#birth center | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

Visit Blog

Explore Tumblr blogs with no restrictions, modern design and the best experience.

Fun Fact

Users from the US are the majority of Tumblr visitors.

theconvenienceofhomebirthce · 6 months

Text

Title: Labors of Love Birth Center, LLC

Description: "Labors of Love Midwifery and Birth Center are your experts in natural birth, water birth and normal deliver of babies. Our midwives are here to better serve the mom's of Greenville, Spartanburg and the Upstate of SC. We can deliver you at your home birth, in a birth pool for a water birth, or at our birth center with state of the art SaniJet tubs. We believe birth to be a natural process not a medical event. You can choose what position to labor or birth in, who will attend you, and to not have tight bands around your belly for monitoring. Whether you want to have a natural birth at home or in a birth center, the philosophy is the same. Both are safe, satisfying and empowering for women and their families."

Website URL: https://laborsoflovebirthcenter.com/

Maps URL: https://maps.app.goo.gl/DBuMMTMSMW1kpCn1A

#Home birth #water birth #birth center #midwife #home birth midwife near me #home water birth #home birth midwife #home birthing options #midwifery birth center #midwifery care #midwife services

0 notes

circlecitymid · 1 year

Text

Circle City Midwifery & Women's Health Services, Inc. is one of the best natural birth clinic in Corona, CA. We specialize in pregnancy, personalized natural birthing plans, emotional support, and resources for your new family. Call 951-547-4208 to make an appointment now!

#midwifery care center #birth center

0 notes

justthe7ofus · 1 year

Text

Season 2 Episode 33 Empaths without Borders: Birth Culture in the US

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/33-birth-culture-in-the-us/id1585057242?i=1000579794977

View On WordPress

#birth #birth center #birth culture #health #moms #mother #systemic racism

0 notes

astrosky33 · 9 months

Text

𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐆𝐀𝐋𝐀𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐂 𝐂𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐄𝐑 𝐈𝐍 𝐀𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐎𝐋𝐎𝐆𝐘

𝐎𝐍𝐄 𝐎𝐅 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐌𝐎𝐒𝐓 𝐈𝐌𝐏𝐎𝐑𝐓𝐀𝐍𝐓 𝐏𝐋𝐀𝐂𝐄𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐀𝐓’𝐒 𝐈𝐍 𝐘𝐎𝐔𝐑 𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐑𝐓

The Galactic Center is one of the most important placements in your chart that a lot of people don’t even know about. The Galactic Center is the strongest energy in the entire galaxy. It withholds an immense amount of power

It can show where/what energy is most intense in your life in your natal chart

Astronomically it is a rotating point in the center of the Milky Way Galaxy. For this reason it’s going to be the same sign for everyone (the house it’s in and aspects to it will be most important because of this)

Example: GC in the 10th house in your Natal Chart can be an indication of fame

𝐆𝐀𝐋𝐀𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐂 𝐂𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐄𝐑 𝐈𝐍 𝐒𝐘𝐍𝐀𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐘 𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐑𝐓𝐒

In Synastry it can show what energy is felt most intense (from the other) in each individual

Example: Person A’s Galactic Center in Person B’s Uranus can indicate Person A sees Person B in a purely platonic way but a very strong friendly bond is built

𝐆𝐀𝐋𝐀𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐂 𝐂𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐄𝐑 𝐈𝐍 𝐂𝐎𝐌𝐏𝐎𝐒𝐈𝐓𝐄 𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐑𝐓𝐒

In Composite it can show the most intense amount of energy in a relationship (whether it be platonic or romantic)

Example: Galactic Center in the 7th house in Composite can indicate marriage or dating long term (lots of romance though)

𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗧𝗢 𝗙𝗜𝗡𝗗 𝗜𝗧

𝗠𝗔𝗦𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗧

𝗦𝗨𝗕 𝗧𝗢 𝗠𝗬 𝗣𝗔𝗧𝗥𝗘𝗢𝗡

#astro community #astrology #zodiac #astro placements #astrology tumblr #astro chart #birth chart #galactic center #galactic center in astrology #galactic center astrology

