#Wrongful Death Lawyer in Georgia | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

dreaminginthedeepsouth · 4 months

Text

Clay Jones

* * * *

LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN

December 29, 2023

HEATHER COX RICHARDSON

DEC 29, 2023

When asked at a town hall on Wednesday to identify the cause of the United States Civil War, presidential candidate and former governor of South Carolina Nikki Haley answered that the cause “was basically how government was going to run, the freedoms, and what people could and couldn’t do…. I think it always comes down to the role of government and what the rights of the people are…. And I will always stand by the fact that, I think, government was intended to secure the rights and freedoms of the people.”

Haley has correctly been lambasted for her rewriting of history. The vice president of the Confederacy, Alexander Stephens of Georgia, was quite clear about the cause of the Civil War. Stephens explicitly rejected the idea embraced by U.S. politicians from the revolutionary period onward that human enslavement was “wrong in principle, socially, morally, and politically.” Instead, he declared: “Our new government is founded upon…the great truth, that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery—subordination to the superior race—is his natural and normal condition.”

President Joe Biden put the cause of the Civil War even more succinctly: “It was about slavery.”

Haley has been backpedaling ever since—as well as suggesting that the question was somehow a “gotcha” question from a Democrat, as if it was a difficult question to answer—but her answer was not simply bad history or an unwillingness to offend potential voters, as some have suggested. It was the death knell of the Republican Party.

That party formed in the 1850s to stand against what was known as the Slave Power, a small group of elite enslavers who had come to dominate first the Democratic Party and then, through it, the presidency, Supreme Court, and Senate. When northern Democrats in the House of Representatives caved to pressure to allow enslavement into western lands from which it had been prohibited since 1820, northerners of all political stripes recognized that it was only a question of time until elite enslavers took over the West, joined with lawmakers from southern slave states, overwhelmed the northern free states in the House of Representatives, and made enslavement national.

So in 1854, after Congress passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act that allowed the spread of enslavement into previously protected western lands, northerners abandoned their old parties and came together first as “anti-Nebraska” coalitions and then, by 1856, as the Republican Party.

At first their only goal was to stop the Slave Power, but in 1859, Illinois lawyer Abraham Lincoln articulated an ideology for the new party. In contrast to southern Democrats, who insisted that a successful society required leaders to dominate workers and that the government must limit itself to defending those leaders because its only domestic role was the protection of property, Lincoln envisioned a new kind of government, based on a new economy.

Lincoln saw a society that moved forward thanks not to rich people, but to the innovation of men just starting out. Such men produced more than they and their families could consume, and their accumulated capital would employ shoemakers and storekeepers. Those businessmen, in turn, would support a few industrialists, who would begin the cycle again by hiring other men just starting out. Rather than remaining small and simply protecting property, Lincoln and his fellow Republicans argued, the government should clear the way for those at the bottom of the economy, making sure they had access to resources, education, and the internal improvements that would enable them to reach markets.

When the leaders of the Confederacy seceded to start their own nation based in their own hierarchical society, the Republicans in charge of the United States government were free to put their theory into practice. For a nominal fee, they sold farmers land that the government in the past would have sold to speculators; created state colleges, railroads, national money, and income taxes; and promoted immigration.

Finally, with the Civil War over and the Union restored on their terms, in 1865 they ended the institution of human enslavement except as punishment for crime (an important exception) and in 1868 they added the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution to make clear that the federal government had power to override state laws that enforced inequality among different Americans. In 1870 they created the Department of Justice to ensure that all American citizens enjoyed the equal protection of the laws.

In the years after the Civil War, the Republican vision of a harmony of economic interest among all Americans quickly swung toward the idea of protecting those at the top of society, with the argument that industrial leaders were the ones who created jobs for urban workers. Ever since, the party has alternated between Lincoln’s theory that the government must work for those at the bottom and the theory of the so-called robber barons, who echoed the elite enslavers’ idea that the government must protect the wealthy.

During the Progressive Era, Theodore Roosevelt reclaimed Lincoln’s philosophy and argued for a strong government to rein in the industrialists and financiers who dominated society; a half-century later, Dwight Eisenhower followed the lead of Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt and used the government to regulate business, provide a basic social safety net, promote infrastructure, and protect civil rights.

After each progressive president, the party swung toward protecting property. In the modern era the swing begun under Richard Nixon gained momentum with the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980. Since then the party has focused on deregulation, tax cuts, privatization, and taking power away from the federal government and turning it back over to the states, while maintaining that market forces, rather than government policies, should drive society.

But those ideas were not generally popular, so to win elections, the party welcomed white evangelical Christians into a coalition, promising them legislation that would restore traditional society, relegating women and people of color back to the subservience the law enforced before the 1950s. But it seems they never really intended for that party base to gain control.

The small-government idea was the party’s philosophy when Donald Trump came down the escalator in June 2015 to announce he was running for president, and his 2017 tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy indicated he would follow in that vein. But his presidency quickly turned the Republican base into a right-wing movement loyal to Trump himself, and he was both eager to get away from legal trouble and impeachments and determined to exact revenge on those who did not do his bidding. The power in the party shifted from those trying to protect wealthy Americans to Trump, who increasingly aligned with foreign autocrats.

That realignment has taken off since Trump left office in 2021 and his base wrested power from the party’s former leaders. Leaders in Trump’s right-wing movement have increasingly embraced the concept of “illiberal democracy” or “Christian democracy” as articulated by Russian autocrat Vladimir Putin or Hungary’s prime minister Viktor Orbán, who has demolished Hungary’s democracy and replaced it with a dictatorship. On the campaign trail lately, Trump has taken to echoing Putin and Orbán directly.

Those leaders insist that the equality at the heart of democracy destroys a nation by welcoming immigrants, which undermines national purity, and by treating women, minorities, and LGBTQ+ people as equal to white, heteronormative men. Their focus on what they call “traditional values” has won staunch supporters among the right-wing white evangelical community in the U.S.

Ironically, MAGA Republicans, whose name comes from Trump’s promise to “Make America Great Again,” want the United States of America, one of the world’s great superpowers, to sign onto the program of a landlocked country of fewer than 10 million people in central Europe.

MAGA’s determination to impose white Christian nationalism on the United States of America is a rejection of the ideology of the Republican Party in all its phases. Rather than either an active government that defends equal rights and opportunity or a small government that protects property and relies on market forces, which Republicans stood for as recently as eight years ago, today’s Republicans advocate a strong government that imposes religious rules on society.

They back strict abortion bans, book bans, and attacks on minorities and LGBTQ+ people. Last year, Florida governor Ron DeSantis directly used the state government to threaten Disney into complying with his anti-LGBTQ+ stance rather than reacting to popular support for LGBTQ+ rights. Missouri attorney general Andrew Bailey early this month used the government to go after political opposition, launching an investigation into Media Matters for America after the watchdog organization reported that the social media platform X was placing advertising next to antisemitic content. “I’m fighting to ensure progressive tyrants masquerading as news outlets cannot manipulate the marketplace in order to wipe out free speech,” Bailey said.

Domestically, the new ideology of MAGA means forcing the majority to live under the rules of a small minority; internationally, it means support for a global authoritarian movement. MAGA Republicans’ current refusal to fund Ukraine’s war against Russian aggression until the administration agrees to draconian immigration laws—which they are also refusing to participate in crafting—is not only a gift to Putin. It also suggests to any foreign government that U.S. foreign policy is changeable so long as a foreign government succeeds in influencing U.S. lawmakers. Under this system, American global leadership will no longer be viable.

When Nikki Haley said the cause of the Civil War “was how government was going to run, the freedoms, and what people could and couldn’t do,” she did more than avoid the word “slavery” to pander to MAGA Republicans who refuse to recognize the role of race in shaping our history. She rejected the long and once grand history of the Republican Party and announced its death to the world.

LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN

HEATHER COX RICHARDSON

#GOP #Letters From An American #Heather Cox Richardson #history #Republican Party #Radical Republicans #extremism #authoritarianism #white supremism

26 notes · View notes

caranfindel · 2 years

Text

Fic: Episode 327 - KURTesy Shuttle

gen | about 2600 words | pg13 for language | characters: karen kilgariff, georgia hardstark, steven ray morris, sam winchester, dean winchester

synopsis: episode 2.17, Heart, as if it were discussed on the My Favorite Murder podcast.

