#ethical conflict | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

boyfridged · 1 year

Text

i’ve been thinking a lot about what is so unique and appealing about 80s robin jay’s moral standing that got completely lost in plot later on. and i think a huge part of it is that in a genre so focused on crime-fighting, his motivations and approach don’t focus on the category of crime at all. in fact, he doesn’t seem to believe in any moral dogma; and it’s not motivated by nihilism, but rather his open-heartedness and relational ethical outlook.

we first meet (post-crisis) jay when he is stealing. when confronted about his actions by bruce he’s confident that he didn’t do anything wrong – he’s not apologetic, he doesn’t seem to think that he has morally failed on any account. later on, when confronted by batman again, jay says that he’s no “crook.” at this point, the reader might assume that jay has no concept of wrong-doing, or that stealing is just not one of the deeds that he considers wrong-doing. yet, later on we see jay so intent on stopping ma gunn and her students, refusing to be implicit in their actions. there are, of course, lots of reasons for which we can assume he was against stealing in this specific instance (an authority figure being involved, the target, the motivations, the school itself being an abusive environment etc.), but what we gather is that jay has an extremely strong sense of justice and is committed to moral duty. that's all typical for characters in superhero comics, isn't it? however, what remains distinctive is that this moral duty is not dictated by any dogma – he trusts his moral instincts. this attitude – his distrust toward power structures, confidence in his moral compass, and situational approach, is something that is maintained throughout his robin run. it is also evident in how he evaluates other people – we never see him condemning his parents, for example, and that includes willis, who was a petty criminal. i think from there arises the potential for a rift between bruce and jay that could be, have jay lived, far more utilised in batman comics than it was within his short robin run.

after all, while bruce’s approach is often called a ‘philosophy of love and care,’ he doesn’t ascribe to the ethics of care [eoc] (as defined in modern scholarship btw) in the same way that jay does. ethics of care ‘deny that morality consists in obedience to a universal law’ and focus on the ideals of caring for other people and non-institutionalized justice. bruce, while obviously caring, is still bound by his belief in the legal system and deontological norms. he is benevolent, but he is also ultimately morally committed to the idea of a legal system and thus frames criminals as failing to meet these moral (legal-adjacent) standards (even when he recognizes it is a result of their circumstances). in other words, he might think that a criminal is a good person despite leading a life of crime. meanwhile, for jay there is no despite; jay doesn't think that engaging in crime says anything about a person's moral personality at all. morality, for him, is more of an emotional practice, grounded in empathy and the question of what he can do for people ‘here and now.’ he doesn’t ascribe to maxims nor utilitarian calculations. for jay, in morality, there’s no place for impartiality that bruce believes in; moral decisions are embedded within a net of interpersonal relationships and social structures that cannot be generalised like the law or even a “moral code” does it. it’s all about responsiveness.

to sum up, jay's moral compass is relative and passionate in a way that doesn't fit batman's philosophy. this is mostly because bruce wants to avoid the sort of arbitrariness that seems to guide eoc. also, both for vigilantism, and jay, eoc poses a challenge in the sense that it doesn't create a certain 'intellectualised' distance from both the victims and the perpetrators; there's no proximity in the judgment; it's emotional.

all of this is of course hardly relevant post-2004. there might be minimal space for accommodating some of it within the canon progression (for example, the fact that eoc typically emphasises the responsibility that comes with pre-existing familial relationships and allows for prioritizing them, as well as the flexibility regarding moral deliberations), but the utilitarian framework and the question of stopping the crime vs controlling the underworld is not something that can be easily reconciled with jay’s previous lack of interest in labeling crime.

