Tumgik
#david yells
flxwer-prince · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
hangin out cheeky style
75 notes · View notes
autie-j · 2 months
Text
They're doing it with video games now :/
33K notes · View notes
sentientsky · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
crowley and aziraphale negotiating child support payments in s3
7K notes · View notes
actual-changeling · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
how are we all feeling? deeply mentally unwell? yeah. me too.
3K notes · View notes
scales-n-art · 26 days
Text
Tumblr media
If this world is wearing thin
And you're thinking of escape
I'll go anywhere with you
Just wrap me up in chains
But if you try to go alone
Don't think I'll understand
Stay with me
Follow me on IG | Twitter | Patreon
736 notes · View notes
dragonmouth · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media
That one spiderman meme, but David Tennant characters
Something something time travel DW/GO crossover 🤷
2K notes · View notes
cuntbrow · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
@thealogie thea your tags about them being one step away from making sheen-tennant holiday cards? well. they took that step.
460 notes · View notes
parispixiegirl · 6 months
Text
Me clicking on Xitter this morning to look for OFMD posts and seeing these instead 🫠
Tumblr media
Aziraphale:
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Also:
Tumblr media Tumblr media
So Aziraphale wanted Crowley to kiss him again 😭 and the director was like oh my god this is a long-ass kiss (david & michael didn’t have to go that hard but of course they did)
no i am not okay (OFMD what?)
i swear this fandom will be the death of me
365 notes · View notes
ingravinoveritas · 3 months
Text
Following up on this excellent post from @nightgoodomens, it really is astonishing to see so many people in the GO fandom misunderstanding the characters/personalities of Aziraphale and Crowley. While I by no means am against people having head canons or differing interpretations, it has become frustrating to see people pushing their ideas about Aziraphale and Crowley onto others and declaring them to be official canon, leaving no room for any kind of discussion.
One of the things spoken about in the above linked post is the denigrating of Crowley, which seems to be a near constant in the fandom at this point, particularly in relation to the "apology dance" scene. (Which, to be fair, is chock full of soft!Dom Aziraphale vibes--thank you, Michael Sheen.) What seems to keep getting missed is that the entire apology dance routine is something that Aziraphale and Crowley do to each other. There is just as much of a possibility that Crowley sat there with a similarly smug look on his face and let out a guttural, snakey "Very nice" when Aziraphale did the dance in the years he listed off, because they play this game together.
Aziraphale and Crowley's relationship is one of equals, and I think this is also something people seem to not understand well. It seems as though a lot of fans who project themselves onto Crowley want to be taken care of, and so they want to believe the same of Crowley, and that the reason he wants to be taken care of is because he is broken. But someone doesn't have to be broken to want someone to take care of them. Sometimes the people who are a shambles on the outside can be dominant, just as sometimes the most buttoned up, put together people can also be submissive. And sometimes the people who look in control on the outside can feel not at all that way on the inside.
But this nuanced thinking seems to increasingly be difficult for many GO fans, particularly those who spend a great deal of time on social media, a place where people are either blindly praised or denigrated and torn down, and where such behavior greatly reinforces that binary, black-and-white mindset. We so badly want the world to be clear-cut--good vs. evil, heroes vs. bad guys--but very often that just isn't how things work. And it is exactly what Terry and Neil were trying to speak against in the GO book (and subsequently, the TV show).
The other thing that I think influences a lot of fans' perceptions about Aziraphale and Crowley is their chosen corporations (i.e., Crowley being thin and Aziraphale being plump). There is an automatic assumption that thin somehow equals more vulnerable, and for all of the emphasis that is placed on Aziraphale and Crowley being genderfluid/nonbinary/not subscribing to traditional gender roles, it's Crowley who seems to be viewed as more androgynous/femme, and is therefore looked at as inherently vulnerable. Meanwhile Aziraphale is thicker and viewed as more masculine, and therefore he is somehow inherently not vulnerable. Yet if the body types were reversed, it seems highly likely that fans' attitudes toward them would be much different.
