Tumgik
#and the genocide that the colonies committed against native americans
homoquartz · 2 months
Text
why is no one talking about the fact that nex benedict is indigenous?
they are choctaw.
native women and two-spirits are at the highest risk of sexual assault and domestic violence of any group. natives as a whole are at the highest risk for suicide. natives are also tied with Black americans for risk of being killed, both by police and by others.
it's critical to note that more than 90% of violence done against natives is committed by non-natives. this is a colonial issue, it's a genocide issue, it's an anti-indigenous issue.
when it comes to indians, our intersectional identities are often erased in favor of more visible or mainstream marginalizations like sex and gender.
this same thing happened when ezra miller kidnapped an indigenous teen. it happened when a nurse assaulted a native coma patient and she became pregnant and gave birth in her hospital bed. our indigenous identity is barely mentioned, despite this being a multinational crisis.
please learn more about the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women (MMIW) movement here, here, and here
and please spread the word about this
don't let native people disappear in this conversation. nex's death is national news and they should be remembered for all that they are.
2K notes · View notes
neil-gaiman · 10 months
Note
Hey I'm sort of curious. I haven't read the book, but I'm a fan of the show and was genuinely disappointed that the phrase "going Native" had an exclusively negative connotation when I watched. Idk if this occurred to you or not, but that's pretty blatant racism. It's especially tone deaf considering this is a show about angels and demons - which have been a tool to commit genocide against us for upwards of 500 years.
Why not just use "human"? It's accurate and doesn't frame an entire demographic as inherently bad or undesireable.
Not trying to garner any ill will, it just rlly bummed me out bc I'm Native and it's an identity I wear with great pride bc ppl have tried countless times to rip it away from me. To see it treated with such disdain was very hurtful.
I understand your concerns, and do not wish to minimise them, or your hurt. Obviously the phrase has colonial roots. However, it's a lower case N, and isn't intended to talk about Native Americans. When the angels talk about Aziraphale "going native", this is the meaning they are using. It may be negative for the grumpy angels, but it's positive for humanity and for Aziraphale and Crowley.
From Mirriam Webster online:
go native
idiom
: to start to behave or live like the local people
After a few weeks, she was comfortable enough to go native and wear shorts to work.
Example Sentences
Recent Examples:
But dogs that go native make bad guards, hunting companions, and friends.—David Grimm, Science | AAAS, 29 Oct. 2020
Let your yard go native: The Cuyahoga Soil & Water Conservation District is offering seven native plant kits for sale that are adapted to the local climate and do not require excess watering or fertilizer once they are established.—Joan Rusek, cleveland, 6 July 2020
3K notes · View notes
shyfrog-says · 6 months
Text
Friendly reminder that November is Native American Heritage month.
Ah-hem
AMERICA IS UNDER IMPERIAL OCCUPATION AND HAS BEEN FOR OVER 300 YEARS!
America is an imperial colony state and will be until we give the indigenous peoples their land back.
As far as I'm concerned, the fight is not over. Different tribes are gaining and losing land all the time to this day.
The colonization, genocide, whitewashing, and erasure of indigenous people in america is not just "history," it's the present. It's today, and it will be tomorrow.
I am not confident in my education on this topic, but I'm not the person you should be listening to anyway because my family has only been here for about 100 years.
Please, for the love of all that is good and just, learn. Do the research. Do something: end an offensive tradition, return an appropriated "family heirloom" to its rightful home, rob a museum, donate to a fund for a family or tribe to buy some of their land back, organize a sit-in or protest, literally anything.
Calling these injustices "history" is one of the ways that the US government tries to convince the people it dictates that there is nothing to be done and any effort to reclaim or salvage their culture is lost. But that's not true.
Please, instead of celebrating a fake story about colonizers and indigenous americans "finding common ground" and "sharing the land," just take some time to learn more about the people and cultures who called this massive and beautiful land home long before anyone from europe or russia even knew it existed. And, arguably more importantly, the atrocities that have been committed against it and its people SINCE those times.
195 notes · View notes
bfpnola · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
ID 1: “These are your reminders that:
Decolonization is not a metaphor or an abstract theory.
Every action/idea is born within context. This is not happening within a vacuum or the void.
It is not our place to dictate what the “proper response” is to 70+ years of occupation, genocide, and apartheid.
In 1923, even pioneering Zionist Ze’ev Jabotinksy acknowledged Zionism as a colonial project, impossible with the consent of natives.
Americans, your tax dollars (a planned $38 billion from 2017-2028) kill Palestinians. Contact your representatives.
The issue lies in settler-colonialism, not Jewish residents, as Palestine’s rich history demonstrates.
The two-state proposal is conceptually flawed, making it unsuitable for resolving conflict. How? It ignores the root issue of Zionist settler colonialism and the displacement of indigenous Palestinians. It offers solutions to symptoms.
This is not a fair fight. The resistance of indigenous people within the confines of an open-air prison ≠ the might of a nuclear-armed military superpower.
The colonial seeds of Zionism were planted nearly a century before the Holocaust.” End ID.
Tumblr media
ID 2: “Statement from 09/08/23: Better Future Program has always, is always, and will always be a staunch ally of the Palestinian people.
Through this statement, BFP reaffirms its commitment to the Free Palestine movement, and stands in solidarity with the people of Palestine in the pursuit of their liberation from settler sovereignty, colonial dispossession, carceral culture, racial apartheid, and European/USAmerican imperialism.
BFP also denounces the Zionist agenda, which seeks to suppress the rightful claim of the Palestinian people to their ancestral homeland, and we reject the notion of a "two-state solution." This "solution" eclipses the fundamentally asymmetrical power difference between the settler-state of "israel" and the nation of Palestine.