#fyi i'm ignoring a single panel in which jay says 'evil wins. he chose the life of crime' because i think there's much more nuance to that #as in: choosing a life of crime to deliberately cause harm is a whole another matter #also: inb4 this post is not bruce slander. please do not read it as such #as i said eoc is highly criticised for being arbitrary which is something that bruce seeks to avoid #also ethics of care are highly controversial esp that their early iterations are gender essentialist and ascribe this attitude to women #wow look at me accidentally girl-coding jay #but also on the topic of post-res jay.#it's typically assumed that ethics of care take a family model and extend it into morality as a whole #'the ethics of care considers the family as the primary sphere in which to understand ethical behavior'#so #an over-simplification: you are allowed to care for your family over everything else #re: jay's lack of understanding of bruce's conflict in duty as batman vs father #for jay there's no dilemma. how you conduct yourself in the familial context determines who you are as a person #also if you are interested in eoc feel free to ask because googling will only confuse you...#as a term it's used in many weird ways. but i'm thinking about a general line of thought that evolves into slote's philosophy #look at me giving in and bringing philosophy into comics. sorry. i tried to simplify it as much as possible #i didn't even say anything on criminology and the label and the strain theories.#i'm so brave for not info-dumping #i said even though i just info-dumped #jay.zip #jay.txt #dc #fatal flaw #core texts #robin days

203 notes · View notes

not-safe-for-democracy · 1 year

Text

For over 20 years, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas accepted luxury gifts from GOP megadonor Harlan Crow that included vacations on Crow’s superyacht and trips on the billionaire’s private jet as well as a week each summer at Crow’s private resort in the Adirondacks.

Source

#supreme court #clarence thomas #CONFLICT OF INTEREST #john roberts #ethics violations

172 notes · View notes

philosophybits · 9 months

Quote

Man is motion toward the world and toward his like. A movement of aggression, which leads to enslavement or to conquest; a movement of love, a gift of self, the ultimate stage of what by common accord is called ethical orientation. Every consciousness seems to have the capacity to demonstrate these two components, simultaneously or alternatively.

Frantz Fanon, Black Skin, White Masks

#philosophy #quotes #Frantz Fanon #Black Skin White Masks #aggression #conflict #love #ethics #humanity

74 notes · View notes

heardatmedschool · 2 months

Text

“If the industry wanted to buy me, they should at least gift me something useful.”

After [medical uniform company] only gave away badges in an event.

#medicine #medblr #nursing #conflict of interest #ethics #sarcasm

13 notes · View notes

omegaphilosophia · 5 months

Text

Theories of The Philosophy of Peace

The philosophy of peace is a complex field that explores the nature of peace, its principles, and the conditions required to achieve it. Here are some prominent theories and perspectives within the philosophy of peace:

Pacifism: Pacifism is a foundational theory of peace, emphasizing non-violence and the rejection of war as a means of resolving conflicts. It includes various subcategories, such as absolute pacifism (opposition to all forms of violence) and conditional pacifism (accepting non-violent resistance but opposing armed conflict).

Just War Theory: This theory, rooted in ethical philosophy, provides a framework for determining when wars can be morally justifiable. It sets criteria for the initiation and conduct of wars and emphasizes proportionality and the protection of non-combatants.

Positive Peace: Positive peace goes beyond the absence of war and focuses on the presence of conditions that contribute to a just and sustainable peace. It considers socio-economic equity, social justice, human rights, and environmental sustainability as essential components of lasting peace.

Conflict Resolution Theories: These theories aim to resolve conflicts through non-violent means. They include negotiation, mediation, diplomacy, and alternative dispute resolution methods. The works of scholars like Johan Galtung and his "positive and negative peace" concept contribute to this field.

Cosmopolitanism: Cosmopolitanism promotes a global perspective that transcends national boundaries. It suggests that a sense of shared humanity can lead to a more peaceful world by emphasizing global citizenship and cooperation among nations.

Feminist Peace Theory: Feminist perspectives on peace challenge traditional notions of masculinity and warfare. They argue for the inclusion of women's voices in peace processes and highlight the links between gender equality, security, and peace.

