#and we as an audience know its his own insecurities but thats ed at his completely most vulnerable

[lemonlimetoast]

Ok so like many people have been like "oh the way ed looks at stede, the way stede looks at Ed, the way the look at each other" etc and yes very true

BUT it's important to me that they look at each other differently.

Everytime stede looks at Ed with love, it's like a look of relief and calmness and belonging (which fits with the theme of him not really feeling like he belongs as a fancy lad or as a pirate until he meets Ed).

Everytime (or a lot of the time) Ed looks at stede with love, it's a look of amazement and also just like idk how to describe this... But it makes sense because he's amazed at how much stede can bring into his life and be so new and genuine and how someone like that could care so much about someone like him.

#finally tagging this one properly bc i have no personal post attached to it #ofmd #our flag means death #stede bonnet #ed teach #i dont know what to tell u guys im seriously deep in this show #and i took lit in hs #i forgot what was actually called #i think it's also interesting how stede presents himself as emotionally mature he still has a lot to learn about himself #and how he often doesnt do what he tells his crew which is to talk about it #like a lot of his convos w ed have undercurrents of him having background feelings #like the iconic tub cry scene hes very much there for him but also like ur not still gonna kill me tho right #which is fair #and the kiss scene where ed talks about running away he seems hesistant even before he gets threatened in the woods #and we as an audience know its his own insecurities but thats ed at his completely most vulnerable #hair down no beard white shirt no cool facade and having just explained his feelings and kissed stede #and he obviously perceives it as wow stede saw me at my most me and decided that he didn't like it and left #anyways I'm feeling so many normal emotions about this show its crazy /j #midnighttalk #BTW hair up is his fancy lad mask/shield/presentation and beard is that for pirating #which is why he starts hair down then as he wants to get fancier and esp for stede its up #then abandons it for stede and to be really himself #then down again bc hes fallen apart then down still because of his emo era and him not wanting anything to do with him anymore #beard is shorter bc he abandons jt fully for stede in 9 then gets stubble following that so its like piracy slowly creeping back #then w the makeup he forces it back on amd goes whole hog for piracy again #andd then cries jt off because he doesnt want to go back to who he was and in many ways cant #ok i keep adding onto these tags my bad but it also has to do with how ed ties sm of his self worth to stede after the fine things scene #and like in general but THATS really the pinpoint yk #and stede doesn't really change like that outwardly i think #also has to do w how for stede its about belonging and and for ed its about who he is fundamentally..... and for both its about living

[lindyhunt]

Everything That Upset The Internet This Week

What is the web-o-sphere angry about this week? One man’s idea of fantasy, another man’s desire to be 20 years younger and a classic animated ogre returning to the big screen. Here’s everything you need to know.

Victoria’s Secret “Architects” say they don’t include plus-size or trans models “because the show is a fantasy”

THE STORY: Ahead of this year’s Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show, Vogue spoke with Ed Razek, the brand’s chief marketing officer, and Monica Mitro, executive vice president of public relations. In the article, titled “’We’re Nobody’s Third Love, We’re Their First Love’—The Architects of the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show Are Still Banking on Bombshells,” When asked to comment on the shifting interests of customers (i.e. diversity), Razek is quoted saying: “So it’s like, why don’t you do [size] 50 [bras]? Why don’t you do 60? Why don’t you do 24? It’s like, why doesn’t your show do this? Shouldn’t you have transsexuals in the show? No. No, I don’t think we should. Well, why not? Because the show is a fantasy. It’s a 42-minute entertainment special. That’s what it is.” At another point in the interview, he laughably tries to credit for Rihanna breaking barriers with Savage x Fenty. HA!

THE REACTION:

fuck VS for not including trans or plus size models in their runway show bc “it doesn’t fit into the fantasy” it’s 2018 no one wants to see basic n boring women wearing rhinestones anymore unless it’s revolutionary AND THATS WHY UR SALES AND VIEWS R DROPPING @VictoriasSecret

— ken🍒 (@KTackkett) November 9, 2018

This is a fucking mess…also, who says trans people can't be fantasized about? So bad. I haven't shopped at VS for years for a variety of reasons and I'm glad my money is going elsewhere.

— 🕸️KVG📚 (@SomethingDutch) November 9, 2018

An 80 year old man owns the company and a 70 year old man runs it. And their archaic perspectives – on women, on gender, on plus size folks, on trans folks – are making VS a worse brand by the day.

— Cora Harrington (@lingerie_addict) November 9, 2018

RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE RAGE: Yup, this outrage was warranted. What exactly is the fantasy, here? Are we, the paying customer, suppose to fantasize about ourselves in this lavish lingerie? Because last I checked, all women wear underwear—not just thin, cis-gendered women. And while I have the utmost respect for the models who work hard to walk in the VS show, but they aren’t representative of all Victoria’s Secret shoppers. They know it, we know it, and Victoria’s Secret knows it, too.

