Tumgik
#OSDD-1
sysboxes · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media
[Text: This user is an OSDD system. OSDD: Other Specified Dissociative Disorder]
Tumblr media
[Text: This user is an OSDD system.]
Tumblr media
[Text: This user is an OSDD-1 system. OSDD: Other Specified Dissociative Disorder]
Tumblr media
[Text: This user is an OSDD-1 system.]
Tumblr media
[Text: This user is an OSDD-1a system. OSDD: Other Specified Dissociative Disorder]
Tumblr media
[Text: This user is an OSDD-1a system.]
Tumblr media
[Text: This user is an OSDD-1b system. OSDD: Other Specified Dissociative Disorder]
Tumblr media
[Text: This user is an OSDD-1b system.]
Like/Reblog if you save or use
135 notes · View notes
spirallingmoths · 4 months
Text
Shoutout to cdd systems who aren't 100% certain about their trauma
Shoutout to systems with high amnesia. Shoutout to systems who feel like they made up all their trauma. Shoutout to systems whose trauma feels "too minor" to have caused their cdd (I promise you all trauma is valid). Shoutout to systems who don't remember any trauma and have a hard time calling themselves a trauma survivor. Shoutout to systems who are still in denial about their trauma. Shoutout to systems who only remember vague flashes or incoherent fragments of traumatic memories. Shoutout to systems who feel like they're making up their trauma. Shoutout to systems who don't remember who their abusers are. Shoutout to systems who question the validity of their own memories. Shoutout to systems who's trauma mainly comes in the form of pseudo memories (you can't have a physical flashback over something you never experienced. If you're experiencing flashbacks, you probably experienced it to a degree)
You do not need a comprehensive trauma timeline or even know all or any specific trauma to have a CDD. The fact you have alters and a CDD is proof enough. You do not need to immediately understand everything that may have happened to you. Your trauma is valid, no matter how little of it you remember.
The point of CDDs is to hide trauma from you to help you cope and function. It's normal to not remember specifics or only remember vague things. It's normal to be in denial. Your trauma is valid. You having a CDD is valid
89 notes · View notes
alethonym · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
its okay to be confused by your own masking.
102 notes · View notes
daydreamers-sys · 2 years
Text
Yet another plural ask game! 🐾
Anti-endo/anti-nontraumagenic please DNI!
You absolutely don’t have to answer any you’re uncomfortable with.
Do you have an innerworld? What’s it like?
Do you have a paracosm? Is it different from the innerworld (if applicable)?
How many headmates do you have/are you aware of including yourself? You don’t have to count anyone who doesn’t want to be counted.
Have you ever created a headmate before?
Have you ever introjected someone on purpose (possibly through soulbonding or other methods)?
Are you mixed-origin or do all of your headmates come from a single origin?
Do you prefer “-genic” terms, or Emmengard’s terms (Unknown, Adaptive, Spontaneous, Created, Mixed)?
Do you have any introjects? How many?
If you have any introjects, how many are from the same source?
Which source has the most introjects?
Are any of you alterhuman? (Otherkin, therian, nonhuman fictionkin, extranth, etc)
Do you have any animal headmates (non-anthro and non-alterhuman, for example just a regular cat)? Do they front?
Are you “out” as plural to anyone you know in person?
Do you know any other plurals in person?
For anyone with exomemories: were you plural back then, too?
What’s the most common favorite color in the collective?
What’s the most unique aesthetic in the collective?
Do any of you have a “dark” aesthetic but are actually a huge sweetheart?
Who is the most calm, and who is the most wild?
Asker gets to ask anything they want!
646 notes · View notes
sleepy-shutin · 1 year
Text
here’s something interesting i feel like some more people in the community should probably think about:
something really interesting i’ve had to learn over the years is that, no, i didn’t actually have that many fictives lol. what i did have was dissociation-related identity issues and severe derealization and latched onto fictional characters because i felt like the rest of the world wasn’t real, like i was in some kind of a TV show or video game or something.
weirdly enough, it hasn’t gotten better since getting a job and getting out of the house, and in fact it kinda feels like it’s gotten worse. every day, i struggle with understanding that people other than me/my family are real and that i have to legitimately deal with them, and that my job is not some video game and is actually something that i have to take seriously.
