#Robert B. Hubbell
Text
MLK at 95.
January 15, 2024
ROBERT B. HUBBELL
Martin Luther King, Jr. was born 95 years ago on January 15, 1929. As a Baptist minister, he advocated non-violence while promoting civil rights. He spoke for the poor, the oppressed, and the disenfranchised. While he was imprisoned in a Birmingham jail for protesting segregation, he responded to eight white ministers who had criticized him for participating in protests that they described as “unwise and untimely.”
Dr. King’s famous reply to the white ministers explained why he traveled to Birmingham from Atlanta to protest:
I cannot sit idly by in Atlanta and not be concerned about what happens in Birmingham. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly affects all indirectly. Never again can we afford to live with the narrow, provincial outside agitator" idea. Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider.
While Dr. King was keenly aware of the racism that served as the understructure of the Christian church in the old South, he would be shocked by the virulent, mean-spirited, anti-Christian message that animates many (not all) evangelical congregations in America today. They form the backbone of Donald Trump's support in Iowa and beyond. They have adopted Trump's message that treats the poor, oppressed, and disenfranchised as “outsiders” and “others” who do not belong in America.
Over the last several days, we have learned that members of the Texas National Guard physically blocked federal Border Patrol agents from responding to reports of immigrants in distress in the Rio Grande. The bodies of a mother and two children were later recovered from the river in the area where immigrants were reported to be in distress.
Texas, of course, denies that its cruel actions caused the drownings—a denial that should be viewed skeptically from a state whose governor—Greg Abbott—recently commented Texas troopers could not shoot immigrants crossing the border because the troopers would be charged with murder by the Biden administration. Texas governor criticized after comment about shooting migrants | The Texas Tribune.
Similar animus underlies the recent comments of Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves, who withdrew Mississippi from a federal program to provide food to school children during summer breaks. Governor Reeves said Mississippi withdrew from the program to fight “attempts to expand the welfare state.”
Blocking efforts to rescue a drowning mother and her children? Regretting the inability to shoot immigrants because it would be murder? Denying food to poor children out of spite? Who are these people? How do they look at themselves in the mirror?
Ninety-five years after Dr. King’s birth and fifty-five years after his death, it is difficult to believe that people who identify as upstanding members of the Christian church can support such actions.
Another section from Dr. King’s Letter from a Birmingham Jail is relevant to this moment in our nation’s history:
But the judgment of God is upon the church as never before. If the church of today does not recapture the sacrificial spirit of the early church, it will lose its authentic ring, forfeit the loyalty of millions, and be dismissed as an irrelevant social club with no meaning for the twentieth century. I meet young people every day whose disappointment with the church has risen to outright disgust.
Dr. King’s words were prophetic. See Pew Research (10/17/19) In U.S., Decline of Christianity Continues at Rapid Pace.
And, of course, as Dr. King recognized, “there are some notable exceptions” among church leaders who supported his work—just as there are exceptions today. Several readers have recommended Faithful America as an antidote to Christian nationalism. The organization’s helpful FAQ page explains why “Christian nationalism” is not Christian. See Resisting Christian Nationalism: FAQ + Resources | Faithful America.
On this day commemorating Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s birth, we can see how far we have come—and how much further we must go. He didn’t despair. Neither should we.
Robert B. Hubbell Newsletter
#MLK#David Horsey#political cartoons#Martin Luther King Jr#justice#equality#economic equality#Robert B. Hubbell#Robert b. Hubbell newsletter
488 notes
·
View notes
Text
A reflection on the terrorist attack on Israel through the lens of America.
October 9, 2023
READ MORE https://roberthubbell.substack.com/p/a-reflection-on-the-terrorist-attack
"For a small country, approximately 700 deaths are the equivalent of 25,000 in the US."
"Sadly, the point of the terror attack on Israel was to disrupt efforts to normalize relations between Israel and Saudi Arabia (among others) as a precursor to a peace framework. Hamas’s goal is to prevent peace and stability in the Mideast—a development that would make its structural opposition to Israel’s legitimacy irrelevant and unnecessary."
191 Comments
Robert B. Hubbell8 hrs ago
"Hi, all. In both the comments section and in my email inbox, I am receiving a lot of criticism for not condemning Israel's policies toward Gaza and the West Bank. As I responded to one reader,
If your criticism is that I should have given the entire history of the Israeli Palestinian conflict in my newsletter last night, that is both an unrealistic expectation and dangerous ground. The attack was on civilians-- on young people from around the world attending a music festival, kids killed in front of their parents, and people asleep in their beds. If you couple those killings with the statement, “But Israel has horrible policies toward Gaza and the West Bank,” can you not see that marshaling those arguments in that order has a logical force that implies the killing of innocent civilians was justified?
Many readers (wrongly) claim that I defended Israel's treatment of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank or that I justified Israel's retaliation on Gaza after the terrorist attack by Hamas. Neither of those statements appear in my newsletter. If you want to disagree with what I wrote, that's fine. But please try to connect your disagreement to something I wrote rather than something you read in the NYTimes or on Twitter by some other writer. If you do that, we can have a discussion. If you don't, you are having an argument with someone other than me. Thanks!"
+ "...the loss of life in Israel (pop 9.2 million) is like America losing more than 20,000 citizens (percentage-wise)."
0 notes
Text
Your mother has a tiny dick asshole
1 note
·
View note
Text
More Words Of Wisdom
More Words Of Wisdom
Of the several newsletters I subscribe to, one of my favourites is by Robert B. Hubbell. I don’t know much about Mr. Hubbell apart from the fact that he is an attorney in California, but he often speaks words of wisdom. I’m sharing the first part of his newsletter from this morning about President Biden’s speech last night. If you enjoy his style, feel free to subscribe to his newsletter –…
View On WordPress
0 notes
Quote
There is no other way to say it: The media is discriminating against Fetterman because of a physical disability and is unwilling to focus on substance. They see Fetterman as a stroke victim, not as a person whose intellect, values, and ideas outshine Oz at every level. Shame on them. I hope you will join me in letting your favorite media outlet know how you feel about reducing Fetterman to his disability rather than recognizing that he—like tens of millions of Americans—is not defined by his disability.
John Fetterman outshines Dr. Oz. - by Robert B. Hubbell
Every person with any disability who reads and watches this kind of discrimination against Fetterman knows that many people feel the same way about them. And yet our Senate is a gerontocracy with a lot of people in worse physical shape because of age than Fetterman. It makes no sense but that’s the way it is.
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Elect Democrats. Reform the Court. Defend the Constitution. Preserve Democracy.