341 notes · View notes

trauma-and-preg · 4 months

Text

Who got space for one or two parient during the holiday we need full intake exam check evrything off before being treated for supposed trauma for the vacation neck brace frequent code and diagnostic exam and procedure to do on us most probably high level of care if not full life support in icu and how know maybe we will find out that we are pregnant whit the blood test or more pregnant then we though like almost to term maybe only sky is me and sab limit for the 27 to the 2. We are curently 23 and 22 both female. If any medical team have question orwish us to fill paper work a head contact us in dm

73 notes · View notes

mostlysignssomeportents · 10 months

Text

Google makes millions on paid abortion disinformation

Google’s search quality has been in steady decline for years, and Google assures us that they’re working on it, though the most visible effort is replacing links to webpages with lengthy, florid paragraphs written by a confident habitual liar chatbot:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/02/16/tweedledumber/#easily-spooked

The internet is increasingly full of garbage, much of it written by other confident habitual liar chatbots, which are now extruding plausible sentences at enormous scale. Future confident habitual liar chatbots will be trained on the output of these confident liar chatbots, producing Jathan Sadowski’s “Habsburg AI”:

https://twitter.com/jathansadowski/status/1625245803211272194

But the declining quality of Google Search isn’t merely a function of chatbot overload. For many years, Google’s local business listings have been terrible. Anyone who’s tried to find a handyman, a locksmith, an emergency tow, or other small businessperson has discovered that Google is worse than useless for this. Try to search for that locksmith on the corner that you pass every day? You won’t find them — but you will find a fake locksmith service that will dispatch an unqualified, fumble-fingered guy with a drill and a knockoff lock, who will drill out your lock, replace it with one made of bubblegum and spit, and charge you 400% the going rate (and then maybe come back to rob you):

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/31/business/fake-online-locksmiths-may-be-out-to-pick-your-pocket-too.html

Google is clearly losing the fraud/spam wars, which is pretty awful, given that they have spent billions to put every other search engine out of business. They spend $45b every year to secure exclusivity deals that prevent people from discovering or using rivals — that’s like buying a whole Twitter every year, just so they don’t have to compete:

https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/how-a-google-antitrust-case-could/

But there’s an even worse form of fraudulent listing on Google, one they could do something about, but choose not to: ad-fraud. For all the money and energy thrown into “dark SEO” to trick Google into putting your shitty, scammy website at the top of the listings, there’s a much simpler method. All you need to do is pay Google — buy an ad, and your obviously fraudulent site will be right there, at the top of the search results.

There are so many top searches that go to fraud or malware sites. Tech support is a favorite. It’s not uncommon to search for tech support for Google products and be served a fake tech-support website where a scammer will try to trick you into installing a remote-access trojan and then steal everything you have, and/or take blackmail photos of you with your webcam:

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/google-search-ads-infiltrated-again-by-tech-support-scams/

This is true even when Google has a trivial means of reliably detecting fraud. Take the restaurant monster-in-the-middle scam: a scammer clones the menu of a restaurant, marking up their prices by 15%, and then buys the top ad slot for searches for that restaurant. Search for the restaurant, click the top link, and land on a lookalike site. The scammer collects your order, bills your card, then places the same order, in your name, with the restaurant.

The thing is, Google runs these ads even for restaurants that are verified merchants — Google mails the restaurant a postcard with a unique number on it, and the restaurant owner keys that number in to verify that they are who they say they are. It would not be hard for Google to check whether an ad for a business matches one of its verified merchants, and, if so, whether the email address is a different one from the verified one on file. If so, Google could just email the verified address with a “Please confirm that you’re trying to buy an ad for a website other than the one we have on file” message:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/02/24/passive-income/#swiss-cheese-security

Google doesn’t do this. Instead, they accept — and make a fortune from — paid disinformation, across every category.

But not all categories of paid disinformation are equally bad: it’s one thing to pay a 15% surcharge on a takeout meal, but there’s a whole universe of paid medical disinformation that Google knows about and has an official policy of tolerating.

This paid medical disinformation comes from “crisis pregnancy centers”: these are fake abortion clinics that raise huge sums from religious fanatics to buy ads that show up for people seeking information about procuring an abortion. If they are duped by one of these ads, they are directed to a Big Con-style storefront staffed by people who pretend that they perform abortions, but who bombard their marks with falsehoods about health complications.