Furthermore, BFP rejects the ideals of homonationalism and pinkwashing. For far too long, non-racialized members of the LGBTQ+ community have been complacent in the war crimes committed against Palestinians, all because of the alleged "modernity" of israeli queer life versus the "barbarity” of Palestine.” End ID.
Tumblr media
ID 3: “It is time to reject the idea that queerness absolves whiteness/imperialism, and non-queerness justifies the abuse of generations of innocent people.
At BFP, we recognize the need to decolonize the narrative of "israel vs. Palestine" and endeavor to do so by elevating Palestinian scholarship and voices. It is wholly inappropriate to assume expertise where there is none, or to speak over Palestinian activists during dialogue regarding Palestinian liberation.
To summarize, BFP reaffirms that we will always defend Palestine and her people. BFP rejects the Zionist agenda, and its colonial, imperial, and racist trappings. Further, we reject all ideas of homonationalism and pinkwashing applied to israel's conquest of Palestine. Finally, and most importantly, BFP seeks to elevate the voices and expertise of actual Palestinians in this fight against a widespread colonial and genocidal mindset.
— BFP's Muslim + Decolonization Youth Advocate.” End ID.
Tumblr media
ID 4: Excerpt from The Jewish Paradox by Nahum Goldman [former president of the World Zionist Organization], p. 99:
“I don't understand your optimism," Ben-Gurion [1st Prime Minister of israel] declared. "Why should the Arabs make peace? If I was an Arab leader I would never make terms with israel. That is natural: we have taken their country. Sure, God promised it to us, but what does that matter to them? Our God is not theirs. We come from israel, it's true, but two thousand years ago, and what is that to them? There has been anti-Semitism, the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They only see one thing: we have come here and stolen their country. Why should they accept that? They may perhaps forget in one or two generations' time, but for the moment there is no chance. So it's simple: we have to stay strong and maintain a powerful army. Our whole policy is there. Otherwise the Arabs will wipes us out".
"But how can you sleep with that prospect in mind," I broke in, "and be Prime Minister of israel too?"
"Who says I sleep?" he answered simply.” End ID.
To make clear, BFP does not rejoice over the deaths of civilians. But in the words of Jewish director of ProjectLETS, Stefanie L. Kaufman-Mthimkhulu, “All death & loss is not the same. Violence in response to genocide & ethnic cleansing is NOT = violence for the sake of colonial land expansion. … Jewish people in Israel are not being targeted or killed because they are Jewish. This is the logical outcome of a colonized & dispossessed people's fight to EXIST and not be wiped off the fucking Earth or continue to live under a death-making apartheid state. Please understand."
No more band-aids or superficial fixes! We WOULD NOT be here if not for settler-colonialism, apartheid, genocide, occupation. We WOULD NOT be here if not for hundreds to thousands of Palestinian deaths at the hands of the IDF every year. The historical truths, even acknowledged by Zionist leaders and British records, cannot be hidden any longer. It is journalistic malpractice to continue to obscure the context that begets Palestinians’ desperately warranted responses.
And to those who may have forgotten, ALL OF OUR STRUGGLES ARE INTERCONNECTED. This has to do with YOU too. This is OUR struggle too. Open your eyes. Please.
113 notes · View notes
elbiotipo · 9 months
Note
Isn't Argentina as much of a settler state as the USA, Canada and Israel? Say, what happened to the Indigenous and the Afro population after independence?
The independent Argentine state commited genocide against the native peoples of Patagonia during the "Conquista del Desierto", and the less known yet not-less brutal colonization of the Great Chaco, by displacing or outright killing native populations. With regards to the Afrodescedant population, there was not an organized campaign of genocide, but rather a process of "invisibilization" where Afrodescendants hid their heritage to assimilate to eurocentric society, same with mestizo people. These are historical and current debts that the successive Argentine state has not repaid or adressed properly despite recent advances.
Sarmiento was the first and main architect of the conception of Argentina as a country for European inmigrants that "to modernize" needed to get rid of the native and afro-descendant population, the now celebrated figure of the gaucho, the same people who fought for independence, was disgusting to him. Julio A. Roca was inspired by the genocide of the native peoples of the United States and tried to use the same mentality and tactics here. Despite there have never been formal laws of racial separation, this mindset continued as part of state policy until roughly the early-20th century and still shapes national attitudes today.
Despite the desires of these men to destroy them, they ultimately failed. Over a milion (probably undercounted) Argentines belong multiple native peoples, with 30-40% of Argentines (depending on region) from partial or full native descent and 4-7% from african descent. Culturally, because of the aftermentioned process of invisibilization and the way the concept of race expresses itself in Latin America, there are fewer people who identify themselves with such groups than genetics show: racism still exists against "morochos", that is, brown-skinned people, compared to the Eurocentric ideal.
These are not hidden facts, they are taught in Argentine schools and universities, widely discussed and regarded as shameful, and they still shape our society and politics.
When I read the term "settler state" it confuses me because every Latin American country is a settler state, because by definition they were colonized by Spain and Portugal. Independent nations in Latin American inherited the racial and colonial mindsets of their "parent" empire. From Chile and Brazil, which also commited similar genocides on native lands following the procesess of the Spanish and Portuguese, to the opression of native and afro-descendants in favor of the european-descended elite in places like Perú, Bolivia and México, and the overall "blanqueamiento" (whitening, or however you want to call it) theory common to all Latin America where mestizaje was encouraged to "whiten" the popluation. Every Latin American nation was born, like it or not, from these violent processes.
The genocide did not begin with Argentine independence, it began in 1492, and it continues to this day. Similiarily, it has not started or stopped with a single administration or another, and it expresses itself in multiple ways. The only way to solve such deep rooted problems is by the state assuming its political, social and economical debt, but also for the entire mindset of society to change, which will take generations. I like to think we are progressing on that front, but when I see recent events such as the repression in Jujuy, I also know we have decades, if not centuries as my grandfather says, to go.