(It also saddens me that this seems to mirror the fans' treatment of Michael and David, where Michael serves as a target for the fans' venom and is seen as less desirable/more threatening because he presents more traditionally masculine, while David is not targeted or attacked and is seen as more desirable/less threatening because he presents much more androgynously. Consequently, many fans find it easy not to sympathize with Michael, and when you can readily disregard someone's feelings, it becomes easier to see them as "less." In the case of Aziraphale and Michael, it leaves no room for either one to be vulnerable and is unfair to both of them.)
What I have always taken away from Good Omens--and from Michael and David's portrayal of Aziraphale and Crowley and how deeply they both understand these characters--is that Crowley doesn't need to be a perfect angel for Aziraphale to like him. He just needs to be a little bit of a good person. And Aziraphale doesn't need to be a perfect demon for Crowley to like him--he just needs to be enough of a bastard to be worth knowing. Neither one has to fully subscribe to the other's outlook or point of view to listen to what they have to say.
Aziraphale and Crowley meet in the middle. In the place that becomes their side, and where they take care of each other, fight with each other, and love each other. And that's more than most of us could ever ask or hope for...
171 notes · View notes
celluloidbroomcloset · 2 months
Text
Finally saw NEXT GOAL WINS and I’m about ready to fight anyone mean about Taika’s work, because there are NO filmmakers working today with as much faith in humanity as he has.
133 notes · View notes
flxwer-prince · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
the daughter pile
77 notes · View notes
areyoudoingthis · 6 months
Text
the fallout of the plank scene hasn't left my mind since thursday. i keep thinking about stede's actions and the way he's sitting alone in the cabin afterwards, the flashbacks to his childhood and the formative moment with the goose and the blood, the tears in his eyes as he pulls ed into the room.
i don't think the issue is whether or not stede likes violence. he's traumatized by it sometimes, giggles as he sets people on fire a few hours later. i believe what determines the difference between those two situations is how they relate to his childhood trauma. the violence isn't the issue, the issue is that he thinks the soft boy who wanted to pick flowers could never be anything other than a disappointment, and if that's all he is people will reject him. the crew won't respect him, ed will get bored and leave. he can tell ed likes the fancy things, but he doesn't think that could ever be enough for him.
it's less about being violent than it is about being strong, always in command, never allowing himself to fall apart. stede doesn't enjoy the violence itself, he enjoys the fame and recognition and acceptance he receives when he's performing the dread pirate bonnet. he also doesn't mind it, he'll set a man or a boat full of people on fire and laugh, no big deal. but when a famous pirate brings up his insecurities and throws racist digs at ed in front of him, it's less about being violent than it is about performing in a certain way, doing what he thinks is expected of him under the circumstances. it's about how violence is directly tied to the idea of the man he thinks he needs to become, and that's what triggers the childhood flashback.
and when ed tells him the next morning about the orange sparkly mermaid that saved his life, he appreciates it but he doesn't hear the message behind the words, the "I'm upset that you had to kill a man in cold blood, that's not what i need from you, that's not what i want for you, because I never wanted it for myself."
i think if stede ever told ed about his father and everything he went through as a kid, ed would understand him so much better, and be a lot less afraid that stede would leave him. because their trauma stems from the same core: they're both haunted by all the wrong things they were taught about being a man
296 notes · View notes
earlgodwin · 21 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
i'm convinced this is a 'normal' part of the relationship between these three siblings, as if her brothers purposefully show off their prowess to her...things couldn't get more insane than this tbh
82 notes · View notes
actual-changeling · 3 months
Text
opened etsy and this is the first thing they showed me. i have so many questions and one of them is how many of these does michael sheen have in his possession
Tumblr media
771 notes · View notes
70snasagay · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
tom????
category 5 fandom collision event
(from tom scott's weekly newsletter)
148 notes · View notes
drawsmaddy · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media
[ID: A digital illustration the Tenth Doctor from Doctor Who. There are two drawings of the Doctor. On the left is a drawing of him from the chest up, looking to the left and grinning. Below him is a drawing of his sonic screwdriver. On the right is a drawing of the Doctor stood in the doorway of the TARDIS. He leans on the doorframe with his hands in his pockets, his left leg crossed over his right, looking off to the right. The background is a pale yellow with squiggly lines in different shades of blue running horizontally across the middle. End description.]
Accidentally awakened my inner 12 year old 💙
400 notes · View notes