Tumgik
#derek chauvin guilty
minnesotafollower · 11 months
Text
Derek Chauvin’s Ex-Wife Sentenced for Minnesota Tax Evasion
On May 12, 2023, Minnesota’s Washington County District Court sentenced Kellie Chauvin, the former wife of Derek Chauvin, based on her recent guilty plea to two counts of aiding and abetting Minnesota income tax evasion.[1] The sentence was 20 days in jail, three years’ probation and payment of  $37,868 in restitution to cover the unpaid taxes. Rather than being in jail, she can satisfy the time…
View On WordPress
0 notes
beardedmrbean · 9 months
Text
The officer, Tou Thao, was found guilty of aiding and abetting manslaughter by a Minnesota judge in May.
Mr Thao testified that he acted as a "human traffic cone", holding back bystanders while Derek Chauvin knelt on Mr Floyd's neck for nearly 10 minutes.
Mr Floyd's death on 25 May 2020 sparked mass protests across the US.
All four former police officers involved in the incident were convicted on federal civil rights charges, in addition to state murder charges for Mr Chauvin. Ex-officers Thomas Lane and J Alexander Kueng pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting second-degree manslaughter.
Thao, who was sentenced to three and a half years over his civil rights conviction, will serve the 57 months at the same time.
The former officer had waived his right to a jury trial in the manslaughter case, opting instead for Judge Peter Cahill to determine the verdict. He also waived the right to testify and question witnesses.
In a 177-page ruling in May, Judge Cahill said that Mr Thao's actions - which included shielding Chauvin and the two other officers from the crowd - prevented a trained emergency medic from being able to help Mr Floyd.
"There is proof beyond a reasonable doubt that Thao's actions were objectively unreasonable from the perspective of a reasonable police officer, when viewed under the totality of the circumstances," the judge wrote.
Judge Cahill added that Thao's actions "were even more unreasonable in light of the fact that he was under a duty to intervene to stop other officers' excessive use of force and was trained to render medical aid".
33 notes · View notes
aronarchy · 1 year
Text
https://web.archive.org/web/20230423173258/https://twitter.com/EFJBGC/status/1649809558284402694
Tumblr media
Serial killer cops are extremely common. Cops typically kill [queer people], BIPOC, and sex workers so they can get away with it.
The Golden State Killer was a cop-serial killer who committed 13 murders and 51 rapes and got away with it for 44 years.
Many others haven’t been caught.
Other famous examples include David Middleton of Miami PD, Gerard Shaefer of Martin Co Sheriffs Dept, Drew Peterson of Chicago PD, Joseph Mensah of Wauwatosa PD, Austin Edwards of Virginia State Police, Derek Chauvin of Minneapolis PD
Many serial-killer cops are still cops
Tips to protect yourself from cop-serial killers:
Stay aware of your surroundings and make note of any approaching cops
Let someone know where you are going and when to expect you back
Travel with other people
Do not talk to cops ever
Do not go w/cops anywhere
Rec[ord]/Stream
Really important 🧵 of examples: killer cops get rehired or promoted. Your serial killer may be the face of your city’s copaganda posters.
Tumblr media
20 years ago this cop was a central player in the biggest dirty cop scandal in Dallas history. The Narcotics Squad was found to have targeted, brutally beaten, and robbed ($10,000s) from immigrant workers and business owners.
Now after killing multiple, he’s the hero cop poster
Tumblr media
Chicago PD in particular has an extremely dark pattern of running torture black sites. Jon Graham Burge, detective and police commander was found guilty of torturing 118 people between 1972 and 1991 as part of a department wide torture program… in 2018.
26 notes · View notes
Text
Former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin has been sentenced to 21 years in a federal prison for violating George Floyd's civil rights. Chauvin, who pleaded guilty in December, will also be required to pay restitution.
During the sentencing, U.S. District Judge Paul Magnuson said that Chauvin "must be held responsible" for his actions, including destroying the lives of the other three officers involved in Floyd's death.
Chauvin's plea deal, which Magnuson accepted in May, called for a sentence of 20 to 25 years. Magnuson shaved seven months off of the 21-year sentence for time already served — last year, Chauvin was convicted in a state court on murder and manslaughter charges related to Floyd's May 2020 death and sentenced to 22 1/2 years. He will serve the state and federal sentences concurrently in a federal prison.
Chauvin, who is White, killed Floyd by pinning the unarmed Black man to the pavement with his knee for 9 1/2 minutes, despite Floyd's fading pleas of "I can't breathe." Floyd's death sparked protests worldwide and forced a national reckoning over police brutality and racism.