These con artists try to trick their marks into consenting to sexual assault — a transvaginal ultrasound. This is a prelude to another fraud, in which the “sporadic electrical impulses” generated by an early fetal structure is a “heartbeat” (early fetuses do not have hearts, so they cannot produce heartbeats):

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/womens-health/heartbeat-bills-called-fetal-heartbeat-six-weeks-pregnancy-rcna24435

If the victim still insists on getting an abortion, the fraudsters will use deceptive tactics to draw out the process until they run out the clock for a legal abortion, procuring a forced birth through deceit.

It is hard to imagine a less ethical course of conduct. Google’s policy of accepting “crisis pregnancy center” ads is the moral equivalent of taking money from fake oncologists who counsel people with cancer to forego chemotherapy in favor of juice-cleanses.

There is no ambiguity here: the purpose of a “crisis prengancy center” is to deceive people seeking abortions into thinking they are dealing with an abortion clinic, and then further deceive them into foregoing the abortion, by means of lies, sexually invasive and unnecessary medical procedures, and delaying tactics.

Now, a new report from the Center for Countering Digital Hate finds that Google made $10m last year on ads from “crisis pregnancy centers”:

https://www.wired.com/story/google-made-millions-from-ads-for-fake-abortion-clinics/

Many of these “crisis pregnancy centers” are also registered 501(c)3 charities, which makes them eligible for Google’s ad grants, which provide free ads to nonprofits. Marketers who cater to “crisis pregnancy center” advertise that they can help their clients qualify for these grants. In 2019, Google was caught giving tens of thousands of dollars’ worth of free ads to “crisis pregnancy centers”:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/may/12/google-advertising-abortion-obria

The keywords that “crisis pregnancy centers” bid up include “Planned Parenthood” — meaning that if actual Planned Parenthood clinics want to appear at the top of the search for “planned parenthood,” they have to outbid the fraudsters seeking to deceive Planned Parenthood patients.

Google has an official policy of requiring customers that pay for ads matching abortion-related search terms to label their ads to state whether or not they provide abortions, but the report documents failures to enforce this policy. The labels themselves are confusing: for example, abortion travel funds have to be labeled as “not providing abortions.”

Google isn’t afraid to ban whole categories of advertising: for example, Google has banned Plan C, a nonprofit that provides information about medication abortions. The company erroneously classes Plan C as an “unauthorized pharmacy.” But Google continues to offer paid disinformation on behalf of forced birth groups that claim there is such a thing as “abortion reversal” (there isn’t — but the “abortion reversal” drug cocktail is potentially lethal).

This is inexcusable, but it’s not unique — and it’s not even that profitable. $10m is a drop in the bucket for a company like Google. When you’re lighting $45b/year on fire just to prevent competition, $10m is chump change. A better way to understand Google’s relationship to paid disinformation can be found by studying Facebook’s own paid disinformation problem.

Facebook has a well-documented problem with paid political disinformation — unambiguous, illegal materials, like paid notices advising people to remember to vote on November 6th (when election day falls on November 5th). The company eventually promised to put political ads in a repository where they could be inspected by all parties to track its progress in blocking paid disinformation.

Facebook did a terrible job at this, with huge slices of its political ads never landing in its transparency portal. We know this because independent researchers at NYU’s engineering school built an independent, crowdsourced tracker called Ad Observer, which scraped all the ads volunteers saw and uploaded them to a portal called Ad Observatory.

Facebook viciously attacked the NYU project, falsely smearing it as a privacy risk (the plugin was open source and was independently audited by Mozilla researchers, who confirmed that it didn’t collect any personal information). When that didn’t work, they sent a stream of legal threats, claiming that NYU was trafficking in a “circumvention device” as defined by Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, a felony carrying a five-year prison sentence and a $500k fine — for a first offense.

Eventually, NYU folded the project. Facebook, meanwhile, has fired or reassigned most of the staff who work on political ad transparency:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/08/06/get-you-coming-and-going/#potemkin-research-program

What are we to make of this? Facebook claims that it doesn’t need or want political ad revenue, which are a drop in the bucket and cause all kinds of headaches. That’s likely true — but Facebook’s aversion to blocking political ads doesn’t extend to spending a lot of money to keep paid political disinfo off the platform.

The company could turn up the sensitivity on its blocking algorithm, which would generate more false positives, in which nonpolitical ads are misidentified and have to be reviewed by humans. This is expensive, and it’s an expense Facebook can avoid if it can suppress information about its failures to block paid political disinformation. It’s cheaper to silence critics than it is to address their criticism.

