Tumgik
#Senator Harris
samanthasgone · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Credit: penaltyboxpodcast ( Instagram )
Shining a spotlight on the trailblazers and game-changers who bring power, skill, and diversity to the ice. 🏒🌟 #NHL #Hockey
104 notes · View notes
girlactionfigure · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
70 notes · View notes
Text
23 notes · View notes
Text
Republican members of the Texas state legislature introduced a slate of bills Thursday designed to subvert election processes and curb voting rights in the state. One of them would even allow the Texas Secretary of State to overturn election results in the state’s largest Democratic-leaning county, with very little rationale for doing so.
On Thursday, Republican state senators introduced Senate Bill 1993, a bill targeting Harris County, a diverse region that includes Houston and is also the most populous county in Texas, to a Senate committee for debate.
SB 1993 would grant Secretary of State Jane Nelson (R) the authority to order a new election in Harris County “if the secretary has good cause to believe that at least 2% of the total number of polling places in the county did not receive supplemental ballots,” according to the bill text. Secretary Nelson would have the same authority granted to a district court.
The bill would “allow really low thresholds” for ordering a new election, Katya Ehresman, the voting rights program manager at Common Cause Texas, told TPM. “Anything from a machine malfunction, which can necessarily be the fault of the county or of an election administrator getting stuck in traffic—which in Houston is incredibly likely—and having a delay in providing election results to the central count station,” she said.
The bill was introduced alongside over a dozen other bills seeking to restrict voter access and overhaul the state’s elections process. Senate Bill 260, for example, would allow the Secretary to suspend election administrators without cause, and Senate Bill 1070 would enable Texas to withdraw from the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), a bipartisan program that maintains voter rolls across state lines that has recently been targeted by far-right propaganda.
State Republicans quietly introduced the bills in the State Affairs Committee on Thursday morning—without giving the mandatory 48-hour notice. “Every part of today’s hearing highlights the subversive attacks on elections in Texas,” Ehresman said, “and (SB) 1993 is a part of that.”
With a population of nearly 5 million, Harris County is the most populous county in Texas and the third most populous in the U.S. It became the subject of right-wing conspiracy theories back in 2020, when the county experienced some technical difficulties as election officials tried to change procedures to make voting safer during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Secretary of State’s office conducted an audit of the general election. They found that the county “had very serious issues in the handling of electronic media,” but none of those issues actually amounted to voter fraud.
Harris County saw issues again in 2022, however, as state and local Republicans went after the county’s election administrations by recruiting and deploying poll watchers throughout the county. This prompted local Democrats to request federal observers instead. On Election Day, the county did experience several issues that often take place in more urban counties, like polling sites opening late and some running out of paper ballots, among other things.
The Texas GOP, including Gov. Greg Abbott, seized the opportunity to accuse county officials of “election improprieties,” and 22 right-wing candidates used it as an excuse to challenge their losses. Still, there was no evidence of widespread fraud.
State Democrats argue that the introduction of a flood of anti-voting legislation targeting Harris County has all been a retaliation against the county turning blue back in 2018.
“A lot of what we see is Harris County as an example of a need to invest in election administration and not penalize or detract from it,” Ehresman said.
101 notes · View notes
wojakgallery · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
Title/Name: Harry S. Truman, (1884–1972). Bio: American politician, senator, 33rd president of the United States, serving from 1945 to 1953. And briefly as the 34th vice president in 1945 under Franklin D. Roosevelt. Country: USA Wojak Series: Bloomer (Variant) Image by: Unknown Main Tag: Truman Wojak
7 notes · View notes
chl-owo-e · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
Guys help. HES GOT ME OBSESSED I LOVE SEBASTIAN SO MUCH
44 notes · View notes
awesomecooperlove · 1 year
Text
🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
💣⏰💥
74 notes · View notes
Text
Shoutout to part of my faves, from crazy bitches, depressed old dudes, morally dubious bastards, softies like-a-horse-kick and the nerdy motherfucker that i find cute. Love y'all.
74 notes · View notes
trainwrecksys · 29 days
Text
hey maybe im just a killjoy but i much prefer the interpretation of silence of the lambs where hannibal and clarice ARENT shipped??? like just because harris did it himself for... some reason doesnt mean its good. i like the much less creepy way better is that bad is that a controversial opinion? the answer is no i'm just an honest movie and book fan that was trying to find any one post appreciating crawford (i just read the bit where he cries on the sidewalk and im brocken </3) and saw a few posts i didnt want to see now hannibal and will?????? i mean. it is much less creepy HEAR ME OUT if its not a murderer behind plexiglass x a female student who is sexualised by nearly every man around her anyway yanno? i can see there would be a better (not less toxic but just better storywise) ship between lecter and graham and i'll read red dragon then give my input but i have seen the movie and i would ship bc i love toxic mlm .that says a lot about me. realising how most of my oc ships are . toxic mlm. and the only lesbian couple are... very healthy and the only straight one got... violently ended. anyway i just .power dynamics. i suppose
what shpuld you take away from this post? i hate tumblr sometimes but i am also a tumblr child
5 notes · View notes
anghraine · 1 year
Text
At 97% of the vote counted, the race is still close (51 Warnock/49 Walker), but 2/3 of the remaining vote is coming from either blue or extremely blue areas, which was good enough for ABC News. They've called it for Warnock!