159 notes · View notes
favroitecrime · 6 months
Text
Anyway, I reinstate my point that no 18+ settler in israel is innocent. They have all picked up guns and fired them at innocent Palestinians. To look at the apartheid and constant attempted genocide that israel has been committing against Palestine and yet have the fucking audacity to argue a bullshit “two innocent” sides narrative is a joke. israel since the beginning of its colony like establishment in 1948 has always been a terrorist state.* Backed by two other major colonial powers who still continue to oppress the people they’ve colonized to this day. Who backed the South African apartheid and were not in favor of pressuring the SA government to stop the apartheid. The colony state sentenced to be merely an influential Western placement in the Middle East has never, and never will be, an innocent bystander in matters of oppression, apartheid, or ethnic cleansing.
In the same breath I would support Native Americans attempting to do the same thing in the US. I would support Natives of Canada doing the same thing. I would support Natives of Australia, Natives of New Zealand, Puerto Rico, the Polynesian islands, and every other occupied people should they decide to rise up and take back what is rightfully theirs. **You and I in our privileged world should not have the fucking audacity to police people’s resistance & liberation**. Especially when some of us have had nothing to say when they were facing the brutalities of occupation.
Keep you two sides narrative to yourselves. It’s a liberation. Down with modern colonizers. Down with modern colonies.
For the notes:
*A post listing some of the crimes israel has committed against Palestinians. I will not trouble myself with finding sources for this very, very long list. Eye.on.palestine // paliroots // letstalkpalestine all have great videos, pictures, and broken down explanations of these crimes. Can be found on instagram or twitter. A majority of these crimes can also be looked up, but heed falling into traps of western/israeli (is there really a difference?) propaganda.
**Yes fucking obviously rape and child murder are bad and harming actual innocent civilians is bad do not try that stupid card here. You know exactly what I’m referring to when I say policing revolution and any attempt to misunderstand that is a deflection.
***And yes fucking obviously anyone using this genuine tragedy as a prop for nazism/antisemitism needs to die immediately like no fucking duh bozo.
59 notes · View notes
molsno · 1 month
Text
once you've started working to deprogram yourself of american propaganda you can't stop seeing how farcical the whole thing is. they talk about "freedom" and "liberty" and write songs about how the usa is the greatest country on earth, all the while they destabilize every other country to keep them impoverished by installing fascist dictators and arming genocide against the natives.
who is "free" in the usa anyway? I drove past a luxurious house in a segregated suburban neighborhood with a fence so tall you could only barely see the top of the owner's massive pickup truck. there was a locked steel mailbox out front, cameras and an intercom system at the entrance, and a warning sign that the owner of the property was armed. does he have freedom? freedom to do what exactly? because to me it seemed that his "freedom" means the right to violently enforce ownership of the land his house is on, land which was stolen from people that the government killed and displaced through genocide. just by looking at his house I could tell that he holds an extremist ideology. yet, because this was the founding ideology of this state, it's considered "normal".
how is this worth protecting? what's redeemable about this? I struggle to imagine how any state could be more depraved than one where this is an accepted norm.
when we see the president espouse values like "freedom" and "equality" while he sends mass amounts of weapons to a state committing a horrific genocide in an act of settler colonialism, it can't be any more transparent what a lie it all is. if israel doesn't succeed, doesn't fully crush the native people of palestine whose land they're illegally occupying, then the ideology of settler colonialism will be exposed for what it truly is, and the usa's claim to "legitimacy" will soon fall.
death to israel, death to america, death to settler colonialism all around the world.
34 notes · View notes
workersolidarity · 6 months
Text
🇵🇸🇮🇱🇺🇲 The mainstream media in the United States and Europe is painting everyone into a corner. Either you are "with Hamas" or something, or you're "with Israel" whatever that means.
Here's the reality of the situation:
Palestinians live under worse apartheid conditions than anything we've seen in our lifetimes. They endure industrial scale oppression and violence at every level of their lives in an attempt to force their displacement.
You know, that whole make someone so miserable they leave of their own volition thing? Yeah, well that's what's been happening in Palestine since 1946.
War by war, skirmish by skirmish, conflict by conflict, with the backing of the entirety of the Western international apparati and the United States, Israel stole a little more land each time conflict broke out from the native Palestinians.
For decades, Israel has used a policy of inviting Jews from around to world to pour into the newly founded Israel and water down the Arab-majority demographics of the region, even as they control who can and cannot leave Palestinian territories and use their blockade of Gaza to control their diets and therefore, their reproductive habits.
Every time there was a war or displacement of Jews around the globe, Israeli authorities were there to invite more Jews, especially European and Soviet Jews, into Israel.
And so each time the apartheid conditions of Palestinians became unbearable, the Arab community in the region would lash out however they could, using politics and violence alike, as any community living under apartheid conditions would do, and each time, with the backing of the United States, Israel acquired more and more territory, displacing more and more Palestinians as they crowded into the few remaining Palestinian enclaves; what is today's West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip.
And so you can see by analyzing this history, how Palestinians, time and time again, are painted into a corner from which there is no escape.
Words go unheard by the world, prayers go unanswered, protests are brutally stifled using Israeli snipers, machine gun nests, and indiscriminate shelling, and slowly but surely, options for the Palestinian community shrink until nothing is left but violence. This cycle of violence is more than well documented for anyone willing to simply look.
Journalists and medics are purposely targeted during Protests, Palestinians are maimed, murdered, raped and imprisoned for resisting non-violently. This is also well documented for anyone willing to just look.