Transitional Justice: This theory focuses on addressing the legacies of conflict and human rights abuses in post-conflict societies. It explores mechanisms for accountability, truth-telling, reconciliation, and reparations to establish a foundation for lasting peace.

Human Rights-Based Approaches: These approaches assert that peace and human rights are intertwined. They emphasize the protection of individual rights as a prerequisite for achieving and maintaining peace.

Gandhian Philosophy: Inspired by Mahatma Gandhi's principles of non-violence and civil disobedience, this philosophy advocates for peaceful resistance as a means to challenge injustice and oppressive regimes.

Global Governance: Global governance theories explore the role of international institutions, such as the United Nations, in promoting peace and stability at the global level. They propose mechanisms for collective decision-making and conflict resolution.

Conflict Transformation: This approach views conflicts as opportunities for positive change and transformation. It seeks to address the underlying causes of conflicts and create conditions for lasting peace by changing the dynamics between parties involved.

Ethical and Religious Perspectives: Many ethical and religious traditions offer insights into the philosophy of peace. These perspectives often emphasize values such as compassion, forgiveness, and the importance of community in achieving peace.

These are just a few of the theories and perspectives within the philosophy of peace. Each theory contributes to a deeper understanding of the nature of peace, the conditions necessary for its realization, and the ethical considerations involved in striving for a more peaceful world.

12 notes · View notes

lovecorepatton · 6 months

Text

i hope patton is ok forever. she deserves it

#something odd to me i guess is the way people tend to frame patton as some kind of master manipulator #hes really... not. you guys know that right #patton is a side who is trying his best and not doing super awesome at it because c!thomas was instilled with particular beliefs--#(cough. cough. catholicism)#that ask for total moral/ethical perfection from a human being and total selflessness and dedication to doing what's right #patton is; at least partially; a manifestation of that belief #patton is in his current state very impulsive and when he ISNT impulsive he is incredibly thoughtful but not CALCULATING #patton is the heart. he's the heart #like i dont know how people end up straying so far away from easily laid out canon #canon to the point of it literally being a repetitive motif and way the character is referenced #im losing my mind. sorry #LIKE!!! i dont even think patton is perfect or anywhere near there #part of the REASON i like her so much is that he is FLAWED #to hell and back #but in the end patton sanders isnt a story of someone who's pulling strings to get what he wants #hes a story of just some guy trying his best to do his job and fucking up #because the way he's existed for all of his life is conflicting with what is actually good for thomas #does this make sense. am i going insane

10 notes · View notes

hidingintheaether · 2 months

Text

A well-explained breakdown of the ethical and legal ramification of the misuse of the hospitals and the corruption of the medical staff in gaza.

#israel #gaza #hamas #war crimes #icrc #un #msf #red cross #ethics #palestine #i/p conflict

6 notes · View notes

dumb-cdc · 3 months

Text

UNRWA and the Problem of Data Stewardship

Every single Registered Palestinian Refugee™️ took a grave risk to maintain their legal claim to their ancestral land. A deadly risk. UNRWA now stewards this data and all claim to land that Palestinians past, present, and future depend on. Even if UNRWA wishes to deny that it grants any type of legal status, it cannot deny that it is stewarding validated data that Palestinians lived on their ancestral land before 1948.

---

Three weeks ago, I was digging into population data for Palestine. Population pyramids offer a crude picture of health for a population, and unsurprisingly, Palestine's trends failed to show population stability. Due to premature death, many children do not age into adulthood and few adults grow old to become elders. Typically, members of a population only "exit" a population in two ways: 1) death and 2) physically leaving the geographic bounds that define this population. This leaving could be a willful emigration or a forced displacement. It's one thing to locate data for death rates and survivorship curves. It's another thing to track down refugee data. For the Occupied Palestinian Territories (oPt as defined by the U.N.), refugee data is poorly defined and deeply political. And this data is stewarded solely by the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA).