Prior to his sentencing Thursday, Chauvin wished Floyd's children "all the best in their lives" and that they have "excellent guidance in becoming good adults," CBS Minnesota reports. He did not offer an apology.
Floyd's brother, Philonise Floyd, asked the judge for a life sentence, adding that he has had nightmares since his brother's death, according to CBS Minnesota.
Prosecutors pushed for the former police officer to serve all 25 years on the grounds that his actions during Floyd's death were cold-blooded and needless. They also argued that he had a history of misusing restraints — Chauvin's plea included an admission that he violated the rights of a then-14-year-old Black boy whom he restrained in an unrelated case in 2017.
The defense instead asked for 20 years, saying Chauvin accepts responsibility for what he did and has already been sentenced to 22 1/2 years in prison by a state court in Floyd's murder. Attorney Eric Nelson wrote that Chauvin's "remorse will be made apparent to this Court."
In pleading guilty to violating Floyd's civil rights, Chauvin admitted for the first time that he kept his knee on Floyd's neck — even after he became unresponsive — resulting in his death. The former officer admitted he willfully deprived Floyd of his right to be free from unreasonable seizure, including unreasonable force by a police officer.
Chauvin is appealing his murder conviction, arguing that jurors were intimidated by the protests that followed and prejudiced by heavy pretrial publicity.
137 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
Globalists are cultivatating professional thugs of anarchists whose goal is to usher in their so called "new world order" through the destruction of the world's cities.
It pains me to see people who look like me rewarded for theft, vandalism and even murder. Once upon a time in black culture, lawlessness was discouraged. Now, mayors (like the one in Baltimore) tell the police to give rioters "space to destroy." Morally corrupt Maxine Watters threatened jurors in Minnesota that a "not guilty" verdict in the case against officer Derek Chauvin would cause violence & destruction.
Two (2) of these gangs have names: Antifa and BLM. Antifa recruits students or entry level young professionals who seek career advancement. This first rung up the anarchist's ladder of success serves as an initiation into more sophisticated anarchist circles. It can lead to lucrative job opportunities and political appointments.
Participants are often rewarded with tenured teaching posts in colleges and universities. They also move up the ladder in various corporate and legal firms and they are positioned for political appointments.
BLM and the lower level "gangs" are made up of the nameless, disposable radicals meant to be sacrificed for "the greater good." Organizations like the NAACP and so called "black leaders" like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Michelle & Barack Obama serve as plantation DRIVERS who are assigned to manipulate the minds of the "disposable" anarchists.
The collapse of American cities into lawless cities is strategic. It is no coincidence that over 400,000 Americans have fled "Gotham" NYC as it is destroyed from the inside out.
New York is redefining what constitutes an actual crime. The result is their statistics don't tell the full story of how failure to prosecute criminals has destroyed New York City and in turn, millions of lives. The dirty cop, DA Alvin Bragg only has dismal 49% success rate prosecuting crime.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
A native New Yorker:
Tumblr media
A silver lining to these fraudulent Trump indictment(s) is a bright spotlight on criminal INJUSTICE at the hands of dirty DAs, AGs, State's Attorneys, Judges and so-called special prosecutors.
Our American House of Representatives hosted a NYC field hearing for victims of violent crime.
Below please find heartbreaking testimonies of the victims. They are cautionary tales of how lawlessness has impacted everyday people around the United States of America. Sadly, the residents of these cities don't understand that they voted for their demise.
youtube
youtube
youtube
youtube
Tumblr media
America's Lawless Cities
Seattle
Los Angeles
Philadelphia
Washington, DC
Portland
New Orleans
Chicago
New York City
San Francisco
Starbucks, Walmart, Cracker Barrel, Whole Foods fleeing due to "security concerns."
Portland, OR
"An open air insane asylum." Portland's Meltdown: "A Progressive Experiment That Has Gone Colossally Bad. Controlled Demolition."
youtube
youtube
Chicago, IL
Walmart Closes 4 Chicago Stores Shoppers complain but they just voted for another mayor who is soft on crime.🤦‍♂️
youtube
The company has pledged to offer more safety training for workers and clarify safety procedures, such as when to call 911, and making changes to store formats and layouts. The measures include “closing a restroom, or even closing a store permanently” where safety is no longer possible, according to a letter posted on the company website. 
Social Disorder Insurance Claims $2 Billion during a Historic Summer of Anarchy
"The most expensive outbreak of civil unrest in U.S. history, costing insurance companies an estimated $2 billion to cover protestor wreckage in the days following George Floyd’s death.
