Control Group (2019) is a collection of four mid-length original scenarios for Delta Green. Each of the scenarios stands alone as a one-shot, but the more intriguing thing is the rough framework for connecting them all. More on that in a minute.
The first is my favorite, involving a team of astronauts accompanying two people who have no business being on a shuttle. Those two are under orders to repair a black ops satellite. Things get weirder from there. I love how audacious it is to set a scenario on a space shuttle, and it seems like a recipe for disaster, but it totally works. The second scenario is a little wobbly for me, depicting an attempt by US forces in Afghanistan at a bit of regional diplomacy that goes terribly wrong. It sure is tense, and the messed up politics of the real world adds dimension to it, but I dunno, it feels fraught to me. This hesitance carries through to the third scenario, which it excellent, but involves a supernatural pandemic and I am just never going to be in the mood to run that in a post-2020 world, you know? That’s just me, though — even though I am unlikely to run these, I appreciate the commitment to having Delta Green’s horror butt up against real world horrors.
All three of those use pre-gens and the idea is to have the survivors come together for the fourth, a really excellent, really goey investigation of a feel-good cult that has real strong X-Files vibes in the best possible ways. I love this scenario and I love how the framework pulls disparate characters into it.
73 notes
·
View notes
why are control groups important?
(if dr. doofenschmirtz had recruited a control group one (1) time.. )
experiment groups: a part of the total sample which undergoes treatment.
control groups: that part of the total sample which is not subjected to the experiment, but is vital in deciding the significance of results obtained.
if a control group is absent in a trial which tests whether a treatment truly works, there is no normal to compare it with. the treatment was created to be better than the current conventional treatment or no known cure at all. without a control group, there is no way to confirm that the treatment is the better option from now on.
therefore, a control group is not the less imporant group. results of different types of studies are more reliable based on how well the control group was designed. yes, designed.
while testing a drug, its effect is compared against a control group, which is given no drug at all or is given placebo (for eg., giving a sugar cube and having people believe they've been given the drug). these are called the untreated control group and placebo control group, respectively.
in some studies, the researchers and participants themselves do not know the control group. the analysis and results are thoroughly unbiased here. this is called a double-blinded control group.
people in the wait list control group receive treatment after experiment is complete, in case they suffer bad consequences due to the experiment. this is extremely important to consider when recruiting patients with depression, anxiety, cardiac problems, etc.
two broader classifications are positive and negative control groups. in the former, researchers expect a known outcome (for eg., giving the control group a known and effective drug for a particular condition); in the latter, no effect is expected (no drug or placebo is given to the control group).
in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the total sample is sorted into control and experiment groups randomly, to avoid bias. RCTs are considered the gold standard and are the most common.
an interesting method of building a suitable control group is to find a near identical match for each member of the experiment group. this is used in studies where a common baseline condition cannot be established across the total sample. these are used in observational studies as well.
that said, a number of questions need to be answered. is the control group selected ethical? is there a chance the selected control group might produce unwanted results in parameters that are not being observed in this study?
in conclusion, a control group ensures that the findings in a study are real and not just believed to be real.
"controlled conditions" is a frequent phrase to encounter in research, especially in clinical research.
researchers design studies to understand the phenomenon they are studying. this means each step, from hypothesis to publishing the article is carefully considered. likewise, the conditions under which to study this phenomenon are controlled. this means that anything that isn't being studied should not behave abnormally.
these conditions are easier to achieve in a sample of cultured cells than in a living organism. they are incredibly difficult to achieve in behavioral or related fields of study because behavior and interactions among living beings are difficult to moderate without intervention and thus awareness of those being observed.
8 notes
·
View notes
people who have not watched stranger things are very important to society
3 notes
·
View notes
Control group figure drawings, the left is without reference, and the right has the reference next to it. This is the first time I drew figures in years. (Refrence from animereferenceposes.com and the other is AI generated)
0 notes
I keep seeing people argue that Aziraphale is "intelligent" or "not a fool" and that this means he can't possibly have fallen for the Metatron's blatant manipulation tactics or still genuinely believe in Heaven's righteousness.