If it were the 90s, I would be slumped over a series of bloated desktops like Julia Roberts. *adjusts tin foil hat*

On January 26th, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that Israel could no longer act with impunity and had to immediately permit the delivery of basic services and essential humanitarian aid to civilians in Gaza. However, Israel has moved to accuse UNRWA staff members of conspiring with Hamas for the October 7th attack. The United States and Western nations have taken their cue to suspend funding to UNRWA.

To recap: now that the ICJ has ordered humanitarian aid to enter the Occupied Palestinian Territories (oPt), Western nations have cut funding to the U.N. arm delivering that very humanitarian aid in the region.

152 UNRWA workers have been killed and 145 UNRWA facilities have been damaged or destroyed. Over 1 million Palestinians are currently taking shelter in ~154 UNRWA buildings (via OCHA's reliefweb). Al Jazeera reports that the United States, Germany, the EU, and Sweden together fund ~62% of UNRWA's total funding. As these countries suspend their funding, it's predicted that UNRWA will run out of funds within weeks.

29 January 2024 statement from NGOs:

The suspension of funding by donor states will impact life-saving assistance for over two million civilians, over half of whom are children, who rely on UNRWA aid in Gaza. The population faces starvation, looming famine and an outbreak of disease under Israel's continued indiscriminate bombardment and deliberate deprivation of aid in Gaza. We welcome UNRWA's swift investigation into the alleged involvement of a small number of UN staff members in the October 7th attacks. We are shocked by the reckless decision to cut a lifeline for an entire population by some of the very countries that had called for aid in Gaza to be stepped up and for humanitarians to be protected while doing their job. This decision comes as the International Court of Justice ordered immediate and effective action to ensure the provision of humanitarian assistance to civilians in Gaza. 152 UNRWA staff have already been killed and 145 UNRWA facilities damaged by bombardment. UNRWA is the largest humanitarian agency in Gaza and their delivery of humanitarian assistance cannot be replaced by other agencies working in Gaza. If the funding suspensions are not reversed we may see a complete collapse of the already restricted humanitarian response in Gaza.

Letting UNRWA sputter out and die has grave implications for Palestinian refugees past, present, and future. Why? UNRWA is the only recognized entity that grants Palestinians their legal claim to their ancestral land and their refugee status. Piecing together the data on Palestinian refugees is Kafkaesque. The U.N. Refugee Agency (UNHCR) operates in 135 countries and estimates that ~108.4 million people are forcibly displaced globally. However, UNHCR is a distinct entity from the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). The U.N. Refugee Agency (UNHCR) serves every single country but Palestine. UNRWA was established in 1949 and is mandated to serve Registered Palestinian Refugees™️. Registered Palestinian Refugees™️ are defined as "any person whose normal place of residence was Palestine during the period 1 June 1946 to 15 May 1948 and who lost both home and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 conflict" (UNRWA FAQs). Registered Palestinian Refugee™️ status extended to biological and adoptive descendants of male lineage only. Registration closed after the 1950s and re-opened decades later in 1992 to allow new appeals for registration from persons "able to produce valid documentation proving their 1948 refugee status." Only in 2006 could Registered Palestinian Refugee™️ women have their own husbands and descendants registered as Registered Palestinian Refugees™️.

Census data has never been used to build UNRWA's registry of Registered Palestinian Refugees™️. All registered persons are registered voluntarily.

So here we are in 2024. The current database of Registered Palestinian Refugees™️ only captures individuals who voluntarily registered to maintain their legal claim to the land they were displaced from. Individual men who, from 1949 to 1959, had physical documents proving that they and their family lived in Palestine. Individual men who, over 40 years later, submitted physical documents (themselves or posthumously through their children) proving that they and their family lived in Palestine. Then, individual women, who almost 60 years later, submitted physical documents (themselves or posthumously through their children) proving that they and their family lived in Palestine.