So no, no American has the right to judge Palestinians for how they choose to resist this Fascism, genocide, Colonialism and occupation.
I've NEVER heard an American denounce the settlers and occupation forces' beatings, raping, imprisoning and murdering of Palestinians.
I'm not "on Hamas' side" or whatever you people are saying, I'm telling you and everyone else it's not our place to tell people how they can and cannot resist genocide and ethnic cleansing or to pass some kind moral judgement as though we're somehow superior to Palestinians.
It's that same kind of supremacist thinking that leads Israelis to commit such horrific and barbaric violence against Palestinians in the first place.
I don't 'celebrate' the deaths of Israelis, I mourn the loss of Palestinians every day.
Solidarity to the death with Palestine!
@WorkerSolidarityNews
46 notes · View notes
mylight-png · 5 months
Note
I swear it's so funny listening to the Americans weigh in on this conflict 😭
"Israel is a settler colonial state"
Quick, tell me guys what you did to the Native Americans. Tell me why your Supreme Court recently ruled that a Native American tribe doesn't have a constitutional right to clean water. Explain to me why there are strict laws prohibiting non Native families from adopting Native children
"Israel is committing genocide in Gaza"
Well, damn, you wanna talk about 9/11 and Iraq?
"Jews should go back to where they came from."
Ok, you gonna give your car, your house, your apartment, your job, all your stuff for free to Native Americans and go back to Europe? Here's your ticket— Oh no you don't want to?
"Jews oppress Palestinians"
You still have a racism problem with your treatment of POC shut upppppp
The hypocrisy is wild, you're right.
Even if Jews weren't indigenous to Israel (except we are), their argument would make no fucking sense.
So would what Hamas did to Jews/Israelis on October 7th be okay for oppressed people to do to anyone anywhere?
How would they feel if, for the sake of an example, a Native American tribe started a violent terrorist group, and this group entered a concert and also civilian homes, and then slaughtered and raped and beheaded and burned alive over a thousand innocent civilians.
Would they be okay with that?
No, because even though the pain of the Native American community is very real, and their awful treatment by US colonizers was utterly atrocious, we recognize that going in and raping young girls to the point where their pelvises literally broke, and putting babies in ovens, and burning children and elderly people, any people really, alive, is unacceptable. Under any and all circumstances.
So why is it ok when it happens to Jews?
I also found this post that I think adds on to your point very well:
Tumblr media
The hypocrisy is just absolutely absurd.
It generally really bothers me how us being indigenous to Israel is being so overlooked and ignored, but when people use it as the basis for antisemitism, it becomes both outrageous and absurd. Not only are they lying, but their lies would justify horrible atrocities committed against them, except that's ignored, because obviously their rhetoric only applies to when Jews are being killed.
27 notes · View notes
a-queer-seminarian · 2 months
Text
Puerto Rican Jewish poet & activist Aurora Levins Morales speaks on solidarity & the history of antisemitism
From her poem "Red Sea":
...We cannot cross until we carry each other, all of us refugees, all of us prophets. No more taking turns on history's wheel, trying to collect old debts no-one can pay. The sea will not open that way.  This time that country is what we promise each other, our rage pressed cheek to cheek until tears flood the space between, until there are no enemies left, because this time no one will be left to drown and all of us must be chosen.  This time it's all of us or none.
Tumblr media
I was deeply moved by an article on Levins Morales' website in which she examines modern-day Israel through a zoomed-out lens of millennia of antisemitism:
‘Long before that state was founded out of the ashes of genocide and at the expense of a colonized Arab people, Jews were the shock absorbers of Europe's class societies, "Middle Agents" drafted into being the local representatives of distant and definitely Christian ruling classes who alternately exploited and persecuted them while squeezing the life blood out of Europe's peasants and workers.'
People are often confused by anti-Semitism. They see many US Jews accumulating wealth, moving up, gaining positions of influence, and they say, "What oppression?"... 
The whole point of anti-Semitism has been to create a vulnerable buffer group that can be bribed with some privileges into managing the exploitation of others, and then, when social pressure builds, be blamed and scapegoated, distracting those at the bottom from the crimes of those at the top. Peasants who go on pogrom against their Jewish neighbors won't make it to the nobleman's palace to burn him out and seize the fields. This was the role of Jews in Europe. This has been the role of Jews in the United States, and this is the role of Jews in the Middle East…’
Levins Morales explains those “buffer” roles in detail, describes how Latin@s are often put in these roles as well, and then brings up an author who said of Israelis, “given all they’ve endured, they should know better.” She responds to this with this insight:
‘Trauma doesn't make people into better human beings. Most of the time, trauma just makes people terrified and easier to manipulate. It makes starving Irish tenants fleeing a devastating famine willing to own slaves or homestead Native American land or police the ghettos they used to live in. It makes the formerly kidnapped and enslaved willing to set up shop in Liberia and hold their African kin in contempt. It makes the survivors of Hitler's Final Solution be willing to become harsh colonial masters, agents of US oil greed and militarism, to bulldoze the villages of Palestinians to make Jewish settlements, torture and kill those who resist, and still insist they are the victims here. People who have faced destruction don't necessarily know better.’
While naming that trauma doesn’t make people “better,” just leaves them terrified and grasping at any sense of security they can, Levins Morales is also sure to note how Jews have always been “disproportionately present in movements for social justice wherever [they] have landed.” To her, fighting antisemitism means supporting Jewish integrity, the Jewish commitment to justice and compassion. 
Furthermore, solidarity with the people of Israel and Palestine alike depends on our clear stand against antisemitism in our own communities, because, she says, 
'The central justification for Israeli militarism and the subjugation of Palestinians is the belief that Jews are alone in the world, that no-one will fight for us, that the next time Jews are blamed and attacked, most of the world's people will stand by and watch.'
