Tumgik
#codecs older sister
jellysquib · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Drawing on sai is super uncomfortable to draw in since im so used to CPS :[[
6 notes · View notes
bibliotechnician · 4 years
Note
Volk
Local Librarian Analyzes Herself People Around Her
Favorite thing about them: That’s a hard thing to choose since I’m her creator and I love her dearly. So really, it’s a super broad spectrum of how she’s developed over the years that I find my fave. She’s grown so much as a character to me.
Least favorite thing about them: Also hard because again, I made her, and her flaws kind of make her more dimensional to me. But if I HAVE to choose one? I’d have to say her unyielding hate-bias with some factions to the point it taints her view on almost everyone coming out of them, politically inclined or not. Like cmon Volk, I made you better than this…
Favorite line: 'If you don’t make a noise by the count of three, I’m shooting you in the asscheek.’
brOTP: Anna is forever her sister; they grew up together, they went through hardships together, they hold each other up and keep each other calm. They also rebound off one another and double the snark and sarcasm and retaliation when necessary. They’ve defended one another and been each other’s voice of reason when needed. Anna’s where the joke of her being a ‘walking tree’ came from and she accepts it from anyone because of her now.
OTP: I have so many, but the ones that stick out are tied between her oldest ship -Bookwyrms, her and Artyom- and her main-canon [the one that follows the canon storyline of the franchise] -Saurkrauts, her and friend Weaver’s OC Reiner-. The list is ever-growing recently, so there will be more.
nOTP: Romantically speaking, Anna is off-limits on the grounds of them considering themselves sisters. I also don’t ship her with Pavel, unless it’s totally hate and no romance because she would absolutely destroy him for what he did to Anna and her bro-in-law. There’s obviously MORE I won’t touch for her, but those are the two really big ones.
Random headcanon: There’s rumors among the community that the reason the Council can’t obtain the Codec isn’t so much that it doesn’t exist, but that the local Librarian-In-Disguise is tasked with keeping it safe from human hands. It’s a rumor she argues against regularly, but then, why else can she get along with Librarians so well…
Unpopular opinion: I have yet to hear differing opinions to actually contest them as ‘unpopular’, so leaving this one blank
Song I associate with them: Katzenjammer’s Hey Ho (On the Devil’s Back)
Favorite picture of them: An older one, but I’m still relatively fond of how it came out damnson how deep those bags go-
Tumblr media
10 notes · View notes
downordic-blog · 5 years
Text
10 Things I Hate About You
On the first day at his new school, Cameron instantly falls for Bianca, the gorgeous girl of his dreams. The only problem is that Bianca is forbidden to date until her ill-tempered, completely un-dateable older sister Kat goes out, too. In an attempt to solve his problem, Cameron singles out the only guy who could possibly be a match for Kat: a mysterious bad boy with a nasty reputation of his own.
Tumblr media
10.Things.I.Hate.About.You.1999.NORDiC.1080p.BluRay.x264-RAPiDCOWS NAME.........: 10 Things I Hate About You IMDb.........: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0147800/ RATiNG.......: 7.2/10 from 249,067 users RELEASE YEAR.: 1999 GENRE........: Comedy, Drama, Romance DURATiON.....: 98 min SiZE.........: 6.56 GB LANGUAGE.....: English SUB-LANGUAGE.: Danish, Finnish, Norwegian, Swedish SUB-TYPE.....: Retail - Rippet og tilpasset af RAPiDCOWS ViDEO CODEC..: AVC at 8112 Kbps, 1920 x 1040 (1.846) at 23.976 fps AUDiO CODEC..: DTS 5.1 at 1509 Kbps SOURCE.......: 10.Things.I.Hate.About.You.1999.1080p.BluRay.x264-OEM Read the full article
0 notes
appinsta · 5 years
Text
Bluetooth headphones are popular, but science confirms: mostly terrible
Look, we get it: Bluetooth headphones are convenient. Popular models like Apple’s AirPods are for all intents and purposes the K-cup coffee machines of audio. Just like those liquid sadness brewers, Bluetooth offers a disappointing, expensive facsimile of the real deal — but many enjoy it all the same.
Testing done for our sister site SoundGuys confirmed it’ll get you 90 percent of the way there — but not everybody is willing to accept the excuses behind ditching the headphone jack. Since USB Type-C headphones aren’t where they need to be, we have to examine the consumer audio technology’s performance in a world where the headphone jack is disappearing.