This fic was inspired by two things: (1) a Tumblr post (which unfortunately I cannot find now) about Sam and Dean hearing about one of their own cases on a true crime podcast and realizing “hey that’s us!” and (b) At First I Was Afraid, a marvelous fic by @themegalosaurus in which we learn Sam listens to the My Favorite Murder podcast. Huge thanks to LJ user hells-half-acre for providing a likely timeline for this episode.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

[break for sponsors]

Karen: So, the case I’m doing is one that we had an email about. You know how we’ll pick a case and then we’ll see if anyone has sent in a hometown email about it? Well, this is that, but backward. A good friend of the victim sent this in as a hometown. And it was weird. And then Jay did some research and it got even weirder. So get ready for… the death of Madison Roberts.

Georgia: Weird, huh? Can’t wait.

Karen: Strap in, friend. My sources are… there’s an article in SFGate by Reese Williams, a San Francisco Examiner article by Elizabeth Aguilar, an LA Times article by Richard Wokowski, a Murderpedia article, and a very long and very insane thread on the Websleuths.com website.

Georgia: Insane by normal standards or insane by Websleuths.com standards?

Karen: Oh, honey. Just insane.

Georgia: [squeals]

Karen: Let’s go back to 2007. Madison Roberts is a 25-year-old legal assistant living in San Francisco. She’s smart, she’s beautiful, she’s living her best life. I’m going to tell you — I’m not going to read the whole email, but I’m going to go ahead and tell you something that was in the email. According to her friend who wrote in, there are three guys in Madison’s life who, let’s say, have a crush on her. There’s her ex-boyfriend Kurt Mueller, there’s her boss Nate Mulligan, and there’s her neighbor, Glenn Dryden. Now, without hearing anything else, I want you to guess. If you thought one of these three guys would be accused of murdering Madison Roberts, who would it be?

Georgia: Ooooh! Well, normally I’d automatically go for the ex-boyfriend. But the fact that you’re asking this question makes me think it’s not him, so I’m going to say… the boss.

Karen: All right. Let’s see how that works out for you.

Georgia: Crap. I’m wrong, aren’t I? Just tell me I’m wrong.

Karen: I’m not telling you anything. Just wait. [laughs] In late January, Madison is viciously attacked by a mugger. This attack, according to the friend who emailed us, leads her to do some soul-searching that makes her decide to break up with her boyfriend Kurt, who then becomes her creepy ex-boyfriend. As they often do. Now fast forward about a month. It’s February 26, 2007. Madison, who also goes by Maddie, is out at a club with friends. Her boss, Nate the lawyer, approaches her at the club and claims he needs her to come back to the office to finish a project.

Georgia: A project.

Karen: Right. And for those of you who can’t see Georgia, which is everybody listening to this, she’s making air quotes. So, Nate makes a couple more lame attempts to get Maddie to leave with him, she brushes him off, and he leaves. Maddie and her friends laugh at him for being so very unsubtle, and all is well. However. Maddie’s friends report that she suddenly seems unsettled, and leaves soon afterward.

Georgia: Because of jerky Nate?

Karen: Well, let’s go back to the email from Maddie’s friend. She says Maddie told her a couple of days later that she left because she saw her creepy ex-boyfriend, Kurt Mueller, watching her at the club.

Georgia: Dammit. I should change my answer. It’s obviously the creepy ex.

Karen: All right. The next morning, Maddie shows up to work like normal. She goes to make coffee and notices something weird in Nate’s office. It is, in fact, Nate’s body.

Georgia: Oh! I feel bad for suspecting him now.

Karen: And not only is it Nate’s body, it’s Nate’s horribly mutilated body. According to the police report, it looks like he’s been attacked by a wild animal.

Georgia: Ooooh, shit! I feel extra bad.

Karen: Yeah, he may have been a jerk, but he probably didn’t deserve that. Anyway. Maddie’s employer says they sent her home for the rest of the week, because of the shock. This is on a Tuesday. On Thursday, Maddie calls the email friend and tells her she not only saw Kurt at the club Monday night, but she also saw him standing outside her apartment earlier that very day, Thursday, watching her.

Georgia: Okay, I knew it. The ex-boyfriend is the killer after all, isn’t he?

Karen: You… might want to put a pin in that for now.

Georgia: Oooooh, okay.

Karen: So, back to the email. This friend wanted to be anonymous, so here’s what our anonymous friend had to say: [reading email] “Maddie called me and said she saw Kurt hanging around outside her house. She said a couple of police detectives had been there, and she told them about him. But she didn’t want anyone at work to know, because he made a scene at her work once and almost got her fired, and she just really really hoped he wasn’t involved.”

Georgia: Red flags, man.

Karen: So many red flags. Now here’s something funny. I’m going back to the friend’s email. [reading email] “None of us liked Kurt. In fact, he was such an asshole that we used his name as a code word. When we were out somewhere and some guy tried to make a move on us, if he was really pushy or creepy we’d say doesn’t this guy look like your cousin Kurt? Or I wonder if our hotel has a KURT-esy shuttle. Using his name was a signal that meant get me away from this guy.”

Georgia: [laughing] KURT-esy shuttle! That’s genius.

Karen: Yes! You know a murderino would think of that. So the friend goes on to say that after Maddie broke up with Kurt, which was right after she got mugged, she thought this was hilarious and joined right in. All right. Back to the story. On Thursday, Maddie tells the friend that she’d seen Kurt outside her house, and she’d told the police. And then. Are you ready?

Georgia: Probably not.

Karen: Then. Thursday night. Kurt Mueller is murdered. And a policeman named Walter Jackson is also murdered outside of Kurt’s apartment building.

Georgia: Shit.

Karen: They were both mutilated, just like Nate. As if clawed to death by a wild animal.

Georgia: Shit!

Karen: Yes. Shit indeed!

Georgia: So it was the neighbor all along!

Karen: Well. Let’s keep going.

Georgia: [squeals] I have a feeling there’s a reason you haven’t mentioned the neighbor.

Karen: I’m. Um. Okay. [laughs] Maddie calls her friend the next evening, Friday evening. She tells her the police, the detectives, came back in the morning and told her Kurt had been killed. And they were concerned she might be the next victim, for obvious reasons, so one of them stayed with her all day, and was staying the night there. But! The friend said Maddie sounded kind of weird on the phone, and she thought maybe something wasn’t quite right, and maybe the cop was listening, so she used their code word and said “Oh, he’s a cop, like your cousin Kurt?”

Georgia: So smart.

Karen: Right? But she said Maddie laughed and said no, this wasn’t a Kurt situation at all. And in fact, the guy was super sweet and hot as hell and she’d been kind of hoping to, and I quote, “jump his bones,” but that he hadn’t caught on yet. Or wasn’t interested.

Georgia: [laughing] Maddie! You go, girl!

Karen: Yeah, girl! But the thing is, this conversation on Friday evening is the last time any of Maddie’s friends or family spoke to her.

Georgia: Oh. Oh no.

Karen: Yeah. So here are the facts about Madison’s murder. She was killed on the morning of Monday, March 5.

Georgia: By wild animals?

Karen: No. She was actually shot in the heart at point blank range.

Georgia: What the fuck?

Karen: Oh, wait. It gets better. So no, she wasn’t clawed like Nate or Glenn or Officer Jackson. However, her spare bedroom was covered in claw marks. The walls were gouged deeply, and I quote, “as if a wild animal were trying to escape.”

Georgia: What the actual fuck?

Karen: I know! But I’m not done. The other facts of the case are that one: she was found laying on the couch, as if she’d been gently placed there, wearing nothing but a man’s shirt, size extra large. Two: there were no signs of forced entry. Three: there were no defensive wounds or signs of a struggle. And four: a postmortem examination showed that she’d had intercourse within the last twelve hours, but there were no injuries consistent with sexual assault, so it was presumably consensual.

Georgia: She banged the hot cop!

Karen: Well, no. She did not bang a hot cop. And here’s why. Her friend was furious, and tells us in the email that she asked the police why they stopped watching over Maddie, and it turns out they never were watching her! He was not a cop!

Georgia: [gasps] Oh my god!!!

Karen: I know!

Georgia: He was lying!

Karen: Hot guys can lie! Who knew?

Georgia: I’m stunned. I’m literally stunned.

Karen: I know! But believe it or not, we’re not even done. Because remember Glenn? The neighbor?

Georgia: Oh, God, Glenn. He must have done it, right?

Karen: Well, no. Because it turns out Glenn had been murdered two days earlier.

Georgia: No!

