Damn I love how absolutely clingy and shamelessly devoted Sokka and Azula are to each other in the Gladiator related chapters you’ve written for Sokkla Saturdays 2021 and 2022. It makes completely sense for them to be like this considering how much they suffered in Gladiator, first by needing to hide their relationship and later by being brutally separated from each other. They’d give Gomez and Morticia a run for their money and I love this for them.
Hahahaha, oh, what's the point of pretending anymore... 😂 those particular chapters were meant to serve as a very helpful balm over my suffering of not writing them together for WAY too long in Gladiator. Helped me to remember that I had that pretty future to look forward to!
But yep, basically, those chapters are glimpses of how things have progressed several years after the big disasters we've seen so far. There were a few hints in there that I very much added to further stir up the "is it Gladiator or isn't it?" mystery, a lot of things I've kept shrouded in secrecy, some characters aren't mentioned so I can continue to torment everyone over the uncertainty of their fate... but ultimately, the truth is what it is 🤣
Anyway, they very much are impossibly obnoxiously in love post-Gladiator, there's no questioning it, no denying it. They ocassionally hold back (particularly whenever Ursa, Hakoda or Gran Gran are around because Azula is going to be a biiiit more prone to embarrassment around those three), but most the time they're just shamelessly basking in not having to hide what they mean to each other. They didn't fight as hard as they did to get to where they are just to... sit tight and behave themselves? 🤣 that'd be too boring!
So yep! They're very much exuding Gomez-Morticia vibes all around, being each other's biggest hypeman/woman and just raising their little dorks as best as they can. Those are the happy lives they deserve 🥺 may their worst problems be who ate the last slice of pie (... okay never mind we know it's always Sokka), rather than ending a hundred years of war and surviving a million anguishing situations just to return to each other, right? :'D
(... also... as I'm here admitting things even though I tried not to admit them but you all were smart enough to figure me out because I was just that transparent... I'm gonna let ya know that chapter 2 of 2020 is also Gladiator-related, sorry not sorry, I was a lot better at hiding it that year but there you go, that's the truth...)
6 notes
·
View notes
I hate having to start from square one here
fuck everything going on on Twitter
it's not even like I had a huge following over there but at least I had *something*
I hate having to tag shit I hate being buried under massive social circlejerks that have existed since 2009 I hate not being able to find other small accounts organically
no character limit is nice but at what cost
I just want to not feel like I'm yelling at a wall
2 notes
·
View notes
Love Endures
I was thinking about the Power of Love today because of course I was thinking about compassion, and my feelings on the subject have potentially fully formed, or are at least moving in the direction of doing so. Power of Love is insufficient a trope. I don't think I like it. The Power of Love can be inspiring or it can be a horror. The way Power of Love is described is usually the former, but I don't think it's enough, which is rather appropriate since that in itself is the criticism of Power of Love.
What I would describe as the Power of Love as usually explored is the idea that love inherently redeeming and saves the day – not just romantic love, but all kinds of love, though for the sake of this post I'm focussing specifically on romantic love. Motivating it is the idea that love alone is enough, usually with the implication it’s an inherently positive thing and a means to its own end with not much beyond it. The focus is usually on the recipient of said love who is someone that needs help, but the scrutiny is less often on the person directing the love (since the Power of Love is a foregone conclusion).
Rather, I think the idea I specifically enjoy is Love Endures. This is not as interested in the utility of love or saving the day but is something mystical which persists on anyway, even if it's not enough. To me love in romance or love in stories isn't just about the kiss/the consummation - I'm talking about people not really into romance but the way it's perceived in popular culture here - but all of the surrounding context of dedication and transformation.
With that being said, I think I am less interested in the idea that 'love saves' but rather that love is transformative. When I think about it in the context of redemption arcs - where I am specifically interested in enemies-as-lovers romance - I am actually not only interested in how the villain is transformed but just as importantly am interested in how the hero is transformed. Love is not merely an asset that’s deployed. It transforms and it endures. In this case, there is the potential to adress criticism of the Power of Love that if only a character had been loved enough they would've been redeemed or never have been evil; rather we're looking at the ways characters interact and change, which to me has always been the message us pro-redemptionists have tried to convey.
I think that Love Endures can encompass a lot of ideas tonally, particularly in the context of seemingly tragic romance or ultimately tragic romance. The idea I am interested in is the extreme edge of experience and the actual limits of love and compassion as a test of will. I think the Power of Love is also a bit more focussed on the recipient, as opposed to the person in question exercising said love. It's a two-way thing.
I did consider if this were a case of what is effectively the endless cycle of term overuse and misapplication so let's build a new one, but in this case I think maybe some of the perspective shift is warranted. I also realised whilst writing this post that I subconsciously borrowed Love Endures from Lavellan's Var lath vir suledin, generally agreed to translate as, "Our love will endure," which encompasses everything complicated about Solavellan.
As opposed to trying to de-emphasise the role of, say, the hero in love with the villain, because the Power of Love 'isn't enough,' and that's a potentially reductive message to send, I instead actually want to overly emphasise the experience of, in this case, the hero's love. I also want to emphasise the transformative aspect and the agency of the characters involved - by agency I mean from a strictly narrative perspective, that loving is an active choice. As always, in the context of enemies-as-lovers, it's something that might be incredibly difficult to do because it is effectively forbidden.
I think it also elegantly side-steps around those messy questions of, "Is it enough?" The question is not really about whether it's enough to save someone, or save the world, etc., but rather about the characters in question. Or in the case of love which is messy and complicated and fucked up, it might come to a different conclusion than something which is redeeming, or something that saves.
But as always, someone has said it better than me. I now fully understand why Joseph Campbell discussing romantic love in Power of Myth touches me emotionally and makes me cry, it's because it's where the spiritual test of love has actually been articulated, the agony and endurance of it. That's all of the stuff I adore.
JOSEPH CAMPBELL: What he was saying is thatthis love is bigger even than death, than pain, than anything. This is the affirmation of the pain of life in a big way.
BILL MOYERS: And I would choose this pain for love now, even though it might mean everlasting pain and damnation in hell.
JOSEPH CAMPBELL: That’s right.
[…]
BILL MOYERS: So there’s joy and pain in love.
JOSEPH CAMPBELL: Yeah, there is. Love, you might say, is the burning point of life, and since all life is sorrowful, so is love. And the stronger the love, the more that pain, but love bears all things.
Love itself is a pain, you might say, but is the pain of being truly alive.
What I would summarise as Love Endures is that love is a transformative experience for characters to go through and accompanying that transformation could be the idea that love is redeeming and is something worth believing in, but it can also encompass the darker and more painful experience of love. Probably most interestingly to me, it doesn't dismiss or gloss over the strength of the character exercising that love. It is also not its own conclusion; it describes a mechanic through which you can realise other ideas (and not just 'Love saves the day' as the idea is so often watered down to). In this case, I think it is useful (for me personally) because then it's not just a tacked on theme, but something you can use to holistically integrate into a greater work.
I'm still figuring out my feelings so I might write something expanding more here. I like where this is going though, and I think you can definitely see what motivates a lot of my fanfic writing with this perspective, so it's worthwhile just for that.
Love Endures is already exciting for me just because, in my eyes, it can already ward off most of the criticism facing Power of Love, but still carry the meaning and the strength of it, if not more.
3 notes
·
View notes