Tumgik
#anti ciri
wanderingwolfwitcher · 11 months
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media
498 notes · View notes
essskel · 1 year
Text
the whole ‘Eskel is a better witcher than Geralt’ stuff has always made me more sad than anything else. Geralt’s arc as a character is the building acceptance that even though he was raised a witcher and the profession is part of him : he’s a human, and he’s happy to be one.
but Eskel is a witcher. He’s not just ‘better’ at killing monsters he’s ‘better’ at wearing the title. He truly does work to cap his emotions, to succumb to the 9-5, to accept that his mutations make him something separate from the human he was born as.
He sees the stereotypes and the stigmatization of witchering and he only allows himself to step outside these forced boundaries when prompted by Geralt, Lambert, or Ciri, and even then he makes it clear that he’s making an exception.
And that’s not to say his moments of vulnerability and human connection are unnatural to him, he feels love and is drawn to protect those that he loves same as Geralt, but he’s out of practice in acting on these emotions because he’s a case study in survival repression.
He never solidifies a relationship with Ciri in the way Lambert does (in the books), he’s not even shown goofing around with her like Coën. He’s kind to her and he loves her and he goes on to put his life on the line to save her, but the vastness of his self-imposed missed opportunities is sickening. And that’s not even touching on the decay of his relationship with Lambert, or his white-knuckle grip on Vesemir.
Eskel is a good fucking witcher, he’ll dispose of your monsters faster and cleaner than his brothers ever will. But when his niece starts reminiscing on her favorite memories from childhood, he’ll be waiting a long damn time before she says his name.
845 notes · View notes
ramen-flavored · 9 months
Text
Damn, I wish they didn’t leave the season 3 finale on a cliff hanger like that. What a shame there won’t be a fourth season.
317 notes · View notes
rogue205 · 4 months
Text
Way late to the party but I am still PISSED about how badly Eskel was both done dirty and absolutely wasted as a character in Netflix’s Witcher. They also seemed to realize that they forgot(for non-book readers) to show just HOW MUCH Eskel meant to Geralt so they also threw in that little “flashback” which also did nothing.
Will I ever stop being salty as fuck about that?
Nope. Not a chance.
That killed the show for me. That and how crappy Jaskier is also handled. I didn’t bother with season three.
31 notes · View notes
babygoestozspace · 7 months
Text
I kinda hate how Cirie's demise has exposed how comp dependent BB has become. Like yeah we been knew, but it’s like… you don't need to do all this song and dance on Survivor. But because a single person has the power to control the fate of everyone in the house week to week, it requires players to cover themselves on all sides, resulting in the post-16 meta of a huge onion alliance to maximize one's chances of not hitting the block any given week. There's no need for that in Survivor; the only person an immunity winner can impact is themselves, so the rest of the tribe isn't forced to play around the whims of a single person. And with the comps themselves becoming increasingly physical over the years, somehow this glorified summer camp is more dependent on physical fitness than the game that starves people on an island for a month and a half.
Tumblr media
26 notes · View notes
pinkhysteria · 7 months
Text
i really don't mind cory getting accused of throwing mental comps all the time (even when it makes absolutely no sense), because he's always telling everyone he's gonna be so good at them in the endgame. 🤷🏽‍♀️ he needs to learn to shut the fuck up a little.
21 notes · View notes
revoevokukil · 1 year
Text
On why TWN's angle on Falka & Lara Dorren in relation to Ciri's arc is pretty weird & misleading.
It overemphasises sticking it to misogyny & forgets that The Witcher deals with the way trauma can make monsters of people & make personal desires lead to monstrous consequences.
As TWN's looking for a money-making premise, saying "Ciri needs to avenge Falka because she was a victim of a witch hunt" is much easier than conveying that Ciri is dealing with severe trauma & is taken in by "friends" who've suffered similarly & also abuse her in similar ways.
As a result, Ciri loses her morals bc it's too tempting to start taking out her rage for being mistreated on everyone around her, including the innocents. If they have not hurt you yet, they will - so hurt them first! This is a trauma response. This is also Falka's legacy.