Karen: He was found shot to death in an area called Hunter’s Point, which is, perhaps coincidentally but perhaps not, the same area where Maddie was when she was mugged a month before her murder.

Georgia: [muffled squealing noises]

Karen: I know, I know.

Georgia: You lied to me!

Karen: Well, technically, I didn’t say one of those guys killed her. I just asked who you would immediately suspect.

Georgia: Well, technically you’re full of shit. [laughs]

Karen: And technically I’m not done. And I’m going to go back to the friend’s email right now, because. Well, you’ll see. This is the email now. [reads] “I’m going to tell you something that wasn’t released to the media —“

Georgia: Which they do, to minimize false confessions —

Karen: [reads] “— but this case has gone cold, and it’s not being investigated, and I don’t think it’s going to hurt anything to let this out. And maybe it will bring more attention to Maddie’s murder. You might not believe me, but I was dating a police investigator for a while, and he swears this is true. Maddie and Glenn were both killed with…”

Karen: Are you ready?

Georgia: Yes!

Karen: [reads] “… with a silver bullet!”

Georgia: [gasps] THEY WERE MURDERED BY THE LONE RANGER?????

Karen: I KNOW!!!!!

Georgia: Are you serious?

Karen: Serious that they were murdered by the Lone Ranger? No. Serious that they were both shot with a silver bullet? Yes.

Georgia: What does this mean?

Karen: As far as the police are concerned, it means the murders of Maddie and Glenn are not related to the other murders. And Maddie knowing two of the three victims is just a coincidence. See, those of us who live, or lived, in San Francisco know Hunter’s Point is a little sketchy, a place where people go to buy drugs or meet up with sex workers, and it was thought that Glenn was just in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Georgia: Is that where young Karen Kilgariff went to buy drugs, back in the day?

Karen: [laughs] No, young Karen Kilgariff got all her drugs from her friends. Because she was smart and responsible.

Georgia: [laughs] I mean, that does sound so much more responsible than buying them from randos on the street.

Karen: Don’t do drugs, kids.

Georgia: Okay, so where do you even get silver bullets?

Karen: Believe it or not, there are actually a few cases of people being murdered with silver bullets each year, all across the United States. So, apparently someone sells them.

Georgia: Was it from the same gun?

Karen: Well, it turns out, silver is harder than lead, and silver bullets aren’t etched the way lead bullets are when they travel through a gun barrel. So the ballistics analysis was inconclusive.

Georgia: But why? Why a silver bullet? Why would you do that?

Karen: I don’t know. But I bet the internet knows. Steven? What does the internet say? [laughs] Look at him, he was already on it.

Steven: Okay, here’s what Wikipedia says: [reads]: “In folklore, a bullet cast from silver is often one of the few weapons that are effective against a werewolf or witch.”

Georgia: So they were witches!

Karen: Or werewolves.

Georgia: Or werewolves!

Karen: No, no, wait, this actually makes sense. Because there was a theory on Websleuths that Maddie had some kind of wild animal locked up in her apartment, in the room that looked like a wild animal had tried to claw its way out of it, and that she somehow trained this animal to attack people. Like, say, her annoying boss, her creepy ex, and a policeman who was just in the wrong place at the wrong time. This theory was widely considered ridiculous. But…

Georgia: Oh my God. She could do that because she was a witch. She had a familiar! A wild familiar with big claws!

Karen: It makes so much sense now.

Georgia: And Glenn too? They were a little coven?

Karen: But if so, who killed them? And why?

Georgia: Was it the hot fake cop? Was he like a witch cop who had to stop them because they were evil witches? Oh my God, was he a Witcher?

Steven: That’s… that’s not what a Witcher is.

Georgia: Okay, I haven’t actually watched the show.

Karen: Oh, you should, it’s really good. And it’s got that guy I like, who was in that one British procedural, oh, you know… Steven? What’s that guy’s name?

Georgia: But is it a lot of sword fighting? You know I don’t like sword fighting.

Karen: I mean, not as much as Game of Thrones. But I think we’re getting away from the important thing, which is that there are witch cops who will take out bad witches who train wild animals to murder their victims. And that at least one of these witch cops is a hot guy.

Georgia: Now that sounds like a TV show I would watch.

Karen: But seriously. Seriously, the important thing is that the murders of Madison Roberts, Kurt Mueller, Nate Mulligan, Glenn Dryden, and Walter Jackson remain unsolved.

Georgia: What’s the official police take?

Karen: That the deaths of Madison and Glenn were unrelated to the deaths of the other three men, and their connections to Madison, other than the police officer who was really a police officer, were coincidental.

Georgia: That’s a hell of a coincidence.

Karen. You are exactly right. But that’s where it stands today.

Georgia: Wow. That was a ride. And I notice you called this the murder of Madison Roberts, when really there were a whole bunch of people who were murdered.

Karen: That’s true. Not to take away from any of the other murders, which are equally horrible. I just related it all to Madison because her friend is the one who sent in the hometown.

Georgia: And you wanted to make me look like an ass by guessing which one of those guys did it.

Karen: There may have been a little of that going on too. [laughs] So, if you have a hometown story about murder or witches —

Georgia: Or werewolves!

Karen: Or werewolves. Send it to [email protected]. And stay sexy.

Georgia: And don’t get murdered!

Both: Goodbye!

Georgia: Elvis, you want a cookie?

[Elvis meows]

[closing credits]

~ ~ ~

Sam takes out his earbuds and sighs. It’s the kind of sigh he, for some reason, always thinks Dean won’t notice. The quiet little sigh that says “I’m disturbed about something but I don’t want to talk about it.”

“You good?” Dean asks.

“Yeah.” Sam shoves his phone and earbuds into his pocket. “Just… kind of tired of podcasts right now.”

#my fic #spn #my favorite murder #2.17 #heart #probably only entertaining to me

40 notes · View notes

finchmccraniega · 1 year

Text

youtube

Business Name: Finch McCranie, LLP

Street Address: 229 Peachtree St NE #2500

City: Atlanta

State: Georgia (GA)

Zip Code: 30303

Country: United States

Phone: (404) 658-9070

Website: https://www.finchmccranie.com/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FinchMcCranie/

Twitter: https://twitter.com/finchmccranie

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/finch-mccranie-llp

Justia: https://lawyers.justia.com/firm/finch-mccranie-llp-13790

Description: Finch McCranie, LLP is one of the most accomplished trial practice law firms in the Southeast, resulting in the firm earning a list of accolades for high professional achievement from national organizations like Martindale-Hubbell, Best Lawyers in America, and Super Lawyers. For over 50 years, Finch McCranie has successfully litigated a wide range of complex civil and criminal cases in court, including catastrophic personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits, white-collar and federal criminal cases, whistleblower claims, and business disputes. Through practicing law with care, compassion, and a dedication to excellence, the lawyers at Finch McCranie have recovered more than $500 million in verdicts and settlements for their clients.

Google My Business CID URL: https://www.google.com/maps?cid=12050955574324636230

Business Hours: Sunday Closed Monday 9:00 am - 6:00 pm Tuesday 9:00 am - 6:00 pm Wednesday 9:00 am - 6:00 pm Thursday 9:00 am - 6:00 pm Friday 9:00 am - 6:00 pm Saturday Closed

Services: Personal Injury, White Collar Criminal Defense, Whistleblower Claims, Securities, Enforcement & Regulation, Internal Investigations, Compliance & Monitorships

Keywords: personal injury attorney atlanta, criminal justice attorney atlanta, whistleblower lawyer atlanta, administrative attorney Atlanta

Location:

Service Areas:

#Youtube

2 notes · View notes

ftale23 · 18 days

Text

we help good people across the state of Georgia navigate the aftermath of an injury, wrongful death, or workplace accident. Our clients turn their legal worries over to us so they can focus on their lives. Although every case is different, we have recovered millions of dollars for accident victims and their families in a wide range of injury claims.

visit us here : Atlanta car accident lawyers

#Atlanta car wreck attorney #Atlanta truck accident lawyers

0 notes

the-firebird69 · 3 months

Text

Judge to hear motions in Trump's Georgia election interference case - ABC News

Trump is sitting there next door hacking away at himself he keep saying it but I have to do something I have to do something. We realized what it was today and we thought what a moron our son doesn't have anything in the physical world that this idiot could use and he would not make a good hostage people just fall apart to try and hold on to him and we're not going to let him get anywhere and nobody else would either the people everywhere and this a****** drove a bus at the smaller bus and we're going to sue him for it and prosecute we are bringing to court for that I'm going to sue him and we're going to take everything from him from using it we're going to press charges it's a lawyer firm and we're going to kill everybody who tries to come at us I'm sick of it I'm sick of seeing his f****** fat face and we have ways of avoiding it but who cares this s*** I guess is dumb face and everybody's I don't want this a****** on my mind all the time he's a freaking retard and a moron just like her son said this is Billy Hicks he's an obscene a****** retard if you ever talk to him he just went and beat him to death we talk so he holds himself what he says he's obscene on purpose he's an obscenity and wants to piss you off and I said said to him one day you piss off the wrong person and you're going to get killed I meant it too I said you're sitting here pissing me off all the time and we're going to kill you now that was about 20 minutes ago and the guy got up and it started ranting and he said real soon who cares for babble Billy Hicks you're the one who dies s*** head so he said I got you to talk and said who cares I got you to die

We'll be back but we have more to say on this

Thor Freya

Olympus

0 notes

fairhopeman · 4 months

Text

𝐋𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧

President Joe Biden put the cause of the Civil War even more succinctly: “It was about slavery.”

