the reason why c!schlatt apologists are superior to c!dream apologists is bc when they say "so what if he's evil? he looked cool doing it" they say it, they mean it and they leave it at that. meanwhile, c!dream apologists will start an argument by saying "so what? he was hot doing it" and then end up arguing with you for 20 paragraphs about how, actually, dream was forced to be a villain by wilbur and co and it's all wilbur's fault, while ignoring the fact that, even if that was true, he still abused multiple children and knowingly chose to ruin all his relationships for power.
423 notes
·
View notes