March 5, 2024
ROBERT B. HUBBELL
MAR 5
READ IN APP
LISTEN TO POST · 18:32
The most important lesson from Monday’s disqualification ruling is that the Supreme Court is broken beyond repair. The reactionary majority made that fact abundantly clear by unilaterally amending the Constitution to remove the Insurrection Clause from the 14th Amendment.
Those sworn to protect the Constitution are dismantling it. The protectors of the Constitution have become its adversary in order to protect a failed insurrectionist who has promised a second effort to overthrow the Constitution. (“I said I want to be a dictator for one day.”)
0 notes
Text
Vince Foster and Hillary Clinton
claim: Hillary had an affair with Vince Foster
analysis: false. In the context that this rumor is often used, it loses credibility. It gained it’s origins as gossip in Arkansas and was used by political opponents to later try and pin his suicide on the Clintons. I will go through why the rumor persists and show how it loses credibility in the way people use this rumor against the Clintons.
Background: the rumor that Hillary had an affair with Vince started in Arkansas where sexuality of public officials is often gossip.
Here’s a quote showing an example of how people would intrude and speculate about public figures life: “Sit in the Capitol Bar, in downtown Little Rock, for a few nights and you can be told that virtually every prominent public figure in the state is a rapacious womanizer and also gay- Including Clinton. Even Hillary Clinton was not spared this treatment: one can hear that she was having an affair with Vince Foster and also that she is a lesbian, often from the same lascivious gossip.”
Web Hubbell, another close friend of Hillary’s spoke on this matter and gave his view: Webster Hubbell explained in his memoir Friends in high places that this kind of sniping came with the territory Hillary had staked for herself in Arkansas. Because Hillary was the first female partner in the upper-crust Rose Law Firm, her close professional and personal relationships with Foster and Hubbell provoked resented in the tightly knit community surrounding the Little Rock Country Club. The governor’s wife was an inevitable focus of gossip and everything she did provoked idle chatter. If Hubbell was and Foster were sometimes said to be lovers, at other moments her friendships with other professional women provoked speculation that Hillary was actually a lesbian.
false accusations and rumors that have been made about Hillary and Vince Foster:
“In new expose Bill & Hillary: so this is that thing called love, authors Darwin Porter and Danforth Prince claim that Foster was “impressed” with the budding attorney and brought her to work at Little Rock’s Rose Law firm in 1977 as the first female associate.” This should hardly raise eyebrows, Hillary was an impressive lawyer and very smart but the way these authors talk about it make it seem as if it was more than that and Vince was only attracted to Hillary in a romantic or sexual way. This claim is false because it can easily be pinned down to sexism and the inability of two male authors to see that a woman can be recognized for her work ethic by a man in a platonic way where neither of the two are interested in each other.
“The authors go on to claim that other colleagues began to notice a brewing romance between Hillary and Vince and that sometimes he would skip family dinners to eat dinner with Hillary.” Again, this goes back to sexism and the fact that these authors and others can’t understand a platonic relationship between a man and a woman. Also what other colleagues? Web Hubbell himself already spoke on the matter, debunking it. And skipping family dinners to eat dinner with Hillary is hardly a crime, ever heard of working overtime?
This one is just laughable. He accompanied her because he worked at the law firm with her! Also never believe an unmerited and unidentified source such as “a room service staffer” or something vague like that. No name for a room service staffer was given so this could have easily been made up. If they were having an affair they would be discreet and not flaunt it in front of room service staff.
The authors also claimed that Vince’s wife, Lisa was jealous and hated Hillary.
Yeah so jealous lol.
Yeah this can be pinned down to troopergate and several troopers were paid to lie and worked with Larry Nichols. I will elaborate more on this in my troopergate post then link it back here but a lot of the troopers are not credible sources.
Just a preview: the dubious local duo of disgruntled former Clinton employee Larry Nichols and local detective Larry Case, whose specialty was outing the sex scandals of public figures, brought the likes of Gennifer Flowers to the tabloids while Cliff Jackson, a former Oxford classmate of Clinton's, created Troopergate.
Why does this claim persist?:
1. Fox news
Fox news has interviewed Jeff Rovin a man who claims he was a ‘fixer for the Clintons.’
his claim: man claiming to be Bill and Hillary Clinton’s “fixer” – hired to cover up their “dirtiest schemes,” including steamy sex romps and a major scandal involving former deputy White House counsel Vince Foster – says the Clintons have an open marriage, patronize hookers, buy off news reporters and coordinated a scheme to destroy White House intern Monica Lewinsky after her affair with the president.
Why he can’t be trusted: he’s biased. He is a trump supporter:
However, Rovin claimed he is coming forward to put an end to the wild and steamy gossip.
“The election is too important to focus in this salacious material,” he told Hannity. “I hope this stuff is so unpalatable that we just stop.”
“I like Trump,” he said, adding that he’s voting for “one of those two.”
Rovin stepped out and broke this “news” in October 2016 during the election. Interesting timing as it seems that he wanted to influence voters and make them have doubts about the Clintons.
More holes in his claims:
1. He claims that on the day Presidential brother Roger Clinton was marrying his eight-months-pregnant bride Molly. there was a bachelor party. Prostitutes were involved. Recordings were made. Recordings involving Bill Clinton. This claim is false. Larry Nichols has been looking for incriminating videos and photographs of Bill with other women for ages and none have been found.
2. “ I have kept these secrets for a quarter-century because Bill Clinton had become an elder statesman with heart trouble and Hillary Clinton seemed to be focused, at last, on the business of doing her job — for better or for worse.” This ruins his claim because why step out then during the 2016 election? Hillary was still very much focused on her job and Bill still had heart trouble oh right:
The National enquirer was the first to break his story and the National enquirer is a tabloid magazine filled with exaggerations that are meant to be eye grabbing, i.e., clickbait in journalism and they are usually biased as well:
2. People want to believe the Clintons are capable of murder.
This rumor persist because if Hillary were in love with Vince then the whole idea of his suicide as a murder is more plausible. People want to believe the Clintons are capable of murder in order to discredit them and they use the Vince/Hillary narrative to try to push this agenda.
why this is false:
Special counsel Robert B. Fiske Jr. concluded that Foster's death in Fort Marcy Park last July was a suicide. The Fiske investigation involved four lawyers, five physicians, seven FBI agents, approximately 125 witnesses; also DNA tests, microscopes and lasers.
According to Fiske, the truth belied all the ugly glamour. Foster's death was a personal collapse, not a White House scandal.
From the pinnacle of the Arkansas legal establishment, Foster leaped into the service of his boyhood friend, Bill Clinton, after Clinton was elected president. According to Fiske, the toll on Foster was intense from the beginning. During the transition period – when he vetted a number of top appointees – Foster complained to his Little Rock physician of depression and anxiety.