— 𝐃𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟐𝟗, 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟑 𝐇𝐄𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐑 𝐂𝐎𝐗 𝐑𝐈𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐑𝐃𝐒𝐎𝐍

0 notes

lawofficesofharoldjcronk · 11 months

Text

If you are looking for a wrongful death lawsuit attorney in Georgia then contact hcronk.com. We understand all aspects of personal injury law and how it applies to claims of Wrongful Death. We work closely with clients to help them understand the legal processes and regulations that affect their case outcomes. Wrongful death claims result from many types of accidents, including vehicle crashes, workplace safety violations, deliberate attacks, and premises hazards. For more detail visit our website.

#wrongful death lawyer in Georgia #wrongful death lawsuit in Georgia

0 notes

meeksimpactlaw · 9 months

Text

Atlanta Wrongful Death Lawyer No Fees Until We Win!

Only the property might seek punitive damages, which punish a defendant for extreme misconduct. There are two distinct types of claims a celebration can file after a wrongful death in Georgia. The first kind, a wrongful death claim, goals to compensate for the “full worth of the lifetime georgia wrongful death attorney of the deceased.” Surviving relations convey this type of action on behalf of the deceased individual. “Intangible benefits” may include care, love, companionship, parental steering, and family duties.

When a loved one loses their life due to the gross negligence of one other, that individual has been a sufferer of wrongful death. Let us assist you to pursue justice and truthful compensation for our family. If you have to file either one of these claims, contact our wrongful death attorneys today. If a now-deceased particular person was liable for an accident that resulted in harm or death to someone else, that person’s estate could be sued for damages. So too can people, corporations, authorities entities, and another party responsible for the lack of life.

If your liked one’s death might have been prevented, there is likely a possibility for punitive damages. A seasoned wrongful death lawyer can analyze your declare and let you know the way much compensation you could be eligible to receive. There is simply a limited period of time to file a wrongful death lawsuit in Georgia. The statute of limitations in these cases wrongful death lawyer is typically two years from the date of the decedent’s passing. A household that waits too lengthy to initiate a wrongful death claim may really lose their alternative to take legal action in opposition to the accountable events.

If you latterly misplaced a liked one in a automotive crash, pedestrian hit-and-run, or another kind of deadly accident, a Georgia wrongful death lawyer might help you discover your authorized choices. In Georgia, any damages suffered by the surviving family members usually are not thought-about relevant, and a wrongful death lawyer won't be able to seek compensation for them. The determination of who has the declare and proper to file swimsuit and recuperate compensation via wrongful death settlements or verdicts is decided at the time of death, not at the time of the damage. It is a rare instance the place this comes up but you'll be able to see the potential problem if a surviving inheritor who in any other case has the declare dies after injury to the relative but earlier than the relatives’ death.

Membership is proscribed to trial legal professionals who want to expand their training relating to the civil process. Attorney Kaine and his group are constantly constructing on their damage law data to serve purchasers higher. It helps if surviving members of the family who stand to obtain compensation from a wrongful death action agree about steps to take subsequent. They also need to choose an administrator of the decedent’s estate and resolve different issues.

If the decedent also left surviving youngsters, the surviving partner should act as a representative for the children and share the damages awarded. However, the surviving partner is entitled to a minimum of one-third of the award. Have you misplaced somebody you're keen on as a end result of another’s negligent or criminal actions? You may be entitled to monetary compensation by way of a wrongful death declare. This compensation cannot convey your beloved again, however it can give your loved ones financial security and area to grieve.

An experienced lawyer may help you through the process from begin to finish. There are a number of harmful intersections in Macon and some unsettling native data about site visitors accident fatalities in current years. Learn concerning the statistics, legal guidelines and how to find an harm lawyer. George McCranie is a respected wrongful death attorney in georgia trial lawyer who prides himself on consideration to detail and his aggressive, smart legal techniques. If your loved ones wants answers and closure after the surprising loss of a liked one, contact our workplace at present. If the one you love had a will, they might have named a personal consultant already.

We hope you by no means have to face the death of a liked one because of someone else’s irresponsibility. For those who do, no amount of cash can compensate for his or her losses. If the swimsuit was brought by the parents, which means there is not any spouse or surviving youngsters, the parents break up the damages equally. It’s necessary to notice that oldsters share in these awards, even if they're divorced and one mother or father did not want to file the declare. It’s necessary to note that not everyone can deliver a wrongful death action in Georgia.

Our Atlanta wrongful death attorneys put our purchasers first, on an everyday basis. Our promise is to treat every consumer with respect, dedication, and kindness. Our clients become ga wrongful death attorney our friends–which is why we consistently win Avvo’s prestigious “Client’s Choice Award”, and the explanation we're chosen “Best Lawyers in America” and “Super Lawyers” yearly.

Generally, if a spouse files a wrongful death declare, and the misplaced liked one didn't have a will, Georgia law says that the partner must share the award from a wrongful death case with the kids. The rule of thumb is that one-third of the proceeds are reserved for the surviving partner, and the youngsters divide the remaining proceeds. Our attorneys handle wrongful death lawsuits all through the state of Georgia. “Wrongful death” is the lack of a life due to the negligence of one other individual of company. It means georgia wrongful death attorneys that the individual or company who caused the death was “at-fault.” In these circumstances, the surviving members of the family are in a place to get well compensation for the loss of their liked one. For instance, if your member of the family was killed by a dashing truck driver, your family will want to work with a lawyer who has previous experience dealing with commercial truck accident circumstances.

0 notes

mikehostilolawfirm · 11 months

Text

Finding a Reliable Personal Injury Lawyer in Savannah: The Mike Hostilo Law Firm

Introduction: When you or a loved one are involved in a personal injury incident, it’s crucial to have a skilled and experienced legal team on your side. In Savannah, Georgia, one name stands out in the field of personal injury law: The Mike Hostilo Law Firm. With a track record of success and a dedication to their clients, they have established themselves as the go-to personal injury lawyers in Savannah. In this blog post, we will explore why The Mike Hostilo Law Firm should be your first choice when seeking justice and compensation for your personal injury case.

I. The Mike Hostilo Law Firm: A Trusted Name in Personal Injury Law Heading: The Legacy of Excellence

A Reputation Built on Trust and Results

With over three decades of experience, The Mike Hostilo Law Firm has built a reputation for excellence in personal injury law. They have successfully represented numerous clients in Savannah and have recovered substantial settlements and verdicts on their behalf. The firm’s unwavering commitment to justice and their personalized approach to each case sets them apart in the legal community.

II. Compassionate and Dedicated Legal Team Heading: Your Support System in Difficult Times

Putting Your Needs First

The attorneys at The Mike Hostilo Law Firm understand that suffering a personal injury can be physically, emotionally, and financially draining. That’s why their legal team goes above and beyond to provide compassionate support throughout the legal process. They take the time to listen to their clients, understand their unique circumstances, and develop a personalized legal strategy to maximize their chances of success.

III. Expertise in Various Personal Injury Cases Heading: Comprehensive Legal Representation

Handling a Wide Range of Personal Injury Cases

The Mike Hostilo Law Firm specializes in a wide range of personal injury cases, including but not limited to:

Car accidents

Truck accidents

Motorcycle accidents

Slip and fall incidents

Medical malpractice

Product liability

Wrongful death

No matter the complexity of your case, their team of experienced attorneys has the knowledge and resources to pursue the compensation you deserve.