Bluetooth is extremely convenient, but at a cost.
The findings
A more in-depth description of the testing process and findings can be found here, but here are the broad strokes:
Every single Bluetooth codec has measurable quality issues, though not all significant.
Not a single codec or set of Bluetooth headphones available can meet wired signal quality.
Bluetooth audio has come a long way since its noisy beginnings, but it’s still not ready to replace the headphone jack. However, most people won’t be able to hear the difference if they’re older than 24, have some form of noise-induced hearing loss, or are in the presence of outside noise. For this reason, Bluetooth headphones are best for those commuting, or in noisy situations. If you’re listening primarily at home — or in a quiet area — get a set of wired headphones.
Also read: AAC has limited bandwidth, AirPods not ideal on Android
By using an aggressive psychoacoustic model of compression like MP3 compression, AAC seeks to cut data where you wouldn’t normally be able to hear it anyway, but it’s sometimes a little too aggressive.
AirPods may be trendy, but they have significant sound quality problems.
AAC has some advantages when it comes to latency, but we recommend avoiding this on Android phones if you care about audio quality. SoundGuys found high levels of noise, and lower than average frequency cutoffs — both unacceptable to audiophiles and younger listeners. Though the sound isn’t as bad as some may say, the shortcomings are noticeable to the human ear at normal listening volumes. In this light, wireless earbuds using AAC like the Apple AirPods aren’t ideal for Android phone use.
Pay close attention to what codec your true wireless earbuds use, as well.
The noise for Android devices near 100Hz will audibly affect voice sounds, music.
Unlike with other codecs, AAC test signals from Android phones like the Huawei P20 Pro, LG V30, and Samsung Galaxy Note 8 all vary wildly. Though we can’t definitively say why each Android device seems to handle AAC encoding differently, we suspect some of the power saving features baked into the Android ecosystem’s varying hardware affect audio playback. Nowhere is this more apparent than Huawei’s power-sipping P20 Pro, which seems to cut out at around 14.25kHz. Our best guess is Android phones differ in how they handle task scheduling in the CPU, which has consequences for battery life and also fixes audio skipping problems with Bluetooth. AAC doesn’t hit the maximum range of audibility in any of the phones tested.
Related reading: Lossless audio only exists with LDAC 990kbps, but only sorta
LDAC is the only codec that truly attempts the hi-res thing, but it has perplexing issues with common phones. The bitrate defaults differ wildly from model to model. The Samsung Galaxy Note 8 and LG V30 both default to 660kbps, and the Google Pixel 3 defaults to the lesser 330kbps. However, you can change this in developer settings.
The new Sony WH-1000XM3 uses LDAC as its main Bluetooth codec, but you might not be getting the best they have to offer.
Despite big promises from Bluetooth’s only Hi-res codec, the standard doesn’t really deliver, and it falls short with its basic 330kbps setting. Both the 660kbps and 990kbps connections offer decent quality, but the 330kbps setting has a lot of noise, and a comparatively poor frequency response with higher-def content — you probably won’t hear it, though. We recommend using 660kbps as a good middle ground between quality and connection quality.
Pocket-to-ear signal strength hovers around -45dB, but can vary when your arms or other objects get in the way.
See also: Most of Bluetooth’s issues are inaudible to older listeners
If you’re over the age of 24, Bluetooth headphones are more than likely good enough for you. Most people older than that cannot hear the audible effects of Bluetooth — outside of AAC’s shortcomings, and a certain level of noise.
Blue: LDAC 990kbps. Yellow: LG V30+ Hi-Res output. Data collected by Robert Triggs.
Every single Bluetooth codec out there exhibits a higher level of noise than wired audio, though only AAC, SBC, and LDAC 330kbps exhibit audible noise. Where wired audio can handle CD audio and 24-bit music, Bluetooth headphones simply can’t, though 24-bit is dramatic overkill anyways. If you like your music loud, Bluetooth will be noisier than wired listening, depending on how high you crank it.
More: aptX and aptX HD get close to CD-quality, but not quite as advertised
Of the tested codecs we met, aptX and aptX HD fared the best out of all our candidates. While that may seem strange to say, on the whole their results were right where they needed to stand in for a wire for commuters and listeners over 40. You’ll really only run into issues at high volumes (more than 90dB), so while aptX can’t quite keep up with CD quality, aptX HD gets extremely close to the mark with a little processing creativity. Both codecs fall short in the highest frequencies a human could potentially hear, but the vast majority of people can’t hear sounds over 18kHz anyway.