His symptoms grew worse when he got to Washington. In January 1993, Zoe E. Baird was forced to withdraw her nomination as attorney general because she had failed to pay taxes for a nanny; fresh from his inauguration, President Clinton was hit with charges of elitism and corner-cutting and incompetent screening. Foster blamed himself – the Fiske report shows him constantly shouldering blame for mistakes made in the chaotic White House – and the night of the Baird debacle Foster was literally sick from a panic attack.
Final thoughts: the idea that Hillary would have an affair with Vince Foster or any of her colleagues is simply rooted in old fashioned Arkansan sexism. It is born out of the idea that a woman can’t be close to a man without being sexually involved with him. It is also rooted in the old Arkansan belief that a woman can’t move forward in her career unless she is aided or favored by a man.
It would be entirely out of character for Hillary to cheat.
These are just now my own evaluations based on opinion/fact
Her methodist faith and from what we know about her drawing into her faith during times of trouble in her marriage give insight into the fact that she would agree that adultery is a sin. Whereas Bill is a completely different story and due to his upbringing, infidelity was predictable, Hillary herself seems to have no inner conflict that would cause her to cheat.
Why?
1. Hillary draws love from within herself. Hillary is entirely confident and does not need validation. Usually people that cheat are seeking to fill an emptiness they feel within themselves. Hillary has always been filled with a purpose.
2. “I was raised to believe that actions spoke louder than words,” she explained “If you were a person of faith, that should be evident in how you treated other people and what kind of life you lived.
To me this shows that Hillary would not cheat. Actions spoke louder than words and it is clear that Hillary is a woman of her word. Married to Bill by a methodist preacher, I think this would only enforce her and make her want to keep her vows, since actions meant more than words and the vows to her would have simply not been words.
3. Chelsea.
It is clear that Hillary’s priority has always been being a good mother to Chelsea. To me this is another reason why it would be out of character for her to cheat. it seems that she would much rather have a stable relationship than risk infidelity and tear their family apart, therefore hurting Chelsea and putting her in the middle of an affair like that would be out of the question for Hillary. Chelsea is one of the reasons Hillary worked so hard to save her relationship with Bill and I don’t think she would have been unfaithful to her husband out of respect for her daughter’s well being and her own beliefs.
sources: https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-private-faith-of-hillary-clinton
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/whitewater/stories/wwtr940701.htm
http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/clinton-fixer-hillarys-affair-with-vince-foster-an-open-secret/
https://www.amazon.com/Hunting-President-Ten-Year-Campaign-Destroy/dp/0312273193
57 notes
·
View notes
Text
Promises Kept.
January 5, 2024
ROBERT B. HUBBELL
When Joe Biden declared his candidacy for president in 2019, the nation was bruised, battered, and divided by three years of Trump's unrelenting chaos and carnage. During Biden’s year-long campaign, Trump plunged America into darker waters as he tried to extort Ukraine into fabricating lies about Joe Biden and his son. Trump then engaged in gross dereliction of duty by mishandling the nation’s response to Covid, ultimately resorting to lies and quackery as the death toll mounted.
Biden stepped into the breach, promising “to restore the soul, honor, dignity, and decency” of America. In word and deed, Biden has kept those promises—despite virulent and violent opposition by MAGA extremists who sought to prevent the peaceful transfer of power—and who still seek to destroy our democracy today.
Historians may view Biden’s greatest success as the restoration of normalcy, decency, and rationality to the executive branch of the US government. Biden’s legislative accomplishments are historic and will be an enduring legacy standing alone.
Identifying Biden’s legislative successes is easy; identifying the depth and breadth of Biden’s restoration of decency and rationality is more difficult—because living in a normal frame of reference is subtle and ineffable. It infuses every aspect of democracy and political discourse. It is the absence of chaos, it is not waking up every morning thinking, “Oh, God. What has he tweeted now?”, and it is not hearing every governmental action re-interpreted through Trump's lenses of narcissism, delusion, and insecurity.
Joe Biden acts within a rational political framework. His policies can be praised or criticized because they exist (in writing) and reflect the reasoned judgment of Biden and his staff after a period of reflection and debate. They are not made up “on the fly” in response to reporters’ questions shouted over the noise of helicopter rotors.
The return to normalcy, decency, and dignity is neither sexy, compelling, nor “made for TV.” But it was precisely what the nation needed after the chaos of Trump's tenure as president. Joe Biden kept his promises. For that, we owe him a debt of gratitude that we must repay in 2024.
On the eve of the third anniversary of January 6, Biden is launching his 2024 campaign in earnest. In a political ad previewed on MSNBC, Biden said that he is making “the preservation of democracy” the centerpiece of his campaign. In the ad, Biden says, in part,
All of us are being asked, “What will we do to maintain our democracy?” History is watching. The world is watching. Most importantly, our children and grandchildren will hold us responsible . . . .
A campaign theme of “preserving democracy” is neither sexy, compelling, nor “made for TV.” But it is precisely what the nation needs as it stares into the abyss of a second Trump term as president.
I have heard from dozens of readers this week who are disappointed with Biden’s responses regarding immigration and the war in Gaza. Some have suggested that they will not vote or will vote for a third-party candidate. Both of those options are the functional equivalent of voting for Trump.
The freedom to criticize the president is a privilege of our democracy guaranteed in the Constitution. We can debate presidential policies only if we have a democratic frame of reference within which to hold those debates.
That democratic frame of reference will exist under a second Biden term. Under Trump, the democratic frame of reference will be replaced by a simple test: Does speech praise Trump? If not, the speaker will act at their peril. Trump’s vigilantes will threaten the speaker, and state and federal agencies will pretend the threats are harmless jokes or over-exuberant expressions of loyalty to Trump.
The threat of vigilantism to punish speech is not hyperbole. As we approach the third anniversary of January 6, elected officials who criticize Trump or apply the law to his unlawful conduct are being deluged with death threats. They are being “swatted” by sick individuals who call 9-1-1 to make false reports of crimes in progress—resulting in the deployment of armed emergency responders to the elected officials’ homes.
Like Joe Biden, Trump has made promises. He has promised his followers that, if re-elected, “I will be your retribution.” He has also promised that he will be a dictator “on day one” if he is elected to a second term.
Joe Biden has kept his promise “to restore the soul, honor, dignity, and decency” of America. We should take Biden at his word that he will work to preserve democracy if re-elected in 2024.
As with Biden, we should take Trump at his word: He will exact retribution and act as a dictator on day one of his second term.
The competing promises of Trump and Biden tell us everything we need to know about the choice we face in the 2024 election.
Concluding Thoughts.
The choice between presidential candidates in 2024 could not be starker. There is no ambiguity, nuance, or grey area. We must help Joe Biden communicate that fundamental difference and help people understand that the choice in 2024 is not about policies or the economy. It is about democracy—and whether we are for it or against it.