Violence since 1948 has repeatedly displaced Palestinians. Most notably is the 1967 Naksa, when Israel annexed the remaining Palestinian territories after the Six-Day War. Though UNRWA serves Palestinians who have been displaced "as a result of the 1967 and subsequent hostilities," these persons are NOT Registered Palestinian Refugees™️ — they can receive services from UNRWA, but only persons and lineages connected to the 1948 Nakba fall under the definition of Registered Palestinian Refugees™️.

This wholly fucks up the numbers.

This data is hardly complete. It is miraculous that there are any Registered Palestinian Refugees™️ given how bureaucratically violent and prohibitive this process is. How do you present documentation when the registration window finally re-opened in 1992... if your entire family line was wiped out? How do you present documentation of where your family lived some 40 years after they were driven from their home with just the clothes on their back? In public health, it has been widely studied and proven that stigma, violence, and distrust are durable drivers of surveillance avoidance. Victimized people will refuse to engage systems that capture any of their identifying information because of their fear of surveillance. They are, rightfully so, afraid of being revictimized by peoples and powers beyond them.

And so: Can you imagine having your home seized by a Western-backed nation, your family dying and suffering on a Trail of Tears, and then being asked to sign up for a Western-backed registry tracking your genetic family lineage?

UNRWA only operates in 5 regions: Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, West Bank (including East Jerusalem), and Gaza. It cannot operate outside of these regions. With that said, the U.N. is only tracking Registered Palestinian Refugees™️ who are internally displaced within the Occupied Palestinian Territories (oPt) or have crossed borders into one of these 5 regions. Apparently the U.N. banks on Palestinians being unable to find resettlement outside of these 5 regions. From VOA News:

UNRWA does not have the authority to give Palestinians refugee status under the 1951 Geneva Convention. Nor does the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees have that authority while they are in UNRWA's area of operations; it can designate Palestinians as refugees only when they are outside UNRWA's jurisdiction. "The Refugee Convention was written such that it excluded [Palestinians] from protection and consideration by the UNHCR," Yael Schacher, director for the Americas and Europe at Refugees International, told VOA.

Unsurprisingly, there have been continued efforts to dissolve UNRWA. Doing so would transfer its mandate over to Arab powers within the 5 regions and subsequently dissolve the registry of Registered Palestinian Refugees™️.

In a 2021 letter, UNRWA's Director of Legal Affairs pens a letter "at the request of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees ('UNHCR') for the purposes of describing the Agency's mandate and services that it is able to provide, and limitations thereto."

The letter defines the purpose of UNRWA and the state of its funding as such:

UNRWA's fields of operations are Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and Gaza. The Agency does not have a mandate to operate outside of its five fields, and therefore, other than maintaining regional representative offices, does not have offices anywhere else. UNRWA pursues its mission within its five fields of operations through the provision of humanitarian assistance and mandated services. UNRWA mandated services are concerned with: - Basic education, - Primary health care, - Relief and social services, - Infrastructure and camp improvement, and microcredit, and, - Emergency assistance, including in situations of armed conflict.

The Agency contributes to the protection of Palestine refugees both through its service delivery and by advocating for their rights with relevant stakeholders. UNRWA does not have a mandate to seek durable solutions for Palestine refugees. UNRWA does not manage refugee camps and is not responsible for protecting the physical safety or security of Palestine refugees or maintaining law and order in UNRWA's five fields of operations. The Agency cannot guarantee any individual's physical security. Ensuring the physical security of Palestine refugees residing in any of UNRWA's five fields is the responsibility of the respective host state or authority. [...] Operating within a resource-constrained environment, and reliant on voluntary funding, UNRWA allocates its limited resources among the services provided to Palestine refugees, prioritizing the needs of the most vulnerable. The level of services that UNRWA is able to provide depends on the Agency's funding situation, which is largely dependent on voluntary contributions by States, and may not correspond to the needs of Palestine refugees. The Agency's funding situation, which has steadily deteriorated over the past several years, reached a critical point in 2020. UNRWA received US$ 940 million, US$ 649 million short of total requirements and US$ 60 million less than in 2019. The Agency's financial situation remains uncertain with a shortfall of US$ 100 million as at mid- September 2021.

