Tumgik
#JLH
Is anyone else convinced that Maddie’s “wow” wasn’t actually a “I didn’t think that’s where your interests would lie” wow?
Cause that sounded like a “my brother is such a bisexual disaster he didn’t even make it to the movie” wow if I’ve ever heard one and she just wanted to be supportive so she quickly pivoted into covering.
Just me? Ok then.
93 notes · View notes
marril96 · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Criminal Minds 10.01 | X
205 notes · View notes
lavoixhumaine · 5 months
Text
sexy babies coming back March 14, 2024 🚨🚨🚨
(abc flexing with the whole “we got Angela Bassett” muscle because hell yeah they do)
244 notes · View notes
deluweil · 23 days
Text
Siblings vibe is so cute! 😍😍
88 notes · View notes
queenjenniferlove · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
79 notes · View notes
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
The Client List, 1x10 – part 1
Like if use/save 🌸
Filter by @myoowmi on polarr
213 notes · View notes
ebdaydreamer · 1 year
Text
Jennifer Love Hewitt is the founder of the Madney fanclub and Evan Buckley is the President. Yes, one’s a real person and one’s fictional. Still true tho.
149 notes · View notes
babytrapperdiaz · 2 years
Text
but did y'all catch THIS!??!!
Tumblr media
409 notes · View notes
wildlife4life · 1 year
Text
911 6B is kicking ass and taking names. Wow. All three episodes so far have just been amazing. Oliver Stark has been stunning, Peter Krause ruins me in the best way, Ryan Guzman makes me emotional, and JLH is just the best. I am so stoked for the rest of this season… even if I have to wait to two weeks.
And to finish…. AHHHHHHHHHHHHH THE FUCKING COUCH AND KITCHEN!!!
116 notes · View notes
buckttommy · 3 months
Text
Jen said she wanted more Maddie angst in Season 7 so, on that note, I've been thinking and one thing I would love is for Kira (AJ Cook's character) to make another appearance. like. Maybe she's in a better place this time when it comes to her alcoholism (?), but now she finds herself in trouble with the law for something she didn't do. So she comes to Maddie — maybe because she looked her up, or maybe because she remembered from one of their long conversations that her brother, or at least someone close to her was friendly with the police. But for whatever reason, she asks her for help and she knows she fucked up the last time they saw each other, and she'd get it if Maddie never wanted to see or speak to her again, but she's better now, she swears, and she doesn't have anyone else to go to. So Maddie (and Athena) help her, of course, but it's such a huge fucking shock to her system because when she came back to Los Angeles, she came back for good, and she put everything and everyone that happened in Boston behind her. So to be reminded of that time and of who she was during that time? Oh man, there would be SO much to play with there. Especially if we set up a nice Maddie/Eddie parallel because they both put their pasts and the people that represented a dark time in their lives behind them when they came to LA..But this time, Maddie gets to save/reconnect with her friend whereas Eddie never got the chance to save/reconnect with Mills. Oooooh. I just gave myself chills. It would be fucking DELICIOUS.
17 notes · View notes
marril96 · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Criminal Minds 10.09 | Fate
65 notes · View notes
matan4il · 10 months
Note
I think the writers making Eddie a love interest for Maddie would’ve been too obvious/easy, the classic Best Friend’s Sister trope. Plus Maddie and Chimney are so cute and so good together, I can’t even picture her character Eddie. JLH is a queen for pushing for them to go a different route, idk what she saw or knows but we’re all in her debt lol. It’s always kind of struck me as odd that we don’t get any scenes between her and Eddie/Ryan though (party/firefam scenes aside, we don’t get meaningful conversations, don’t really know if they’re friends the way everyone else is with the others’s spouses). I feel like we’re missing out, they’d have a lot to talk about.