#Robert b. Hubbell#Robert B. Hubbell Newsletter#Biden Administration#Democracy itself#the threat of vigilantism#preserving democracy#Boston Globe
140 notes
·
View notes
Text
What happens now? Judge Dearie will continue his review of the non-classified documents. We should expect that process will turn out badly for Trump. And then . . . sometime in 2023, we should expect an indictment of Trump for espionage.
“A reader asked in the Comments section yesterday whether the crime of espionage requires an intent to share the defense secrets with another party. It does not. Under Subsection (d) of the 18 USC § 793 (Espionage Act), if a person lawfully obtains possession of information harmful to the security interests of the United States (if disclosed), the person is guilty of espionage if he “willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it."
Thus, under the Espionage Act, there is no requirement of an intent to share the information with anyone. Continued possession of defense secrets after a demand for their return is espionage. That is why the DOJ will indict Trump.”
READ MORE https://roberthubbell.substack.com/p/a-good-day
88 Comments “This was quite a masterpiece Mr. Hubbell. I appreciate your excellent summary of events and the links to documents. I would also like to add Mr. Raskin's diatribe against the Republicans in the House yesterday. He gave them heck concerning the January 6 Select Committee. Here is the link:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/let-s-tell-some-truth-raskin-goes-scorched-earth-on-republicans-during-hearing-over-opposition-to-jan-6-committee/ar-AA126gqR#:~:text=View%20Profile-,%E2%80%98Let%E2%80%99s%20Tell%20Some%20Truth!%E2%80%99%20Raskin%20Goes%20Scorched%20Earth%20on%20Republicans%20During%20Hearing%20Over%20Opposition%20to%20Jan.%206%20Committee,-Michael%20Luciano%20%2D
Robert B. Hubbell 12 hr ago Author
“There is a DOJ rule against indicting within 69 days of an election. I suppose a November or December indictment is possible .”
“Is it possible for TFG to appeal the 11th Court's decion to the Supreme Court?” Robert B. Hubbell Author “Possible. Highly unlikely that the Court would grant review.”
“A terrific newsletter! To add frosting to the cake of Robert's excellent perspective, check out Lawrence Tribe's conversation Wednesday at the weekly Community Advocates/Jews United for Democracy and Justice. It's on YouTube at” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAg9rT2csgc.
COMMENTS “And may I quote constitutional law scholar Laurence Tribe, who last night stated on a Zoom with Jews United for Democracy and Justice: "The recoking is coming for the president." (Former president!) I slept well.”
Legal expert reacts to Trump's inaccurate claim about declassifying
https://youtu.be/wAkvJPd1uoI
Attorney who sued Trump over real estate properties speaks out
CNN's Jim Sciutto and Poppy Harlow discuss the New York attorney general's lawsuit against Trump accusing him of business fraud with New York real estate attorney Adam Leitman Bailey. Bailey has sued Trump in the past over his real estate properties.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H_HZlL8cJg
Trump Seems To Think His Presidential Powers Continue
“Former Chief of Staff at the Department of Homeland Security Miles Taylor, former FBI counterintelligence agent Pete Strzok, former U.S. attorney Harry Litman, and Wall Street Journal Justice Department reporter Sadie Gurman react to Trump’s claim that he declassified documents just by “thinking” about it “
364,376 views Sep 22, 2022 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDoIn23gyxg
3,612 Comments
0 notes
Text
Prez Meets Prez
Yesterday, President Biden met with President Xi Jinping, President of the People’s Republic of China, in San Francisco. I would like to share with you Robert Hubbell’s take on the meeting and what it says about the ability of our president to be exactly what he needs to be in order to help make the world a safer place for us all …
Biden In Command
16 November 2023
Robert B. Hubbell
After…
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
Building Management Market Trends, Global Industry Research, Analysis, Production Demand Ratio, Suppliers and COVID-19 Pandemic Presenting Future Opportunities 2027
"
This Building Management Market research report has a complete overview of the market, covering various aspects such as product definition, segmentation based on various parameters, and the prevailing vendor landscape. The market report consists of explicit and up-to-date information about the consumer. demands, their inclinations, and their variable likings about a particular product. The report not only saves valuable time but also adds credibility to the work that has been done to grow the business. In this winning Building Management Market business report, thorough investment analysis is offered which forecasts imminent opportunities for the market players and develops the strategies to grow return on investment (ROI).
The Building Management market research report highlights the key trends and the factors driving the industry as well as those hindering it. Moreover, it boasts of accurate data pertaining the future growth model of this domain by referencing the past and present business landscape. Further, the document offers a broader perspective by defining the size and shares of the market and its segments, unveiling the top revenue prospects in the process.
Download Sample PDF+ All Related Graphs & Charts @: https://axelreports.com/request-sample/141342
(Note: The sample of this report is updated with COVID-19 impact analysis before delivery)
By Market Verdors:
Honeywell International Inc. (U.S.)
Siemens AG (Germany)
Johnson Controls International PLC (Ireland)
Schneider Electric SE (France)
United Technologies Corp. (U.S.)
Robert Bosch GmbH (Germany)
Legrand SA (France)
Hubbell Inc. (U.S.)
ABB Ltd. (Switzerland)
Ingersoll-Rand Plc (Ireland)
Lutron Electronics Co., Inc. (U.S.)
Crestron Electronics, Inc. (U.S.)
BuildingIQ (U.S.)
By Types:
Facility Management
Security Management
Energy Management
Infrastructure Management
Emergency Management
By Applications:
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
A detailed outline of the Global Building Management Market includes a comprehensive analysis of different verticals of businesses. North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Africa, and Europe have been considered for the studies on the basis of several terminologies.
Table of Content:
Market Overview: It includes six chapters, research scope, major manufacturers covered, market segments by type, Neutral and Extra Neutral Alcohol market segments by application, study objectives, and years considered.
Market Landscape: Here, the competition in the Worldwide Neutral and Extra Neutral Alcohol Market is analyzed, by price, revenue, sales, and market share by company, market rate, competitive situations Landscape, and latest trends, merger, expansion, acquisition, and market shares of top companies.
Profiles of Manufacturers: Here, leading players of the global Neutral and Extra Neutral Alcohol market are studied based on sales area, key products, gross margin, revenue, price, and production.
Market Status and Outlook by Region: In this section, the report discusses about gross margin, sales, revenue, production, market share, CAGR, and market size by region. Here, the global Neutral and Extra Neutral Alcohol Market is deeply analysed on the basis of regions and countries such as North America, Europe, China, India, Japan, and the MEA.