Only through all of us standing up to antisemitism and standing side by side with our Jewish neighbors, she says, can Jews feel secure enough to “abandon the middle agent role and get the backs of other peoples, knowing that they also have ours."
It is this vision of interdependence and mutual aid that Levins Morales brings into her poem “Red Sea," which imagines the kind of liberation when Moses parted the Red Sea happening today — but only if we support one another.
Tumblr media
15 notes · View notes
criptochecca · 2 months
Text
Promptings to reinterpret the Judeocide also hail from cultural and political circles that should not in any way be confused with historical revisionism. Some time ago, a debate developed in France that pitted Armenian intellectuals and Jewish intellectuals against one another. The former attacked Bernard Lewis as a revisionist and negationist. Concerned to reassert the incomparability of the Holocaust, he had rejected any attempt to equate, or even compare, it with the Armenian tragedy. The latter was to be interpreted as a 'simple' deportation which, in conditions of total war, objectively resulted in a large-scale massacre: 'no serious proof exists of a decision and plan by the Ottoman government to destroy the Armenian nation' as such. The angry reaction of descendants of the victims of this tragic episode in modern history is fully understandable, especially since for some time now they have been stressing that it was precisely to the genocide of their ancestors that Hitler referred when planning the war of extermination in the East: who, Hitler asked, now remembers the Armenians? And who, some decades hence, will bother about the drastic reduction in numbers of the natives that the Wehrmacht intends to carry out in the impending German colonial empire? In the history of the twentieth century, then, the Armenian genocide is not only the first chronologically, but the model inspiring the culprits of subsequent genocides. The Jewish Holocaust is not a unique phenomenon, and not even the original genocide. This thesis provoked cries of scandal over the 'ultimate expedient of a more subtle revisionism' and a new riposte from the Armenian side: does drawing attention to 'genocides other than the Jewish one', and rescuing those suffered by the Armenians and Romany from oblivion, 'attest to a more subtle revisionism'? Romany likewise lament the lack of attention paid to the tragedy of their people:
Romany are confined to oral culture and must speak the unspeakable to distracted ears in simple terms. They do not possess organic intellectuals who can express the collective anguish of exterminated families or schol- ars capable of analysing the specific character of Nazi legislation, describing the process of deportation, and quantifying the impact of the extermination.
Identified as responsible for the first twentieth-century genocide, Turks not only reject the charge, but sometimes observe that behind their measures against the Armenians lay the experience of the concentration camps employed by the British against the Boers some years earlier. Significantly, it was precisely then that a term and category destined to play a crucial role in today's debates began to make its appearance: the British pacifist press denounced the 'holocaust of child-life' which occurred during the suppression of the Boer rebels. The latter in fact embodied the worst of the colonial tradition in their policy towards the natives, who met with the fate traditionally reserved for Indians and peoples regarded as dross. From Europe and Africa we thus pass to America. During the inauguration of the mausoleum dedicated to the Holocaust, survivors of the Native American population asked why a similar monument had not been erected in memory of the genocide committed in the Western hemisphere. Like the Romany, Native Americans cannot count on many organic intellectuals. Perhaps they have found an exception in the author of a book, at once committed and rigorous, devoted to the ' American Holocaust'. As early as the end of the sixteenth century, the ' discovery' of the New World had led to 60-80 million deaths, but 'the carnage was not over'. Intellectuals of Jewish origin do not challenge the fact that 'sheerly as a matter of quantity the Indian catastrophe is unparalleled' and, 'both absolutely and proportionally, surpasses the destruction of European Jewry'. In this instance, however, we are not dealing with the planned total destruction of an ethnic group. To which the scholar on the Native American side of the question replies:
A traditional Eurocentric bias that lumps undifferentiated masses of' Africans' into one single category and undifferentiated masses of 'Indians' into another, while making fine distinctions among the populations of Europe, permits the ignoring of cases in which genocide against Africans and American Indians has resulted in the total extermination - purposefully carried out - of entire cultural, social, religious, and ethnic groups.
This thesis is fully confirmed by the picture drawn by a loyalist historian of the American Revolution. Ryerson observed of the policy of 'the destruction of the Six Indian Nations' adopted by the rebel colonists: 'Congress, by an order which, we believe, has no parallel in the annals of any civilized nation, commands the complete destruction of these people as a nation … including women and children.
[...]
The fate of the Native Americans evokes that of the blacks, who were called on to replace or flank them in the forced labour required in the continent conquered by the Europeans. Descendants of the slaves deported from Africa in their turn underscore the centrality of the 'Black Holocaust', if only on account of its secular duration and the number of countries involved, including the most civilized - among them, the leader of the Western world today. A religious curse has long followed blacks. In Genesis (9, 2 1-7), we read that, after the great flood and following a copious libation, Noah slept naked and was discovered thus by his amused, disrespectful youngest son, Ham. When the patriarch awoke and realized what had occurred, he condemned Ham's descendants to be slaves of the descendants of Shem and Japheth (Noah's other sons). Blacks were subsequently identified and branded as descendants of Ham and their slavery was thus theologically sanctioned.
[...]
Over the centuries, anti-Hamitism has raged alongside anti Semitism; and Christians and Jews have participated in it. More than on any other people, the horror of world history has been focused on blacks. Unlike all others subject to persecution, noted Malcolm X, they cannot hide their skin colour and identity. Consequently, we can understand the success of Islam among black American activists, who, to prove the uniqueness of the 'Black Holocaust' , sometimes stress Jewish participation in the slave-trading from Africa. While the thesis of the exemplary character of the Armenian genocide sparks accusations of revisionism, the latter argument prompts the charge of anti-Semitism. But it is meaningless to brand as such an assertion corresponding to historical reality. The tendency to inflate the role of Jews in the black slave trade is certainly dangerous and inadmissible. Yet it would be absurd and unjust to claim that Jews alone were strangers to a historical experience and infamy whose protagonist was colonialism in its entirety, and to which Islam - often referred to by black militants in their polemic against the West (and the Judeo Christian religious tradition) - was certainly no stranger.