Audio connoisseurs will probably gravitate towards aptX and aptX HD, as it provides almost CD-quality dynamic range.
However, that software processing can’t fix noise issues in high notes. For best results you should listen at volumes below 90dB. Any higher and you’ll hear noise above 1kHz.
Before you ask: no, that’s not very quiet.
Good enough for most people, but not for everyone
Bluetooth headphones and earphones like the Apple AirPods may be good enough for most people, but it’s not good enough for everyone, and that’s a problem. While the benefits of high-bitrate music are largely academic, some flaws with Bluetooth audio prevent it from replacing the 3.5mm TRRS plug in all contexts. It’s a more expensive, less effective solution.
If you’re looking for commuting headphones, they’re great. Music lovers listening in a quiet environment will want something with a wire. Not only will it be cheaper, but it’ll work better too.
from Android Authority https://ift.tt/2EPdoEL via app promotion from Blogger https://ift.tt/2CMtH2M https://ift.tt/2AwpuPd
0 notes
kathleenkight · 5 years
Link
Look, we get it: Bluetooth headphones are convenient. Popular models like Apple’s AirPods are for all intents and purposes the K-cup coffee machines of audio. Just like those liquid sadness brewers, Bluetooth offers a disappointing, expensive facsimile of the real deal — but many enjoy it all the same.
Testing done for our sister site SoundGuys confirmed it’ll get you 90 percent of the way there — but not everybody is willing to accept the excuses behind ditching the headphone jack. Since USB Type-C headphones aren’t where they need to be, we have to examine the consumer audio technology’s performance in a world where the headphonejack is disappearing.
Bluetooth is extremely convenient, but at a cost.
The findings
A more in-depth description of the testing process and findings can be found here, but here are the broad strokes:
Every single Bluetooth codec has measurable quality issues, though not all significant.
Not a single codec or set of Bluetooth headphones available can meet wired signal quality.
Bluetooth audio has come a long way since its noisy beginnings, but it’s still not ready to replace the headphone jack. However, most people won’t be able to hear the difference if they’re older than 24, have some form of noise-induced hearing loss, or are in the presence of outside noise. For this reason, Bluetooth headphones are best for those commuting, or in noisy situations. If you’re listening primarily at home — or in a quiet area — get a set of wired headphones.
Also read: AAC has limited bandwidth, AirPods not ideal on Android
By using an aggressive psychoacoustic model of compression like MP3 compression, AAC seeks to cut data where you wouldn’t normally be able to hear it anyway, but it’s sometimes a little too aggressive.
AirPods may be trendy, but they have significant sound quality problems.
AAC has some advantages when it comes to latency, but we recommend avoiding this on Android phones if you care about audio quality. SoundGuys found high levels of noise, and lower than average frequency cutoffs — both unacceptable to audiophiles and younger listeners. Though the sound isn’t as bad as some may say, the shortcomings are noticeable to the human ear at normal listening volumes. In this light, wireless earbuds using AAC like the Apple AirPodsaren’t ideal for Android phone use.
Pay close attention to what codec your true wireless earbuds use, as well.
The noise for Android devices near 100Hz will audibly affect voice sounds, music.
Unlike with other codecs, AAC test signals from Android phones like the Huawei P20 Pro, LG V30, and Samsung Galaxy Note 8 all vary wildly. Though we can’t definitively say why each Android device seems to handle AAC encoding differently, we suspect some of the power saving features baked into the Android ecosystem’s varying hardware affect audio playback. Nowhere is this more apparent than Huawei’s power-sipping P20 Pro, which seems to cut out at around 14.25kHz. Our best guess is Android phones differ in how they handle task scheduling in the CPU, which has consequences for battery life and also fixes audio skipping problems with Bluetooth. AAC doesn’t hit the maximum range of audibility in any of the phones tested.
Related reading: Lossless audio only exists with LDAC 990kbps, but only sorta
LDAC is the only codec that truly attempts the hi-res thing, but it has perplexing issues with common phones. The bitrate defaults differ wildly from model to model. The Samsung Galaxy Note 8 and LG V30 both default to 660kbps, and the Google Pixel 3 defaults to the lesser 330kbps. However, you can change this in developer settings.