IV. Personalized Attention and Client-Focused Approach Heading: Your Case, Your Priority

Tailored Strategies for Optimal Results

At The Mike Hostilo Law Firm, you are not just another case number. They prioritize building strong attorney-client relationships based on trust and open communication. They will keep you informed about the progress of your case, answer any questions you may have, and ensure that your legal rights are protected every step of the way.

V. Proven Track Record of Success Heading: Results that Speak for Themselves Subheading: Recovering

Substantial Compensation for Clients

The Mike Hostilo Law Firm has a long list of successful settlements and verdicts in personal injury cases. Their legal team’s skillful negotiation tactics and courtroom prowess have helped their clients obtain the compensation they deserve for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and more.

Name — The Mike Hostilo Law Firm

Address — 33 Park of Commerce Blvd STE 100, Savannah, GA 31405, United States

Website — https://mikehostilolawfirm.com/location/place/corporate-office

0 notes

ausetkmt · 11 months

Text

On a dark, damp February morning in 2018, a police officer escorted Lynn Davis to a pew in Clayton Municipal Court, a tiny city court tucked away in the Blue Ridge Mountains of northern Georgia. Davis was “freezing to death” in nothing but a jail-issued orange jumpsuit, she recollects this February. There was a distinct smell of mildew in the air as the night’s heavy rain seeped into the aging building. The faded lettering on its facade, “CLAYTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL,” served as a reminder of its previous function.

In addition to the court, the building is now the headquarters of the Clayton Police Department.

Davis, whose name has been changed to protect her identity, had been arrested 11 days prior to that court date. She had been “bluelighted” — a term many in the 2,000-person town use to refer to frequent stops by local police — after leaving work on another rainy morning. The police had pulled her and a friend over in a “bad part of town,” about 2 miles west of Clayton’s tourist center. Despite the picturesque mountain setting and bustling downtown, Clayton’s poverty rate is 20.4%, almost double the national average, per the 2020 census. The predominantly white, rural community’s employment rate was marked at 41.2%, about a third lower than Georgia’s statewide rate of 59.2%.

Davis was not arrested for any new charges that day. Instead, she was arrested on a failure to appear warrant for a series of minor traffic offenses, accumulated over nearly 10 years. Upon her arrest, Davis was taken to the jail for Rabun County, the surrounding jurisdiction of about 17,000. The facility was so overcrowded that many were sleeping on “boats,” plastic beds on the floor, she says. Davis was told her prior failure to appear in court made her ineligible to bond out, forcing her to sit in jail to await the city’s next court session nearly two weeks later.

Clayton Municipal Court meets only once a month, on second Tuesdays.

I was not present for Davis’ appearance, but I have observed Clayton’s court proceedings on multiple occasions over the past three years, first as a legal investigator and then as a reporter for In These Times. In the same room as the city council’s meeting chambers, Judge Robert Sneed, a man of about 60 with a quick smile and a laid-back demeanor, presides from a raised dais adorned with name plaques for the town’s mayor and city council members. To the judge’s right sits the clerk of court, wearing a Clayton Police shirt that signals her dual role as clerk of the Clayton Police Department.

Mitch Baker, the court’s prosecutor (referred to as a “solicitor”) often sits in a room adjacent to the courtroom, where he negotiates plea agreements with lawyers or defendants, many of whom represent themselves. Baker also serves as Clayton’s city attorney, supervising the city’s budgetary and legal responsibilities.

Finally, inconspicuous behind the dais, in the far corner of the room, sits John Roberts, president and primary probation officer of Capital Probation Management Inc., a private probation company that contracts with Clayton to supervise all city court probation. Davis had waited all morning to be seen by the judge, she tells me. As is common practice in small courts, those with hired attorneys see the judge first; Davis couldn’t afford a lawyer, nor was she offered a court-appointed public defender, she says. Next come the walk-in defendants, those who had received tickets with a summons (but without an arrest) or had been able, unlike Davis, to bond out of jail before their court date.

After more than a week in jail, with uncertain job prospects at the restaurant where she worked — not to mention the growing loss of income from so many missed shifts — “I just wanted to go home,” Davis tells me. And she worried she would receive more time in jail if she said or did the wrong thing.

Davis finally stood in front of Judge Sneed for five minutes, “at the most,” she says. In those five minutes, she received five years’ probation.

Davis pleaded guilty or no contest on all five of her charges, and Judge Sneed sentenced Davis to the maximum probation term, 12 months, on each traffic offense— a broken taillight, an improper tag, a failure to change her address within 60 days of moving, an insurance lapse, and driving with a suspended license. Some of these offenses dated back to 2009.

Georgia is one of only 12 states that treats all traffic tickets as criminal misdemeanors, according to Priya Sarathy Jones, national policy and campaigns director for the Fines and Fees Justice Center, a national advocacy organization that tracks these trends. And while speeding tickets, for example, are fairly universal, broken taillights and expired tags are offenses deeply associated with poverty, Sarathy Jones tells me. Those with the means to fix their taillight or pay for their insurance can avoid nonmoving traffic violations altogether, she says.

Beyond the burden of traffic fines for those who already can’t pay, Georgia’s criminalization of traffic violations allows each ticket to have a maximum penalty of 12 months in jail — or on probation. Multiple sentences in criminal courts often run concurrently, meaning the sentences are served all at once. But Judge Sneed stacked Davis’ sentences into “consecutive” 12-month probation terms, so her five 12-month sentences would be served back-to-back-to-back-to-back-to-back.

Judge Sneed did not respond to requests for comment from In These Times.

A probation sentence is no trivial thing. It is a suspended jail sentence, which means it can be revoked, or converted to jail time, even for technical violations such as missing a meeting with a probation officer. Davis also owed $2,266 in court fines, an amount she could not afford to pay. Most importantly, Davis may not have been sentenced to probation at all had she been able to pay her fine in full on her court date. In January and February 2018, of the 205 defendants with non-DUI traffic tickets, no one who had paid their tickets (clearly noted in court files) received probation. All 20 people with non-DUI traffic cases and no note of payment received probation. And even for DUI cases, all six defendants noted as paying their fines in court avoided probation altogether.

Besides Davis, 10 other people in that period received “stacked” probation sentences of two or more years for non-DUI traffic offenses or minor misdemeanors, like shoplifting, possession of marijuana, or “pedestrian under the influence.” In total, 56 received those types of sentences in 2018.

Capital Probation took on supervising Davis. Clayton contracts with Capital Probation to supervise all defendants on misdemeanor probation at no cost to the city. Not only is Georgia one of the few states that criminalizes traffic tickets, it is also one of approximately 12 states that allows localities to outsource misdemeanor probation supervision to private companies. (Felony probation cases, which are not handled through Clayton’s city court, are supervised by public probation officers.)

Instead of charging the city for its services, private probation companies make their profit by collecting fees directly from the people they supervise, like Davis. On top of the fines Davis owed to the court, she owed a $44 monthly fee to Capital Probation — $35 for probation supervision and $9 earmarked for a state victims’ compensation fund. If paid every month for 60 months, it amounts to another $2,640 — more than doubling Davis’ total costs. To remind Davis of the stakes from the outset, “FAILURE TO REPORT AS DIRECTED WILL RESULT IN A WARRANT FOR YOUR ARREST” is splashed in all caps across the Capital Probation agreement.

“How are you supposed to pay?” Davis wonders, already struggling to pay her bills and support her two children in high school.

For Davis, the trap of “offender-funded” probation was laid: Keeping up with her supervision fees would make it almost impossible to pay off the underlying fines, which keep a defendant on probation. In fact, Davis’ case was marked as “early termination,” meaning she could end her probation as soon as she could pay her court fines. But as with traditional loan debt, paying off the principal — in this case, court fines — can be rendered impossible by accumulated interest — in this case, monthly supervision fees.

The “domino effect,” as Davis refers to it, was in motion. Davis had lost almost two weeks of paychecks while languishing in jail, which meant she fell behind on her weekly car payments. Then, she missed a power bill, and the electric company shut off her lights. The added probation payments only put her further behind.

“I couldn’t catch up,” Davis tells me. Her car was repossessed, and to report to probation, Davis needed that car. And even if she could report, she didn’t have the money to pay for the probation supervision, so she stopped reporting. “You do the best you can, but sometimes it’s not enough,” she says.

Davis eventually left Clayton and Rabun County, the place where she was born and raised, and where her family had more than 150 years of history. But it had become a place where Davis lived in fear. “They step on you,” she says.