The sky high price tag comes from an assessment by Property Claims Services (PCS) published in Axios which has tracked claims related to social disorder since 1950. The company classifies any violent outbreak sparking more than $25 million in claims a “catastrophe.”
The $2 billion figure covering claims made from rioting across 20 states between May 26 and June 8 dwarfs the dollar-amounts doled out by insurance companies in the aftermath of previous periods of unrest isolated to individual cities.
“It’s not just happening in one city or state – it’s all over the country,” Loretta L. Worters, a spokesperson for the group told Axios. “And this is still happening, so the losses could be significantly more.”
Indeed, the initial Floyd riots merely kicked off a historic summer of anarchy sweeping the nation’s cities where
in Portland, Oregon, militant social justice warriors surpassed 100 days of consecutive terrorism. Protestors launched repeated assaults on state and federal law enforcement featuring mortar-style fireworks and lasers that can cause permanent blindness.
Protestors launched repeated assaults on state and federal law enforcement featuring mortar-style fireworks and lasers that can cause permanent blindness.
The only prior outbreak to come close to producing the same level of carnage as the 14 days of rioting after Floyd’s death, measured by insurance claims, are the 1992 Los Angeles riots causing $775 million in insured losses, or more than $1.4 billion in today’s dollars, according to PCS.
Consequent research on the nation’s pandemic of domestic terrorism this summer has further highlighted the breadth of the destruction. The map below shows where the nation suffered nearly 570 violent riots between May 24, the day before Floyd’s death, and Aug. 22, the day before Jacob Blake was shot in Kenosha, Wisconsin triggering a second wave of chaotic demonstrations reaching smaller communities."
Cracker Barrel Manager Killed During Robbery
youtube
An Inconvenient Truth: To neutralize the threat, you fire until the threat is neutralized.
youtube
youtube
17 notes · View notes
Text
when someone’s legal rights are violated, when we are talking about the death penalty, it’s not about guilt or innocence. a lot of people have absorbed this very shallow criticism of the carceral system and this very shallow understanding where if someone’s rights were violated, then they must be innocent, or that rights violations only matter when a person was innocent, or that the death penalty is only wrong when the person is innocent. and you have people who claim the banner of abolition or at least reform but then turn around and when someone like derek chauvin was convicted, argue 22 years in prison is not a lot time (what???? it absolutely is. thats a quarter of a lifetime). or someone argues against the death penalty and it’s for someone who has committed a heinous, heinous crime. the death penalty is still wrong. period. it doesn’t matter the crime. if the crime matters to you, then you do support the death penalty. you can just say that.
it’s hard to face people who have done heinous things and care about their humanity. the fact is adnan syed likely did kill his ex girlfriend. he did kill hae min. but people have should have basic legal rights and under no circumstances should those be denied, nor should minors be sentenced to serve long sentences in adult prisons. it’s hard for me to argue a teenage boy who strangled his girlfriend should not be swallowed whole by the carceral state, especially when male violence is a bedrock of our horrible society. but for me, the carceral state is male violence in the form of an institution, and i cannot argue that girls like cyntoia brown, chrystul kizer, pieper lewis, anissa weier, morgan geyser, and so on, should be given mercy and spared a carceral system that will only make life worse for them and everyone else that loves them if i don’t make that case across the board……it’s not just about the easy cases. it’s the absolute principle of it. of course innocent people should not be behind bars, but there are a lot of guilty people who should not be either. it is not abolitionist or reformist to be taken by some allegedly charismatic guy and decide because he’s nice he must be innocent. that’s not the point, but that’s also a very ugly and very shallow way to address this issue.
21 notes · View notes
femmesandhoney · 1 year
Note
trans people want to and will make everything about them. oh another school shooting happened and there are literal dead children but the shooter identified as trans? gosh it must be because of those anti trans laws that aren’t actually anti trans at all. the day derek chauvin was found guilty for killing george floyd there were people outside the courthouse waving around trans flags with black trans lives matter written on them. jewish people weren’t legally allowed to ride bikes and had to have the star of david pinned on their clothes so they would be identifiable as jewish for law enforcement before they were forced to go to auschwitz’s and be gassed to death simply because they were jewish. come the fuck on trans people don’t have a genocide against them. someone not calling you it/itself and not wanting their preschoolers to go to a drag show isn’t a genocide. trans day of vengeance is such a cringey thing anyway. these people throw temper tantrums when the mcdonald’s cashier says sir instead of ma’am. they’re not gonna do shit and honestly the tq+ community is probably one of the most protected communities right now.
