THE WHITE DOOR
He never called her “the woman he loved” until she was dead in his arms.
Her killer was a a man whom Bastian admired; but Bastian wronged him anyway, and he was savage and exacting in his vengeance. So: Bastian too is savage and exacting, and far less admirable.
Though revenge provided no abatement of his grief, it was required by the circumstances.
It is not enough by far.
He readies his companions to set out for the continent of Death itself. He knows only one man who has been there, and that man returned blinded, bitter, and heartbroken: but the dark prince loves his wife, and a knife will not keep him from her. Nor will the endless miles of the white countries, nor the threat of mutilation, nor the will of any God.
He expects horror. He will bring it himself.
His wise wife, his fairy wife: he trusts she knows that he is coming.
96 notes
·
View notes
China is and has been doing the same to Uyghur people that is happening within Gaza right now. The US made a human rights policy act for them, so why are they supporting Israel? This is almost identical to what is happening in Gaza, yet western powers only care about the 'countries' that further their own agenda at that time
9 notes
·
View notes
I think it's pretty well established now that Edelgard and Dimitri are foils to each other in that one looks to the future and the other to the past and that's a huge part of why their outlook on the war and what they went through is so different, but I haven't seen it pointed out and discussed yet that a good chunk of their classmates follow that theme as well.
(I haven't seen all the Blue Lions' supports so this is in general, from the Academy phase's supports I've seen, which means I may lack a specific example one way or the other, but is still globally accurate, at least for their Academy phase)
In the Blue Lions House, based on the students' supports with each other, the most obvious are Ingrid, still mourning and resenting the loss of her fiancé, Felix, still mourning the loss of his brother and focused on that one day he saw Dimitri rampage and those two things being basically the only things that inform his decisions, and Dedue, who literally tries to push EVERYONE away because of how still hung up on the Tragedy of Duscur the Kingdom is and how anyone who spends time with him would be shunned for it (though he does look forward to Dimitri's reign because he believes Dimitri will change things in Faerghus, but most of his supports are still based on the Tragedy of Duscur still impacting his life to this day). Sylvain also fits because bad past examples and relationships have taught him that women are only interested in his blood line ; he doesn't ever talk about finding someone who would think differently, for example, he stays hung up on the past and doesn't even consider the future, at least not as something that could bring a change. Mercedes is less hung up on her past, though still quite focused on what happened to her mother, her brother and herself and wanting to find her brother so they can be happy again, like when they were children. Annette and Ashe, from what I've seen, don't fit the theme.
In the Black Eagles House, the most obviously focused on the future are Dorothea, who talks about her past but only to explain why she's so focused on securing a good future for herself, Ferdinand, who can't SHUT UP about becoming Edelgard's Prime Minister and guiding her in her reign, Petra, who holds a grudge against Caspar's father for killing her own, but whose supports pretty much all mention her desire to make Brigid an equal to Adrestia and ensure a bright future for her people, and Caspar, who is focused only on getting stronger to carve his own path in life. Hubert, of course, being aware of Edelgard's plans, is also solely focused on the future, though always only related to Edelgard and her goals, never his own person outside of his work ; Linhardt is neutral, as he focuses only on Crests ; Bernadetta has been traumatised by her past, but she's not hung up about it, she's only focusing on how afraid she is in the present, so I'd say she's neutral as well.
It always struck me as odd that no one, among the Black Eagles, ever said a word about the Insurrection of the Seven, Edelgard's time in the Kingdom when she sought asylum there, or Edelgard's siblings when, in comparison, the Blue Lions wouldn't SHUT UP about the Tragedy of Duscur and the Faerghus Four's childhood friendship. Even Edelgard and Hubert barely ever mention that they knew each other as children (Edelgard only tells you once, in Hubert's introduction I believe, that he has served her since she was a child) and the others never mention any time spent with Edelgard as children (the only ones who admit they saw each other often as kids are Caspar and Linhardt, but it doesn't even really come up in their supports, when the Faerghus Four's supports with each other are FULL of reminders of their shared past). Now I think it's to further emphasise the themes of their houses : the Black Eagles represent rebellion and the desire to shape their futures the way they see fit while the Blue Lions represent order, discipline and the shackles of the past.
It's really super interesting on a meta level. I haven't played VW yet but I'm curious to see if a similar theme is shared through the House, or if it's a patchwork of different goals and focuses, to represent how disparate the Alliance is and how they can never make a unanimous choice.
45 notes
·
View notes
Salam, Sister. Can we see Asif being carried/cared for by Ahmad Massoud. I felt this suggestion would greatly benefit the Afghan audience to quell some rage against Pakistanis. Remember, Afghanistan is very diverse so to portray Asif as only a pushton is insulting.
Dear Anon, i feel like an ask like this is a bit too controversial for me to draw or answer. As this is just a platform i like to discuss and create Hetalia - related things, i usually like to keep things more generalized and less tense.
Afghans may have anger with regards to Pakistan's political leadership (current or in the past), but i don't think any hatred should translate into hatred for the normal, average person. If some people are too narrow-minded to understand this basic thing, then it is not my business to indulge them either. It is not my responsibility to educate people who are hellbent on their biased hatred-filled views and neither would i encourage such a person to so much as even engage with me.
But yes, i agree that Afghanistan is much more than just it's Pashtun group :D I completely agree with you on that. I need to do more research on the other different groups of Afghanistan in order to add to his overall quirks and maybe personality. However, correct me if i'm wrong, the reason why i give more emphasis on the Pashtun group is because the current Afghanistan exists due to the conquests of Afghan/Pashtun dynasties on non-Pashtun regions. And historically people used to consider Afghan and Pashtun to be synonymous to one another. It's only recent that i've seen people trying to diverge Afghan from just being synonymous to Pashtun, and into a much more inclusive national identity for Afghan Tajiks, Uzbeks, Turkmens, Baloch, Hazaras, Nuristanis etc etc Consider reading some of my old posts regarding Afghanistan :) I have explained some things related to it there.
12 notes
·
View notes