s paternity):
As he wrote to Charles, “The executioner’s sword and her own death were virtually to separate and divorce man and wife. However, if such was their intention it strikes me that it would have been a far more decent and honest excuse to allege that she had been married to another man still alive.”
Anne’s death was, to the ambassador, utterly unnecessary, and he wrote, “May God permit that this may be his [Henry’s] last folly.”
this takes that quote vastly out of context, which is this:
The statute by which the concubine's daughter was constituted legitimate heiress to the Crown has been revoked, and she herself declared bastard, not indeed as the daughter of Master Norris, as might have been implied more honestly, but owing to her marriage with the King having been pronounced illegitimate on account of his having previously had connexion with her sister.On such grounds did the archbishop of Canterbury (Cranmer) pronounce the sentence of divorce one or two days before the execution of the concubine; of which sentence, however, there was no need at all, as you are aware, since the executioner's sword and her own death were virtually to separate and divorce man and wife. But if such was their intention it strikes me that it would have been a far more decent and honest excuse to allege that she had been married to another man still alive. (fn. n17) However that may be, it pleased God that by making such a statement a still greater abomination should become manifest, —one for which the King cannot find a possible excuse, since he himself cannot plead ignorance neque juris neque facté. May God permit that this may be his last folly.
anyway...a rather generous interpretation, again. is chapuys really referring to the execution of the woman whom, still after her death, he continually refers to as ‘the concubine’, as henry’s ‘last folly’? or is he referring to the marriage of henry & anne itself as the folly, as he has consistently insisted it was for years? my money’s on the latter.
‘far from rejoicing’, indeed:
I have not hitherto written, awaiting some certain issue of the affair, which, in my opinion, has come to pass much better than anybody could have believed, to the great disgrace [of the Concubine], who by the judgment of God has been brought in full daylight from Greenwich to the Tower of London, conducted by the duke of Norfolk, the two Chamberlains, of the realm and of the chamber, and only four women have been left to her.
These news are indeed new, but it is still more wonderful to think of the sudden' change from yesterday to today, and the manner of the departure from Greenwich to come hither
1533...there was nothing in chapuys that wouldn’t have rejoiced at anne boleyn’s death, by means fair or foul, and there’s little to suggest that changed in any way in the years to come:
The lady and her father, who are perfect Lutherans, abet him in this (le mectent en cecy), and the Pope must not think to have any influence over the King while the lady and the present Council reign, unless he will give the dispensation already mentioned.
A sentence is the sovereign and only remedy, and the Queen says that the King would not struggle against it, if only from fear of his subjects, who are not only well disposed to your Majesty and the Queen, but for the most part good Catholics, and would not live in excommunication and under an interdict. The King would, therefore, be forced to obey the sentence. If a tumult arose, I do not know if the Lady, who is hated by all the world, would escape with her life and jewels.
The month fixed in the brief sent to the King is nearly passed, and there are no signs of his obeying it. A sentence only would be of effect. If, meanwhile, the Pope would decree a good excommunication against the Lady if she did not stay away from Court, the King would have less occasion to complain than if it were decreed against himself, and the people more liberty of speaking against her, and remonstrating with the King.
and there’s chapuys soliciting an excommunication against anne, but not henry. tell us more about chapuys’ "distaste and disbelief” against henry...?
19 notes
·
View notes