In response to the backlash, this apology was issued:

Please read this important message from Ed Razek, Chief Marketing Officer, L Brands (parent company of Victoria’s Secret). pic.twitter.com/CW8BztmOaM

— Victoria's Secret (@VictoriasSecret) November 10, 2018

Or, as Twitter user @VABVOX summarizes, “SHORTER RAZEK: ‘I’m sorry I got called out for my remarks about trans models who are on EVERY runway from Paris to Milan but mine. As for the fatties, I’m not even bothering with apologizing to them, even though the average American woman is a size 14, because no one cares.'”

69-year-old man who identifies as a 45-year-old begins legal action to lower age

THE STORY: Emile Ratelband, a 69-year-old Dutch “positivity trainer,” has launched a legal battle to change his age to 45. “We live in a time when you can change your name and change your gender. Why can’t I decide my own age?” he said. His argument is that he’s being discriminated against because of his age, noting how it affects his employment chances and his success rate on Tinder. Like, the dating app.

THE REACTION:

A 69 year old man wants to legally change his age to 45 because he identifies as a 45 year old.

2018, you are whack. pic.twitter.com/Yhk0qG7Rh2

— Cathy Crawley (@cathy_crawley) November 8, 2018

Just saw a headline there about a man entering a lawsuit to legally lower his age as he identifies as a 45 year old rather than 69. I thought it was a joke but its genuinely serious. The world's fucking nuts

— Liam Dodson (@Liamdodson) November 8, 2018

Some dumb fuck who feels insecure about their age: im trans-age! I dont identify as 69 years old, im living in a 45 year old body GREAT FOR YOU FOR FEELING HEALTHY AND YOUNG BUT NO. TRANS AGE IS NOT A THING. THIS JUST PAINTS A BAD PICTURE FOR THE TRANS COMMUNITY. TED TALK, OVER

— 🎄Festive Emy🎄 (@CertifiedWeaboo) November 8, 2018

RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE RAGE: Ageism is a real thing. Particularly in the career spaces, where in a youth-oriented work culture, the positive attributes of older employees are often crowded out by negative stereotypes. And, despite what you may have seen on Age Gap Love, age is a number people tend to care about in the dating sphere.

But it really feels like that in bringing this to court, Ratelband’s goal is to delegitimize trans rights. Being transgender is not a choice. By “choosing” to be a 45-year-old, is Ratelband choosing to live a life that risks him facing daily abuse, discrimination and prejudice? Is his age dysmorphia causing him extreme distress? At what point did he decide he was 20 years older than what is stated on his birth certificate? I don’t know the answers to these questions, but I’m interested in seeing how the court case—and the conversations surrounding it—develop.

  Shrek is getting the Hollywood reboot treatment from the guy behind Despicable Me

THE STORY: In a recent Variety profile, Chris Meledandri, the founder of Illumination Entertainment, revealed that he would be rebooting the Shrek and Puss in Boots franchises. Meledandri, who is best known as the creator of the Despicable Me franchise, said in the interview that his task for Shrek is to craft new storylines that will re-introduce the beloved ogre to new movie audiences. Really, really.

THE REACTION:

Who asked for this? There is nothing wrong with OG Shrek. Leave the good things alone. https://t.co/q1kT9stkU4

— Charnelle Blackwood (@x_charneezy) November 6, 2018

" Shrek reboot but without Smashmouth and by the guy who made the fucking minions movie " We are in the Darkest Timeline

— Trustworthy Fellow (@idiotwhoreass) November 7, 2018

what the FUCK do you mean "reboot Shrek"?!

— Kate Peterman (@KayTePea) November 6, 2018

RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE RAGE: Honestly, this was going to happen eventually. It sucks, but it’s the new normal in the oh-so-unoriginal Hollywood. The reboots start coming and they don’t stop coming…

Their best bet might be to just hire Bradley Cooper and Lady Gaga as voice actors. Those two seem to know how to make a reboot work.

[jessicakehoe]

Everything That Upset The Internet This Week

What is the web-o-sphere angry about this week? One man’s idea of fantasy, another man’s desire to be 20 years younger and a classic animated ogre returning to the big screen. Here’s everything you need to know.

Victoria’s Secret “Architects” say they don’t include plus-size or trans models “because the show is a fantasy”

THE STORY: Ahead of this year’s Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show, Vogue spoke with Ed Razek, the brand’s chief marketing officer, and Monica Mitro, executive vice president of public relations. In the article, titled “’We’re Nobody’s Third Love, We’re Their First Love’—The Architects of the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show Are Still Banking on Bombshells,” When asked to comment on the shifting interests of customers (i.e. diversity), Razek is quoted saying: “So it’s like, why don’t you do [size] 50 [bras]? Why don’t you do 60? Why don’t you do 24? It’s like, why doesn’t your show do this? Shouldn’t you have transsexuals in the show? No. No, I don’t think we should. Well, why not? Because the show is a fantasy. It’s a 42-minute entertainment special. That’s what it is.” At another point in the interview, he laughably tries to credit for Rihanna breaking barriers with Savage x Fenty. HA!