Hi Nonnie! I gather this is in continuation of this ask reply. TBH, I'm not sure if they would have gone in on making Eddie Buck's BFF if it weren't for the change in plans JLH caused. Ravi and Lucy were both introduced without assigning them a bestie on the team, so maybe that's how Eddie would have been handled as well. Or maybe they would have had him be besties with Hen. Because back in s1, Chim was still portrayed more as Bobby's BFF than Hen's. The person Chimney was closest to after Bobby was Buck. So basically, they would have had room to play with who would be Buck's bestie. And since Eddie was a single dad, connecting with one of the other parents on the team could have been easily done.
Basically, I'm saying that we may owe JLH not just the romantic subtext between Buck and Eddie, it might be their friendship and its depth that we owe to her, too. Not to mention we might not have had the cuteness of Buddifer! So yes, 10000%. We probably wouldn't have had this fandom if it weren't for her.
As for Maddie and Eddie interacting, forever wanting to see more of that, which is why (as I've mentioned before), I even wrote that into one of my fics. Maybe they're kept apart because Maddie's hints for Eddie to finally confess his feelings to Buck would just be too loud. ;)
Thank you for your ask, lovely! Have a great day. As always, here is my ask tag. xoxox
31 notes · View notes
deluweil · 27 days
Note
Would love to hear ur take on all this buddie Oliver Ryan press???
Lmao, I have resolved myself to not watch any of the press circuits done, by anyone.
I read here and there from the corner of my eye.
But from what I've seen, you can't really match what's being said to what is happening on the show.
On one hand, you have diplomatic responses from both Oliver and Ryan of things like vulnerable male friendships and shit like that. I say shit like that because I have watched so many best friends pairs on several different TV shows where there is trust and vulnerability and love and sharing of apartments and kids in the mix, and none of those look as gay as Buck and Eddie and whatever the hell they do.
And on the other hand, we have the unfiltered God bless him, Ryan responses, where he loves both Buck and Oliver to the core, and "this goes beyond friendship".
In my opinion, Ryan is the only one being honest about how this thing looks like, he's been married, he has kids and lot of close friends,he can be objective and tell the difference.
I buy more into Ryan's solo interviews, than whatever was said in the show oriented PR tour.
The fact that they finally put Ryan and Oliver together tells me that Buck and Eddie will get even more, if that is possible, close this season.
Where it leads, is unclear, because the interviews may not say much, but the show itself just seems like it's gravitating to a buddie endgame conclusion.
It helps that the entire cast, low key, are buddie shippers since S3, led enthusiastically by Ryan and JLH.
So I don't know, but I wouldn't look too closely at the interviews, they never reflect the on screen interaction.
Since I didn't watch the Ryan and Oliver interview, if I missed something or got it wrong correct me, but looks like the bottom line of the gifs I saw is they're married but not sleeping together vibe lol
25 notes · View notes
queenjenniferlove · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
53 notes · View notes
gothhabiba · 11 months
Text
it's unfortunate that scholarship about Darija literacy is thin enough on the ground that reading a PhD dissertation (as a result of another text that cited this dissertation) is a perfectly reasonable thing to do (like, as opposed to only consulting published works)—
because I can tell that this was sort of written to fulfill the qualifications for the degree, rather than to really contribute to the field as a whole. in one chapter, for example, Hall gives a literature review of the extant scholarship on code switching, text messaging, and especially text messaging in North Africa, and then gives an overview of a few things she noticed in the corpus of Latin alphabet text messages that her connexions gave her access to—
and then ends the chapter. she doesn't theorise her observations, or explain at length what implications they might have for our understanding of code switching more generally, or any other more broadly debated or theorised sociolinguistic question. she doesn't produce the corpus itself in an index (understandable, for reasons of privacy?), or do the scan that linguists usually do where they'll provide a translation at the level of the morpheme, one at the level of the word, and another at the level of the sentence, so that other linguists can follow what's happening grammatically. in fact a few of her translations are sort of bad and incomprehensible, because she tries to make the word-for-word literal translation stand in for the sentence-level translation of the whole utterance and as a result produces things that are not understandable to an English speaker.