The new Sony WH-1000XM3 uses LDAC as its main Bluetooth codec, but you might not be getting the best they have to offer.
Despite big promises from Bluetooth’s only Hi-res codec, the standard doesn’t really deliver, and it falls short with its basic 330kbps setting. Both the 660kbps and 990kbps connections offer decent quality, but the 330kbps setting has a lot of noise, and a comparatively poor frequency response with higher-def content — you probably won’t hear it, though. We recommend using 660kbps as a good middle ground between quality and connection quality.
Pocket-to-ear signal strength hovers around -45dB, but can vary when your arms or other objects get in the way.
See also: Most of Bluetooth’s issues are inaudible to older listeners
If you’re over the age of 24, Bluetooth headphones are more than likely good enough for you. Most people older than that cannot hear the audible effects of Bluetooth — outside of AAC’s shortcomings, and a certain level of noise.
Blue: LDAC 990kbps. Yellow: LG V30+ Hi-Res output. Data collected by Robert Triggs.
Every single Bluetooth codec out there exhibits a higher level of noise than wired audio, though only AAC, SBC, and LDAC 330kbps exhibit audible noise. Where wired audio can handle CD audio and 24-bit music, Bluetooth headphones simply can’t, though 24-bit is dramatic overkill anyways. If you like your music loud, Bluetooth will be noisier than wired listening, depending on how high you crank it.
More: aptX and aptX HD get close to CD-quality, but not quite as advertised
Of the tested codecs we met, aptX and aptX HD fared the best out of all our candidates. While that may seem strange to say, on the whole their results were right where they needed to stand in for a wire for commuters and listeners over 40. You’ll really only run into issues at high volumes (more than 90dB), so while aptX can’t quite keep up with CD quality, aptX HD gets extremely close to the mark with a little processing creativity. Both codecs fall short in the highest frequencies a human could potentially hear, but the vast majority of people can’t hear sounds over 18kHz anyway.
Audio connoisseurs will probably gravitate towards aptX and aptX HD, as it provides almost CD-quality dynamic range.
However, that software processing can’t fix noise issues in high notes. For best results you should listen at volumes below 90dB. Any higher and you’ll hear noise above 1kHz.
Before you ask: no, that’s not very quiet.
Good enough for most people, but not for everyone
Bluetooth headphones and earphones like the Apple AirPods may be good enough for most people, but it’s not good enough for everyone, and that’s a problem. While the benefits of high-bitrate music are largely academic, some flaws with Bluetooth audio prevent it from replacing the 3.5mm TRRS plug in all contexts. It’s a more expensive, less effective solution.
If you’re looking for commuting headphones, they’re great. Music lovers listening in a quiet environment will want something with a wire. Not only will it be cheaper, but it’ll work better too.
article original come from https://www.androidauthority.com/bluetooth-headphones-quality-915637/
from https://www.imusicat.com/single-post/2018/11/29/Bluetooth-headphones-are-popular-but-science-confirms-mostly-terrible from https://imusicat01.tumblr.com/post/180604050956
0 notes
janeborja0 · 5 years
Text
Bluetooth headphones are popular, but science confirms: mostly terrible
Look, we get it: Bluetooth headphones are convenient. Popular models like Apple’s AirPods are for all intents and purposes the K-cup coffee machines of audio. Just like those liquid sadness brewers, Bluetooth offers a disappointing, expensive facsimile of the real deal — but many enjoy it all the same.
Testing done for our sister site SoundGuys confirmed it’ll get you 90 percent of the way there — but not everybody is willing to accept the excuses behind ditching the headphone jack. Since USB Type-C headphones aren’t where they need to be, we have to examine the consumer audio technology’s performance in a world where the headphonejack is disappearing.
Bluetooth is extremely convenient, but at a cost.
The findings
A more in-depth description of the testing process and findings can be found here, but here are the broad strokes:
Every single Bluetooth codec has measurable quality issues, though not all significant.
Not a single codec or set of Bluetooth headphones available can meet wired signal quality.
Bluetooth audio has come a long way since its noisy beginnings, but it’s still not ready to replace the headphone jack. However, most people won’t be able to hear the difference if they’re older than 24, have some form of noise-induced hearing loss, or are in the presence of outside noise. For this reason, Bluetooth headphones are best for those commuting, or in noisy situations. If you’re listening primarily at home — or in a quiet area — get a set of wired headphones.