[...]
Silence on the 'Black Holocaust' and the 'American Holocaust' is matched by trivialization of the Jewish Holocaust. Although, in justifying two different ideas of global 'mission' or 'task' , the genealogical myths thus constructed can come into contradiction with one another, they fully converge in reinforcing a third genealogical myth. With the repression of the Native American and black tragedies, and the trivialization of the Judeocide - or, at any rate, its severance from the colonial tradition and assignment to Asiatic barbarism (the fact that the fate of the Jews was sealed by their dual stigmatization as Eastern 'natives' and bearers of eastern Bolshevism is ignored) - the West undergoes a dazzling transfiguration that affords no space for balanced historical assessments and relations of equality with the rest of the world. While he characterizes the genocide of the Native Americans as the worst ever perpetrated, the author of American Holocaust suggests regarding each of the great genocides in the history of humanity as 'unique, for one reason or another'.
At work here is a concern to put an end to the quarrels dividing the victims and their descendants. It is clear that historians must continue to examine the peculiarity of each of the great historical tragedies. Yet the horror of the dual naturalistic de-specification of which the Jews were victims in the twentieth century cannot be adequately appreciated if their experience is severed from the colonial tradition, which the Third Reich sought to resume and radicalize.
Domenico Losurdo - War and Revolution
17 notes · View notes
slicedblackolives · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
btw this person admitted to me in the DMs (they initiated) that the only reason their great grandma got a college education was because they were Mormon settlers in Utah and the LDS (who committed genocide against native Americans in Utah with collusion from the US government) subsidised female education with the money they got from said settler genocide. Their family also were farmers and I…. Wonder how the fuck they got the land? It was not stolen from indigenous people surely? And then they’re whining about what they should do. Thee most direct beneficiary of American settler colonialism and genocide crying about having to work in a restaurant. How dare the blood money not stay in the family!!!!
Tumblr media Tumblr media
14 notes · View notes
turtletoria · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
I was debating just ignoring this message because it's stupid and inconsiderate as hell but im just going to use this as an opportunity to talk to you all about this, especially if you also think this way since i dont think this is even an uncommon line of thought (as ghoulish as it sounds 5 months into this genocide. where have these people been???).
I believe that if you see injustice you should try to do something, anything, about it, especially something so harrowing and horrific as a genocide that is currently decimating said country a "world away." it is our responsibility as humans to care about other humans. and apparently millions and millions of other people agree, just from opening tumblr or instagram or twitter and seeing supportive posts and calls to action, or looking at the brave people going to rallies and protests and disrupting life as usual, seeing people come together to mass email and call representatives so that these government workers can get off their asses and do something. recently chicago has become the biggest city to call for a ceasefire. This is a really big deal.
and also if "your country" means the US, then I feel like this "territorial dispute" (what a crass and disgusting way to refer to an ethnic cleansing that goes way beyond just fighting over territory) is definitely relevant to USians, especially taxpayers. the US, the UK, Canada, the imperial powers of the West are aiding and abetting this genocide through their citizens' tax dollars. despite their frustrating and infuriating inaction, even an important institution as the ICJ has acknowledged that genocide committed by israel is plausible - its on the record now. how horrible then, that MY and millions of others' tax dollars are being taken and used against our will for something so depraved and evil as this - it's all the more reason that all these problems are connected and those in the West have a responsibility to redirect where their money goes - i and everyone else that lives and works and pays taxes in the West have a stake in this and an even bigger moral imperative to do something, anything. moreover these imperial powers, most notably the US, have a history of colonization and subjugation of the global south, often using military power not for the benefit of their citizens but more so for consolidating and maintaining global hegemony - just look at the korean war, the vietnam war, CIA involvement in cuba, etc. etc. etc.
and in this way the US' problems, like anon's mention of enslaved labor, are interconnected with Palestinian liberation -> Palestine is a country struggling for statehood against a colonial power. Land back for Palestinians translates to Land Back for Native Americans and indigenous peoples. A common slogan that I saw in posters was "Nobody is free until we are all free." And this is true! Also it's possible to care about multiple things at once, by the way! just a thought! you don't have to give up everything just because you can't solve or do everything! i get it, it can be overwhelming since it seems the world is ending everyday everywhere. but you have to take a breath and do what you think is right. and sometimes that means focusing your energy on things that are pressing and important, and would make the biggest impact (that one is able to make) for helping people in the here and now. its not "handwringing," it's a reminder of our responsibility to humanity.
15 notes · View notes
tieflingkisser · 6 months
Text
We Are Millions, We Are Billions, We are all Palestinians: Stand with Palestine in DC on November 4th
There is an emergent mass movement in the United States unwavering in its struggle for the liberation of Palestine. Join us in Washington, DC on November 4 for the largest march for Palestine in U.S. history: the Palestinian cause is your cause.
We are witnessing an emergent movement in the United States, one that upholds Black Lives from Ferguson to Minneapolis, champions Native sovereignty from the Hawaiian mountains to the Plains of the Dakotas, knows no borders from the Texas deserts to the California valley and reclaims our stolen labor from the classrooms of Oklahoma to the factories of Michigan and the hotels of Los Angeles. It is a mass base, cross-coalition movement unwavering in its struggle for the liberation of Palestine. Although it may appear disparate at times, its compass is the world-historical refusal of the downtrodden, and as the Palestinian revolutionary intellectual Ghassan Kanafani makes clear, Palestine unites us, for “the Palestinian cause is not a cause for Palestinians only, but a cause for every revolutionary wherever he is, as a cause of the exploited and oppressed.”   