Application or End User: This section of the research study shows how different end-user/application segments contribute to the global Neutral and Extra Neutral Alcohol Market.
Market Forecast: Production Side: In this part of the report, the authors have focused on production and production value forecast, key producers forecast, and production and production value forecast by type.
Research Findings and Conclusion: This is one of the last sections of the report where the findings of the analysts and the conclusion of the research study are provided.
Key Questions Covered in the Report :
What is the total market value of the Global Building Management Market report?
What would be the forecast period in the market report?
What is the market value of the Global Building Management Market in 2021?
What is the Key Industry Leader’s opinion for the Global Building Management?
Which is the base year calculated in the Global Building Management Market Report?
What are the key trends in the Global Building Management Market Report?
What are the market values/growth % of emerging countries?
Which market holds the maximum market share of the Global Building Management Market?
Do You Have Any Query Or Specific Requirement? Ask to Our Industry Expert @ https://axelreports.com/enquiry-before-buying/141342
Note: This content doesn’t contain all the Information of the Report please fill the form (via link) and get all interesting information just one click in PDF with the latest update with chart and Table of Content.
Any special requirements about this report, please let us know and we can provide custom report.
ABOUT Axel Reports:
Axel Reports has the most comprehensive collection of market research products and services available on the web. We deliver reports from virtually all major publications and refresh our list regularly to provide you with immediate online access to the world’s most extensive and up-to-date archive of professional insights into global markets, companies, goods, and patterns.
Contact:
Axel Reports
Akansha G (Knowledge Partner)
Office No- B 201
Pune, Maharashtra 411060
Phone: US +18488639402
Email: [email protected]/
Web: https://axelreports.com/
"
0 notes
Text
Atomska bomba: Zašto je nacisti nisu uspjeli napraviti i kako je Jugoslavija to pokušavala 3 puta
Istovremeno, toga 10.augusta 1945. godine u Hirošimu je stigao tročlani tim znanstvenika koji je vodio Sakae Shimizu (1915. – 2003.), fizičar sa Sveučilišta Kyoto. – Cijeli je grad uništen u potpunosti, ostalo je u ruševinama s posebnim mirisom smrti, sa samo nekoliko željezo-betonskih zgrada koje nalikuju duhovima – zapisao je Shimizu svoj prvi dojam nakon dolaska u Hirošimu.
On je tada započeo višednevno istraživanje koje je ušlo u povijest kao prva znanstvena studija o posljedicama atomske eksplozije u Hirošimi. Sve rezultate Shimizuovih istraživanja zatim je preuzeo general Thomas Farrell, zamjenik generala Leslieja Grovesa, vojnog voditelja projekta Manhattan te ih odnio u Ameriku…
Saradnja s Hrvatom
Četrdeset dvije godine nakon bombardiranja Hiroshime, prof. Sakae Shimizu sjedio je na ručku u jednom zagrebačkom restoranu u podsljemenskoj zoni. Društvo su mu pratili fizičari dr. Ante Ljubičić (1938. – 2018.), prof. John Howard Hubbell (1925. – 2007.) iz američkog National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) i dr. Krunoslav Pisk (76), tadašnji direktor Odjela FEP Instituta Ruđer Bošković (IRB).
Shimizu je sarađivao s Antom Ljubičićem, a obojica su s Hubbellom vodili International Radiation Physics Society. Za vrijeme ručka razgovarali smo o tome je li trebalo baciti atomsku bombu na Japan i zašto je bačena. Je li to bilo da se pokaže demonstracija sile, da se završi Drugi svjetski rat ili da se zaustave Rusi? Tijekom rasprave, Shimizu je izrekao svoje stajalište da to, bez obzira na sve razloge u prilog bombi, nije trebalo napraviti. No, Hubbell je imao drukčije mišljenje.
On je od 1943. godine bio u američkoj vojsci, a nakon kapitulacije Njemačke 1945. godine bio je u Sudetima. Da nije bačena atomska bomba, njegova jedinica bila bi poslana u rat na Pacifik, u borbu s Japancima. Stoga je Hubbell rekao Shimizuu: Čujte, ja sam bio sasvim zadovoljan što je rat završio – prisjetio se Krunoslav Pisk zanimljivog ručka s kraja 1987. godine.
– Dvije godine poslije, Institut Ruđer Bošković organizirao je veliku znanstvenu konferenciju na kojoj je sudjelovao i prof. Satoshi Yamada sa Sveučilišta Tokyo, kojega sam ugostio kao generalni direktor IRB-a. Onda mi je ispričao da je javna tajna među fizičarima u Japanu kako je moj poznanik prof. Shimizu radio na stvaranju japanske atomske bombe, ali u tome nije uspio. Da je to istina, doznao sam tek 2006. godine, kad su strani mediji objavili da su u američkoj Kongresnoj knjižnici otkriveni japanski dokumenti iz vremena Drugog svjetskog rata.
U tim je dokumentima eksplicitno pisalo da je Shimizu 1940-ih radio na ciklotronu na razvoju atomske bombe za japansku mornaricu, ali je zaključio da je to nemoguće napraviti. Možete zamisliti koji je bio stres za Shimizua kad je došao u Hirošimu. Mislio je da je atomsku bombu nemoguće napraviti, a onda je došao u Hirošimu i prvi izmjerio posljedice eksplozije – rekao je Pisk.
Školovanje u Leipzigu
Kad je atomska bomba eksplodirala nad Hirošimom, Krunoslav Pisk bio je dječačić od nepune dvije godine. – Moja obitelj je bila građanska, no kad sam rođen, otišli smo u Donju Stubicu kod roditelja moje majke, koji su bili trgovci, pa je bilo lakše živjeti. Ne mogu se sjetiti kad sam prvi put čuo za atomsku bombu, ali sam već u gimnaziji čitao tekstove i knjige Ivana Supeka pa me to na neki način i usmjerilo na studij fizike na Prirodoslovno-matematičkom fakultetu.
Supek je na predavanjima puno govorio o događajima iz vremena stvaranja atomske bombe te o svome školovanju u Leipzigu kod Wernera Heisenberga. Inače, sjećam se da sam u širem krugu moje familije jednom čuo da se rat mogao okrenuti jer su Nijemci imali tajno oružje. No, pretpostavljam da je to bilo pod utjecajem tiska u Hrvatskoj tijekom Drugog svjetskog rata -rekao je Pisk.
Povjesničari već desetljećima raspravljaju zašto nacisti nikad nisu napravili atomsku bombu. Neki tvrde da je nobelovac Werner Heisenberg (1901. – 1976.), koji je bio na čelu njemačkoga projekta stvaranja atomske bombe, namjerno usporavao projekt kako bi spriječio naciste u opaskom naumu da zavladaju svijetom. No, kad su 1993. godine postali javno dostupni transkripti iz Farm Halla, postalo je razvidno da je njemački atomski program zaostajao za savezničkim barem tri godine.
