okay. having been made aware that most people dislike more characters than me, i need to try to do this. who are tv characters i don't like??? who? who??
boat guy on ted lasso. a concept and not a person. a concept designed to torment me and crush all my dreams. an avatar for all my dead dreams. if he'd actually become more of a character, like as a series regular or something, i would have probably grown to like him, because i'm weak. but in our reality, i can hate him forever.
jack from lost i always really hated, and i still do, but in a way where i almost like him because i hate him so much??? like, it's hilarious and special to me how much he sucks, and how consistently, always. jears forever.
jess mariano, but that's just because gg fandom has driven me crazy over the past 20 years in that regard, hyping him up so much, and i'm a hateful crone. technically he is fine.
christopher hayden is pretty bad. yeah, i think i can say with confidence i dislike christopher hayden.
extremely ashamed to report that i have sort of developed an occasional soft spot for dean forrester in my old age. awful! i'm not proud, okay! but i'm being honest.
i do hate rupert from ted lasso. but like. i don't think i get a prize for that one. that's an extremely easy dude to hate.
oh. i lowkey kinda hate nigel from cbs ghosts. i apologize, but i do. i think isaac could do better. i wish he would go for the australian stripper dinosaur enthusiast from the most recent episode. wouldn't it be hilarious if they decided to kill that lap dancer so he could become isaac's new boyfriend? i should write this show. it would be stunning and universally beloved and full of murders just to expand the friend group.
this has really gotten away from me.
wait!!!!! helene from killing eve! was that her name? i really didn't like her! she bugged! to me, she had too much screentime! (the actress seems very cool though, no offense to her.)
i am kind of bothered by joel mchale's character in animal control specifically because he's so identical to jeff winger in mannerisms that i just feel like jeff winger abandoned his greendale family and started a new life as an animal control man in seattle. i don't like this feeling. i just want to scream, "go back to greendale, jeff! i know frank isn't your real name!!!!" at the screen every second. does this count as disliking a character?
BOAT GUY 😡
26 notes
·
View notes
Can I ask when the last time “dick worshipper”, etc. has actually been used by a radblr woman? Not a black-pill orbiter; they’re awful to everyone and don’t tend to last long here. I mean from someone in radblr, claiming to be a radical feminist or supporting radical feminism. I know it used to be fairly common years ago. So did political lesbianism, which pissed everyone off for different reasons. Most of those people either left or just don’t show up in my circles anymore, and those that do again don’t last long. So where is this coming from? I see it referenced but no recent examples. I am seeing a hell of a lot of recent homophobia from women in radblr though. Every woman I’ve seen addressing the homophobia has stated the misogynistic terms aren’t okay, again, even though from what I’ve seen it hasn’t happened for a long time. Whereas I’m seeing a ton of defensiveness and doubling down in regards to the homophobia. And there seems to be this demand of all lesbians and non-lesbian pro-separatist women to denounce the “dick worshipper” type comments, and it’s like, A) they already have and B) if they’re not the ones who said it can you stop conflating pro-separatist arguments with that shit? Again, this is just what I’ve seen. Maybe the “dick-worshipper” comments are all over some areas of radblr, but they’re not from anyone I follow or have seen on my dash for years. I’d say for the last four or five years the only time I’ve seen it is from women asking not to be called that--which, I agree, I don’t want to be called that and I don’t want to see other women called that. It’s just, I haven’t been called it or seen it for a long time, so something’s not adding up.
47 notes
·
View notes
I HAVE MADE A VERSION WITH ARMOR AS WELL. I HAVE LEFT ALL VERSIONS UP ON MY BLOG FOR YOU TO USE. PICK WHICHEVER ONES YOU LIKE.
3 notes
·
View notes
Interesting how men and the maids of the patriarchy have all the time and energy in the world to nitpick and criticize “imperfect” feminist movements for like …..idk spray painting some buildings and also fear monger about the violent femanazis!!11 being destructive as if any other fucking day of they say anything about the general destruction of property and violence men cause as a collective ( ex—-> fights during sports matches anyone?? + if they hate graffiti so much give then I hope they give that same energy towards men who overwhelmingly spray paint all over any city just for the fuck of it). Like you don’t see these “feminist critical” men canceling the entirety of *other* men and their opinions based on their destructiveness (that women don’t hold a candle to) now do we??? Men get to be as destructive and no one questions them and their rationality but the second a women does something similar ( albeit calculated, as a last resort and for an important cause) all of a sudden anti-feminist want to talk about rationality???
Also let’s not act as if men aren’t looking for any reason to dismiss an entire women’s rights movement let’s be real here. They have the audacity to ignore and trivialize women’s pleads about rape culture and femicide just because some feminists painted some buildings. Men are absolutely rotten at the core.
2 notes
·
View notes
🖋️
If you haven't noticed I often portray Queen Irene as a feminist and a particularly outspoken one. This might seem like a contradiction of the fictitious "royals aren't political rule" many IRL royalists espouse, but it really isn't. The institution of monarchy is inherently political and if we're talking about the UK the sovereign has the ability to intervene in partisan politics and does so constantly. The British royal family has the ability to lobby and express support for certain policy decisions, the monarch can also revoke royal assent to prevent certain laws from passing (although they don't because that would trigger a constitutional crisis). On top of this, several royals around the world have taken on political roles such as being trade ambassadors. Outside of the UK royals have advocated for gender and LGBTQ+ plus rights in an overtly political fashion, often calling for changes to policies and making speeches for intergovernmental organizations like the UN.
The issue isn't what is political by nature, the issue is what is framed as being political by the media. What makes Meghan Markle talking about #MeToo political and "breaking royal protocol", but Queen Camilla giving a speech about domestic violence normal? It's all about bias and where we choose to see politics.
So, Queen Irene, as the most senior woman of the country would never be called out for "forcing politics". On the other side of the coin, her feminism is still toothless as it's done in service of the monarchy, an institution that hesitates at even having a female head of state. Despite her best efforts, the media reporting on the female members of her family is shallow and insulting, because that is what the monarchy encourages: viewing women as commodities and clothing racks.
And that's just how it views the wealthy white women of the royal family. We're going to see in real-time how far Irene's particular brand of feminism goes when it comes to protecting the integrity of women outside of the system, namely WOC. In other words, Jean will be appearing soon, and the hypocrisy will be laid bare. Apparently, a lot of these royal women find Jean just existing very political.
13 notes
·
View notes
is anyone getting the laser away ad thats like a montage of feminine women yelping in pain while waxing or knicking themself shaving. and then the ad goes "Good news! Pay us $250 a session to laser blast your hair follicles away forever."
and. doesnt it make you think??
2 notes
·
View notes