Tumgik
#cherik fan art
magnetosfavorite · 8 months
Text
trying to commission a cover for a cherik fic, pls let me know if you're interested or have a suggestion for someone <3
13 notes · View notes
swedenis-h · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
The Lovers.
2K notes · View notes
album-aurum · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media
I want to love you but I better not touch 
Don't touch
I want to hold you but my senses tell me to stop
I want to kiss you but I want it too much 
Too much
I want to taste you 
but
883 notes · View notes
thischerik · 1 year
Text
Charles, sighing: Erik, we tried things your way.
Erik: No, we didn't?
Charles: I did it in my head and it didn't work.
540 notes · View notes
phantomato13 · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
SO happy I was able to finish this piece today!! :) Cherik will always have a special spot in my heart 💛💛
83 notes · View notes
slouph · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
"Are you still quitting your job?"
"I think that's probably for the best, yes."
"Fine. I accept your resignation. Which means I can finally--"
What a way to make a livin’ by kaydeefalls
580 notes · View notes
evil-swedenish · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
X-men first class is so silly so funny
250 notes · View notes
viviarts-c · 2 years
Note
cherik art prompt: cherik cuddles?
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Cuddles throughout the ages! This was fun to do
Currently accepting cherik doodle prompts!
193 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
💙 Cherik Erasers 🤍
Handmade with eraser clay !!
57 notes · View notes
swedenis-h · 28 days
Text
Tumblr media
X-girlies… and men 😒
591 notes · View notes
riddlexiii · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
30 notes · View notes
album-aurum · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media
boobs boobs boobs boobs, erik, it’s illegal.
503 notes · View notes
teamxcherik · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
We understand completely how it feels to join an old, small fandom that is almost completely dead and to realize we joined a little bit too late. For the new and old fans alike, and because Cherik is so much fun, Cherik Week is back!
Anyone can participate! All languages are welcome too!
Content that will be accepted:
 Drabbles
 Ficlets
 Poems
 Fanfiction
 Art
 Edits
 Photonovels
 Fanvids
 Playlists
Cosplay
Comics
Content that will NOT be accepted:
Any content made with the help of an AI or made by it.
If you want to join and participate in this event, please do so because you love the ship. If you feel you have no skill, this is the perfect time to start with something. We will welcome your creations, doesn't matter how new you are in that skill. We want creations that make us feel something, that means something to us.
How to participate:
When posting your contribution to the event on tumblr, add the tag “CherikWeek2023″ so we can track it and reblog your post!
Be sure to post/share your themed content on the day of the week it corresponds to on the provided schedule.
You can also add your work to our AO3 collection.
Dates:
June 5th - 11th
Day 1: Gangster/Mafia | Dystopian
Day 2: Gokushufudo | Sentinel & Guide
Day 3: Gardenverse | Victorian Era
Day 4: Demisexual Erik | Protective Erik
Day 5: Gladiator | Actors
Day 6: Genosha | Drunk
Day 7: GoT/Medieval | Students
More info:
Someone had a question about the themes of this week. You can read here the answer.
For more general information, click here. If you have any questions feel free to send us a message through tumblr! 
Hope to see your contribution to the ship during our special week!
170 notes · View notes
slouph · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Character posters for Ikeracity & Pangea’s The Stars Incline Us, They Do Not Bind Us
276 notes · View notes
destinationtoast · 1 year
Text
"Entertainment" and modern AI-fandom interactions
There's a 1985* sci-fi short story I once read by M.A. Foster called “Entertainment” that predicts what will happen in an increasingly AI-generated art world.  I can't find any excerpts or summaries of it online, but what I recall is:
In the future, humans can prompt machines to create any art -- e.g., "What would a collaboration between early-era Peter Gabriel and late-era Beethoven look like, with a music video directed by Werner Herzog?"  (That's a made up example, but someone originally gave me the story because Peter Gabriel and early Genesis are actually referred to in the text, and I was at the height of my fandom. XD )  An AI then comes up with a bunch of different examples, and the human who gave the prompt chooses the one(s) they like best.  They then release the creation to the broader world, and people make micropayments to stream it.  Everyone competes for attention, hoping to go viral or at least make a decent living.