yeah i remember those black trans lives matter flags during the live streams/news casting of the courthouse :( i think i made a post about it myself too. it's just so intellectually dishonest to compare what happened in the holocaust and other genocides around the world to what trans people in the US are experiencing. also i feel i've never seen another social justice group bank so heavily on other oppressed and minority peoples experiences so much to get their own point across. if what was happening to you was as bad as you say it is, you wouldn't have to utilize such loaded words and language to make others empathize with you, you could go "look, look at what's happening right here right now", but the trans rights movement cannot do that because, again, there's no actual genocide. buzzwords, loaded words, slippery slope bullshit. my AP Lang teacher would probably go nuts.
5 notes · View notes
vague-humanoid · 1 year
Text
3 notes · View notes
90363462 · 11 months
Text
The Derek Chauvin verdict was about the power of bystanders.
https://web.archive.org/web/20210421121515/https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2021/04/derek-chauvin-verdict-power-of-bystanders-hope.html Skip to the contentMenu
Chauvin TrialJohnson & JohnsonPoliceSonia SotomayorTeslaSoccerLost at SeaDogecoinMasks OutsideJeans
News & PoliticsCultureTechnologyBusinessHuman InterestPodcasts Search
FOLLOW US
SubscribeSign in
Subscribe
JURISPRUDENCE
This Verdict Was About the Power of Bystanders
This is the sliver of hope to hold onto.
BY DAHLIA LITHWICK
APRIL 20, 20217:57 PM
People react after the verdict was read in the Derek Chauvin trial on April 20, 2021 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Scott Olson/Getty Images
It is hardly an original observation that getting to “guilty” on all three counts for Derek Chauvin took too much. His conviction required too much video, too many eye witnesses—far more evidence, argument, and proof than most victims of racialized police shootings will ever be able to amass. By that measure, tonight’s verdict is both a huge win and an impossibly small one. Police killings of unarmed Black men have happened since George Floyd was murdered, and more will come. It cannot be the case that this quantum of proof will be required to bring them to justice.
ADVERTISEMENT
And yet. There is something profound that brought about this verdict and that thing may be new and worth celebrating: This was a lesson in the power of bystanders. Not just the bystanders who stood by and filmed the police as the travesty was unfolding and not just the bystanders who implored the police to stop, or the bystanders who improbably and amazingly called the cops on the cops. This verdict was also the result of the police officers who stepped in to testify against their own. What was astounding, watching the Chauvin trial play out, wasn’t just the fact that people who had every reason to bolt at the scene stood their ground and bore witness. What was astounding, watching this trial, were the cops who could have faded back and held their tongues who decided instead to speak truth not merely to power, but to their own best interests.
ADVERTISEMENT
Perhaps as important as all that is the fact that millions and millions of Americans saw the video of George Floyd’s death. People who could have reacted by turning away, or persuading themselves it didn’t matter, who also chose to bear witness, and then chose to stand up, to march, to learn. For the people who witnessed the actual truth of things and decided that the time for silence was over, this too, is a lesson in the transformational power of bystanders. In an age in which celebrity and individualism seems to count for everything, this verdict stands perhaps for the possibility that crowds of millions may count for more.
Maybe the lesson of “what’s different” now—after George Floyd’s tragic death and the outpouring of anger that resulted and this past summer in which it seemed possible to think maybe this time was different—isn’t that the future Black victims of a police system that has been careless and cruel to Black lives since its inception will have an easier time proving it. It will clearly never be easy. The system will continue to demand that it be Herculean to bring about change for a long time to come. The victims will far too often be dead—killed, unfairly, too soon, and for nothing. But maybe what is different is that we will be more careful both about defending bad apples who are rotted to the core, and also more careful about understanding that we operate within a system that either protects and promotes and rewards those aggressors, or stands up and says this cannot stand. And that is a story of bystanders; of bystanders who chose not to stand down.
ADVERTISEMENT
POPULAR IN NEWS & POLITICS
Who Is Kyrsten Sinema Telling to F— Off?
What Are Police Thinking?