I don’t think Google gives a shit about the $10m it gets from predatory fake abortion clinics. But I think the company believes that the PR trouble it would get into for blocking them — and the expense it would incur in trying to catch and block fake abortion clinic ads — are real liabilities. In other words, it’s not about the $10m it would lose by blocking the ads — Google wants to avoid the political heat it would take from forced birth fanatics and cost of the human reviewers who would have to double-check rejected ads.

In other words, Google doesn’t abet fraudulent abortion clinics because they share the depraved sadism of the people who run these clinics. Rather, Google teams up with these sadists out of cowardice and greed.

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/06/15/paid-medical-disinformation/#crisis-pregnancy-centers

[Image ID: A ruined streetscene. Atop a pile of rubble sits a dilapidated shack. In front of the shack is a letterboard with the word ABORTIONS set off-center and crooked. In the foreground is a carny barker at a podium, gesturing at the sign and the shack. The barker's head and face have been replaced with the Google logo. Within the barker's podium is a heap of US$100 bills.]

Image: Flying Logos (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Over_$1,000,000_dollars_in_USD_$100_bill_stacks.png

CC BY-SA 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en

#pluralistic #abortion clinics #forced birth #disinformation #medical disinformation #paid disinformation #google #google ads #ad-tech #seo #kiin thai #locksmiths #abortion #dobbs crisis pregnancy centers #roe v wade

233 notes · View notes

circlecitymid · 1 year

Text

Looking for best water birthing center near me in Corona? Then contact with Circle City Midwifery & Women's Health Services, Inc. All of our rooms are equipped with oversize and deep soaking birthing tubs to allow both parents to enter the tub to experience the delivery or labor. Visit to our website to get more information.

#water birth near me #birth center

0 notes

dontmeantobepoliticalbut · 1 year

Text

A 35-year-old Texas woman said she had long dreamed of having children with her husband and was thrilled — after a year and a half of trying to conceive through fertility treatments — to learn she was pregnant.

But five weeks into her second trimester, Amanda Zurawaski was told her pregnancy was not viable. Doctors in Texas could not provide any treatment under the state's abortion law, and Zurawaski nearly died as a result, according to a lawsuit she and four other women filed against the state.

The women are asking a state court to clarify Texas' near-total abortion ban to say that doctors should make the final determination about whether women need medically necessary abortion care.

Zurawaski said she was denied care because doctors at her hospital were worried about breaking the law.

Zurawaski's water broke on a Tuesday night but she was forced to wait until her body naturally delivered the baby, who had died, on that Friday, according to the lawsuit. By then her body went into septic shock, the lawsuit said.

She now has permanent scar tissue as a result of infections she developed and will have trouble getting pregnant again, according to the lawsuit filed in District Court in Travis County, Texas.

"Amanda spent three days in the ICU while her infection was treated. Amanda's family flew to Austin from across the country because they worried it would be the last time they would see her," the complaint says. "Amanda was eventually discharged and returned home, but her suffering was far from over."

Texas was the first state to implement a near-total abortion ban in September 2021. The law includes limited exceptions for medical emergencies but provides little clarity about what constitutes an emergency, according to the suit.

The lawsuit was brought against Texas by The Center for Reproductive Rights on behalf of Zurawaski, four other women who underwent similar trauma and illness while pregnant, and two doctors.

Attorney General Ken Paxton and Texas Medical Board executive director Stephen Brint Carlton were also named as defendants in the case.

In a statement to Insider, Paxton's office said he is "committed to doing everything in his power to protect mothers, families, and unborn children, and he will continue to defend and enforce the laws duly enacted by the Texas Legislature."

The office also sent Insider a "guidance letter" on the Texas law, which says the law prohibits the performing, inducing, or attempting of an abortion unless the mother has "a life-threatening physical condition aggravated by, caused by, or arising from a pregnancy that places [her] at risk of death or poses a serious risk of substantial impairment of a major bodily function unless the abortion is performed or induced."

The letter goes on to say that the term "abortion" doesn't apply when these acts are done to "(A) save the life or preserve the health of an unborn child; (B) remove a dead, unborn child whose death was caused by spontaneous abortion; or (C) remove an ectopic pregnancy."

It does not address cases where a nonviable pregnancy — where the fetus still has cardiac activity — is threatening the life of the mother.

