There's this discourse in Wish that gets some viewers riled up, in which is that Magnifico has a point and that he's the real hero of the story. I am generally against this, largely because I'm just indifferent about the "villains doing bad thing for good reasons" shtick that has gotten old after overstaying its welcome since Thanos stank up the villain writing department, and in some cases some of the people who state that are totally not racially motivated.
With the case of Magnifico having a point that not all wishes should be granted, it would've prove he has a point, if the movie actually showed us an example.
That's the thing, the movie never presents an example of a bad wish and all people got is Magnifico's word for it.
In context, Magnifico doesn't want to grant Asha's grandfather's wish because and in his words "it's too vague". It's this vagueness that people run with and easily conclude with assumptions that he is correct in some way that generally doesn't prove he had a point. He sites that Sabino wants to inspire the next generation, which he concludes would lead to a rebellion that will destroy Rosas. However, with further context that Magnifico selfish tyrant, in his view, Sabino would inspire his own subjects to rebel against him, and therefore destroy not his kingdom, his rule as its king.
This discourse also ties in with how Asha is vilified and labeled selfish for wanting to grant all the wishes. The thing here is, she doesn't. She never said she wants all the wishes to be granted, she wants them returned. Asha was in agreement with Magnifico until he refuses to grant her grandfather's seemingly harmless wish on his 100th birthday, which she kindly asked him if he could consider and apologizes for. She is even in agreement with him that dangerous wishes can be stopped. Her point is that if Magnifico doesn't want to grant most if not all of the wishes, he could just return them and encourage the people to put in the effort to achieve their dreams themselves. If Magnifico was just as benevolent as people say he is, there wouldn't be a system of him hoarding there wishes in the first place.
Another contender is the comparison to the movie Bruce Almighty, to which is just a surface level comparison. In the film, Bruce is given God's powers but must also do God's job, which includes granting prayers. Taking the lazy route, Bruce nonchalantly says yes to the wishes which leads to the town going in chaos. However, this is the part where things get muddy. A lot of people use this moment in the film to compare Wish's nonexistent bad wish cautionary warning, but they either forget, missed or straight up omitting the other reasons why this happened. The town's biggest game winning which leads to fans rioting, everyone winning the lottery and because they all won, they have to split the money which gives them less than what they wanted, also causing a riot, and the asteroids Bruce recklessly cause causing people to believe the rapture is upon them.
In Wish, the wishes are returned to the people because they have the power to achieve them. The wishes are not just magical stuff that gives people wealth and power, they're goals and aspirations. With Magnifico taking away one's wish, including the memories of said wish, they're aimless and lose their ability to achieve a dream they cannot recall, and only need to rely on Magnifico to achieve said dream.
Comparing Bruce to Asha is just silly to me when Bruce is more comparable to Magnifico; both are given strong godlike powers with Magnifico wanting the masses to praised him as one; both are lazy and use said powers for their benefit. And the kicker is that Bruce learned to care for others and uses his powers to help them instead.
The consequences of the granted prayers is not on the citizens, it's Bruce's. And the consequences of Rosas not needing a system that selects few wishes to be granted is not Asha's, it's Magnifico's.
There's this line in Bruce Almighty said by God to Bruce which is perfectly applicable to Wish and how if you were to rewrite Wish that's not just yourself projecting into Asha to ship yourself with golden Jack Frost, make one about Magnifico becoming the benevolent king he wants to be.
"People want me to do everything for them, and what they don't realize is they have the power. You want to see a miracle, son? Be the miracle."
In the movie "Bruce Almighty" The city of Buffalo is filled with lawlessness and it lööks like an Antifa Riot burning to the ground, Bruce realizes he can't be God because his ego is in the way. He shows up in God's realm right on time.
Listen to what God (Morgan Freeman) says to Bruce. No matter how dirty things get you can always clean it up, the people having the power, what a miracle is and pay attention to the very end. What's the problem? People are always lööking up... Meaning: Since you have the power, löök inside and stop relying on someone else and go out and be the miracle.
I have this weird headcanon about the movie Liar Liar. Jim Carrey (I know the character has a name but idc) is cursed to always tell the truth, but the rules of this are pretty inconsistent and seems like some god is toying with him. I headcanon that Loki overheard Jim Carrey’s son’s wish and decided to mess with him. I made this connection because in The Mask Jim Carrey is able to use Loki’s powers when he wears the titular mask, making two movies where Loki interacts with Jim Carrey.
But wait, there’s more! Y’know the movie Bruce Almighty? Where God himself decides to give Jim Carrey his powers and lets him use them in whatever whacky ways he wants? Does that sound like something that the christian god would do? Or something another god, one with a love for mischief would do?
I consider these movies to be The Jim Carrey Lokiverse