This movement did not begin two weeks ago but builds on decades of grassroots and youth-led struggle wherever Palestinians, Arabs, and those who stand with them against Zionist colonialism find themselves. On November 4th, this movement will make its way to Washington, DC’s Freedom Plaza, to march for an end to the siege on Gaza, a ceasefire, and an end to the U.S. aid to Israel. Organized by the Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM), National Students for Justice in Palestine, ANSWER Coalition, The People’s Forum, Al-Awda, US Palestinian Community Network, American Muslim Alliance, US Campaign for Palestinian Rights, Maryland2Palestine and the Palestinian Feminist Collective, this march represents a critical moment in the Palestine struggle, signaling the consolidation of a mass movement in the United States committed to challenging the decades-long role of the American government in the genocide of the Palestinian people.
As of this morning, the Ministry of Health in Gaza reported approximately over 8,000 Palestinians have been martyred, including no less than 3,342 children, with one child killed every 10 minutes by the Israeli bombardment. All of this death in just three weeks’ time. Still, there are hundreds more buried in the rubble, scattered across the besieged and leveled neighborhoods. Palestinians cannot count their dead, and Israel—in its never-ending bombardment—has robbed them of their mourning. The occupying colonial power has destroyed over half of all homes in its bombing campaign, displacing 1.4 million Palestinians within the 140 square miles of what is called the Gaza Strip. There is no place to hide from this unceasing assault. Even the places of refuge and medical care—hospitals, schools, mosques, and churches—are brazenly blown to pieces. More US-funded bombs have been dropped on Gaza over the past two weeks than the United States dropped on Afghanistan over ten years. 
A campaign of relentless destruction and massacre is not cheap. Israel needs more bombs, more white phosphorus, more soldiers, and ever more weapons to raze Gaza and fill its mass graves. On October 20, the White House requested $10.6 billion in additional military aid to Israel. According to U.S. President Joe Biden, this material support for the Israeli state’s escalating colonial depravity is “a smart investment that’s going to pay dividends for American security for generations.” Concurrently, Israeli think tanks—operationalizing this investment—have openly laid out their blueprints for the complete ethnic cleansing of 2.4 million Palestinians in Gaza. Israeli officials have openly called for genocide, the wiping of Gaza from the Earth, and referring to Palestinians as human animals and children of darkness. This extermination, as both U.S. and Israeli governments assert, is essential for national security. Such revolting claims to national security are not new but predicate U.S. imperialism and the 17-year siege on Gaza: a land, air, and sea blockade that has transformed Gaza into a concentration camp, where new U.S. and Israeli weapons and surveillance technologies are field-tested on a captive population, and Israeli officials proudly exclaim that they are keeping Palestinians in Gaza on a strict diet. 
The movement for Palestine is not confined only to the crowds of big liberal cities but courageously proclaims its imperative in the streets of Green Bay, Wisconsin, and Jackson, Mississippi. This movement advances alongside the global people’s struggle to uplift the Palestinian cause from the streets of Dublin and Sanaa, Jakarta and Tehran, Toronto and Cairo, and London to Amman, calling for the end of the U.S.-backed Zionist siege on Gaza. Students walked out of their classrooms on October 25th on over one-hundred campuses across North America; Jewish organizers chained themselves to politicians’ doors and occupied their offices, along with New York City’s Grand Central Station; activists are taking direct action against Elbit Systems, Israel’s largest weapons manufacturer, in Cambridge Massachusetts; Palestinian youth and grassroots organizations from Houston to Detroit organize rally after rally, culminating in some of the largest marches for Palestine the country has ever seen.  
As we march, speak, and sing out our commands for Palestinian freedom and an end to the genocidal siege, we know that we are not alone or small. We hear the mighty chorus tremble through our city streets. We see the feeble Zionist response. It is clear the people are with Palestine. Yet, the corporate media attempts to portray the movement as an isolated radical fringe. The numbers in the streets are outright ignored or under-reported, revising the thousands into hundreds or fewer. When reported on, the movement is depicted as violent “terror” rallies, reinforcing the Biden administration’s Islamophobic incitement of hatred and the dehumanization of the Palestinian people. With these mass mobilizations have also come state repression and violence. The FBI has visited homes of Palestinians, workers and students have been fired from their jobs, and universities have threatened action against the student movement. Lamentably, these are not empty threats. Lives have been destroyed. Our precious martyr, Wadea Al-Fayoume, a 6-year old living with his family in the suburbs of Chicago, was brutally murdered in his home. And as Zionists attack peaceful rallies with their cars and fire guns into crowds in another Chicago suburb, we continue to mobilize in the face of reactionary violence, resolute in the conviction of the Palestinian cause. 
In spite of these attempts to silence and violently suppress the movement, we know that Palestinians in Gaza and throughout the lands of Palestine hear us and see us. We know, just as they have remained steadfast throughout 75 years of occupation and ethnic cleansing, throughout 17 years of blockade, and in the face of the current bombardment of Gaza and reinvigorated effort at eliminating Palestine, our struggle is not in vain, and we too must remain steadfast in mobilizing day in and day out to end the siege on Gaza and stop the genocide of the Palestinian people.  
The national march on November 4th in Washington, DC, is a call to all progressive forces steadfastly fighting against exploitation and oppression: the Palestinian cause is your cause. Transportation is being organized all over the country, from cities including Chicago, New York, Atlanta, Boston, Pittsburgh, Raleigh, Indianapolis, Albuquerque, Providence, Philadelphia, and more. Over 200 organizations have endorsed the march and are joining together on Joe Biden’s doorstep—with the combined energy and strength the movement has brought to cities, towns, workplaces, and schools across the country— demanding, loud and clear: CEASEFIRE NOW! END THE SIEGE ON GAZA! END ALL U.S. AID TO ISRAEL! 