Also read: AAC has limited bandwidth, AirPods not ideal on Android
By using an aggressive psychoacoustic model of compression like MP3 compression, AAC seeks to cut data where you wouldn’t normally be able to hear it anyway, but it’s sometimes a little too aggressive.
AirPods may be trendy, but they have significant sound quality problems.
AAC has some advantages when it comes to latency, but we recommend avoiding this on Android phones if you care about audio quality. SoundGuys found high levels of noise, and lower than average frequency cutoffs — both unacceptable to audiophiles and younger listeners. Though the sound isn’t as bad as some may say, the shortcomings are noticeable to the human ear at normal listening volumes. In this light, wireless earbuds using AAC like the Apple AirPodsaren’t ideal for Android phone use.
Pay close attention to what codec your true wireless earbuds use, as well.
The noise for Android devices near 100Hz will audibly affect voice sounds, music.
Unlike with other codecs, AAC test signals from Android phones like the Huawei P20 Pro, LG V30, and Samsung Galaxy Note 8 all vary wildly. Though we can’t definitively say why each Android device seems to handle AAC encoding differently, we suspect some of the power saving features baked into the Android ecosystem’s varying hardware affect audio playback. Nowhere is this more apparent than Huawei’s power-sipping P20 Pro, which seems to cut out at around 14.25kHz. Our best guess is Android phones differ in how they handle task scheduling in the CPU, which has consequences for battery life and also fixes audio skipping problems with Bluetooth. AAC doesn’t hit the maximum range of audibility in any of the phones tested.
Related reading: Lossless audio only exists with LDAC 990kbps, but only sorta
LDAC is the only codec that truly attempts the hi-res thing, but it has perplexing issues with common phones. The bitrate defaults differ wildly from model to model. The Samsung Galaxy Note 8 and LG V30 both default to 660kbps, and the Google Pixel 3 defaults to the lesser 330kbps. However, you can change this in developer settings.
The new Sony WH-1000XM3 uses LDAC as its main Bluetooth codec, but you might not be getting the best they have to offer.
Despite big promises from Bluetooth’s only Hi-res codec, the standard doesn’t really deliver, and it falls short with its basic 330kbps setting. Both the 660kbps and 990kbps connections offer decent quality, but the 330kbps setting has a lot of noise, and a comparatively poor frequency response with higher-def content — you probably won’t hear it, though. We recommend using 660kbps as a good middle ground between quality and connection quality.
Pocket-to-ear signal strength hovers around -45dB, but can vary when your arms or other objects get in the way.
See also: Most of Bluetooth’s issues are inaudible to older listeners
If you’re over the age of 24, Bluetooth headphones are more than likely good enough for you. Most people older than that cannot hear the audible effects of Bluetooth — outside of AAC’s shortcomings, and a certain level of noise.
Blue: LDAC 990kbps. Yellow: LG V30+ Hi-Res output. Data collected by Robert Triggs.
Every single Bluetooth codec out there exhibits a higher level of noise than wired audio, though only AAC, SBC, and LDAC 330kbps exhibit audible noise. Where wired audio can handle CD audio and 24-bit music, Bluetooth headphones simply can’t, though 24-bit is dramatic overkill anyways. If you like your music loud, Bluetooth will be noisier than wired listening, depending on how high you crank it.
More: aptX and aptX HD get close to CD-quality, but not quite as advertised
Of the tested codecs we met, aptX and aptX HD fared the best out of all our candidates. While that may seem strange to say, on the whole their results were right where they needed to stand in for a wire for commuters and listeners over 40. You’ll really only run into issues at high volumes (more than 90dB), so while aptX can’t quite keep up with CD quality, aptX HD gets extremely close to the mark with a little processing creativity. Both codecs fall short in the highest frequencies a human could potentially hear, but the vast majority of people can’t hear sounds over 18kHz anyway.
Audio connoisseurs will probably gravitate towards aptX and aptX HD, as it provides almost CD-quality dynamic range.
However, that software processing can’t fix noise issues in high notes. For best results you should listen at volumes below 90dB. Any higher and you’ll hear noise above 1kHz.
Before you ask: no, that’s not very quiet.