Sonia Sotomayor’s Lonely Battle to Give the Voiceless a Voice at the Supreme Court
Why Conservative Media Is Celebrating the Chauvin Verdict
I’m the last person to suggest that everything will change in the wake of this verdict. But I would like to be among the first to say that this verdict lights a way to real change. Crowds who witness racial and power indignities should not disperse. Police officers who see violence and abuse in their midst should not persuade themselves that their voices don’t matter. It’s entirely possible that one small lesson of the Chauvin verdict is that the “rugged individualism” ideal that comes cloaked in violence and state-sanctioned authority has finally had its day, and that brave, anonymous, collective action is capable of standing up to it. That doesn’t bring back George Floyd and it doesn’t fix systemic police violence. But if offers a template of how change ultimately comes. It comes whenever we are faced with the choice to stand up and speak up, or to hang back and do nothing. Bystanders brave enough to see the difference and demand big systemic change won’t bring back George Floyd. But they will be the ones to lead us forward.
As politicians race to pass new voter suppression measures across the country, the fight for voting rights has never been more important. Slate Plusmembers allow us to cover this fight for the franchise with the urgency it deserves. We really couldn’t devote the time and resources necessary to report out this monumental story were it not for your support. —Mark Joseph Stern, staff writer
Tweet
Share
Comment
Police ShootingsRacismGeorge Floyd
ADVERTISEMENT
ABOUT
About Us
Work With Us
Contact
Pitch Guidelines
Send Us Tips
Corrections
Commenting
SUBSCRIPTIONS
Subscribe
Sign In
Account
Subscription FAQs
Podcast FAQs
Newsletters
Customer Support
ADVERTISING
Advertise: Site / Podcasts
AdChoices
Cookie Preferences
MORE
Reprints
Slate Shop
Slate is published by The Slate Group, a Graham Holdings Company.
FOLLOW US
FacebookTwitterInstagramRSS Feed
3 notes · View notes
beardedmrbean · 1 year
Text
NEW YORK — Colinford Mattis’ trajectory from a working-class upbringing in East New York to the Ivy League and corporate law abruptly ended at about 1 a.m. May 30, 2020, when a Molotov cocktail ignited the center console of an empty police car during a Black Lives Matter protest.
On Thursday afternoon, Judge Brian Cogan of U.S. District Court in Brooklyn sentenced Mattis, one of two young lawyers who burned the vehicle during the protests days after the murder of George Floyd, to 12 months and a day in prison and a year of post-release supervision.
Mattis, 35, has lost his law license, having pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit arson and having acknowledged he had broken the law he had sworn to uphold. Now he may lose much more: the guardianship and planned adoption of three foster children. The oldest is 14.
On Thursday evening, the Brooklyn courtroom was crowded with Mattis’ friends and family.
“I’m deeply sorry and embarrassed about the things I did and said in May 2020,” Mattis told the judge. He said he recently reread his text messages from that day. “I am more than horrified at the words I used,” he said.
“I am sorry that I hurt my three children that my mother had entrusted to me,” he added.
The judge told Mattis that the country needed attorneys to bolster faith in the rule of law and to reassure Americans that the legal system would hold Floyd’s killers to account. He told Mattis that his hard work had changed his station in life.
“You’re not one of the oppressed,” Cogan said. “You’re one of the privileged.”
Spectators in the gallery gasped at the judge’s words. “To make that comment, you’re not seeing the same things that I’m seeing,” said Taaj Reeves, a friend of Mattis’, after the hearing.
In November, the judge had sentenced Urooj Rahman, Mattis’ friend and a fellow lawyer, to 15 months in prison and two years of supervised release for the same crime. She was the primary caretaker of her aging mother. Cogan called the sentence one of the most difficult he ever had to impose. After a lifetime of hard work and conscientiousness, he said, Rahman’s conduct was a violent aberration.
“You are a remarkable person who did a terrible thing on one night,” the judge told her.
Cogan said Thursday that Mattis got a lighter punishment because he had not been the main instigator of the attack.
The sentences close a case that stunned the city, devastated two families and exposed deep fissures between the police and the community. They reflect a long negotiation with the U.S. attorney’s office in Brooklyn, which at first sought steep charges and had pushed to deny bail to Rahman and Mattis, both first-time offenders.
Rahman and Mattis had been high achievers, children of immigrant families who were raised in New York. Rahman pursued public interest law, co-authoring a paper on police reform in 2014 and working at Bronx Legal Services. Mattis followed a more lucrative corporate path. But he was already teetering in his career and personal life when the protests occurred.
The events that led to their downfall began in an unsettled spring.
Mattis had been furloughed in March from his job as an associate at the law firm Pryor Cashman, and the pandemic had cut him off from outside support as he took care of the children, his lawyer wrote.