The national march on November 4th in Washington, DC, is a call to all progressive forces steadfastly fighting against exploitation and oppression: the Palestinian cause is your cause. Transportation is being organized all over the country, from cities including Chicago, New York, Atlanta, Boston, Pittsburgh, Raleigh, Indianapolis, Albuquerque, Providence, Philadelphia, and more. Over 200 organizations have endorsed the march and are joining together on Joe Biden’s doorstep—with the combined energy and strength the movement has brought to cities, towns, workplaces, and schools across the country— demanding, loud and clear: CEASEFIRE NOW! END THE SIEGE ON GAZA! END ALL U.S. AID TO ISRAEL! 
5 notes · View notes
fyumbrellaacademy · 3 months
Text
During colonial times in north america, it is documented that many natives did kidnap and rape white female settlers, as well as killing peaceful or non-combative settlers.
Does that mean natives deserved to be genocided?
During the Haitian Revolution, specifically the 1804 french massacre, hundreds, maybe more, of french women were raped and killed, and even more french civilians were killed wholesale.
Does that mean Haitians deserved to be enslaved?
The Viet Cong committed massacres against its own countrymen, women, and children, notably including the Huê' massacre of 1968.
Does that mean Vietnam deserved to have well over 65 thousand of its civilians slaughtered by the US and 50% of its forests destroyed? Was the My Lai massacre justified?
Japan was a member of the Axis powers in WW2.
Does that mean over 200 thousand japanese civilians with no say in what wars their country fought deserved to be slaughtered by two atomic bombs? Did japanese-americans deserve to be imprisoned in camps?
If you answered "yes" to any of these, you're racist. Full stop. If you said "no" to any of them, then I don't want to hear a fucking peep about how Hamas actions delegitamize the call for Palestinian freedom. We can fucking account for any crimes they've committed AFTER they're not being FUCKING GENOCIDED anymore.
5 notes · View notes
little-lynx · 2 years
Note
Disney didn’t make Pocahontas to make kids interested in history and want to ask questions. It was yet another instance of white people intending to changing history in order to fit their narrative and manipulating the next generation into believing it. I feel that topics such as colonialism and Europeans committing genocide against indigenous peoples should be common knowledge. I understand you’re not from the Americas but this should be standard world history, similarly to how the Russian Revolution is. If you’re putting art into spaces, please be conscious and careful of how it is received. I don’t believe you to be ignorant, but even if you weren’t aware of such a thing, it only would’ve taken a moments research to understand how hurtful that depiction is.
I noticed that you said that you are now opposed to drawing Katniss as indigenous because of this response. I would like you to understand that Katniss IS coded as indigenous. Instead of stripping that character of her identity, perhaps you should take this time as constructive criticism and learn. You’re a very talented artist, and you do a lot for the fandom to keep it alive. We would appreciate it if you don’t whitewash her character because your newfound worry to draw her as indigenous.
Hello.
I would like this to be the last message to this topic and after that I want to consider this incident settled.
I have no idea what Disney’s intentions were. I can only speak for myself. I was around 6 or 7 years old when I watched this movie and it made ME to ask questions and it made ME to want learn more. Maybe you were well aware of Russian Revolution when you were seven but I had no idea about Pocahontas at that age. Also American films have taught me to rigidly separate truth from fiction, and not to be offended by the disgusting stereotypical image that they present. I mean. I’m russian. Vodka-medvedi-balalaika-kgb. I still enjoy those movies sometimes. But I understand that people can have different opinions.
My dearest friends from the fandom were kind enough to tell me everything I should know and why people were so upset with my art. I apologised sincerely and deleted it.
You said that “If you’re putting art into spaces, please be conscious and careful of how it is received.” And of course I will be more careful now. But you see… There are people who say that Stephenie Meyer is racist and her depiction of Quileutes is awful and if I draw Jacob Black than I’m a racist too (no kidding, I have this message in my ask box since 2020, and I haven’t draw Jacob anymore since I received it well it didn’t prevent me from being called a racist anyway). Also I saw people talking that Suzanne Collins is racist because she “intentionally wrote Seam people as olive skinned to show POC as dirty and aggressive”. So am I a racist because I draw Gale Hawthorne a lot? Should I stop drawing him? Should I stop drawing Haymitch? Should I stop drawing Katniss? Where’s the line? Who is the judge?
Katniss MIGHT BE coded as indigenous. Or she might have black roots (I’m not sure if this sounds good enough but believe me I don’t try to offend black people). Or Spanish. Or Asian (in Russia “olive skinned” is usually referred to Asian people). Or just have tanned skin tone (for example my husband has a lot more darker skin than I have because he has ancestors from Central Asia but he is still white man). That’s up to readers to decide how to imagine Katniss. And I’m sure Suzanne did it intentionally so many different people can feel connection with Katniss. There are different opinions and please stop considering yours as the only true.
You might have noticed that I ALWAYS draw Katniss with darker skin and black hair. I have no idea what do you mean about “whitewashing” but I don’t have any intentions to change my way of drawing Katniss. But it’s up to beholders what to see in my depiction: native girl, black girl, anyone else. Anything that would make them feel good. What I meant is that I won’t ever draw Katniss’s race easily recognizable anymore.
I’m here to give people joy and share my love and some skill. And what I received was not “constructive criticism”. But I certainly learned a lot.
For everyone who sent me words of support - thank you. That means a lot to me. I don’t want to answer publicly because I want this topic to be done. I hope you understand. Thank you again. I love you all and only meant good.
103 notes · View notes