FREE WEBSITE
Best offer to improve your business today with us, contact us now! www.africadigital.eu
0 notes
Genie script For self improvement
First of all, I don’t know if you need self improvement or not? I mean I don’t know who reads this blog? But I think that we all get into some sort of slump from time to time and it effects our whole universe! I do know that there are days that I have where I am truly on fire! with my luck or my odds of winning are astronomical! days i just cant lose! Then 2 days later, I couldn’t win for losing!…
View On WordPress
1 note
·
View note
In this infographic, I've highlighted key differences between traditional marketing and digital marketing:
Reach: Traditional marketing has limited geographic reach, while digital marketing offers a global reach.
Cost: Traditional marketing tends to be expensive, whereas digital marketing is generally more cost-effective.
Target Audience: Traditional marketing often targets a broad audience, while digital marketing allows for precise targeting.
Timing: Traditional marketing follows a fixed schedule, whereas digital marketing enables real-time campaigns.
Interaction: Traditional marketing relies on one-way communication, whereas digital marketing provides interactive communication channels.
Metrics: Traditional marketing can be challenging to measure, while digital marketing offers trackable and measurable metrics.
Content: Traditional marketing mainly uses tangible mediums like print ads and billboards, while digital marketing utilizes diverse channels like websites, social media, videos, and blogs.
This infographic visually represents the key distinctions between traditional marketing and digital marketing, highlighting the advantages of digital marketing in terms of reach, cost, targeting, timing, interaction, metrics, and content diversity.
0 notes
This might seem like an "old man yells at cloud" situation, but it's just wild growing up and being told how dangerous distracted driving is - how, at highway speeds, you can traverse the length of a football field (100 yards, 91 meters) in a matter of seconds - how one split second sending a text while driving could result in a potential fatal crash, and then getting on the road as a driver and being surrounded by billboards. Their entire purpose is to catch one's attention, so they're lining major roads, which tend to be highways. How is it that you're told how important it is to never be distracted while driving, but still being advertised to?
At best, this type of advertising is an eyesore to pedestrians and motorists and a general waste of electricity to light it, and at worst, it is an active danger considering they are there to advertise and therefore, must catch people's attention.
I'm not even against advertising in theory, but this particular mode bothers me so much and I hate how pervasive it is - especially in large cities or highways.
3K notes
·
View notes
Branding Website Services
Brand awareness
In the modern generation, the theory of branding has been laid out to include progress by a manager of the marketing and imparting strategy and tools that help to determine a company or products from candidate, intend to create an abiding apprehension in the intellect of customers. The key sections that form a brand’s toolbox include a brand’s identity, personality, product…
View On WordPress
0 notes
The deeply moralist tone that a lot of discussions about media representation take on here are primarily neoliberal before they are anything else. Like the shouting matches people get into about “purity culture” “pro/anti” etc nonsense (even if I think it’s true that some people have a deeply christian worldview about what art ought to say and represent about the world) are downstream of the basic neoliberal assumption that we can and must educate the public by being consumers in a market. “Bad representation” is often framed as a writer’s/developer’s/director’s/etc’s failure to properly educate their audience, or to educate them the wrong way with bad information about the world (which will compel their audience to act, behave, internalise or otherwise believe these bad representations about some social issue). Likewise, to “consume” or give money to a piece of media with Bad Representation is to legitimate and make stronger these bad representations in the world, an act which will cause more people to believe or internalise bad things about themselves or other people. And at the heart of both of those claims is, again, the assumption that mass public education should be undertaken by artists in a private market, who are responsible for creating moral fables and political allegories that they will instil in their audiences by selling it to them. These conversations often become pure nonsense if you don’t accept that the moral and political education of the world should be directed by like, studio executives or tv actors or authors on twitter. There is no horizon of possibility being imagined beyond purchasing, as an individual consumer in a market, your way into good beliefs about the world, instilled in you by Media Product
879 notes
·
View notes