Dune Sequels Explained
What Is It?
The YouTube video Dune Sequels Explained by the YouTube channel Alt Shift X.
Here is the description for this video:
Get a free audiobook with an Audible trial: https://www.audible.com/asxWhat happens in the sequels to Dune? A quick summary of all six Dune books by Frank Herbert: Dune, Dune Messiah, Children of Dune, God Emperor of Dune, Heretics of Dune,…
If I had more confidence, I would do a video series poking fun at BCS, in the style of @Glidus 's GOT Review/Pisstake series.
Before even talking about S1E1, I'd come in hot right out of the gate with:
"Better Call Saul is a story about how sometimes, violence IS the answer. And anyone who tries to tell you otherwise is lying to you. Even when those people are the show's own writers. LET'S GOOOOOO!"
most of the theory youtubers are kinda silly but i did watch all of glidus’ like 3 hour theory streams where he’s like “[insert insane theory that makes no narrative sense but IS pretty cool] has like a 40% chance of happening”. he recognised jonsatin though and hes australian so i like him
my beef with analysis youtube nation is eternal. we all have our bad takes. we all have our “hyle hunt is azor ahai” moments. but with youtubers said opinion is then projected to an audience in the hundred thousands. also bc said statement is communicated through some mf speaking into the microphone with pictures over it, there is more authority placed on it for some reason, even if they are also #some random guy on the internet. then i have to see these interpretations reiterated for the rest of eternity and even become a general fandom consensus. this is less about the youtubers themselves even and more about people refusing to have their own interpretations without it being validated by someone speaking into a microphone.
“If you ever utter her name again in my presence, I will cut out your tongue.” / this could be him talking to someone about Claire or to Claire about carol either way it's SPICY
𝐀 𝐌𝐄𝐌𝐄 𝐈 𝐇𝐀𝐕𝐄 𝐋𝐎𝐒𝐓. @wristful :
❝ what would you have me do? ❞ the question lands heavily between them, delivered in something caught between a shout and a whisper, a stinging hiss that does not become her, she knows. her fingers have curled tightly into the fabric of her blouse, knuckles digging in against the dip of her waist on either side as she turns from him and paces in bare feet : she'd not been expecting him. more than that, she'd not been expecting him to pick this particular fight. ❝ the entire -- country, is saying her name. ❞ i should not have to remind you of this. ( they had been aligned in the first news cycle - she'd been determined to staunch the bleeding, to keep him from losing his head. now she wonders if she should have taken jane's advice. his advice. ) ❝ if i didn't know better i'd think you were being deliberately obtuse. ❞ you don't know better. you don't know anything.
❝ oh fuck off. if the press ask me a question i have to answer it. i don't know how many times you think i can say no comment, but it's less than whatever you're imagining. ❞ she turns back to face him then, her hands falling from her sides in time with the twisting of her torso. ❝ i do not have the liberty of being sensitive to your feelings on this, phillip. not anymore. you'll kill my reelection with this if i let you, and i think you know that i won't. ❞
you know what? romance is great. like i'm so proud of you for dating in middle school and shit i mean good for you that week-long relationship must have been heaven on earth.