Farm Hall je kuća u jednom engleskom selu gdje su nakon kapitulacije nacista, nekoliko mjeseci boravili vodeći njemački fizičari. Kuća je imala prislušne uređaje, što Nijemci nisu znali, pa su govorili bez zadrške. Transkripti sadrže i tekst predavanja što ga je Heisenberg održao kolegama kad se doznalo da su Amerikanci bacili atomske bombe na Hirošimu i Nagasaki. Upravo je to predavanje pokazalo da je proračun koji su imali Heisenberg i njegovi saradnici bio kriv.
– Danas znamo da Nijemci nisu došli daleko s razvojem atomskog oružja, ali je i dalje enigma što je sve znao Heisenberg. Pitao sam Supeka je li ikad o tome razgovarao s Heisenbergom kojeg na Zapadu nisu voljeli jer je ostao u Njemačkoj tijekom Hitlerova režima. Heisenberg nije bio za Hitlera, ali nije htio ni da Njemačka izgubi rat, što je bilo teško pomiriti.
Supek mi je rekao: ‘Da, razgovarao sam s njim o tome’. No, Heisenberg mi je odgovorio: ‘Čujte, Supek, da niste počeli pisati romane, bili biste dobar fizičar’. Drugim riječima, Heisenberg to nikome nije želio reći, čak ni svome bivšem studentu Ivanu Supeku s kojim je ostao prijatelj do kraja života – ispričao je Krunoslav Pisk.
Naš sugovornik već godinama pokušava dokučiti i tajne jugoslavenskog nuklearnog programa. Iako je nakon Drugog svjetskog rata bila jedna od najsiromašnijih zemalja u Europi, bivša je Jugoslavija razvijala nuklearni program radi stvaranja atomske bombe. Jugoslavija je s prvim nuklearnim programom startala 1947. godine.
Dokazi o vojnom usmjerenju jugoslavenskog nuklearnog programa su u dokumentu pod naslovom “O dva bitna uslova za razvitak atomske energije” iz 1953. godine, što su ga potpisali Stevan Dedijer, Pavle Savić i Nizozemac Robert J. Walen, viši znanstveni suradnik u Vinči. U tome se dokumentu navodi da je prvi od dva cilja jugoslavenskoga programa razvoja atomske energije “proizvodnja atomskog oružja”. Drugi je cilj bio “uporaba atomske energije u gospodarstvu”. No, početkom 1960-ih Tito je iznenada obustavio program razvoja nuklearnog oružja, a razlozi za to još se propituju.
– Jugoslavija je definitivno imala aspiraciju napraviti bombu i pokušala je to tri puta: nakon Drugog svjetskog rata pa do početka 1960-ih, zatim između 1974. i 1982. te od 1982. do 1987. godine. No, problem je manjak arhivskih dokumenata u kasnijim razdobljima pa je stoga vrlo dragocjena knjiga srpskog povjesničara dr. Dragomira Bondžića ‘Između ambicija i iluzija: Nuklearna politika Jugoslavije 1945.-1990.’, prva na našim prostorima koja se u cijelosti bavi jugoslavenskim nuklearnim programom.
U toj se knjizi spominje da je Savezni sekretarijat za obranu u listopadu 1974. godine prema Titovoj direktivi izradio elaborat, kodnog imena Zadatak Kozara, u kome se spominju tri scenarija kako bi Jugoslavija mogla razviti atomsko oružje, a da se izbjegne vidljivo kršenje Međunarodnog ugovora o neširenju atomskog oružja. Zaključak je da se ide u civilni nuklearni program unutar kojeg će se skriti vojni dio. Jer, mali je korak između dobrog civilnog programa i da napravite bombu, što su uostalom napravile mnoge zemlje. Iz dokumenata u Bondžićevoj knjizi razvidno je da su u Zadatak Kozara s IRB-a bili uključeni dr. Ivo Šlaus i dr. Petar Strohal – rekao je Pisk.
Ipak, novac za nuklearni program odvojen je tek nakon Titove smrti, 1981. godine. U sklopu jugoslavenskog nuklearnog programa 1980-ih postojala su dva programa: Program A, koji je bio vojni s ciljem izrade atomske bombe, i program B, koji bi se mogao nazvati mirnodopskim, a obuhvaćao je sve nuklearne tehnologije. Na IRB-u, Program A bio je usmjeren posebno na razvoj neutronske komponente bombe, a na tome je radila skupina sastavljena od manje od deset fizičara, elektroinženjera i tehničara s IRB-a. Za smještaj tajnih djelatnosti na programu A sagrađena je nova zgrada na IRB-u, nazvana “Fesobil”.
– Naziv zgrade nastao je prema Radoslavu Despotoviću Fesu, glavnom čovjeku koji je pridonio da se ona podigne. Budući da je zgrada sagrađena nakon černobilske katastrofe, a bila je povezana s primijenjenim radom s radioaktivnim materijalima, odnosno povezana s nuklearnim elektranama, kombinacijom između nadimka Fes i nuklearne elektrane Černobil nastalo je ime Fesobil – objasnio je Krunoslav Pisk koji je pravu istinu o programu A doznao tek početkom 1990-ih.
“Idemo napraviti bombu”
– Jedan od mojih najboljih prijatelja, dr. Đuro Miljanić (1942. – 2016.), voditelj skupine na IRB-u koja je razvijala neutronsku komponentu bombe, 1990. ili 1991. godine ispričao mi je sve o nuklearnom programu 1980-ih. Nikad nisam osjećao ljutnju prema Đuri što sam naknadno doznao istinu o tome što se radilo na IRB-u. Jer, moram reći da ne znam što bih ja napravio da je mene netko pozvao iz vrha države da se pridružim tajnom projektu razvoja atomske bombe.
Primjerice, što bi bilo da je meni predsjednik Tuđman, koji se sa mnom šalio na račun atomske bombe, ozbiljno rekao: ‘Kruno, idemo napraviti bombu’. Ne znam što bih učinio – zaključio je Pisk. Potvrdu o postojanju tajnog jugoslavenskog nuklearnog programa dobio je i od dr. Božidara Matića (1937. – 2016.), ministra znanosti u saveznoj vladi Branka Mikulića te čelnog čovjeka Energoinvesta od 1989. do 1993. godine.