Further, Falka was not Ciri's ancestor. Making them blood-relatives in earnest & justifying Ciri's turn to the dark with that is at once a dumb simplification & ironic: it sets Ciri on a pre-determined path when the Witcher is ultimately about the choice between violence & love.
Ciri is not "avenging" Falka & Lara in a "you-go-girl" moment. Ciri's path of vengeance is a tragedy. She is trying to avenge herself as a wounded & traumatized person. With the consequences of her deeprooted needs & violent emotions being woeful, just as Lara Dorren's choices & actions were in the grand scheme of things.
Let's talk about Falka. It looks like Falka will be conveyed as a girlboss. Falka was not discriminated against bc she was a woman. Misogyny in her tale is present insofar as Vridank disowned her after having divorced Falka's mother because she was ugly.
Falka when she was wronged was not a "remarkable woman" & her father was not "afraid of her power" - she was 1y old when she was disowned. Her revenge on her father, half-siblings (including Riannon) & Cerro was about being abandoned & her title of Princess ripped away from her.
And Falka's rage at being stripped of her birthright & deprived of all legitimate power is an exact echo of Ciri's own ire. That is why Ciri eventually leaves the Rats - because she cannot stand the thought of an impostor becoming the Empress of Nilfgaard under her name.
Falka's tale as Ciri's is one of a child being deprived of love & parental guidance, of being exposed to violence & how it leads to the picking of monstrous means for dealing with their pain. It's not possession, it's not blood magic. It's the choices of people who are in pain.
The theme of a cycle of violence underlies the lives of Witcher's characters: Geralt's inability to deal w Visenna's abandonment, Yennefer killing her parents, Milva killing her father, etc. Instead TWN is simplifying again: men mistreat women, women get revenge; revenge good! Raar!
The Witcher is pretty clear on revenge not paying off. Revenge consumes & leads to parents & loved ones hanging in the gallows, burned on stakes. That is Falka's story & it's not one about emancipation. It's about how monsters are made.
A fate Geralt tried to protect Ciri from.
A/N: This is a summary of a discord discussion + thoughts in response to the description on the official Netflix website: “[Ciri] is the descendant of Lara Dorren and Falka: fierce, remarkable women who were swallowed up by the men afraid of their power. Women whom Ciri is destined to avenge.“
----
If you like my writing, consider buying me a coffee. Thanks! ❤️
118 notes · View notes
mazojo · 6 months
Text
America’s power bc she has everyone OBSESSED with her
Tumblr media
15 notes · View notes
ayrennaranaaldmeri · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
i’m fucking screaming sophie holland showed her entire ass with this huh. 
32 notes · View notes
marinamd29 · 1 year
Text
AU empire
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Vernon: "Shit, shit, shit..."
Thaler: ...
Vernon: "That bastard Voorhis... And he is Ciri's future husband?!"
Thaler: "Heh, it's funny to see you so jealous and in love, Roche."
Vernon: "Go to hell, you're hurting my head."
33 notes · View notes
Photo
Tumblr media
Lauren Hissrich doing damage control as her inept, collapsing show sinks around her translation: 
“It was ok to pervert and bastardize Eskel’s entire personality and characterization and kill him off solely to create cheap angst for Geralt and motivation he should already have to protect Ciri, because he’s only popular in the games and isn’t at all important in the books! It’s not like he’s kind to and supportive of Ciri, teaches her that frightening appearances can be deceiving, is respectful to Triss and maturely backs her up on supporting Ciri while the other Witchers are immature and cringing over her having a period, and is pretty much Geralt’s brother, who grew up alongside him and knows him best. It’s not like we could have added more to the story through that relationship dynamic and shown more insight into our normally emotionally distant and stoic protagonist that way with conversations and further flashbacks and quiet scenes between the two around Kaer Morhen, perhaps out hunting together. It was an honest mistake, I mean, it’s not as if I knew Eskel’s actual importance to the story and Geralt or anything!”
