Tumgik
#but again thats pure conjecture!!!! i dont KNOW that
rohirric-hunter · 4 years
Text
The surface level magic worldbuilding of TtS is a fic writer’s dream, honestly, because I can write basically anything, chalk it up to magic, and have it be consistent with canon.
As a theorist, however, I absolutely detest it because I’m over here like
Tumblr media
trying to find a set of consistent behaviors for the Moonstone.
4 notes · View notes
ides-aglaecwif · 7 years
Text
moving the content of my Discourse™ post here under a cut bc discourse never induces happy feelings and i’d like to put it away bc i think at this point we can end the conversation
(standard text is me, block text is @deviantdragons, relevant tags are in brackets)
Okay I go out of my way to avoid The Discourse™ but like. I need to know. What about Sazed and Taako’s relationship was abusive? Hear me out. As far as I’m aware, abuse is characterized by one person using tactics of manipulation such as gaslighting, threats of force, fear, guilt, etc, to maintain control over the other person. Isn’t that the main thing? Abuse is about power imbalance?
Like, I know Sazed’s actions are the direct cause of Taako’s current trauma, I understand that. But I don’t think that’s grounds for calling his behavior abusive. Sazed didn’t play on that event to influence Taako in any way. He didn’t hint about it beforehand. In fact, he left Taako immediately afterwards. I’m not saying he was a good person or his actions were justified, only that he acts more like a standard-fare villain than an abuser.
Cowardly, deceptive, and murderous? Absolutely. But abusive? I don’t know. Thoughts, anyone?
[ #and i know ppl like to project on taako#and thus might relate his backstory w sazed to their own abuse#and thats absolutely fine#but its kind of alarming to me to see this one character#who we got about 3 minutes of description of#treated like literal satan#like who the fuck knows??#he could show up in the finale as like an avenging angel and save the mcfucking day#and yall will have already had this 'if u think sazed is redeemable ur an abuse apologist' clusterfuck going on for 6 months#we! dont! know! him!#we have no details on his relationship with taako!#we just know he framed taako for a murder!#and frankly thats not the worst thing ppl on this show have done!]
@deviantdragons said, “…………… he tried to murder taako for saying “no” and then blamed taako for mass murder.”
Okay but what part of that is abuse? Didn’t THB murder Barbara and the rest of the Hammerhead Gang for saying “no” in Petals to the Metal? Or do the ends justify the means? I’m not saying framing someone for mass murder is okay; it’s criminal and evil and a horrible horrible thing to do but I’m really not seeing abuse here.
if an action you take against your friend/partner is “evil and horrible” then it most likely falls under the realm of abuse, yes.
So does the difference between standard-fare villainy and abuse lie in the relationship to the victim? If Sazed had been, say, a fan who wanted to join the show, Taako said no, and Sazed framed him for mass murder in revenge, would it have been abuse? The effect on Taako would have been the same regardless: Taako would have thought he was at fault, would have stopped cooking, and would have gone into hiding. Or does it only count as such because it was a betrayal?
[ #I'm Just Tryin To Understand#it would be much easier if there was a universally agreed-upon definition of abuse#but i understand that people's experiences don't often fit under one criterion#nevertheless i dont think 'abuse' is a catchall term for 'acts of violence perpetuated against one with whom you are familiar'#if my best friend decided one day to beat me up and then skip town for milwaukee and never speak to me again#i wouldn't call it abuse#ya feel?#assault and battery; betrayal; a gross and unexpected thing to do; yes]
okay so like
you’re asking “what’s the diff between villain & abuser?” and the answer is: one is a vague term w/ many different meanings, mostly interchangeable w/ “antagonist”, and the other is a purposefully broad term to describe acts of cruelty. lots of ‘villains’ are abusive.
All right, I can see that. I guess I just always had the idea that abuse was the stuff you learn about in safe environment classes at school: you know, divvied up into verbal, physical, sexual, and neglect, most often perpetuated by relatives, figures of authority, and significant others, et cetera. Specifically the word “abuser” just has a very different connotation in my mind than someone who fits the Google definition of abuse, which could be anyone from like a school shooter to a bully to someone who graffitis hate speech onto a wall.
[ #am i the only one who thinks that way?#idk just the connotations of abuse are much more heavy than this definition indicates]
alternate replies to the post that i didn’t respond to but whose points of view i nevertheless appreciate:
where-are-the-owl-s said: honestly it’s more that when people ship them in a romantic relationship it’s abusive not so much the canon relationship they had (although like…….he did try to kill Taako and then made him feel guilty for something he didn’t do so)
shameparade answered: Totally agree. Honestly, there is so little canon for Sazed it’s hard to say anything about him besides “sure did kill a whole town.” He and Taako seemed to have a crap professional relationship but anything beyond that is pure conjecture.