Then, on May 25, video of Floyd, a 46-year-old Black man who died in Minneapolis after his neck was pinned to the ground by Derek Chauvin, a white police officer, ignited protests. There were demonstrations in at least 140 cities across the United States.
In New York, peaceful protests turned into confrontations with police. Throughout the weekend, demonstrators clashed with officers in Union Square in Manhattan and outside the Barclays Center in Brooklyn, resulting in injuries and hundreds of arrests.
On May 29, according to court documents, Mattis had been drinking throughout the day as he exchanged despairing messages over the murder of Floyd with friends, including Rahman, who were mobilizing to join a protest. That evening, Rahman, who was 31 at the time, met Mattis after he made stops to buy supplies, including gasoline, and joined a swell of protesters in Brooklyn.
Shortly after midnight, with Mattis at the wheel, according to court filings, they drove in a tan minivan to a police precinct in Clinton Hill. After trying to persuade a bystander to throw a bottle that she was holding, Rahman got out of the van herself, walked toward an empty police patrol car that had already been damaged by protesters and threw the Molotov cocktail through its broken window before fleeing.
She and Mattis were arrested shortly afterward and held in jail for several days before they were released to home confinement.
It was a politically fraught moment after New York police officers had arrested hundreds of people during the protests, many on charges of disorderly conduct, resisting arrest and unlawful assembly. District attorneys said they would not prosecute many of the nonviolent cases.
Brooklyn federal prosecutors, then part of the Trump Justice Department, appealed twice to keep them behind bars, saying that the two lawyers had tried to incite others to similar attacks. But more than 50 former federal prosecutors signed a public letter urging the appeals court to reject the U.S. attorney’s office’s argument for detention, saying it contradicted settled bail law.
In June 2020, a grand jury returned an indictment against Mattis and Rahman that included seven counts, including arson, use of explosives and civil disorder.
In November 2021, after President Joe Biden had taken office and new leadership had taken over in the Department of Justice, Rahman and Mattis each pleaded guilty to one count of possessing and making an incendiary device. Last June, those charges were dismissed as part of a deal with prosecutors, and both pleaded guilty to a count of conspiracy to commit arson.
At Rahman’s sentencing, she faced up to five years under federal guidelines, and the government had asked for 18 months to two years. Her lawyer, Peter Baldwin, asked the court to impose only supervised release, saying his client had experienced “a dangerous and reprehensible lapse of judgment.”
“Urooj’s emotions — her anger, her despair, her rage — got the better of her,” he told the judge. Since the incident, Rahman had been in therapy and Alcoholics Anonymous, Baldwin said.
Rahman was born in Pakistan and grew up in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn; she graduated from Fordham Law School and had always been drawn to public interest work, a commitment for which Cogan praised her.
When she addressed the court, Rahman cried as she spoke about her mother’s grief. “I don’t think there are enough words to express my sorrow and regret,” she told the court. “My sole intention was to lend my voice to other New Yorkers in the pursuit of justice. I completely lost my way in the emotions of the night.”
She is to report to federal prison in Connecticut on Tuesday.
Mattis has already spent nearly a month in jail, has taken a leadership role in his Alcoholics Anonymous chapter and is at no risk of reoffending, his lawyers said in the memorandum to the judge.
Sabrina Shroff, his defense attorney, told Cogan in a presentencing letter how Mattis, the son of immigrants from Jamaica and St. Vincent, grew up in a chaotic home. Although early on he struggled academically, he went on to graduate from boarding school, then attended Princeton University and New York University’s law school.
When he was in his second year of law school, his father, Kingcolinford Mattis, was stabbed to death during a robbery in St. Vincent. His son used alcohol to dull his pain, Shroff wrote.
After law school, when he took a job at a law firm in 2016, he was often late or absent, court documents said. His yearslong dependency on alcohol worsened. He was asked to leave the firm just as his mother was diagnosed with uterine cancer, and he became her primary caregiver until her death in 2019, even as he worked at another firm.
After she died, Mattis took over her role as the foster parent for the three children he is now in the process of trying to adopt. He is also the primary caretaker for his 15-year-old nephew.
Shortly after the pandemic hit in March 2020 and Mattis was furloughed, his drinking increased, according to court filings.
On May 29, 2020, hours before he joined the protests, Mattis watched the video of Floyd’s murder for the first time and began to cry.
Within hours, court records said, Mattis was driving the minivan quickly away from the burning police sedan with open bottles of Bud Light, a funnel, a half-full red gas can and rolls of toilet paper.
