I heard someone say that the reason people are reacting so strongly to what’s happening in Palestine is because seeing what’s happening is causing them moral harm (A moral injury can occur in response to acting or witnessing behaviors that go against an individual's values and moral beliefs.) And this take actually really frustrated me, because I’m not really sure they understood the full implications of what they were saying.
Because if people are so upset about Palestine due to receiving moral harm, then we have to ask why there was no same outpouring of rage when Hamas attacked on October 7th. When people were taken hostage, raped, burned alive, murdered and the corpses desecrated to the point where some of the bodies may never be identified – the same people who are outraged now were silent then.
The way I see it is that there’s one of two things happening here (they’re both rooted in antisemitism, just manifesting in different ways). One option is that there is no moral injury – this is just an excuse to be antisemitic. The other option is that there is moral harm being caused, but then we have to ask why the same moral harm wasn’t caused when it was Israelis under attack, and the only answer I can come up with is that their morals are ok with those things as long as they’re happening to the correct people (this could be straight antisemitism, but it could also be leftists loving violence against oppressors, but viewing Israeli children as oppressors comes from antisemitism).
Honestly, I think there’s a stronger argument for the first option, given that most of the people who are so upset about Palestine don’t seem to care about the Uyghurs, what’s happening in Syria or Myanmar or any of the other places where equally bad stuff is happening. And I almost think that’s a good thing? It’s possible to be antisemitic without actually seeing Jews as subhuman, but I can’t think of a way to be morally offended by the deaths of Palestinian children but not Israeli children, without classifying Israeli children as subhuman in some way. So, option one is still bad, but option two is worse.
I just think that if you’re going to claim that the reason for the way people have been acting is that it’s an expression of pain caused by moral harm, when no such pain was present when it was Jews under attack, then it leads to the question of what the heck are these people’s morals anyway? It’s not the excuse you think it is, it’s an indictment.
140 notes
·
View notes
I know the fandom latched onto the 'Jeff's Inn by the Sea' thing early on as some sort of romantic idealized Retirement Goals (TM) endgame, but to me this has always sounded less 'domestic bliss' and more 'unmitigated disaster,' and the finale has definitely not changed my opinion on that. Like I'm giving this venture about a week before both of them are metaphorically clawing the curtains and gnawing the furniture. And the only reason I'm giving them that long is because I'm assuming they spend the majority of that first week screwing each other's brains out (with a few intermittent breaks for incompetent attempts at house renovation). Anne and Mary's antique shop really feels like foreshadowing here. Or at least a warning.
Glad they've got a chance to fail at something together, though (other than communicating about their relationship). Love that for them.
143 notes
·
View notes
the major arcana, shuffled: 4/??
THE HIGH PRIESTESS;
⤉ spirituality, higher power, mystery, subconscious
⤈ hidden motives, secrets, repressed intuition, cognitive dissonance
THE EMPRESS;
⤉ motherhood, femininity, nurturing, harmony
⤈ smothering, negligence, lack of growth, insecurity
THE EMPEROR;
⤉ fatherhood, structure, authority, control
⤈ tyranny, domination, recklessness, rigidity
56 notes
·
View notes
related to the latest discourse, can we perhaps NOT tell people to go kill themselves even if - and this may be hard to understand! - even if we disagree with their TV show hot takes. can we agree that being mean on anon is shitty, cowardly behaviour and indefinitely worse than expressing an opinion on the Caring Too Much About Fandom website.
thank you.
21 notes
·
View notes
Thinking ab Liu Kang… thinking about a god who thinks he has lived this new life well, has learned the rises and falls of divine existence and knows what to expect, only to remember he is just a boy given too much power when he reaches a present he cannot control. Faces he used to laugh with, people he has seen grown old, different and changed, but so much the same. Events he thought he had avoided repeating themselves, his timeline slipping from underneath him for the first time possibly in millennia. What is a god meant to do when he cannot escape his own mortality, cannot escape the ghosts yet to come, the blood he must prepare to have spilled at his feet? What is a god meant to do when he cannot fathom his own power? When he is still just a boy so scared to be champion, but must now hold the weight of the universe on his shoulders?
25 notes
·
View notes
THE WHITE DOOR
He never called her “the woman he loved” until she was dead in his arms.
Her killer was a a man whom Bastian admired; but Bastian wronged him anyway, and he was savage and exacting in his vengeance. So: Bastian too is savage and exacting, and far less admirable.
Though revenge provided no abatement of his grief, it was required by the circumstances.
It is not enough by far.
He readies his companions to set out for the continent of Death itself. He knows only one man who has been there, and that man returned blinded, bitter, and heartbroken: but the dark prince loves his wife, and a knife will not keep him from her. Nor will the endless miles of the white countries, nor the threat of mutilation, nor the will of any God.
He expects horror. He will bring it himself.
His wise wife, his fairy wife: he trusts she knows that he is coming.
96 notes
·
View notes
Nghhh chewing on finweans and realizing how self-sacraficial is so deeply instilled in that family, and that that particular trait is prevalent in each generation.
Finwe knew he couldnt win against Morgoth, but he could try and protect his grandchildren. He fought regardless.
Fingolfin knew he couldnt twin against Morgoth in 1-on-1. He fought regardless.
Finrod knew he would die on his quest for Beren, and still fought the wolf to save his friend. He did.
Celebrimbor knew he could protect others by dying, protecting the knowledge about the rings. He did.
It stands to reason that Elladan, Elrohir or Arwen, would have come upon a similar fate.
10 notes
·
View notes
the longer i sit with it the more it really gets me how nobody ever really mentions obito and rin before obito's reveal in shippuden. kakashi vaguely mentions his old friends and i think other characters allude to the tragedy of kakashi's past but rin and obito themselves are lost to time. something about that is so fucking haunting and so gutting. you would think it would be a pretty big deal that two kids from the same class died within a year of each other, but the nine tails attack probably wiped so much clean that nobody could really carry the grief... still, when we see their class in flashbacks, we recognise almost everyone else, so... there's something really sad and hopeless about their absence...
there's a lot a LOT to say about it from a lot of different angles and i don't really feel like going into meta posting territory i just have big feelings about it you know? and to me i guess obito encapsulates a lot of the anger. for the people who get left behind and forgotten. and that can mean a lot of things
9 notes
·
View notes