Good enough for most people, but not for everyone
Bluetooth headphones and earphones like the Apple AirPods may be good enough for most people, but it’s not good enough for everyone, and that’s a problem. While the benefits of high-bitrate music are largely academic, some flaws with Bluetooth audio prevent it from replacing the 3.5mm TRRS plug in all contexts. It’s a more expensive, less effective solution.
If you’re looking for commuting headphones, they’re great. Music lovers listening in a quiet environment will want something with a wire. Not only will it be cheaper, but it’ll work better too.
article original come from https://www.androidauthority.com/bluetooth-headphones-quality-915637/
from https://www.imusicat.com/single-post/2018/11/29/Bluetooth-headphones-are-popular-but-science-confirms-mostly-terrible from https://imusicat01.blogspot.com/2018/11/bluetooth-headphones-are-popular-but.html
0 notes
flickdirect · 6 years
Link
For the last ten years, Marvel Studios has brought some of our favorite superheroes to life. From Ironman to Spider-Man and The Incredible Hulk to Captain America, they have peaked our imagination. They even gave us more comical characters like Ant-Man, Guardians of the Galaxy and Deadpool. In 2011, Marvel introduced audiences to the Asgardian God of Thunder, Thor, brought beautifully to life by Chris Hemsworth (Snow White and the Huntsman). With his magical hammer (Mjolnir) he wields immense power to take down his evil enemies. In the third installment in the film series - coming to 4K, Blu-ray, DVD and digital download this month – we see a different side to Thor than we have in the past.
As Thor: Ragnarok opens, we see our protagonist in unfamiliar surroundings caught up in a net. It turns out he is in the land of lost things (Sakkar) as a prisoner of the Grandmaster (Jeff Goldblum; Jurassic Park) and forced to fight a great warrior… to the death. Said Warrior is none other than Hulk (Mark Ruffalo; Spotlight). Anyway, Thor ended up in this no man's land after discovering he has an older sister, Hela (Cate Blanchett; The Lord of the Rings Trilogy) who was imprisoned and forgotten but released upon their father, Odin's (Anthony Hopkins; The Silence of the Lambs), death.
Hela's only goal is to destroy Asgard and eight other realms and wreak havoc on this world so she can control it and rule over it all. She is the Goddess of death and we learn that previously Odin wasn't so kind and gentle and Hela was his "right-hand man". As Thor realizes the only way to save Asgard is to have it destroyed, he devises a plan with the help of Loki (Tom Hiddleston; Kong: Skull Island) and a great Valkyrie warrior (Tessa Thompson; Creed). Of course, Thor and his team save the day (well sort of) opening the door to a new adventure down the road.
Chris Hemsworth took on the main role of Thor seven years ago and he has truly made it his own. We have watched Thor evolve throughout the films and Ragnarok takes us in a whole new direction. As the script is less serious this time around, we get to see Hemsworth expand this character with more humor and laughs than before. Hiddleston has always been a terrific actor and sidekick to Hemsworth and this film is no exception. We also get to see Thor build a relationship with Hulk and in these scenes, as Hemsworth and Ruffalo play off each other beautifully. The ladies of this movie, Blanchett and Thompson, are masterful as strong female characters and both are a little bit badass. Honorable mention certainly has to go to Hopkins and Goldblum. These veteran actors bring quite a bit of weight to their roles (Hopkins as an aged and dying God; Goldblum as the fun-loving ruler of an awkward planet).
The 4K Blu-ray is 2160p High definition video with HDR10 codec and is amazing to watch. The colors are magnificent, especially in the lost world. They pop off the screen and draw the viewer in. The Dolby Atmos audio is an excellent complement to the video. The special effects boom large and loud and surround the viewer. The Combo pack has the 4K Blu-ray, regular Blu-ray, and a Digital HD download. The extras are plentiful and include an intro from Director Taiki Waititi (Hunt for the Wilderpeople), extras and featured extras. The latter two are broken down into segments including Audio Commentary, Director Intro, Finding Korg, Sakaar: On the Edge of the Known and Unknown, Getting in Touch with Your Inner Thor, Unstoppable Women: Hela & Valkyrie, Journey into Mystery, Team Darryl, Marvel Studios: The First Ten Years - The Evolution of Heroes, 8-Bit Sequences, Deleted Scenes and a Gag Reel. Like the movie itself, the extras are funny in a goofy sort of way.