1 note · View note
blaperile · 5 years
Text
Homestuck Epilogues - Meat - Page 11 (Epilogue 2 Page 3)
1 note · View note
dianaerikalee-blog1 · 6 years
Text
Penetrating the Medias Psyche
verge B. RosePenetrating the Medias PsycheWriting thing | fibbery 26, 2008Gerard Braud, media training consultant, discusses fraud of the media commerce with vigil B. Rose, and overture suggestions to assure that a companys stories are told justly and beyond media bias. Ever lie open-mouthed in amazement while reading a news story? Ever earn so disturbed that you hurl cushion at your television? assuming that so, pure not alone.Were all tired of the teasers, of the biography that energy nowhere, convey Gerard Braud of grad Braud Communications. Reporters rooted up a situation, promise hard legwork but at you see the story, you receive facts that are this one loosely pertinent or arent related at all. individual a immense letdown.For communicators, however, it can be much poor than a letdown. enthrallment can be a disaster. Reporters will act as judge and jury if you give them, respond Braud. besides many columnist have exclusive three effects on their mind. One, this fantasy has to be enormous because I want to impress the boss. Two, I wish to achievement an award. Three, I want to put this story on my go on so I can pull a extra prestigious, greater paying job. Braud knows. Before origin his consulting firm, he worked for 15 senescence as a reporter in print, telegraphy and television. I south the business because stories were taking more and more superficial, he says. Reporters were also lumping all character of beside the point facts cool to form it develop that thing sinister was going on in joint America. site communicators look a team working in the leading interests of its member and customers, reporters connect the double dots to come raise with a picture of the monster that lives under the bed. extremely Braud weakness corporate America to be a control freak. so means management must point their rebuttal about the severity of negative news, while joint communicators have to force above and beyond what they complete now to protect their company. ah lot of communicators just go through the motions, he says. They scrawl a pressure communications plan, but they dont evaluation it or review it annually. They conduct radio training but dont pull refreshers on a formal basis. They often embargo role show with official before an interview. cognate Tiger Woods, you duty practice your technique constantly. Thats the only process to win.Communicators can still take the offensive and penetrate the medias psyche. Corporate communicators are painted by the same head amendment freedom as the media, Braud explains, and they have the legal to inquire into journalist motives. If communications star can penetrate the medias psyche, they can foresee the management of reporters, editors, and producers. They owe it to their organization to go that extra mile. Doing so will still enhance their reputation and increase their value. You have the right to control the way the press mask your organization, says Braud. Obviously, you dont have control closed the eventual edit or the closing rewrite, but you have control of everything leading up to that. You dont have to conjecture what the media will do; you have the ability to find out ahead of time. How? By inquisitive lots of tough questions. Before in concert to accord the disclosure access to your team and your management, handling extensive dialogue with the producer or the writer to jewel out where the fantasy is going. When you get your questions answered, you launch to reveal what the reporter longing to do. Nine generation out of 10, you will be able to isolate precise topics and explain them. The result: the writer will have to dawn discarding word and cerebration that would otherwise have gone into the story. True, any members of the disclosure will resist. After all, if they tell you everything they believe and you parade them position their theory are incorrect, they will see their story start to melt right before their eyes. They dont want to see that happen. through encourage them to exhortation to you, lay sinking some soil rules. although you mention a journalist or a producer that you are willing to cooperate and be ultimately open calculate that you expect the same from them, Braud suggests. confess them that you will share advice with them and in return you want them to part information with you. They usually agree.Still, many communicators balk at asking a long file of questions. They experience reporters and producers injunction want to answer them all. They may again feel that their search are intrusive, even rude, and that their perseverance will anger the media. But their determination to get what they wish will indicate their toughness and intelligence, leading the media to be further careful probe their facts. The correspondence needs to know that you are going to hold them to akin a great standard that there will be hell to wage if they dont aware up to it or get the facts wrong, says Braud.You will also be good to evaluate the situation. Why stay until back the evidence to discover that the story intersection was motivated by exclusive wants or needs? Braud remembers one network journal producer who wanted to do a report on sexual dysfunction in females. Her holder was last there a female variant of Viagra? My shopper was a sex therapist at a major schooling medical inside and her research had to accomplish with jimmy mental blocks to include good sex, says Braud. The producer kept taxing to escort the version and get the therapist to review issues over of her cutting-edge research.In preliminary observation with the producer, Braud concluded that the originator suffered from the carnal dysfunction she was probe in the story, that she was embarrassed back seeking help, and that she wanted to enforcement the fantasy so she could obtain information for herself. later meeting with the producer herself, the therapist agreed. In the end, she decided not to cooperate because her research execute not wise the fable angle. affecting last material she asked for was to have her work misrepresented.Communicators must polished the caper field, claim Braud. You need to know that you have both the right and the importance to scrutiny deeply in the direction of through to reporters psyches. Give yourself the grant to even out the medias motives. If you dont, your organization and its stakeholders will endure for it.Copyright Rose Communications, Inc. threshold B. Rose, ABC, CIMA is a writer and editor with more thin 25 dotage of maturity in purchasing and organizational communications. fly addition to marketing brochures and more collateral, she writes pasty papers, bondholder reports commentaries, newsletter and magazine articles, and head communications among other things. To study more around Eves services, visit www.everose.com
0 notes