Clayton’s picturesque downtown conceals a local poverty rate nearly double that of the national average. Juan Diego Reyes

Towns turn to fines to drum up revenue

An extensive In These Times investigation found that at least 115 people convicted of minor traffic charges or misdemeanors in Clayton in 2018 received probation sentences of a year or more. Jack Long, a Georgia-based attorney and longtime private probation expert, describes these sentences as “draconian.” Our investigation included extensive file review and court-watching sessions, and interviews with lawyers, policy experts, legislators and those most impacted by these practices. The investigation also draws on public records requests filed during my time as a legal investigator at the Southern Center for Human Rights, with permission.

Our investigation identified a judicial standing order, requested by John Roberts and signed by Judge Sneed, that in effect softened recent legislative reforms intended to cap probation fees for defendants who are unable to pay their court fines. That standing order, in Long’s words, “increase[s] [a probation company’s] revenue … which has the effect of making poor people … pay more money to a private company.”

In a detailed response to questions from In These Times, John Roberts denies Long’s claim, noting the terms of Davis’ early termination eligibility. “I always encourage my probationers to complete probation as soon as they’re eligible to terminate early to save the hassle of reporting as well as money,” Roberts writes. “So again, NO, I do not engage in trying to prolong the term of probationers … to increase revenue.”

I described Davis’ charges and her sentence to former Georgia state Rep. Robert Trammell, the former Democratic minority leader in the Georgia House of Representatives, who worked on the legislative probation reforms in the Judiciary Non-Civil Committee. Trammell says “the [reform] bill was designed to address” cases precisely like Davis’ — to ensure no one was “staying under the supervision … on and on and on … because they lacked means.” But Davis was not affected by these reforms.

The private probation system in Clayton is just one such example in a state that continues to have, by far, highest probation rate in the country, according to the Prison Policy Initiative, a nonpartisan firm that produces research on mass incarceration.

Ultimately, this probation debt — a cousin of other forms of loan debt — fractures families that become subsumed by it, according to Thomas Gokey. Gokey is co founder of the Debt Collective, a debtors’ union that recently sponsored a probation debt jubilee that canceled $3.2 million in probation fees. Debt also sows distrust in public institutions among communities that feel like they are being exploited and forced out of their homes, Gokey says.

As Davis reflected on her own debt, she sees a city telling her, “We need you out of here now because you don’t make enough money.” But “that’s our home,” Davis adds forcefully.

Davis’ experience lays bare the symptoms and costs of a predatory mode of municipal finance. Court-based municipal finance has its roots in the austerity era of the 1980s, as a newly empowered conservative federal government stemmed the flow of federal money to states and localities. The practice has proliferated across the country in the years following the 2008 financial collapse, according to Sarathy Jones. As municipal revenues cratered in the recession, and with restrictions on how localities can raise revenue, cities filled their budgetary gaps on the backs of those passing through their courts at levels never seen before: “It was the easiest thing [cities] could do,” Sarathy Jones says. But, “We know who ends up being caught in the criminal legal system,” she says. “Low-income communities” and “Black and brown… communities.”

Sarathy Jones calls this system a form of “regressive” taxation.

Predatory municipal finance first reached popular consciousness in the aftermath of the police killing of Michael Brown, Jr. in Ferguson, Mo. in 2014. The groundbreaking Department of Justice report that followed described Ferguson’s “revenue generation” model of policing: “Officers appear to see some residents… less as constituents to be protected than as potential offenders and sources of revenue.” In 2013, municipal fines and fees accounted for 20.2% of Ferguson’s budget, a figure that astounded DOJ investigators. In 2018, the year Davis appeared in Clayton Municipal Court, 24.6% of Clayton’s general revenue came from court fines, according to the city’s annual audit.

In this system of predatory municipal governance, residents like Davis, who describes herself as a “poor country girl,” are caught in the crosshairs.

“They’ll make you feel like you’re worthless”

I know that private enterprise can do a better job and do it more efficiently,” declared longtime Georgia politico Ned Young, co-founder of one of the first private probation companies in Georgia, to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC) on the eve of the industry’s big breakthrough in the state. In 1992, the Georgia legislature became one of the first in the nation to authorize the privatization of misdemeanor probation. In late 1992, Chatham County, home to Savannah, became Georgia’s first county to follow through.

Chatham County’s contract with Ned Young’s Professional Corrections Services revealed the structure of this new probation system: “Under the contract,” Young explained in the AJC article, “Chatham pays us nothing, not one dime.…We collect our money from the people on probation.”

From the outset, proponents offered a new approach to county and city governance, one that prioritized cutting costs and generating evermore municipal revenue.

Young, with Pat Monahan, Chatham County’s assistant manager, highlighted the key goals of the model. First, Young estimated his company would save Chatham approximately $365,000 per year. Second, Professional Corrections Services would be more “aggressive and successful” in collecting fines than their public counterparts, according to the 1992 article.

Private probation companies make their money by shifting the criminal legal system’s costs onto the backs of those entangled in the municipal court system. This process is often referred to — by the system’s actors, legislators and critics alike — as “offender-funded” or “user-pay.” As Young advertised, probation companies offer cities what looks like a sweet deal. In exchange, these companies are permitted to charge fees to those on probation. Sometimes these fees include a host of expensive “services,” provided by the company, such as mandatory drug testing or “anti-theft” classes, ankle monitors, or even a “digital photo fee.” Probation companies’ bread and butter, however, is monthly supervision fees, like those that Davis confronted in Clayton.

In this model, longer terms of probation rule. The reasoning is clear: The monthly fees are far higher than the marginal cost of the “supervision.”

Following Chatham County’s lead, the privatization rush grew over the next 20 years, and private probation came to dominate the criminal legal landscape in Georgia’s misdemeanor courts. But privatization came with a clear consequence: Probation rates skyrocketed, outpacing prison and jail rate growth in the state. The number of people on probation (both felony and misdemeanor) more than doubled between 1990 and 2004, when Georgia first hit the 400,000 mark, according to data collected by Reform Georgia, a justice policy think tank.

By 2018, Georgia’s probation rate per 100,000 adult residents was 3.5 times the national rate, eclipsing every other state in the country, according to the Prison Policy Initiative. More than half of those on probation in Georgia were on misdemeanor probation, according to the AJC, and 80% of those on misdemeanor probation were supervised by a private company.

But these probation companies’ profit-seeking practices were beginning to attract notice.

In 2015, after what the AJC called a “blistering” statewide audit, dozens of lawsuits and a barrage of bad press surrounding Georgia’s “troubled misdemeanor probation system,” as the AJC put it, the Georgia legislature passed House Bill 310 (HB310), a modest reform of the private probation system. The “misdemeanor probation system,” the AJC noted in its coverage, “is widely used by judges as a high cost payment program for traffic fines.”

The HB310 reform package sought to restrain the system’s excesses but not transform the system. According to Rep. Robert Trammell, legislators were “trying to reign back in some of the [probation industry’s] more abusive practices.” They “settled” on a set of tweaks.

One of HB310’s most substantive changes was the imposition of a three-month cap on supervision fees for “pay-only” probation cases — those cases in which defendants are placed on probation because they can’t pay court fines.

The new three-month cap, while still allowing some fees to be extracted from defendants who can’t afford to pay, nonetheless had profound effects on the bottom line for probation companies. California-based Sentinel Offender Services, Georgia’s largest probation provider at the time of HB310’s passage, supervised approximately 7,000 people on misdemeanor probation in Atlanta alone, according to an article in Slate; 70% were designated as pay-only cases under HB310’s new cap on supervision fees. While Sentinel had gained notoriety (and faced legal exposure) from its alleged administration of illegal drug tests, supervision fees remained the company’s primary mechanism for generating revenue.

Following the passage of HB310, Sentinel’s “chief business development officer,” Mark Contestabile, wrote to city officials that their Atlanta office had “lost tens of thousands of dollars monthly,” in an email among a cache of documents obtained by The Marshall Project in 2017. In a proposal made to Atlanta court officials in light of the new law, Sentinel pitched an amended public-private probation services model — also obtained by The Marshall Project—warning that “offender-funded” probation had “become politically and fiscally untenable.”

Sentinel’s proposal revealed another priority at the heart of private probation: Not only would reform hurt the company’s profit margins, but it would erode public coffers “for the cities and counties that [rely] on fines generated by criminal sanctions.” Private companies, Sentinel argued, collect fines at rates “25%-30% higher than in house programs.”