Setting aside the validity of various theories (most of which I at least find interesting, if not outright compelling!) I think there's an issue here, which is that intelligence doesn't protect you from cult-like thinking. Especially not when you've been more or less born and raised in the environment.
In fact, what intelligence tends to do to people who have been indoctrinated into cults (and a cult is exactly what GO Heaven operates like) is give you even more tools for justifying or thinking your way around the contradictions of the cults actions vs message.
We even see Aziraphale do this, several times!
In fact, at the end of S1 doing this is part of what helps save the day. When he points out that Heaven can't know that they aren't defying God's ineffable plan while trying to follow the Great Plan, he's not just talking them into standing down, he's giving them an out. Because the whole Armageddon thing has already gone to shit and cannot proceed without Adam's cooperation, what they're really dealing with at that point is getting Heaven and Hell to accept that without retaliating. Even when Satan shows up it's because he's pissed, not because doomsday is still on.
Aziraphale uses the cult's own logic to give Heaven (and Hell) a plausible reason to back down without completely losing face. They don't have to admit that they were wrong, they can just file everything under "ineffability". Aziraphale pulls this off so well in part because he's been doing this to himself for millennia.
When he doesn't understand or really approve of the Flood, he files it under "ineffability". God has a plan but it's too complex and beyond even angelic comprehension to understand, so there must be a good reason for the Flood, it's just that Aziraphale can't see it. When he sees Heaven being complicit in Job's suffering and the potential murder of his children, he reconciles it by deciding that what God really wants is for him and Bildad to secretly stop it. But he flounders on that later, because to some extent I think he knows that this reasoning is self-serving.
(Knowing it's self-serving doesn't refute it, though, it just means that he worries about that until he talks himself into a bunch of reasons why it's still probably true.)
In S1, when Crowley broaches the subject of the apocalypse, Aziraphale's initial response is to recite the propaganda. It's all going to go according to plan, and it will all be great! When that doesn't work (because of course it won't be great, he's going to end up losing his true home and the person he loves most if this all goes down no matter who wins), he lets Crowley help talk him into how he could thwart the plan without "really" betraying his concept of God.
Basically, if Aziraphale's values come into conflict with Heaven, he decides that God secretly agrees with him. It's very like people who find their values coming into conflict with the institution of their church or temple, and so decide that there's nothing wrong with their actual religion, it's all just normal human corruption (or in GO's case, angelic corruption) muddying the waters of an otherwise purely good thing.
Now in real life of course this gets to be a thorny issue, but keeping it simple there isn't really a total separation between a faith and its institutions. You can't claim that there's nothing in the religion that lends itself to bad takes, just like you also can't claim that any ideology or belief system is invulnerable to corruption. Likewise, even if every bad thing in GO were to turn out to be the fault of Heaven and Hell and not God, God would still be accountable for a lot of the situation because God still set the stage.
But what matters for Good Omens and Aziraphale and this post is that, Aziraphale has put considerable mental energy into justifying how God and Heaven can still be Good and Right even as both of them do things he finds intolerable. Whether it's "God secretly wants me to do what I think is right instead of what I'm being told" or "Heaven has earnestly misinterpreted the will of God due to not knowing as much as I do", he puts his intelligence to use in protecting himself from the kind of revelation that would uproot his worldview.
The only kind of knowledge that actually protects people from cults is the knowledge of how they operate, and awareness that you're dealing with a cult. Aziraphale has a terrible disadvantage on both fronts because even though he's spent years watching humanity get into hot water with this stuff, he does so with the firm perspective that things are different for angels. He can't necessarily apply what works for humans to himself, because he knows he's a different kind of being (and unlike with IRL cults, it's actually true in his case, though I think demons and angels are both less different from humans than they believe).
Though, interestingly, he's closer to a accepting the truth when it comes to the differences between angels and demons. In S1 he is fully confident that he could possess someone, because even though angels don't do that, demons can. Whether he admits it or not, Aziraphale really does believe that Crowley is not meaningfully different from himself in terms of personhood or ability. If he can make the leap to the idea that angels and demons are not exempt from human-oriented concepts of self-determination and free will and unfair treatment by authority, and reconcile it with his own intense distress at challenging a core belief, then the fact that he's quick on the uptake will really start to work in his favor.
218 notes
·
View notes