I think that individualist theorists are important to learn from in the areas where collectivist theory fails (or sets itself up to fail), while still maintaining my sense of striving for betterment FOR a collective. Where individualism fails is in thinking “I got mine, fuck you,” but where collectivism fails is in creating a sense of duty and obligation that makes it easier to force people to fall in line—the crux of the fucking issue to begin with, right?
I WANT people to think for themselves and to act independent of a sense of duty…for the overall betterment of everyone. Of course I want the liberation of everyone—an injury to one is an injury to all, your struggle is my struggle and our paths are intertwined etc etc but forfeiting individual roles both speeds up burnout and makes group dissent impossible.
“You should care about x struggle because you should just care naturally” sure, but this strategy isolates each struggle from each other and isolates YOU from the struggle. “I am not x but I’ll care because I’m nice” survives as long as the fight doesn’t destroy you. You cannot martyr for every individual cause one at a time out of obligation.
“This hurts YOU, which is connected to what hurts ME, so together we are fighting for each other” is a much more sustainable practice.
Without personal connection, it is difficult to keep going, it is difficult to not feel split between struggles, and guilt becomes a tool you either self-destruct with, or it can be used to manipulate your actions. We cannot oust abusers because it would “harm the collective.” When one leader is removed, it’s over because my obligation was to that group above my own individual action. I cannot question the authority leadership of our group because it will undermine the Collective.
Self-preservation becomes ‘selfishness,’ all efforts not going to the cause become ‘unimportant,’ and dissent from within will be crushed unceremoniously. A new state is born, a new leader is chosen. The cycle repeats. What are we even fighting for if not to better all of our own lives together?
I don’t want to trade one lord for another, I don’t want my neighbors to be content with submission, I don’t want complacency.
I will fight for my neighbor any day, but I am not their savior. I am not their lord. They should be the arbiter of their future, like I should be mine. Rejecting a total melting into a collective is essential to resist tyranny from outside and within, not for the sake of “rugged individualism” but to actually ensure we all are really free.
Autonomy above all else, for the good of us all.
33 notes
·
View notes
eso: "yess the three tribunal line up with the anticipation daedra quite well; vivec is constantly writing self insert smut fiction so he's oBVIOUSLY a perfect match with lolth- I MEAN mephala, the sexy spider lady of evil sex and backstabbing sexily".
meanwhile: mephala is the webspinner, overseeing how the smallest action snowballs and causes disastrous effects down the line.... Like how sotha sil is obsessed with, by eso's own writing, cause and effect and (like mephala) says he can see the far-off consequences of the smallest action.
sotha sil is a mephala! it's sotha sil, not vivec! vivec is an azura!
ALSO, MEPHALA IS NOT LOLTH, ESO!
35 notes
·
View notes
Okay so if the whole wedding debacle hadn’t happened (which I’m still mad at Bonnie for because we deserved a Kai redemption arc and to see him finally have a chance to see what family could really be like and we could’ve had it if she hadn’t sent Kai back to a prison world) this is what I’d like to imagine uncle Kai would be like with baby Lizzie and Josie
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZPRTUwT1C/
HOW did this ask escape for so long?? I'm so stale.
BUT YES, that is so much the relationship they'd have, I'm giggling!!
And same, I'm so bitter that we couldn't have a redemption arc. I feel like Kai wouldn't be bad with kids as long as he isn't competing against them for 1.) having importance to the family / coven, and 2.) literal survival. Someone who's the eldest of six other kids, I actually think would be quite good with them, given the chance. Ugh, I so wish they kept him around and we could have scenes like that. And Jo / Liv / Bonnie, etc. all terrified and waiting for him to lose patience / mess up, but every time, he proves them wrong. 😭
11 notes
·
View notes
How do you feel about this song for Hector? <3
"When the fires, when the fires have surrounded you
And the whole wide world's comin' after you
I've got blood, I've got blood on my name"
omg, just that excerpt alone is perfect for the Guy but OH i have SO many thoughts <3 im just gonna cover the lines that i feel are most interesting in terms of my boye
under the cut for scrollings sake hehe
I dont think i need to cover the chorus, its kinda quite obvious dghsgdh THE REST HOWEVER-
Oh, Lazarus, how did your debts get paid?
Oh, Lazarus, were you so afraid?
Hector working himself to the bone, Hecula Draculas Cruse etc. Though a simple line in concept its driving me up a wall for totally unrelated reasons hfghd
Not a spell gonna be broken with a potion or a priest
When you're cursed, you're always hopin' that a prophet would be grieved
not a spell gonna be broken [...] the curse, easy enough but that last line 'hopin' that a prophet would be grieved' - once again metaphorically connected to Dracula, Hector and Isaac thinking of him as their Lord/God, him favoring Hector and how he almost places him on a different level than Isaac - he gets between them, his will is his Lord, He really is like a Dark Prophet both to the people he is made to kill for Dracula and maybe even the hierarchy in the castle itself (AAAA). But obviously, we know what being Draculas favorite does to any one - Hector is his favorite without a choice. It is not worth being the lords favorite, it rips him up and tears him at every seam. as a plea, Isaac is lucky to be almost oh so despised by him.
also another few lines that fascinate me
Can’t you see I’m sorry
I will make it worth your while
Made a(or "of") dead man’s money
You can see it in my smile
i dont necessarily see how it can fit Hector however, it does nicely fit Dracula towards Hector which admittedly is a major part of his character. Once again under the assumption that this is Lazarus the beggar, and the man speaking rather than being Lazarus is the rich man (as the song does have quite alot of biblical themes) to me it makes sense that this is for a quick moment, a switch to Dracula - perhaps his words ringing in Hectors head? the guilt of so easily forsaking his Lord with the 'cant you see im sorry?' but as i said, its not so much applicable to Hector as it is good ole' Dracul
It won’t be long
‘Til I’m dead and gone
Watch the fires rise under my skin
Down to the bone
Scorchin’ my soul
just wanted to remark on this that hell in the song is destroying to the extent of burning or even destroying his soul. its a tangential tie to Hector at best but i still think its noteworthy. what is Hectors hell? i can assume his "sin" are his ties to Dracula so perhaps the "hell" is his life under his servitude? /shrug/
Also, this is mostly under the interpretations that it is Lazarus the beggar and not the more well known one i.e the one risen from the dead as it fits most considering Hector. The entire song feel of desperation for redemption, immense guilt and shame also the simple weariness in his voice is soo Hector </3
6 notes
·
View notes