– Kad sam 1992. ili 1993. godine telefonski razgovarao s Božom Matićem, koji je tada bio u opkoljenom Sarajevu, potvrdio mi je postojanje nuklearnog programa kodnog imena Sutjeska. Inače, u članku objavljenom 2000. godine u časopisu Bulletin of Nuclear Scientists, Đuro Miljanić je s Williamom Potterom i Ivom Šlausom opisao jugoslavenski nuklearni program nakon 1980-ih i ulogu sarajevske kompanije Energoinvest. Iz onoga što su mi Božo Matić i Đuro Miljanić rekli, spoznao sam da se u razvoju jugoslavenske atomske bombe nije došlo daleko, ali da je realizacija bila moguća.
Projekt Sutjeska bio je u potpunosti vojni i vjerujem da će se jednog dana, kad se otvore arhivi bivše Jugoslavenske narodne armije, naći dokumenti koji će nam potvrditi osobna svjedočanstva ljudi koji su bili upućeni u jugoslavenski nuklearni program – zaključio je Krunoslav Pisk prenosi Jutarnji.
Izvor
0 notes
Text
Kary B. Mullis, 74, Dies; Found a Way to Analyze DNA and Won Nobel
Kary B. Mullis, a biochemist who won the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for discovering a way to analyze DNA easily and cheaply and thus pave the way for major advances in medical diagnostics, molecular biology and forensic science, died on Aug. 7 at his home in Newport Beach, Calif. He was 74.
The cause was heart and respiratory failure brought on by pneumonia, his wife, Nancy Cosgrove Mullis, said.
The process for analyzing DNA that Dr. Mullis invented is called polymerase chain reaction, or PCR. It replicates a single strand of DNA millions of times, enabling scientists to pinpoint a segment of the strand and amplify it for identification. Polymerase, an enzyme that synthesizes polymers and nucleic acids, is essential in creating DNA and RNA, the molecules that are responsible for coding DNA.
Before PCR, amplifying DNA took weeks, because it had to be generated in bacteria. Once Dr. Mullis’s process was perfected, it took only hours, opening up a world of possibilities.
Today, his method is used to detect genetic mutations that can lead to diagnoses of diseases, like sickle cell anemia; analyze ancient sources of DNA, like bones; assist in obtaining crime scene evidence; and determine paternity.
It was used as well to decode and map the entire human DNA as part of the Human Genome Project, the landmark international research effort that ran from 1990 to 2003.
As he told the story in his Nobel lecture, Dr. Mullis found his inspiration one night in 1983 while driving to his cabin in Mendocino, Calif.
At the time, Dr. Mullis was a lab director for Cetus Corporation, one of the first biotechnology companies, which had been founded in Berkeley, Calif. His lab made short strands of DNA molecules called oligonucleotides, and had become so efficient at it that it was making more than the company could use. Worried that some of his lab workers might be laid off because of their overproductivity, Dr. Mullis was searching for a way to use more of the molecules.
As he drove, he considered the challenges scientists faced in decoding and identifying problems in human DNA. There are billions of DNA base pairs, he knew, but they had proved exceedingly difficult to analyze because there was no easy way to focus on small groups of them.
Dr. Mullis knew that the oligonucleotides bond easily with DNA. The problem was how to isolate the DNA that scientists might want to analyze. Dr. Mullis, pondering ways to control the oligonucleotides, suddenly realized that they didn’t have to be controlled at all. The bonding would have a useful side effect: It would double the amount of DNA that scientists were interested in. The process could then be repeated over and over, expanding the DNA sample exponentially. It would be like pumping up a microbe to the size of a dinosaur.
Indeed, the science of PCR, because it allows for the unlimited replication of small bits of DNA, was one of the inspirations of “Jurassic Park,” the Michael Crichton novel about a theme park of cloned dinosaurs that Steven Spielberg turned into a movie franchise.
Though Dr. Mullis came up with the concept of PCR, proving that it worked was another matter; months after his breakthrough, he had still not done so. He had not written a paper to validate his idea.
“Mullis as an experimentalist is sort of hit and miss,” Thomas J. White, who got Dr. Mullis his job at Cetus, told The New York Times in 1998.
As a result, two other Cetus scientists, Randall K. Saiki and Henry A. Erlich, were put on the project, and the three published a paper about the process in 1985. No one, however, disputed that it was Dr. Mullis who had first figured it out.
For his discovery, Cetus awarded Dr. Mullis $10,000, but the company later sold the rights to his PCR process to the pharmaceutical giant F. Hoffmann-La Roche for $300 million. Dr. Mullis, believing he had been denied a just reward, remained bitter about it for the rest of his life.
He shared his Nobel Prize with Michael Smith, a British-born scientist, who was also cited for advances in DNA research.
In 1995, defense lawyers in the murder trial of O.J. Simpson enlisted Dr. Mullis as an expert witness because his PCR method had been used to analyze blood samples in the case. But he was ultimately not called to testify; prosecutors had made it clear that if he did take the stand they would try to undermine his credibility by bringing up his acknowledged history of drinking and drug use.
Kary Banks Mullis was born on Dec. 28, 1944, in Lenoir, N.C. He was the second of four sons of Cecil and Bernice Alberta (Barker) Mullis. His father was a furniture salesman. The family moved to Columbia, S.C., when Kary was 5. He got his start in science there one summer when, at 13, he designed and made his own rockets, inspired by the launch of the Soviet satellite Sputnik.
Dr. Mullis attended Dreher High School in Columbia and the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, graduating in 1966 with a degree in chemistry. He then headed to California, arriving in Berkeley around the time of the Summer of Love in 1967. As he spoke and wrote about it in later years, he used L.S.D. liberally. He earned his Ph.D. in biochemistry from the University of California, Berkeley, in 1972.
Dr. Mullis took a detour from science after that, trying his hand at writing fiction and then managing a bakery for two years. He then headed for Kansas, where his wife at the time was enrolling in medical school. He did a postdoctoral research fellowship in pediatric cardiology at the University of Kansas Medical Center, finishing in 1977. He returned to California and went to work at Cetus in 1979.
After the discovery of PCR, his career trailed off. He quit Cetus in 1986 and thereafter mostly stuck to the lecture circuit.
Dr. Mullis’s marriages to Richards Haley, Gail Hubbell and Cynthia Gibson ended in divorce. He married Nancy Cosgrove in 1997. Along with her, he is survived by a daughter, Louise Olsen; two sons, Christopher and Jeremy; two brothers, Brent and David; and two grandchildren. Another brother, Robert, died several years ago.
Dr. Mullis was naturally contrarian and none too fond of many scientists. “Scientists are doing an awful lot of damage to the world in the name of helping it,” he told The Times in 1998. “I don’t mind attacking my own fraternity because I am ashamed of it.”
One reviewer called Dr. Mullis’s 1998 book an “autobiography of the nervous system of an extraordinary chemist.”