As stated, UNRWA does not operate or fund refugee camps, as they can only deliver services; refugees become the financial responsibility of the host nations. Thus, pushing Registered Palestinian Refugees™️ across borders is to the advantage of UNRWA in a few ways. If Registered Palestinian Refugees™️ are pushed outside of UNRWA's 5 regions, through the Rafah crossing into Egypt let's say, then UNRWA washes its hands of these refugees from both a financial and jurisdiction standpoint.

To reiterate from before: At least 152 UNRWA workers have been killed and most of UNRWA's physical infrastructure has been blown up and destroyed. Over 1 million Palestinians are taking refuge in remaining UNRWA buildings. Nations that account for ~62% of UNRWA's total funding and are now suspending their funds one-by-one. It's predicted that UNRWA will run out of funding within weeks.

Sounds like a convenient solution for the problem of Registered Palestinian Refugees™️. And again, this brings up concerns regarding data stewardship.

If UNRWA dies, then all Palestinians would be absorbed into the umbrella title of Internally Displaced Persons™️ (IDP) -- forcibly-displaced persons who do not cross borders. "People become internally displaced when they are forced to leave their homes due to conflict, violence, human rights violations, natural hazards, or other crises within the borders of their country. This can include situations where people move voluntarily to seek safety or to access essential services" (via OCHA).

IDP is a regionally-agnostic and globally-used term, as opposed to Registered Palestinian Refugee™️. The U.N. body primarily concerned with IDPs is the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). Defined solely by geographic bounds, IDPs are not refugees, even if they've been displaced for generations. Those IDPs are just experiencing protracted internal displacement: "Protracted Internal Displacement refers to IDPs who, for significant periods of time, cannot take steps to progressively reduce their vulnerability, impoverishment and marginalization, and find a durable solution" (United Nations Secretary-General’s High-Level Panel on Internal Displacement, 2021).

There is a current movement to apply the term IDP to Palestinians. On one hand, it's accurate and helpful in garnering resources. On the other hand, it further erodes the UNRWA classification of Registered Palestinian Refugee™️.

The Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (a Norwegian organization) put out an interesting report in 2015 regarding this language shift and foreshadows a mandate shift for UNRWA:

Until 2006, local NGOs, INGOs and the media generally referred to Palestinians displaced by house demolitions and evictions as "homeless", not as IDPs. At that time, some did not see the utility of the IDP label, especially given that the status of Palestinian refugee used by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) conferred some degree of assistance to Palestinians. Over time there has been growing recognition of the validity of the IDP label in Israel-Palestine and its potential to ensure greater visibility. This new awareness of internal displacement and its triggers and consequences in the region was reflected in the 2008 creation of the Inter-Agency Displacement Working Group (DWG) led by OCHA under the auspices of the Protection Cluster chaired by OHCHR. It rapidly grew to include over a hundred members, including UN agencies, Palestinian and Israeli local organisations, INGOs and donors. They collectively acknowledged the local applicability of the IDP definition provided by the Guiding Principles and started considering as IDPs all Palestinians, including UNRWA-registered refugees, who have been displaced as a result of policies associated with the Israeli occupation of the territories annexed in 1967. Accompanying this conceptual shift there has been increasing recognition of the applicability of the term "forcible transfer" to describe Israeli practices in the oPts.

Without UNRWA's registry of Registered Palestinian Refugees™️, the public identity of Palestinians will irrefutably change. Both in the region and on the world stage.

Just another internally displaced person. Just another refugee. Displaced from where? Refugee from where? Not any place that they have claim to, legally or anecdotally; not any place that they have power to return to.

This is the problem of data stewardship that needs to be answered. Anyways, a depressing rabbit hole I found myself in.

6 notes · View notes