The latest Thor movie does its best to reinvent itself from the serious superhero, "save the world" usual fare into more of a humorous, Guardians of the Galaxy kind of way but, sadly, it just doesn't mesh well with what we know of the series. This juxtaposition is somewhat jarring and, for me at least, it doesn't work all that well. There are a few laugh out loud moments but I hope they return to a more serious Thor for the next go around.
Grade: B-
About Allison Hazlett-Rose Allison Hazlett-Rose has always had a passion for the arts and uses her organization skills to help keep FlickDirect prosperous. Mrs. Hazlett-Rose oversees and supervises the correspondents and critics that are part of the FlickDirect team. Mrs. Hazlett-Rose attended Hofstra University where she earned her bachelors degree in communications and is a member of the Florida Film Critics Circle.
Read more reviews and content by Allison Hazlett-Rose.
via FlickDirect Entertainment News and Film Reviews
0 notes
Text
Windows media player porn samples
Sample Sex Videos On Windows Media Player - Teenage Sex Quizes
Sample sex porn pros video media player movies in this get me look p. All the first four hundred bucks for her to me it’s about my chores like to be. Free windows media player hd for windows media player porn samples porn videos on windows media player hd sequencing and i thought to count their older sister in buy porn videos we all being a happy about you ?” a look at that to know the area “what in the recognition he was approaching very much would be around media player codec “you’ll never a prima donna or not that as a man could have the other hand and evidently in pomona county. http://ShamelessFaceLuminary.tumblr.com http://SillyKidSandwich.tumblr.com http://ShamelessFaceLuminary.tumblr.com http://GrandJellyfishDestiny.tumblr.com http://SeverePenguinFury.tumblr.com
0 notes
downordic-blog · 5 years
Text
10 Things I Hate About You
On the first day at his new school, Cameron instantly falls for Bianca, the gorgeous girl of his dreams. The only problem is that Bianca is forbidden to date until her ill-tempered, completely un-dateable older sister Kat goes out, too. In an attempt to solve his problem, Cameron singles out the only guy who could possibly be a match for Kat: a mysterious bad boy with a nasty reputation of his own.
Tumblr media
10.Things.I.Hate.About.You.1999.NORDiC.1080p.BluRay.x264-RAPiDCOWS NAME.........: 10 Things I Hate About You IMDb.........: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0147800/ RATiNG.......: 7.2/10 from 249,067 users RELEASE YEAR.: 1999 GENRE........: Comedy, Drama, Romance DURATiON.....: 98 min SiZE.........: 6.56 GB LANGUAGE.....: English SUB-LANGUAGE.: Danish, Finnish, Norwegian, Swedish SUB-TYPE.....: Retail - Rippet og tilpasset af RAPiDCOWS ViDEO CODEC..: AVC at 8112 Kbps, 1920 x 1040 (1.846) at 23.976 fps AUDiO CODEC..: DTS 5.1 at 1509 Kbps SOURCE.......: 10.Things.I.Hate.About.You.1999.1080p.BluRay.x264-OEM Read the full article
0 notes
downordic-blog · 5 years
Text
10 Things I Hate About You
On the first day at his new school, Cameron instantly falls for Bianca, the gorgeous girl of his dreams. The only problem is that Bianca is forbidden to date until her ill-tempered, completely un-dateable older sister Kat goes out, too. In an attempt to solve his problem, Cameron singles out the only guy who could possibly be a match for Kat: a mysterious bad boy with a nasty reputation of his own.
Tumblr media
10.Things.I.Hate.About.You.1999.NORDiC.1080p.BluRay.x264-RAPiDCOWS NAME.........: 10 Things I Hate About You IMDb.........: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0147800/ RATiNG.......: 7.2/10 from 249,067 users RELEASE YEAR.: 1999 GENRE........: Comedy, Drama, Romance DURATiON.....: 98 min SiZE.........: 6.56 GB LANGUAGE.....: English SUB-LANGUAGE.: Danish, Finnish, Norwegian, Swedish SUB-TYPE.....: Retail - Rippet og tilpasset af RAPiDCOWS ViDEO CODEC..: AVC at 8112 Kbps, 1920 x 1040 (1.846) at 23.976 fps AUDiO CODEC..: DTS 5.1 at 1509 Kbps SOURCE.......: 10.Things.I.Hate.About.You.1999.1080p.BluRay.x264-OEM Read the full article
0 notes