THE REACTION:

fuck VS for not including trans or plus size models in their runway show bc “it doesn’t fit into the fantasy” it’s 2018 no one wants to see basic n boring women wearing rhinestones anymore unless it’s revolutionary AND THATS WHY UR SALES AND VIEWS R DROPPING @VictoriasSecret

— ken🍒 (@KTackkett) November 9, 2018

This is a fucking mess…also, who says trans people can't be fantasized about? So bad. I haven't shopped at VS for years for a variety of reasons and I'm glad my money is going elsewhere.

— 🕸️KVG📚 (@SomethingDutch) November 9, 2018

An 80 year old man owns the company and a 70 year old man runs it. And their archaic perspectives – on women, on gender, on plus size folks, on trans folks – are making VS a worse brand by the day.

— Cora Harrington (@lingerie_addict) November 9, 2018

RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE RAGE: Yup, this outrage was warranted. What exactly is the fantasy, here? Are we, the paying customer, suppose to fantasize about ourselves in this lavish lingerie? Because last I checked, all women wear underwear—not just thin, cis-gendered women. And while I have the utmost respect for the models who work hard to walk in the VS show, but they aren’t representative of all Victoria’s Secret shoppers. They know it, we know it, and Victoria’s Secret knows it, too.

In response to the backlash, this apology was issued:

Please read this important message from Ed Razek, Chief Marketing Officer, L Brands (parent company of Victoria’s Secret). pic.twitter.com/CW8BztmOaM

— Victoria's Secret (@VictoriasSecret) November 10, 2018

Or, as Twitter user @VABVOX summarizes, “SHORTER RAZEK: ‘I’m sorry I got called out for my remarks about trans models who are on EVERY runway from Paris to Milan but mine. As for the fatties, I’m not even bothering with apologizing to them, even though the average American woman is a size 14, because no one cares.'”

69-year-old man who identifies as a 45-year-old begins legal action to lower age

THE STORY: Emile Ratelband, a 69-year-old Dutch “positivity trainer,” has launched a legal battle to change his age to 45. “We live in a time when you can change your name and change your gender. Why can’t I decide my own age?” he said. His argument is that he’s being discriminated against because of his age, noting how it affects his employment chances and his success rate on Tinder. Like, the dating app.

THE REACTION:

A 69 year old man wants to legally change his age to 45 because he identifies as a 45 year old.

2018, you are whack. pic.twitter.com/Yhk0qG7Rh2

— Cathy Crawley (@cathy_crawley) November 8, 2018

Just saw a headline there about a man entering a lawsuit to legally lower his age as he identifies as a 45 year old rather than 69. I thought it was a joke but its genuinely serious. The world's fucking nuts

— Liam Dodson (@Liamdodson) November 8, 2018

Some dumb fuck who feels insecure about their age: im trans-age! I dont identify as 69 years old, im living in a 45 year old body GREAT FOR YOU FOR FEELING HEALTHY AND YOUNG BUT NO. TRANS AGE IS NOT A THING. THIS JUST PAINTS A BAD PICTURE FOR THE TRANS COMMUNITY. TED TALK, OVER

— 🎄Festive Emy🎄 (@CertifiedWeaboo) November 8, 2018

RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE RAGE: Ageism is a real thing. Particularly in the career spaces, where in a youth-oriented work culture, the positive attributes of older employees are often crowded out by negative stereotypes. And, despite what you may have seen on Age Gap Love, age is a number people tend to care about in the dating sphere.

But it really feels like that in bringing this to court, Ratelband’s goal is to delegitimize trans rights. Being transgender is not a choice. By “choosing” to be a 45-year-old, is Ratelband choosing to live a life that risks him facing daily abuse, discrimination and prejudice? Is his age dysmorphia causing him extreme distress? At what point did he decide he was 20 years older than what is stated on his birth certificate? I don’t know the answers to these questions, but I’m interested in seeing how the court case—and the conversations surrounding it—develop.

  Shrek is getting the Hollywood reboot treatment from the guy behind Despicable Me

THE STORY: In a recent Variety profile, Chris Meledandri, the founder of Illumination Entertainment, revealed that he would be rebooting the Shrek and Puss in Boots franchises. Meledandri, who is best known as the creator of the Despicable Me franchise, said in the interview that his task for Shrek is to craft new storylines that will re-introduce the beloved ogre to new movie audiences. Really, really.

THE REACTION:

Who asked for this? There is nothing wrong with OG Shrek. Leave the good things alone. https://t.co/q1kT9stkU4

— Charnelle Blackwood (@x_charneezy) November 6, 2018

" Shrek reboot but without Smashmouth and by the guy who made the fucking minions movie " We are in the Darkest Timeline

— Trustworthy Fellow (@idiotwhoreass) November 7, 2018

what the FUCK do you mean "reboot Shrek"?!

— Kate Peterman (@KayTePea) November 6, 2018

RIGHTEOUSNESS OF THE RAGE: Honestly, this was going to happen eventually. It sucks, but it’s the new normal in the oh-so-unoriginal Hollywood. The reboots start coming and they don’t stop coming…

Their best bet might be to just hire Bradley Cooper and Lady Gaga as voice actors. Those two seem to know how to make a reboot work.

The post Everything That Upset The Internet This Week appeared first on FASHION Magazine.

Everything That Upset The Internet This Week published first on https://borboletabags.tumblr.com/