The Texas Medical Board did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

THE HOSPITAL WAS SCARED TO VIOLATE THE ABORTION BAN, THE LAWSUIT SAYS

Zurawaski underwent exploratory procedures, used multiple medications, received one misdiagnosis, and was treated with intrauterine insemination before she finally got pregnant for the first time, according to the lawsuit.

The pregnancy was normal until she was diagnosed with an "incompetent cervix" at 17 weeks and 6 days, according to the lawsuit. That's when medical providers told her the pregnancy was not viable.

Having tried so hard to get pregnant in the first place, she and her husband asked if there was anything they could do to save it — even if it meant undergoing a procedure to stitch her cervix closed to prevent preterm birth. The doctor said even that wouldn't work.

When she went home that day, her water broke.

Amanda returned to the emergency room that night and was diagnosed with preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes and was kept overnight in hopes that she would go into labor on her own.

In the morning, she still hadn't gone into labor and the fetus still had cardiac activity, so she was sent home.

"Amanda was told that under Texas's abortion ban, there was no other medical care the hospital could provide," the suit says. "At this point, absent Texas's abortion bans, a patient in Amanda's situation would have been offered an abortion or transferred to a facility that could offer the procedure."

Amanda wasn't offered either "because the hospital was concerned that providing an abortion without signs of acute infection" would be in violation of the abortion ban, the lawsuit says.

The closest clinic where she could get the necessary treatment — an abortion — was 11 hours away in New Mexico, and she needed to stay within 15 minutes of the hospital in case her health declined, the suit says.

For the next two days Zurawaski stayed home, "grieving her inevitable loss and worrying about her own health," the lawsuit says.

On Friday, after a check-up showed her vitals were stable, her health deteriorated.

She developed chills and started shivering, her fever began to spike, and she did not respond to her husband's questions, according to the lawsuit. At the emergency room, she was admitted to the labor and delivery unit. With her temperature now at 103.2 degrees and confirmed to be in sepsis, her medical team agreed she was sick enough that they could induce her labor without violating the abortion ban.

The baby, whom she named Willow, died, according to the lawsuit.

Zurawaski then developed a second infection and went into septic shock, resulting in a three-day ICU stay. After being released she underwent a procedure to remove severe scar tissue from her uterus and one fallopian tube — while the other remains permanently closed, the suit says.

Her medical team told her that in order to get pregnant again, she should undergo IVF treatments, which she had already started by the time the lawsuit was filed on February 6.

"Amanda and her husband have been trying to have children for years, and she not only lost her first pregnancy, but because of Texas's abortion bans, she nearly lost her own life and spent days in the ICU for septic infections whose lasting impacts threaten her fertility and, at a minimum, make it more difficult, if not impossible, to get pregnant again in the future," the suit says.

71 notes · View notes

informed-empowered-birth · 2 years

Photo

Allow me to reintroduce myself!

Hi, my name is Lindsey and I haven't had professional photos taken in awhile. So, here's one from my wedding reception.

I'm a Mom of one, former birth Doula, labor and delivery nurse, Lactation Consultant, and Evidence Based Birth® Instructor.

I'm also an avid knitter, gardener, and mini homesteader.

I decided to get certified as an Evidence Based Birth® Instructor because I LOVE this organization. They break the current research about pregnancy, birth, postpartum, and newborns down into digestible, applicable information for expectant parents!Side note: Did you know that the care you get prenatally and in the hospital often isn't based on the most current research? Or any research at all? I didn't when I first became a labor and delivery nurse either.

When I first started in this career I saw a lot of births that didn't go as planned and I thought... Why? How is it possible that ONE THIRD of babies in the U.S. are born by c-section for "safety"? Some more of them are born by operative vaginal delivery? And close to 50% of birthing people have posttraumatic stress symptoms after having a baby? That didn't seem right. So, what are we doing wrong?

I've learned so much since then. I became a lactation consultant and witnessed how the parents' birth experience, the mode of birth, and other circumstances during pregnancy affect breastfeeding. I started running support groups for postpartum mood disorders and breastfeeding (separately!). I had my own baby, my own pregnancy complications, and my own lived experience of birth and breastfeeding.

Now I'm here to say- I think the most important thing I can do for pregnant people is help them feel prepared, informed, and supported in the many decisions they have to make from conception through the postpartum period.