so none of her data is necessarily accessible to anyone who doesn't speak Tashelhit (a variety of Tamazight), Darija, English, and French. nevertheless I can still see interesting observations to draw that she leaves on the table—for example she points out that "these text messages use abbreviations" and that English and French were more commonly abbreviated than Darija and Tashelhit, and reports the texters' explanation that this was because Darija and Tashelhit don't have a standard written form and so an abbreviation could be more confusing.
interestingly, though, the abbreviations they used in English were not the texting abbreviations that I would consider 'standard' in English, either in texting (especially during the years before cell phones had full keyboards) or online! one message reads:
I receivd ur nice card, thanks. Its up t us t do such a nice gesture.. Anyway, w/all mis u, always at our tongues, in our minds. Nxt time u mst com t Fac t see u. bye…
["Fac" from French "faculté," common casual term for "campus" in written and spoken French]
Hall describes this message as "peppered with the distinctive features that Crystal identifies as characteristic of text messages in English including initialisms, omitted letters, nonstandard spellings and shortenings" (p. 139) and leaves it at that.
but surely it matters which letters are omitted and which nonstandard spellings are used? 'standard' English textspeak (if such a generalisation can be permitted) uses "w/" to mean "with," not "we." "t" is not an abbreviation I've ever seen for "to"—you'd be more likely to come across "2." "ur" and "u" for "your" and "you," respectively, and "Its" for "it's," are much more familiar to me.
in others of the nine text messages whose text she produces I see some of the abbreviations I expect in French (& my sense is that these are more frequently used than abbreviations for English words online)—"slt" for "salut," "bcp" for "beaucoup," "jtm" for "je t'aime," "a+" for "à plus [tard]". also "mé" for "mais," which at least I have never seen before? unsure if other common ones ("qqun" for "quelqu'un," "j" for "j'ai," "tt" for "tout," &c.) occur because, again, she only produces nine text messages total.
so to what extent do text abbreviations arise spontaneously and to what extent are they common to communities of practice / speech communities? do the four speakers in the corpus use these abbreviations consistently throughout their texts, or do they seem more 'random'? do any of the speakers use some abbreviations or spellings that the other speakers do not use? what does this mean for the relationship between orthography and community / group identity in small groups who have to get creative with their writing (i.e. because they're sending messages in limited-character formats, often in languages without standardised writing systems)?
this was my first line of thinking here, but, to be far, Hall is focused on the writing of Darija. so is the Darija orthography standard across the corpus? across one speaker over time? do any of the speakers seem to borrow spellings from others? what does the orthography say about their language ideology (like, "lkhobz" is written for something which in standard Arabic would be "الخبز" alkhobz, "al" "the" and "khobz" "bread," with the "l" pronounced since "kh," the voiceless velar fricative at the beginning of "Hannukah," isn't one of the sounds that makes it silent—but the writer does not write "alkhobz" or "al-khobz" or "el khobz" or anything else that would point to the standard Arabic "al." they drop the "a" and thus reference Moroccan phonology rather than the Arabic orthography)?
maybe none of these things are the exact thing that Hall wanted to get at (she opens her dissertation with a lit review on 'language ideology' and 'fractal recursivity' [roughly, differences between language ideologies in different domains and contexts as a result of ideological disjuncture, such as being confronted with a written version of a language which you believe should not be written].) I guess what I'm missing is something that seems like it ties the analysis of the data to the literature, rather than the literature reviews sort of seeming like they're there so she can prove she knows the current state of the field (& the prevalence of the latter approach is a problem with, like, the entire structure of academia, not just Hall). or speculation about the implications of her observations for the field at large, rather than just pulling up a text when it on the surface agrees with what she observes. as it is, the chapter left me with the feeling of "oh... that's it?"
36 notes · View notes
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
The Client List, 1x10 – part2
Like if use/save 🌸
215 notes · View notes