Tumgik
#WOMAN'S VAGINA
rainbowmothed · 10 days
Text
AND THE WINNER OF HOTTEST HAZBIN WOMAN...
Tumblr media
VAGGIE!! congrats on winning my beloved little girl failure <3
she reminds me of a wet cat
Tumblr media
get you a girl who can do both. anyway!! this was fun and ill likely do more polls in the future <3 ly guys and thank u for voting
69 notes · View notes
sunny-blue · 9 months
Text
Barbie movie be like: you’ve seen and felt the pain that patriarchy will inflict on you,do you still choose this?you choose to be a woman,be yourself,endure this pain?do you choose girlhood,despite everything you will lose?and the answer is yes.
224 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
I love her, your honor 🥹
Gwendoline and her characters have me in a chokehold ❤️
607 notes · View notes
philsrosesweatshirt · 1 month
Text
women are great 🤝 fyi i like vagina
64 notes · View notes
sharkgirldick · 4 months
Text
Transphobes will find the thinnest logic possible to call a trans woman a pedophile and act like they said something with any actual weight.
66 notes · View notes
radically-annoyed · 6 months
Text
I think for this Halloween I’m gonna dress up as the word woman, since so many of you are so fucking scared of that word
117 notes · View notes
johnny1note · 9 months
Text
Barbie (2023) is thematically a traditionalist satire and I'm not kidding, the subtext theses are:
Liberal feminism is based in unreality, requiring women to place no value on male attention and agency, and sexuality in general, and this will catch up with them even if they're able to temporarily compartmentalize and deny the importance of these things.
Radical feminism is also based in unreality: firstly in the sense that women must consciously perform femininity in order to get ahead, and secondly that many "social constructs" in the radical feminist paradigm are really just aspects of woman's essential nature.
The mature, adult thing to do is to reject both utopias (the femininity-performing liberal feminist one, and the power-holding radical feminist one) and embrace the biological reality of womanhood and its telos: motherhood.
76 notes · View notes
dullahandyke · 3 months
Text
Also sorry to keep banging on about it but 'the barbie move was soooo trans positive' WHERE. how
33 notes · View notes
Text
Still not really over how the 90m mattel ad was so universally praised and that people said it was misogyny that it got snubbed at the Oscars when it was the safest, most toothless form of feminism imaginable.
25 notes · View notes
Note
tw for graphic body description:
as someone who has been with a fully transitioned TIM (transwoman) during my TRA phase (which is over now), I can say with certainty that neovaginas are completely different from natural vaginas.
The myth TRAs promote of neovaginas being "indisinguishable" from natural vaginas has officially been debunked.
Some examples i noticed when i was with this TIM are:
-they are completely smooth inside, similar to inner cheek lining, but much firmer. there are no ripples, no soft spots no organ structure, nothing like a real vagina inside. It is just a tube.
-no muscle structure
-no stretch
-no clitoris (this TIM did not have an artificial one augmented either but i'd be able to tell the difference between real and fake)
-he pees out of his neovagina
-daily dilation is required for these surgical wounds
Hope this helps anybody (especially lesbians) being gaslit by the TRA community.
x
145 notes · View notes
healingheartdogs · 5 months
Text
Men can have vaginas. Women can have penises. Being a lesbian is not about "only liking pussy". Being gay is not about "only liking dick". Those are transphobic and intersex exclusive statements.
The "sex" in "sexuality" is not referring to assigned sex at birth or the most common presentations of assigned sex genitalia. It refers to sexual attraction. Queer sexual attraction is gender and/or shared queer experience based. Gender is not the same as assigned sex at birth or genitalia. If your personal sexual attraction is based on assigned sex at birth and specific genitalia and you use a queer sexuality label you are appropriating that label and participating not only in transphobia and intersex exclusion from queer communities but also in homophobia.
Stop appropriating queer sexualities and then trying to kick out people who actually belong under that label because you want to make a little exclusion based bigot club for yourselves.
21 notes · View notes
coochiequeens · 1 month
Text
The Canadian government wasn't confused about the term Woman before 1918. (That’s when Canadian women won their fight for the vote)
By Anna Slatz March 13, 2024
The Supreme Court of Canada has asserted that a lower court judge should not have referred to a sexual assault victim as “a woman,” a term which they claim was “unfortunate and engendered confusion.” The ruling, published on March 8, goes on to imply that the more effective term would be “person with a vagina.”