The city of Atlanta rebuffed the company’s proposal for a new operating model that would salvage its profit margins. Not long after, Sentinel left Georgia entirely, selling all of its probation contracts there to CSRA Probation Services, now the largest provider in the state.

So how did all of this change and reform affect a smaller company like Capital Probation, operating outside of national and local media attention? And why did Davis tally more than $2,500 in prospective supervision fees if HB310 was “designed,” according to Rep. Trammell, to cap fees in cases like hers at three months (which would have amounted to $132)?

In Georgia, cycle of probation debt continues despite reforms

On May 10, 2017, less than a year before Lynn Davis was sentenced to five years’ probation, Georgia’s Department of Community Supervision (DCS), which oversees the state’s private probation industry, conducted its annual audit of Capital Probation to ensure compliance with the law. In its review, DCS noted that “several cases appear to conflict” with the pay-only provision in HB310. The auditor was concerned that Capital was “not treating cases as ‘pay-only’ when the defendant is placed on probation supervision solely because such defendant is unable to pay court imposed fines and surcharges. However, the probation provider assumed cases were not ‘pay-only’ and assessed and/or collected more than 3 months of standard supervision fees.”

Within two weeks, and in direct response to DCS’s concerns, Judge Sneed and Capital Probation landed on their resolution: formalizing the status quo by judicial order. On May 24, 2017, Judge Sneed signed a standing order regarding the “Designation of Pay Only Cases.” Standing orders are administrative directives that courts use to establish general rules for how matters will be handled in a particular court.

Judge Sneed’s standing order states explicitly that it was “requested” by “the probation officer” — and is signed, at the bottom, by Judge Sneed and John Roberts, president and chief probation officer of Capital Probation.

The order, although confusingly worded, appears to Sarathy Jones and Long to avoid the 2015 statutory cap on monthly probation fees: “Probationers in the Municipal Court of Clayton sentenced after July 1, 2015 shall be designated as non ‘pay-only’ probation sentences and were not placed on probation for the sole purpose of paying their Court-ordered fine(s) and surcharge(s).” July 1, 2015, was the effective date of HB310.

The standing order, according to Sarathy Jones and Long, effectively redefines pay-only probation to only refer to defendants the court explicitly labels as such, rather than the definition laid out by the state: “a defendant … placed under probation supervision solely because such defendant is unable to pay the court-imposed fines and statutory surcharges.”

“They’re reclassifying these as not about payment in order to allow for the fees to be charged. … It seems like they … are trying to get around [the] three-month [cap],” Sarathy Jones says.

According to Roberts, the judge has discretion to set probation terms, and the standing order was signed because the compliance monitor “needed something from the Judge to verify his policy” regarding the designation of pay-only cases.

“The Designation of Pay Only Cases Order was not a ploy to increase profits,” Roberts said. “It was requested by my governing body to clarify policy from the Court. It satisfied them.”

When asked by In These Times about the standing order, DCS replied: “We do not have the authority to impose upon the court when pay-only status is applicable and therefore cannot sanction the probation providers for abiding by such judicial order.”

To Jack Long, the standing order is in direct contravention of the legislature’s intent. According to Long, “a judge cannot change what the legislature said. Pay-only probation is when the sole purpose of the probation is to give the defendant time to pay.”

Roberts replied that Long is either “missing context or misinformed.”

Importantly, as Long himself acknowledges, HB310 did not carefully define “pay-only probation,” which meant it had “too many loopholes to have teeth,” Long says. For example, a judge could add “one hour of community service” to a defendant’s sentence and then decide that no longer constituted pay-only probation, according to Long. (Indeed, Davis received 20 hours of community service, a small addition to her five years’ probation and thousands of dollars of fines and fees). As such, Long concludes, “the entire [statute] was just window dressing for the private probation industry.”

Roberts, for his part, says he believes the legislative reforms and past lawsuits have “cleaned up” the industry, and that his small company, formed in 2002, has established “ethical, fair and reputable” policies in good standing with state compliance.

For Lynn Davis, the probation system in Clayton had staggering consequences. But, she says, this kind of “sentence is just how it works” in Clayton. And Davis was far from the only one.

The wide-ranging impacts of Clayton’s private probation system

Claire Young says she felt like she “was being taken advantage of” during her encounter with Clayton’s court system in 2018. Young, who was 72 at the time, was staying with her sister in Clayton during a “horrible time in my life,” struggling financially between jobs.

During a February interview, Young tells me she had heard police in the area were “notorious” for pulling drivers over when she moved to the Clayton area. One day, she was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed her insurance had lapsed, something she described as an unfortunate consequence of her financial hardships.

That incident began a years-long saga that followed the Clayton court pattern. Young appeared in court the month after Lynn Davis, in March 2018, and pleaded guilty to reduced counts on both charges. Young was sentenced to two years’ probation— consecutive 12-month terms — for her speeding ticket and her insurance lapse. She owed almost $1,000 in fines, an amount she could not afford on the day of court. But her case was not designated as pay-only, with HB310’s cap on supervision fees. Like Davis’ case, Young’s was marked “early termination,” meaning she could end probation early if she paid off her underlying fines. But each month that she couldn’t pay her fine, the supervision fees added to her debt, placing payment further out of reach.

Young did not realize, at first, that she had been sentenced to probation, thinking instead she was on a “payment plan” to give her time to pay her fines.

John Roberts says he finds it “hard to believe” Young was unaware of the terms of her probation agreement since she signed a waiver form to plead guilty. Roberts notes all defendants he supervises are eligible to pay off half of their court fines by completing community service at the rate of $7.25 per hour, the federal minimum wage. They may also request the judge convert their entire fine to community service work, though this would not include probation fees.

Meanwhile, in May 2018, according to probation officer notes in her file, Young reported she was in “deep debt” and “again” requested “for fine to be lowered.” According to the notes, her probation officer “explained that [her fines] cannot [be lowered.]”

Young soon learned the “horrifying” stakes of her new sentence as she began to fall behind on payments. Her probation officer threatened her with probation revocation hearings, which could mean jail time. Young was “hauled back into court,” as she describes it, on at least two occasions, and recalls being “so scared” when she had to face the judge. Roberts, in commenting for this story, indicated that Young failed to show up for probation appointments, leading to three probation revocation hearings, which he said are required when a defendant falls two monthly payments behind.

After one such hearing, approximately six months into her time on probation, Young left the court/police department building flustered. In the parking lot outside, she tripped and “fell because I was so upset,” and a paramedic was called because of the amount of blood. It marked the nadir of her entanglement with what she calls the “barbaric” court system in Clayton, and remains one of the most “humiliating experiences” of Young’s life. “They make you feel like you’re worthless,” Young tells me.

Beyond Davis and Young, the private probation system has had wide-ranging effects in Clayton. A review of all of Clayton’s court cases in 2018 reveals that at least 115 defendants received long probation sentences of a year or more — just like Davis and Young — for similarly minor traffic charges or misdemeanors. One defendant received three years’ probation for minor traffic offenses, one of which was a $15 seatbelt violation. Another received a two-year probation sentence for two traffic offenses, including 12 months for running a stop sign. One man received four years of probation for three traffic tickets (two insurance lapses and driving on a suspended license) and possession of drug-related objects.

In Clayton’s city court, a defendant’s ability to pay fines appeared directly correlated to their sentencing. Defendants with a wide range of offenses similar to Davis’ and Young’s — or some even more severe — did not receive probation if they were able to pay their fines. In one revealing case, a defendant sentenced to two consecutive 12-month probation sentences (for speeding and reckless driving) had his probation crossed out on official court documents after it was noted he ultimately paid his fines.

Data reported to Georgia’s Department of Community Supervision show the pay-only label for probation cases, and thus the three-month cap on probation fees that went with it, was applied to a fraction of total cases in Clayton. In DCS’s 2019 compliance report, conducted in summer 2019, Capital Probation reported only six cases — or just under 3%, of active probation cases in Clayton Municipal Court — were serving on pay-only probation, a far cry from the 70% figure that Sentinel cited before it cut ties with Georgia.

Clayton is not alone, however. An identical standing order was signed on the exact same date in at least three other jurisdictions where Judge Sneed presided and Capital served as probation provider. In these four courts, only 5% of active probation cases were designated as pay-only, per the DCS compliance report. (It is not clear how many cases were labeled pay-only between the 2015 effective date of HB310 and the 2017 standing order, as DCS did not yet track overall figures in their initial compliance reports.)