He was skeptical of climate science and expressed doubts that H.I.V. causes AIDS, though Ms. Mullis said he had been misunderstood. “He thought it was premature to assign blame to one tiny retrovirus,” she said.
In 1998, Dr. Mulls gathered some of his controversial ideas — and unfiltered moments — into a book, “Dancing Naked in the Mind Field.” In one anecdote, on receiving the prestigious Japan Prize for his research, he recalled meeting the empress of Japan and calling her “Sweetie.”
In The New York Times Book Review, the science writer Dick Teresi called the book “darkly joyous” and an “autobiography of the nervous system of an extraordinary chemist.”
Sahred From Source link Science
from WordPress http://bit.ly/305b9Ud
via IFTTT
0 notes
Text
Commercial Building Automation Market to boom exhibiting a CAGR of 4.3% From 2016-2024
Global Commercial Building Automation Market: Snapshot
The global commercial building automation market is highly likely to experience surge in demand for energy-conservative processes and reduction of overall operating costs, especially in the government buildings’ segment. Government initiatives for constructing green buildings and the rising primary focus on green building by more companies are the key contributors to the growth of the global commercial building automation market. Other factors driving it include a gain in demand for building automation within the small and medium sized buildings segments after the growing use of include energy consumption analytics, the need to improve occupant comfort level and mental satisfaction for environment-conscious buyers.
The global commercial building automation market is likely to reach US$77.63 bn by the end of 2016. In terms of revenue, this market is expected to reach US$108.49 bn by 2024, after expanding at a steady CAGR of 4.3% from 2016 to 2024.
Read Report Sample @
https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=S&rep_id=2070
Very High Focus Gained by HVAC in Global Commercial Building Automation Market
Power supply, interfacing components, room automation, HVAC systems, security and surveillance, and illumination and light sensors are the commonly known types of products within the global commercial building automation market. Of these, HVAC systems are expected to be lead the market between 2016 and 2024. The power supply market is also a strong segment within the global commercial building automation market and is further segmented into UPS, battery modules and others.
By type of material, the global commercial building automation market is divided into lighting control and regulation, interfacing and inter-working with other building systems, blind and shutter control, temperature control and regulation, energy and load management, security and fault monitoring, visualization & remote control and monitoring, reporting, display. Among these, in terms of revenue, temperature control and regulation held the leading share in the market for 2015, followed by lighting control and regulations. It is very likely that both segments will retain their spots in the global commercial building automation market over the coming years.
Read Report Brochure @
https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=B&rep_id=2070
North America Strikes Dominant Chord in Global Commercial Building Automation Market
Based on the geography, the global commercial building automation market is segmented into North America, Europe, Asia Pacific and the rest of the world. North America held the top value share in 2015, followed by Europe. Both regions are expected to remain at the same spots from 2016 to 2024. The global commercial building automation market generates a substantial volume of revenue from a few end users. The overall demand for energy conservation and reducing the overall operating cost is one of the key factors driving the market for commercial building automation market in North America as well as Europe. Asia Pacific, on the other hand is expected to show a fast growth rate in its demand for commercial building automation systems, but is currently being stifled by factors such as a slow rate of ROI for builders due to the high installation costs.
Key players active in the global commercial building automation market for 2015 included ABB Ltd. (Switzerland), Honeywell International Inc. (United States), Cisco Systems Inc. (United States), Ingersoll Rand Plc. (Ireland), Hubbell Inc. (United States), Robert Bosch GmbH (Germany), Johnson Controls International plc. (United States), United Technologies Corp. (United States) Schneider Electric SE (France), and Siemens AG (Germany).
0 notes
Text
Commercial Building Automation Market: Rising Primary Focus on Green Building by More Companies
The global commercial building automation market is growing at a significant rate as the need for energy-efficient buildings in increasing. Companies and governments of various regions have shifted their focus on constructing green building which has led to the growth of commercial building automation market. Various initiatives such as mergers and acquisitions, launching improved products, and penetrating into new markets played a crucial role in the development of commercial building automation market. The market is highly fragmented owing to the presence of large number of regional players. Few of the prominent players operating in the global commercial building automation market include Honeywell International Inc. (U.S), ABB Ltd. (Switzerland), Ingersoll Rand Plc. (Ireland), Robert Bosch GmbH (Germany), Hubbell Inc. (U.S), Siemens AG (Germany), Johnson Controls International plc. (U.S), Schneider Electric SE (France), and Cisco Systems Inc. (U.S) among others.
The commercial building automation market was valued at US$77.63 billion in 2016 and is anticipated to reach at US$108.49 billion by the end of 2024 globally. The market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 4.3% steadily during the forecast period. According to product segment, the global commercial building automation market is bifurcated into interfacing components, HVAC systems, light sensors, power supply, security & surveillance, and room automation. Among these, HVAC system segment is likely to dominate the market in the forecast period.
Request to View Sample of Report -
https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=S&rep_id=2070
As per material, temperature and lighting control segments are expected to retain their positions in the forecast period 2015-202 too. The global commercial building automation market is divided into different regions which include Europe, North America, Asia Pacific, and some other regions. Europe and North America are anticipated to hold the majority market share throughout the forecast period. Energy-efficiency and cost-effectiveness is one of the main driving factors for the growth of commercial building automation market in North America and Europe. Also, Asia Pacific is expected to grow at a significant rate owing to the increasing demand for this market.
Construction Sector to Drive the Global Building Automation Market at a Significant Rate
The global commercial building automation market is expanding and is expected to see lucrative growth due to the continuous developments in construction sector. With the rising economic growth, demand for construction projects has increased across the globe. Regions such as Middle East and Africa possess a powerful base in terms of commercial building automation and therefore, is estimated to drive the market growth in the coming years. Rapid development in the construction sector has also led to reduce volumes of materials coupled with less use of power. Adding to this, the governments have imposed various strict guidelines over the effective utilization of resources as environmental pollution has been increasing over past few years. This is estimated to positively impact the commercial building automation development in the coming years.
Low Investment Return and High-value to Restrict Growth of Commercial Building Automation Market
Although the market is growing worldwide yet there are some challenges faced by commercial building automation system. The cost involved in maintaining, operating, and installing these systems is higher. Due to these high costs, the new entrants are finding it difficult to penetrate into the market. Also, the low rate of return is impeding the adoption of commercial building automation to the end-users. In the coming years, this factor is predicted to create some issues for the small players in commercial building automation market globally.
Request to View Brochure of Report -
https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=B&rep_id=2070
0 notes
Last Seen Blogs
kosmic-autokrat
go witness what is truly beautiful.
rosalina-s-blog
Rosalina
tarotreadingculvercity
Psychic in Culver City
diehardrocketshipper
Oh hello there!
0ruguitas
This is a safe space for bullying LMM