8 notes · View notes
follow-up-news · 2 years
Link
A white Minneapolis police officer whose murder of a Black man outside a convenience store touched off protests around the world was sentenced to 21 years in federal prison on Thursday, in a case that signaled a new readiness to hold police officers criminally accountable for misconduct.
The former officer, Derek Chauvin, 46, was sentenced for using excessive force under color of law against both George Floyd, the man who died in the encounter, and a 14-year-old boy, also Black, who was injured in an unrelated, though similar, incident.
With time already served deducted, Mr. Chauvin’s sentence amounts to 20 years and five months, near the lower end of the range of 20 to 25 years prescribed by the sentencing guidelines. His federal and state sentences are to be served concurrently.
8 notes · View notes
Text
The man who allegedly attacked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband early Friday posted memes and conspiracy theories on Facebook about COVID vaccines, the 2020 election and the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, and an acquaintance told CNN that he seemed “out of touch with reality.”
David DePape, 42, was identified by police Friday as the suspect in the assault on Paul Pelosi at the Speaker’s San Francisco home.
Three of DePape’s relatives told CNN that DePape has been estranged from his family for years, and confirmed that the Facebook account – which was taken down by the social media company on Friday – belonged to him.
His stepfather, Gene DePape, said David DePape grew up in Powell River, British Columbia, and left Canada about 20 years ago to pursue a relationship that brought him to California.
“I really don’t know what to think,” the suspect’s uncle, Mark DePape, said of his nephew’s alleged attack on Pelosi. “Hopefully it’s a scam. I don’t want to hear something like that.”
People who knew DePape in California described him as an odd character.
A 2013 article in the San Francisco Chronicle identified him as a “hemp jewelry maker,” and said that he lived with a nudist activist. Other photos published by the Chronicle show DePape – fully clothed – at a nude wedding on the steps of San Francisco City Hall.
Linda Schneider, a California resident, said she told CNN she got to know DePape roughly eight years ago and that he occasionally housesat for her. When they met, she said, DePape was living in a storage unit in the Berkeley area and told her he had been struggling with hard drugs but was “trying to create a new life for himself.”
She said that he was extremely shy. “He said he couldn’t even go and have a bank account because he was terrified of speaking to a teller,” Schneider said.
But Schneider later received “really disturbing” emails from DePape in which he sounded like a “megalomaniac and so out of touch with reality,” she said. She said she stopped communicating with him “because it seemed so dangerous,” adding that she recalled him “using Biblical justification to do harm.”
DePape’s social media presence similarly paints a picture of someone on a worrying trajectory, falling into conspiracy theories in recent years.
Last year, David DePape posted links on his Facebook page to multiple videos produced by My Pillow CEO Mike Lindell falsely alleging that the 2020 election was stolen. Other posts included transphobic images and linked to websites claiming COVID vaccines were deadly. “The death rates being promoted are what ever ‘THEY’ want to be promoted as the death rate,” one post read.
DePape also posted links to YouTube videos with titles like “Democrat FARCE Commission to Investigate January 6th Capitol Riot COLLAPSES in Congress!!!” and “Global Elites Plan To Take Control Of YOUR Money! (Revealed)”
Two days after former Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin was found guilty of killing George Floyd, DePape wrote that the trial was “a modern lynching,” falsely indicating that Floyd died of a drug overdose.
He also posted content about the “Great Reset”– the sprawling conspiracy theory that global elites are using coronavirus to usher in a new world order in which they gain more power and oppress the masses. And he complained that politicians making promises to try to win votes “are offering you bribes in exchange for your further enslavement.”
BLOGS SHOW IMAGES OF PELOSI, QANON AND ANTISEMITISM
Most of the public posts on DePape’s Facebook page were from 2021. In earlier years, DePape also posted long screeds about religion, including claims that “Jesus is the anti christ.” None of the public posts appeared to mention Pelosi.
More recently, two other blogs written by someone with the username “daviddepape” have posted content similar to that on DePape’s Facebook page.
In a string of posts on a Wordpress.com blog over the course of several days in August 2022, the author complained about big tech censorship and posted statements like “Hitlery did nothing wrong.” The site has since been taken offline.
And another blog, also attributed to “daviddepape,” featured antisemitic screeds and content linked to the QAnon conspiracy theory. One video posted on the site includes a shot of Pelosi swinging a gavel during one of former President Donald Trump’s impeachments, and another video includes an image of Pelosi and other politicians. A third video includes a clip of Pelosi speaking on the House floor.