(There's a dystopian aspect, where if you don't make enough money and your balance drops below zero, you disappear back into the human factory to get remade.  Also, people don't have sex in person -- they pay each other for the rights to their likeness, and they have sex with simulated versions of one another.  All of which is rather interesting, but not as directly relevant to the point I'm making here.)
M.A. Foster did an impressive job foreseeing a bunch of aspects of modern AI and online culture (especially keeping in mind that there was no Web or social media or digital streaming or online micropayments at the time this was written).   And it’s becoming easy to imagine that we may reach a point where many of the story’s predictions about art come true, as well.  
Currently, you can give increasingly complex prompts and get AIs to respond with something that makes sense and seems like a valid reply. Newer AIs often create text and images that are both exciting and terrifying due to what feels like a sudden potential to blend in with or replace human output.  Fandom, along with everyone else, is unnerved.  After all, will we still need fan creators in a world where we can prompt AIs to do this?
Tumblr media
(source)
Or this?
Tumblr media
(source)
Or when AI can even take the prompt “Professor Charles Xavier and Erik Lehnsherr kissing next to a conflagration” and output this?
Tumblr media
(source)
Okay, there’s definitely still some funkiness going on there with some body parts; cherik fanartists can still obviously do better, for the moment.  And more generally, AI output is still frequently goofy, full of embellishments and fabrications, literally tasteless, and/or flat-out wrong – but we can see so many promises of how good it will get.  And we can imagine how AI output will increasingly be incorporated into transformative fandom and shipping culture.  
But all of the above examples illustrate another thing that M.A. Foster got right: If you want AI to produce something really interesting and compelling, it's important to have a human come up with a good prompt and then select the best output. 
This isn’t new; for years, we have been living in an increasingly curatorial world.  For instance, with stock photos of nearly everything, and digitized versions available of much of the world's art and photography, and endless hours of new YouTube & TikTok videos uploaded to the web every passing minute, it's much easier these days to create new images or videos or other visual works without being an artist.  But building a compelling visual work based on others' images -- a mood board, edit, collage, fanvid, etc. -- still benefits enormously from being driven by a human with a particular sense of style and particular goals in mind.  And the more that any human wants to see something that is different from the most common or most popular images that already exist, the more likely they are either going to have to create it themselves – or at least push the AI really hard in that direction via increasingly specific prompts and feedback.  (None of these roles are unique to online culture, either – art commissioners have historically prompted things, and art collectors and museums have curated them -- but these days we all have access to a much wider world of online works, and we all curate our own tumblrs and pinterest boards and so forth, even if we don't explicitly create curatorial works for fandom.)
The thing I found most unrealistic about "Entertainment" was that people weren’t tempted to try their own hand at creating art; it was a purely remix + curation culture.  In reality, even if AIs get really excellent at creation, so good that their fic and art are as good as your favorite fan creators’ work, I don't think they're ever going to suppress our own creative urges.  We live in a world where there are already 313 Dean/Castiel high school AU hurt/comfort fics – and yet people were still inspired to write/update two more this week.  People are not going to stop creating new fanworks just because the AIs are increasingly able to join in and create more.  And, for some time yet, humans are still going to lead the way in creating new canons with compelling stories and characters, which machines will then learn from and remix.  (That is another thing that human artists have also always done -- drawing inspiration from and remixing one another's art -- and something that fandom in particular is pretty great at.)
TL;DR human contributions to fandom will still be very important for fandom for the foreseeable future.  Even if the internet -- and now AI -- have helped us shift from spending more time as solo creators to also having increasingly active roles as prompters and curators.  
---
This post was partly inspired by @fansplaining 's latest discussion of AI & recent fandom panic, "Artificial Fandom Intelligence", as well as @cfiesler 's post, "Elon Musk did not create an AI trained on your fanfiction." They also addressed other issues that fans are worried about, like the idea of AIs and their creators getting credit and/or monetary reward for new fanworks trained on existing human-generated fanworks. If you've read other good meta about any aspect of fandom & AI, I'd love pointers -- please feel free to share in the notes!
*At least, it was collected in a 1985 anthology called Owl Time; I’m not sure when/where it was originally published.
204 notes · View notes