Whether you're a fellow birthworker, parent, or other birth nerd, it's awful nice to have you here! Thanks for advocating for yourselves and others.

#evidencebasedbirth #evidencebasedmedicine #birth #giving birth #childbirth #pregnancy #pregnant #second trimester #third trimester #baby bump #baby #hospital birth #home birth #homebirth #birth center #in labor #labor and delivery #lactation consultant

0 notes

bostonbakeddeans · 3 months

Text

I work at a hospital as a central monitor technician. I (and the 2-3 other techs) sit in the basement for 12 hours and watch patients who are on cardiac monitoring, and I communicate (generally via a secure chat function) as needed with the nurses assigned to those patients. The communication is often the hard part, especially if I'm working with a nurse who doesn't work on one of our cardiac floors.

Yesterday I had a patient in the birthing center, which is very rare - but the nurse was fantastic. She did a wonderful job communicating with me, up to and including letting me know that the patient was being transferred to a different unit so that I didn't worry when the patient came off monitoring. I was so grateful, and so (even though I had praised her in our shift report, which gets passed on from our manager to the appropriate unit) I reached out to her at the end of shift to really quickly let her know how great of a job she had done, and how sincerely grateful I was to have worked with her during the shift.

She wrote back telling me it was the nicest thing anyone had ever written to her, and that she had especially needed to hear it then, because she felt as though she was doing a terrible job and like she was failing her patient. I reassured her that she had done a wonderful job, and we wished each other a great night.

I don't know if I'll ever need to work with that nurse again; I certainly wouldn't be able to pick her out of a crowd. But I do know that I made a difference for her, and she made one for me, and I think that's really beautiful.

#we proved that #love is real #we all have the power to make a difference to someone #i had no idea she had been feeling that way - i just knew that i was grateful for her #the station that watches the birthing center also watches 2 out of 3 cardiac floors #(and a special care unit and a regular medical unit)#so my day was very full and a lot of the nurses i was talking to were hard to communicate with #(they're very busy so it's understandable‚ but that doesn't make it less frustrating)#and i wanted her to know that i was grateful for her #it took all of two minutes to write and send the message and it had a big impact #little things matter. people are struggling and you won't see it. be kind. prove love.

7 notes · View notes

jamesunderwater · 8 months

Text

the yellowjackets s2e6 ending -- i was already so triggered just hearing the baby cry because he was starving and just shauna's desperation to feed him, i had to mute parts of it. then when she became conscious again...i... i just wish more people watching that scene understood how real it is. how it happens to birthing people all the time even today, not just in a freezing cabin in the middle of the woods, and how shauna's reaction was.....it was just.....it was very much what happens. she does still hear him crying. idk, i'm just sitting here still crying over it, and i can't stop. because people experience this loss and their brains have to make sense of it and it comes up with something that is as much real to them as the loss is, but no one around them understands, everyone wants to just shove the truth at them because they think it will be better. let her talk about him crying. let her talk about how it felt to feed him, to hold him. tell her you believe her. fuck, i'm just so fucking sad.

#for context one of my focuses in school is reproductive mental health and i work for a counseling center that focuses on it and #im planning to do doula work one day and so i was just watching this in physical pain wanting shauna to have someone there to help her #with the birth and the nursing. and then she woke up. and i just.#idk i dont think i'll ever get over that scene #im so fucking sad #yellowjackets #yellowjackets spoilers #tw pregnancy #cw pregnancy #cw child death #tw child death

11 notes · View notes

astrosky33 · 9 months

Note

Hello, What would it mean if both galactic centers in synastry were stacked right on top of each other in a chart?

It doesn’t mean anything cuz it’s like fixed stars it’s in the same sign/degree for everyone. The important thing to check would be what house it’s in inside of your Composite Chart together

Often I see couples having it in the 7H/8H or aspecting Venus and I see close friends having it in the 6H/11H or aspecting Uranus

#astro community #astrology #zodiac #astro placements #astrology tumblr #astro chart #birth chart #galactic center #galactic center in astrology

15 notes · View notes

Last Seen Blogs

rosaviaggiante-blog

V I A G G I A N T E

cannibal-love-confessions

*Hurls*

onlyfansgirls99

OFG99

nottragedies

written sins

thedaysgrowlonger

Unbroken