Other posts from the last few weeks featured videos accusing LGBTQ people of “grooming” children, and declared that “any journalist saying” there is no evidence of election fraud “should be dragged straight out into the street and shot.” The most recent post – linking to a YouTube video comparing colleges to cults – went up the day before the Pelosi attack.
CNN was not able to confirm that the two blogs were written by DePape.
Another former acquaintance of DePape’s also told CNN he exhibited concerning behavior over the years.
Laura Hayes, who also lives in California, said she worked with DePape for a few months roughly a decade ago making hemp bracelets when he was living in a storage shed in the Berkeley area. She said DePape sold the bracelets as a business.
“He was very odd. He didn’t make eye contact very well,” Hayes said. She recalled him saying that “he talks to angels and there will be a hard time coming.” But she didn’t remember any seriously threatening comments, and said she didn’t think much of it because “it’s Berkeley,” a place where eccentric characters aren’t uncommon.
Hayes, who was Facebook friends with DePape, called his more recent posts “so phobic in so many ways” and filled with “so much anger.”
35 notes · View notes
cyarskj1899 · 1 year
Text
Toggle navigation
FOLLOW LOVEBSCOTT
Sponsored Content
Diabetes Is Not From Sweets! Meet The Main Enemy Of Diabetes
Cluco-D
Early Signs Of AFib (Some May Wish They Knew Them Earlier)
Search Ads
What Causes Bipolar Disorder Is Not What You Think. Take A Look
Search Ads
Home
News
NEWS
Walker
N.O.R.E. Apologizes For His Disastrous ‘Drink Champs’ Interview With YE [Video]
October 17, 2022 9:57 AM PST
Tumblr media
There’s an old adage about journalism that has been attributed to numerous sources but which ultimately boils down to explaining a journalist’s responsibilities in plain and effective terms. “If someone says it’s raining and another person says it’s dry, it’s not your job to quote them both. Your job is to look out the f*cking window and find out which is true.”
via: Complex
In the interview, as previously reported, Ye made incorrect remarks about the cause of death in the murder of George Floyd. Civil rights attorney Lee Merritt later announced that Floyd’s family is considering a lawsuit against Ye over “false statements about the manner of his death.”
Specifically, Ye attempted to link Floyd’s 2020 death at the hands of since-convicted Minneapolis cop Derek Chauvin to fentanyl. This is an outright fabrication, as Floyd’s death was officially ruled a homicide. Chauvin, notably, is currently behind bars after being found guilty in Floyd’s murder.
During a call-in appearance on Monday’s Breakfast Club, N.O.R.E. apologized to Floyd’s family and said that Drink Champs will employ editing in the future.
“I just wanna be honest, I support freedom of speech,” N.O.R.E. said. “I support anybody, you know, not being censored. But I do not support anybody being hurt. I did not realize that the George Floyd statements on my show was so hurtful. And you gotta realize, it was the first five minutes of the show When he walked in, he told my producer, he said that if he’ll stop filming, he’ll walk out.”
According to N.O.R.E., he and the team didn’t want to have a “Birdman moment” (Birdman walked outof a Breakfast Club interview in 2016). N.O.R.E. also said he “checked” Ye on his comments later into the episode, although he conceded he was “already inebriated” by that point, which meant his pushback may have been overlooked.
“I apologize to the George Floyd family,” he said. “I apologize to anybody that was hurt by Kanye West’s comments.”
Around the 3:40 mark in the video below, N.O.R.E. was asked why Drink Champs even bothered with the interview at all given Ye’s recent antisemitic comments. N.O.R.E. responded with an explanation focused on how Ye has treated him in one-on-one scenarios in the past, although he also condemned Ye’s current rhetoric.
“I don’t support none of it,” he said. “I don’t support the George Floyd comments, I don’t support the antisemitic [comments]. That’s all I have is Jewish friends, all I have is Black friends. That’s it.”
2 notes · View notes
if-i-am-not-for-me · 2 years
Text
As someone who finds interest in true crime and occasionally follows ongoing court cases, I often find myself disgusted by defense attorneys, especially those defending people like Derek Chauvin, who are manifestly guilty.
But I remind myself that not only is the right to counsel important to support for even the clearly guilty because it is essential for those who may be innocent, but also because of how appeals work.
Petitions for post-conviction relief often hinge on the assertion that the convicted person received inadequate attorney representation during their trial. A lawyer for the defense of someone like a cop who was filmed murdering an innocent person could very well be pulling out all the stops to make sure that the inevitable conviction isn't overturned on appeal based solely on inadequate counsel.
2 notes · View notes