In commenting for this story, Roberts reported the 2017 standing order is no longer in effect because his company worked with Judge Sneed “to come up with a new policy based on what we had experienced in Court over the years and what charges are based on financial hardship.” Roberts said Judge Sneed signed a new standing order May 14, 2019 for each of the courts where Capital provides probation services — which “classifies a standard sentence for each charge listing special conditions and minimum term lengths for all cases to be classified as a non ‘pay-only’ cases.” All other cases are designated pay-only, Roberts said. Young’s case, he said, would have been classified as pay-only under the more recent 2019 standing order.

The 2019 order, however, does not explicitly reference pay-only cases. And the minimum sentences it sets for a host of traffic offenses and misdemeanors, such as driving on a suspended license and possession of marijuana, include mandatory probation and community service in addition to court fines. According to Jack Long, the new order raises legal concerns of its own because it suggests that the court is “prejudg[ing] individuals before hearing the facts.”

Claire Young, sentenced to two years’ probation for two traffic misdemeanors in Clayton, Ga., says the private probation system takes advantage of defendants by billing them for their own supervision.

“Speed up and take care of business”

In 2019, Governing, a magazine that covers state and local governments, published “Addicted to Fines,” one of the first attempts to track trends in predatory municipal finance across the country. The report defined the threshold of “high” fine revenues as more than 10% of a city’s general revenue or revenues that exceeded $100 per adult resident. Not only did Clayton exceed the report’s 10% threshold by more than double in 2018, its total fine revenue per capita was $308.

A review of all of Clayton’s court cases in 2018 reveals that at least 115 defendants received long probation sentences of a year or more—just like Davis and Young—for similarly minor traffic charges or misdemeanors.

It is not just Clayton that stands out, however. In Governing’s analysis, Georgia had 52 localities that generated more than 20% of their general revenue from court fines and forfeitures, more than any other state. In a report that analyzed all 50 states from the libertarian public interest law firm, Institute for Justice, Georgia ranked first as the legal environment “most hospitable” for municipal “taxation by citation,” as the report’s authors refer to it. The report concluded, “not only do … [Georgia’s] laws do little to discourage reliance on fines and fees for revenue, but they also provide for the structures and mechanisms that allow such behavior to flourish,” including outsourcing fines collection to private companies.

But Clayton did not always generate a quarter of its general revenue from court fines. In fact, Clayton’s share of revenue generated from fines has grown continuously in the years after the 2008 financial crisis while its share of tax revenue has decreased in tandem. According to Clayton city audits, the amount of court revenue increased by about 60% between 2011 and 2018, all while the city’s expenditures and population have remained relatively constant. In 2011, the city generated 15.3% of its revenue from fines; by 2018, that figure had ballooned to 24.6%. City leaders in Clayton have made decisions about how they would sustain their city, and more importantly, from whom they would extract revenue. A city like Clayton is “fraught with misaligned incentives,” says Sarathy Jones, of the Fines and Fees Justice Center.

Robert Sneed was appointed as Clayton’s Municipal Court judge in 2017, but he had long been a familiar face at courthouses across the region. By 2012, he was already serving as municipal judge in 17 jurisdictions, a number that far surpasses any other judge in the state. That number has since grown to at least 22.

Of those 22 municipal courts, half meet the Governing report’s criteria for abnormally high court revenue. And Judge Sneed serves as judge in all four of the municipal courts for which Capital Probation served as probation company in 2018. All four of those Capital Probation cities appear in Governing’s report.

The circumstances preceding Judge Sneed’s appointment as Clayton’s judge illuminate the city’s view of its court. Judge Sneed replaced longtime Judge David Smith. City officials had raised “concerns” about Smith in a January 2016 city council meeting, when, according to meeting minutes, “[Councilmember] Debbie [Chisholm] stated that she would like to discuss the City Judge’s appointment. She stated that everyone has had this discussion regarding the concerns.”

At issue was Chisholm’s worry that “there are too many court cases that are being assigned a Public Defender. This process is creating more time and city resources, therefore costing the city more money.” Chisholm (who is no longer a city council member) succinctly encapsulated the city’s priorities: efficiency and the preservation of “city resources.” Later at the meeting, according to the minutes, city officials discussed the need for the court system to “speed up and take care of business.” Chisholm did not respond to requests for comment. Clayton’s city manager, on behalf of all Clayton officials contacted, declined to comment on any specific allegations, writing, “[t]he City of Clayton takes its involvement within the judicial system seriously and strives at all times to comply with Georgia and Federal law concerning its Municipal Court.”

The January 2016 meeting also exposed a tangled web of city and court bureaucracy. According to the minutes, “[A]fter much discussion it was determined that the Chief of Police chooses the Public Defender. Therefore [Police Chief] Andy Strait said that he would discuss this further with the Public Defender.”

In other words, the chief of police chooses the public defender tasked with representing those arrested by the police for allegedly violating laws. Without reservation, the city council, who had just re-appointed Strait as police chief, gave him a directive to talk with the public defender about “speed[ing] up” the court process. After reviewing the city council minutes, Sarathy Jones expressed concern “that those two entities should not be having that kind of relationship.”

Chief Strait did not respond to requests for comment.

Yet another potential conflict of interest, according to Georgia attorney Jack Long, is that Clayton’s city attorney — engaged deeply in managing the city’s budgetary and legal responsibilities — serves a dual role as the solicitor charged with prosecuting defendants on whose very backs budgetary gaps might be closed. It is in this context, of contingent relationships, that the city’s budgetary priorities can be infused into the operation of its criminal legal system. These “overlaps” in responsibilities call “into question what drives decision making,” Sarathy Jones says.

City Attorney Mitch Baker did not respond to requests for comment.

In early 2017, 364 days after the city council raised its concerns, Robert Sneed was appointed as Clayton’s new city judge.

The court’s revenue generation reached new heights from the very start of Judge Sneed’s tenure. In fiscal year 2018, Judge Sneed’s first full fiscal year as judge, the city’s budget expected $595,000 in court revenue, which was $208,000 more than its fiscal year 2017 budget — and more than double what the court generated in 2011. While the court fell nearly $100,000 short of those expectations, fines and forfeitures still amounted to 24.6% of the city’s revenue in fiscal year 2018.

Clayton’s city manager noted that “Clayton utilizes and relies upon a Municipal Judge whose sole role with the City is to preside over and conduct the Municipal Court; creating a separation between the Court and the multiple other administrative, legislative, and enforcement roles of the City.” Judge Sneed did not respond to requests for comment.

As Clayton’s court has transformed, city leaders have oriented routine budgetary decisions around this new paradigm. At one council workshop — held later the same day of Lynn Davis’ 2018 court proceeding — the police chief, Andy Strait, requested funds for body cameras in the aftermath of a lethal police shooting in Clayton. Councilmember Debbie Chisholm’s reaction was telling, asking “if the department could add money by raising fines,” according to the Clayton Tribune. Strait “responded that it was a possibility, but fines were already recently increased.”

In the very same workshop, a public accountant presented his annual audit for the previous fiscal year, noting in his presentation that fines and forfeitures were up approximately $115,000.

“You’ve got to stand for something or you’ll fall for anything”

I met Lynn Davis for the first time four years to the day after her 2018 sentencing. “I’m coming up on 50,” she tells me, her voice catching. “I don’t want to have to worry about this stuff, I want to be a grandma, and see my grandkids, and spoil my kids.”

Davis began to reflect on her roots in Clayton, telling me about her great-grandmother’s house, the white house on a hill near the center of town. “I’ve got generations of family buried there,” she tells me. It is those roots that give her fortitude. Davis has remained unyielding in her desire to tell her story.

Davis has a clear vision of a city with fundamentally different priorities. But, “Instead of setting up programs for rehabilitation [and] setting up jobs [and] a transit system … they build a jail,” Davis laments, referring to a Rabun County construction project for a new jail annex that increases capacity by nearly 60%. Meanwhile, there remains a lengthy waiting list for public housing in Clayton, says Davis, who was once on the waiting list herself.

Davis says repeatedly that she is committed to fighting for a town she feels has left her and many residents behind. She tries to live by an adage of her grandfather’s: “You’ve got to stand for something or you’ll fall for anything.” Instead of more jail beds, and a city that views people as “sources of revenue,” what Clayton needs most, Davis says, is “something to show to these people that they matter.”

#georgia #clayton county #police #police raising revenue for towns by giving tickets #In Small-Town Georgia #A Broken Taillight Can Lead to Spiraling Debt

0 notes