either way i find it really interesting to consider that some people don’t have as many fictives (or non-fictives) as they think they do. it’s not a bad thing, just part of the process of getting all your shit sorted out, especially if you don’t have a therapist. but i think too many people are afraid to admit that they could be wrong about how many alters they have for some reason. if they think they have an alter of something than they must, and they can never be wrong about it because why would they? they know themselves best, right?
not necessarily true.
all the time, people mistake things for alters that were not alters. people who have been diagnosed for years can mistake something for an alter when it’s not an alter at all. it’s simply a part of the process, and people need to acknowledge that you can be wrong about having (a) certain part(s), and that’s fine.
like i said at the beginning of this post, this very thing has happened to me. i thought i had alters i didn’t, particularly fictives, and had to eventually restart my alter count a couple of years ago because i didn’t have my shit figured out, and was so sick of being unable to tell what was real and what isn’t. 
here’s some things that should’ve been my own hint that the alters i thought i had were not real:
if you have fictives that go 'dormant’ when the fixation on their source material goes away,
if they only front to interact with their source material,
if they only front because their source material triggered them out,
if you’re only ever ‘splitting’ fictive alters, especially if you’re in spaces where fictives are the majority,
or if you constantly expect to split fictives over any other kind of alter...
...then that/those fictive(s) might not actually be there.
causes could be related to being in fictive-heavy spaces causing you to feel like you’re only going to split fictives or identity issues related to severe, chronic dissociation causing you to identify with fictional characters heavily without actually introjecting them. both of these were the reasons i thought i had more fictives than i did in the beginning.
obviously, not a one-size-fits-all type deal and there are probably plenty of cases where this is flat-out wrong. i’m mostly just writing this so that someone out there like me doesn’t have to waste their time thinking they have more parts, or more of one specific kind of part, than they actually do, thus stunting their own recovery like i did for a handful of years.
it’s also not to shame anyone or fakeclaim anyone or whatever. there’s no shame in being wrong, and being wrong about having a specific alter or a handful of a certain type of alter doesn’t necessarily mean that you’re faking everything or whatever. it’s just something to consider, especially if you’re new to the system community, like a year or less into realizing you have a complex dissociative disorder.
104 notes · View notes
doomsdayradio · 1 year
Text
actually im curious what type of switching do yall experience
69 notes · View notes
scungledfiles · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
OSDD-1a and OSDD-1b Alert User Boxes!
Requests are open!
180 notes · View notes
radinclusys · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Radinclusys Flag Update!
We decided to include the Plural Rings symbol on our Radinclusys flag now! The symbol is optional, of course, so anyone may continue to use the "old" (but not obsolete) flag.
We also created a new "simplified" version of the Radinclusys flag, with and without the symbol.
Radinclusys -- Rad- from "radical," -inclu- from "inclusive," and -sys from "system." To be Radinclusys is to be radically inclusive of all system origins, functions, and types; bar-none.
138 notes · View notes
the-sunroom-system · 2 years
Text
me: i am exhausted i sure would love if someone else would take over for a bit
also me, pushing away anyone who tries to get close to the front:
151 notes · View notes
sysboxes · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
[Text: This system likes to answer questions]
Like/Reblog if you save or use!
330 notes · View notes
systempositive · 1 year
Text
Figuring out if you have either DID or OSDD-1 can be pretty tricky. Our brains hide our amnesia from us, too, so we can easily just not know we’re experiencing it.
Symptoms of CDDs can be really hard to track due to the nature of CDDs themselves, so this can make it hard to tell whether you have OSDD-1 or DID. We say: don’t sweat it. Your symptoms cause you distress, so you know you’re disordered, and the difference between the two disorders can be very arbitrary depending on who gives you the diagnosis and which text they use.
Do you experience distress due to your CDD? Do you experience being “more than one?” Then you’re absolutely a disordered system, and the distinction between DID and OSDD-1 doesn’t really matter in the long run.