The case being discussed was that of Christopher James Kruk, a man from Maple Ridge, British Columbia who had been convicted of sexually assaulting a woman in 2020. According to past news coverage of the initial charges, the incident occurred the night of May 26, 2017, after Kruk encountered a heavily intoxicated woman in the city’s urban center. Kruk reportedly offered to ensure the woman got home safely, and then brought her to his residence via the SkyTrain and a taxi.
At some point during the journey, he called the woman’s mother on his cellphone to let her know that he was going to bring her daughter home. But instead, the woman reportedly passed out or fell asleep at Kruk’s home. Meanwhile, her mother was frantically calling Kruk, ringing him more than 20 times over an almost two-hour period without any response from the man.
The victim testified at the first trial that she woke up to find Kruk penetrating her, and that she tried and failed to push him off through her disorientation.
At around 4 a.m., many hours after Kruk had initially called her mother and told her she would be brought home, the woman’s father and brother managed to track down Kruk’s address using information from taxi cab drivers, and arrived in his neighborhood. When the woman heard her father’s voice calling out for her from the street, the woman rushed out the door wearing only her sweatshirt and underwear. She told her brother she had been raped, and filed a police complaint.
In his defense, Kruk claimed he never penetrated the woman, and that she had simply become startled when he had tried to wake her up, misinterpreting the sudden sensation as rape. He also claimed her pants were off because she had spilled water on them and that she had removed them herself while intoxicated earlier that evening.
Finding Kruk’s defense “fanciful,” Justice Michael Tammen found Kruk guilty of sexual assault in 2020, in part because he asserted that it would have been “extremely unlikely that a woman would be mistaken” about the feeling of penile penetration.
Tumblr media
But a 2022 appeals court overruled Kruk’s conviction and ordered a new trial, arguing that Tammen had “engaged in speculative reasoning” and “made an assumption on a matter that was not so well known as to be notorious, that was not capable of immediate and accurate proof by resort to a readily accessible source of indisputable accuracy, or that was a matter of common sense.”
The Supreme Court of Canada has now found the appeals court erred in overturning Tammen’s conviction of Kruk, determining that Tammen had acted appropriately in the case. But despite upholding Tammen’s initial arguments, Justice Sheilah Martin took issue with Tammen’s description of the victim as “a woman.”
While she disagreed with the appeals court’s argument that Tammen’s ruling relied on “speculation” as to whether the sensation of penile penetration was readily identifiable, Martin did imply that the terminology needed to be changed.
“Where a person with a vagina testifies credibly and with certainty that they felt penile‑vaginal penetration, a trial judge must be entitled to conclude that they are unlikely to be mistaken,” Martin wrote.
“While the choice of the trial judge to use the words ‘a woman’ may have been unfortunate and engendered confusion, in context, it is clear the judge was reasoning that it was extremely unlikely that the complainant would be mistaken about the feeling of penile‑vaginal penetration because people generally, even if intoxicated, are not mistaken about that sensation.”
Martin does not specify what about the word “woman” could have “engendered confusion.”
The ruling, first highlighted by Canadian journalist Tristin Hopper, comes on the heels of recent controversy surrounding an updated guidebook on general practice issued by the Federal Court of Canada which references pronoun use.
According to the guidebook, “the Court invites counsel, parties and witnesses to provide information about the correct pronunciation of their names (phonetic or syllabic spelling), titles (Dr., Mrs., Mr., Ms., Miss, Mx., etc.) and pronouns (she, he, they, etc.) prior to and at the outset of proceedings.”
While amended in late December of 2023, screenshots from the guidebook began circulating on social media in February of this year, prompting backlash from those concerned with gender ideology’s impact on Canada’s judicial system. While some feared the process may be mandatory, Reduxx reached out to the Federal Court and was informed that was not the case.
“It is important to note that this is simply an invitation. Participants before the Court remain free to proceed in the manner that they prefer,” the Office of the Chief Justice of the Federal Court stated.
14 notes · View notes
m4ndysk4nkovich · 3 months
Text
you know how ive told you guys that people think im homophobic when i make gay jokes because they cant tell im a lesbian? well, maybe you dont, but it happened again and idk what to do. i made a joke that from a straight woman, would sound homophobic, and i made it in a gc with my two best friends and their other friend. we’re all gay, and the other friend knows i’m a lesbian- after i made the joke i literally clarified. but he got mad and kicked me out of the gc and i can’t join again and i’m literally so confused because i keep getting accused of being homophobic… i literally love women, i have a girlfriend
12 notes · View notes