Tumblr media
“Don’t worry, we won’t do it again... mainly because we’ve already destroyed him and his potential completely, so we’ll instead continue to fuck up the series in no shortage of other creative ways. Be sure to keep tuning in, Witcher fans, you won’t be dissapointed!”
Tumblr media
153 notes · View notes
podlaskazazula · 4 months
Text
Rant 4: Ciri and Yennefer
In netflix witcher it's barely possible to see age difference in Ciri and Yen. They look like they are friends from highschool or something.
•CIRI:
In my opinion, Ciri is way too old, in books she started as 12 and finished as 16. Meanwhile here she looks like she is 20 and acts like she is older teen. She doesn't act like young girl that both Geralt and Yennefer had to raise and teach her things that they believe in. Ciri after short training in Kaer Morhen acts like she is better than Geralt. He is only her support and she kills all the monsters and fights elves. Ciris personality and story in series is personally offensive for me, because I always saw her as my absolutely favourite character, yet in netflix series I hate her. She is such a mary sue who as teen is stronger than adult witcher who is mutated and trained. Congrats netflix, you clearly have no idea how to write strong women without making them mary sues and annoying.
• YENNEFER:
Same issue as Ciri. Yen doesn't match her age. She is way too young and acts way too chaotic. She doesn't seem to be advanced sorceress who finished Aretuza and had her own practice. Since second season, she acts just like begginer sorceress student, who knows maybe 5-6 spells. But somehow netflix tries to making her a saviour and martyer by making her do bad things ----> getting punished ----> deciding to save everyone. In second season she tried to sacrifice Ciri to some Baba Jaga from aliexpress who was cheap version of Mr. Mirror from witcher 3. (And let's not forget how Lauren promised to not take inspirations from game). In books, metting of sorcerers and sorceresses was normal thing that happened ocassionally. But in series ofc they had to make Yennefer throw party to "make friendships, not enemies" and shit like that. Yennefer is one of worst characters in whole series, just like Lauren didn't read her description in books.
In books, Yennefer used to call Ciri "ugly", because Ciri was just a kid and as a kid she wasn't really pretty. Now, when in series Ciri propably is 20 or around 20 it just seem very cynnical, just like Yen is jealous about Ciri and Geralt or something xD
Tumblr media
13 notes · View notes
babygoestozspace · 7 months
Text
I have consistently seen more thinkpieces about “it’s okay to just not like Cory and America” than I’ve seen thinkpieces moralizing dislike.
Tumblr media
13 notes · View notes
maggiespsp · 7 months
Text
god i wish meme would recognize that she's not setting herself up well. i have faith she can pivot later when things get bad but she really should keep with cirie for now i feel
7 notes · View notes
hacked-wtsdz · 2 years
Text
I’ve said it before I’ll say it again. There is a criminal under-appreciation and discrimination and cultural-appropriation in cinema when it comes to Slavic people. Eastern Europe isn’t portrayed at all, and Russian people are constantly made either mob bosses, spies, prostitues or gopniks as if that’s all we are. I suppose that these stereotypes were partly caused by the propaganda during the Cold War, but it still doesn’t excuse anything. And that’s why I think it was a big mistake to hire poc and actors that generally do not look Slavic for the Witcher show. I’m not against poc in shows or whatever somebody’s critical thinking deprived mind might think. I’m against hiring actors that do not logically fit into the scenario of the film. Had the show been about native Africans and there were white people playing them, the internet would’ve gone batshit. But when it’s Slavic people and Slavic culture, it’s ok. Erasure, discrimination, general fucking stupidity only for the sake of pleasing critics or whatever is ok. They should have hired Slavic actors or people who looked like Slavic people for every character that had Slavic features in the book. The books had some poc, though not many of them, because they were written by a polish man and were heavily affected by Slavic culture. We need to end Slavic hate.
135 notes · View notes
stromuprisahat · 2 months
Text
The locations are just SO RANDOM?!
Did they run out of stage set money in Netflix?
First the cheap shit in Shadow and Bone, now The Witcher?
Yennefer and Ciri walking through the most obvious exterior with no settlements around: "We're almost at the stables..."
Tumblr media
5 notes · View notes