Looks like it'll be a real Senate majority, y'all.
46 notes · View notes
Photo
Tumblr media
Give me a moment as I imagine George W. Bush telling Ted Kennedy to relax before slipping his cock in him. Meanwhile Harry Reid and Frank Murkowski wait their turn.
25 notes · View notes
Text
Missouri House advances bill allowing guns on buses, inside churches and synagogues
By Kacen Bayless and Maia Bond
Missourians would be allowed to carry guns on public buses and inside churches and other places of worship under a bill advanced by the Missouri House Thursday.
The bill, sponsored by Rep. Adam Schnelting, a St. Charles Republican, would allow people with concealed carry permits to carry guns on public transit in the state.
“We all have the potential of running into situations where we have to utilize self defense to protect ourselves and those we love,” Schnelting said on the floor Thursday. “This legislation will discourage criminal activity on our public transportation systems, but most importantly, it will ensure that we maintain our constitutional right to self defense.”
An amendment successfully added by state Rep. Ben Baker, a Neosho Republican, would also strike down the current rule banning concealed guns in places of worship without the permission of the religious leader of the congregation.
The Missouri House gave the bill initial approval on a voice vote Thursday. It will need one more vote before it heads to the Missouri Senate, which could come next week.
Democrats on Thursday criticized the legislation, saying it would broaden Missouri’s already loose gun laws as the state sees high rates of gun violence in the state’s urban areas.
“What kind of world are we creating with these kinds of laws? It’s absolute insanity, and it’s morally corrupt,” state Rep. Barbara Phifer, a St. Louis Democrat, said on the floor Thursday, referring to the amendment that allowed guns in churches.
The legislation comes amid instances of gun violence on Kansas City buses in recent years. In 2021, three people, including a police officer and a bus driver, were wounded in a shooting on a RideKC bus by a suspect in an alleged robbery. In 2017, another man was shot on a RideKC bus in downtown Kansas City after an altercation.
Kansas City saw its second-deadliest year in history in 2022 with 171 killings, marking the third year in a row with high reports of violence.
More than 150 people submitted testimony in favor of the bill when it was in the House Emerging Issues Committee earlier this month. Most supporters cited the need to protect themselves from potential criminals on buses.
Representatives and lobbyists from organizations and transit associations in the major cities in Missouri – Kansas City, St. Louis, Springfield and Jefferson City – all testified against the bill.
Jennifer Harris Dault, a St. Louis Mennonite pastor, told The Star Thursday she was disappointed that Republicans were trying to allow guns in churches while ignoring calls to enact gun regulations. Mennonites are historically peaceful and her congregation would not believe in bringing guns for personal protection.
“The idea that someone could legally bring a gun into our worship space, I don’t even want to think about it,” she said. “That’s so foreign to who we are. It would be basically an attack on our religious liberty.”
The bill does include a provision that would still allow places of worship to prohibit firearms if they post signage that they’re not allowed on the property.
William Bland, a member of the Western Missouri Shooters Alliance, previously wrote to Missouri lawmakers in favor of the bill, saying that current law prevents Missourians from exercising their constitutional right to carry.
“This is especially dangerous late at night. CCW permit holders are not the problem. They have been photographed, fingerprinted, investigated, and vetted. They have to demonstrate competency with a firearm,” he wrote. Bland did not return a call for comment Thursday.
Kimberly Cella, the executive director of the Missouri Public Transit Association, told The Star that allowing guns on public transit would seriously jeopardize federal funding.
Cella said transit providers like OATS Transit and SMTS, Inc., which are both non-profit transit providers for most rural areas of the state, would likely face issues with gathering funding.
Those providers, Cella said, have private contracts and receive federal funding, and there are requirements in those contracts that prohibit guns on transit. The bill would jeopardize those contracts and the matched federal funding, Cella said.
Both St. Louis and Kansas City’s transit systems are bi-state operations governed by a federal compact that prohibits guns on public transit, and Cella said it is her understanding that that compact would supersede the bill and not apply to transit in those cities.
Cella said there is no proof that more guns make transit safer, and she said it puts staff members like bus drivers in more danger.
“What we’re saying is if we impair the ability of transit providers to deliver service by passage of CCW in transit, we’re really going to impact the state’s bottom line as well,” Cella said.
19 notes · View notes
machetelanding · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
8 notes · View notes
nodynasty4us · 1 year
Link
She can travel instead of staying close to Washington to cast tie-breaking votes in the Senate.
9 notes · View notes
whatemidoing · 1 year
Text
Want to make sure control of the Senate isn't decided by a runoff again? Help Catherine Cortez-Masto pull it off in Nevada. Thousands of ballots won't count due to signature issues unless resolved
Call to voter with incomplete ballots through Nov. 14!
5 notes · View notes