54 notes · View notes
spirallingmoths · 1 year
Text
Something I've noticed is how some CDD systems (and general trauma survivors) sometimes treat "extreme" trauma like a fictional concept when trying to valid themselves. I understand where "you don't need to go through RAMCOA abuse/a war/a dictatorship/etc to be a system and have cptsd" comes from and I fully agree with it. Some shitty ableist singlets can be very annoying with how they only accept trauma when it's "extreme" trauma. But I think the way some people talk about it sometimes just makes it sound off. I don't know it's just the way some people phrase it like "Not everyone traumatised is living in a war zone 🙄" makes me really uncomfortable. Like it's not the faults of people who have gone through "extreme" trauma that some people are ableist and uneducated
Also, people who go through those do exist? Like idk most people I see talk about it like it's some far-off vague fictional out-there concept and not like, a thing that real people experience and go through? Like RAMCOA abuse is real and valid (I'm not a survivor myself so I won't talk about it a lot but I felt the need to bring it up because the way some people talk about it is just weird), people who have lived through wars exist? and their trauma is valid, people who have been trafficked exist and their trauma is valid, people who have been tortured exist and their trauma is valid, people who have survived genocides exist and their trauma is valid, and people who have been in cults exist and their trauma is valid. In general, people with "extreme" trauma exist and their trauma is real
Survivors of "extreme" abuse/trauma shouldn't be made to feel like their trauma is too taboo to mention. Or feel like they can't talk about it out of fear of "invalidating other systems". All trauma is valid (including "non extreme" trauma). I think validating traumatic things that aren't usually viewed as trauma by the average person is good but please try not to bring down anyone else in the process
37 notes · View notes
staticmogai · 1 year
Text
this user is a system
Tumblr media
userbox by us, icons by m0dem0n
63 notes · View notes
systemsafetypsas · 1 year
Text
Welcome To System Safety PSAs
This blog is for Public Service Announcements regarding anything that could pose a danger to systems or people in system spaces, regardless of syscourse stance, origin, disorderedness, or diagnosis status.
This blog/account was created because we've noticed that sometimes things pop up in the plural community that could potentially be a threat to anyone, and we want to make sure that as many people as possible see the message so that as few people as possible get hurt. On our main blog, however, we have to block a lot of people on one side of the syscourse spectrum for personal safety reasons. This blog was created as a platform where all systems can safely interact and see warnings about problems that may potentially be relevant to them.
Examples of situations we may make warnings about include:
r/SystemsCringe or r/FakeDisorderCringe doing anything to "lure in fakers"
Death threats, doxxing, or harassment campaigns
Anyone routinely posting anything blatantly ableist, transphobic, etc. in system tags, unrelated to syscourse (i.e. slurs, reality checking, untagged unreality, using "delusional" as an insult)
Etc.
Trigger warnings will be in the text of the post, not the tags. This is because those who would have such tags blocked are probably also those most at risk for whatever the post is about. Detailed descriptions of the situation, as well as any and all screenshots or evidence will be placed under a "Read More," so it will be available but anyone who might potentially find it triggering can easily avoid it.
We will only mention specific usernames if it is necessary for people to block them in order to avoid the issue. Do not harass anyone mentioned, as it will likely only make the situation worse, and potentially make you a target as well. We do not make call-out posts unless there is genuine reason to believe that a blog poses a significant danger.
We may at some point also attempt to start or spread awareness for tagging initiatives and/or terminology that make navigating syscourse easier and safer for everyone involved.
As mentioned earlier, we have a lot of people on one side of the syscourse spectrum blocked on our main for safety reasons, so we may not be able to catch everything. We may reblog PSAs or warnings from others if they meet the criteria described above. Please submit or send in asks about anything that you think meets the criteria described above.
23 notes · View notes
oillipheist9000 · 2 years
Text
System Question
"Does this count as a possessive or non-possesive switch? Or is it something else?
When we switch, the main person can sometimes feel themselves 'leaving' and another alter approaching, but once they get to a certain point, it suddenly feels like they were always the approaching alter and they are just switching in. The alter who left now feels foreign."
That's all that is written from Alex. Gonna try to clarify, don't laugh if I screw this up.
It basically feels like nobody ever leaves front, but at the same time experiences both leaving and coming. We recently figured out that nobody really 'experiences' the inner world, it's closer to assigned places that alters stay in doing a small task until they head over to the 'fronting room' which is when we can 'hear' them and they can front from (duh)
-Ryan
85 notes · View notes
sleepy-shutin · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
another interesting snippet from another paper i'm reading. (the evolution of alter personality states in DID - pica, 1999)
31 notes · View notes