#first joke is a reference to one of my Many deep space nine screenshots just for the record

[apolesen]

Fixing the Changeling Bashir Timeline. Or: Uniform Changes and Bedside Manner

Common wisdom is that Bashir was kidnapped and replaced by a Changeling between The Ascent and Rapture, as when he appears in the prison-camp, he is wearing the old uniform. 

However, I would like to propose that that is not the case. Christopher L. Bennett, who writes tie-in novels, has pointed out that the timeline does not add up. Consider:

The Begotten takes place at least three weeks after The Darkness and the Light (in the latter Kira says that she is due in three weeks, and she gives birth in The Begotten)

The Begotten takes place during at least one week (Bennett says two, but I can only find that the baby Changeling has been with Odo for a week, so let’s say a week)

Kirayoshi was born “less than a month” before Purgatory’s Shadow.

Bashir says in Purgatory’s Shadow that he was captured “over a month ago”.

Let’s draw up a timeline based on this. This counts weeks from the end of The Darkness and the Light. 

START - The Darkness and the Light

Week 1 

Week 2 

Week 3 

Week 4 - The Begotten

Week 5 

Week 6 - (For the Uniform somewhere here)

Week 7 

Week 8 ~ In Purgatory’s Shadow

We don’t know the gap between Rapture and The Darkness and the Light. Even if there is virtually no time in between, the timeline doesn’t add up if Bashir was impersonated by a Changeling for four weeks (as Bashir says in Purgatory’s Shadow)  but this started before Rapture. 

What is it that dates Bashir’s abduction to before Rapture? The fact that he’s in the old uniform. That is all. 

So, let us say that Bashir was not abducted before Rapture, but sometime before The Begotten. Why is he in the old uniform? Bennett calls this “a paradox”. I do not agree. For this we have to look at how uniform changes in Starfleet happen. 

For this part, I will be referring to uniform by numbers in the order they were rolled out (as terms like “TNG uniform” and “DS9/VOY uniform” are often confusing and feel odd when discussing things in-verse): 

Uniform type I - the uniform seen in TNG. Black shoulders, division colour beneath, no visible undershirt. 

Uniform type II - the uniform seen in Voyager and DS9 series 1-4. Division colours on shoulders, the rest black, grey undershirt. 

Uniform type III - the uniform seen in DS9 series 5-7 and the TNG films. Grey shoulders, the rest black, division colours on undershirt. 

The Emissary, Way of the Warrior and TNG Birth Right part 1 show that uniform changes are not done all at once. In The Emissary, we see Bashir and Dax in Uniform type I when they first arrive, and then change into Uniform type II. The same goes for Sisko. 

In Birth Right, Bashir wears a type II uniform at the same time as the Enterprise crew wear type I.  

In Way of the Warrior, when Worf turns up, he is still in Uniform type I, while the Deep Space Nine crew are in Uniform type II.

I propose that uniform changes happen gradually, not all at once. Deep Space Nine (the station not the show) undergoes uniform changes earlier than the Enterprise. If you stationed on Deep Space Nine, you are supposed to wear Uniform type II, and if you work on the Enterprise, you wear Uniform type I. If you are visiting, like when Worf and Geordi go over to Deep Space Nine or Bashir goes onboard the Enterprise, you don’t change your uniform for that short time. 

So why would Bashir change from Uniform type III to Uniform type II?

We can find the answer in Homefront. Here is Sisko when he is acting head of Starfleet Security: 

Like Captain Benteen (who is stationed on Earth), Sisko is in Uniform type I. Earlier in this episode, when Sisko is on Deep Space Nine, he is in Uniform type II. However, as soon as he comes to Earth, he changes into Uniform type I. This implies that it is about maintaining uniformity and making things like ranks easier to tell. The difference between this and the other cases when people do not change is that when Sisko goes to Earth, is a longer stay and a much more official one. 

So my suggestion is this. At the time around The Begotten, Deep Space Nine has already changed to Uniform type III, but other parts of Starfleet are still wearing Uniform type II. Therefore, when Bashir goes to the burn treatment conference on Meezan IV, he changes from Uniform type III to type II. It is an official occasion, he is on duty and there is probably going to be a lot of Starfleet people. Deep Space Nine seems to be one of the first places where new uniforms are introduced, so it is plausible that many other participants will still be in Uniform type II. This explains how Bashir would be in his old uniform despite having left after the uniform change. 

What is more, it makes much more sense that Bashir is not abducted until just before The Begotten. Let’s consider what he is up to and how he acts during the first four episodes after the uniform change. 

In Rapture, he treats Sisko, eventually performing brain surgery. In The Darkness and the Light, he examines Kira and he treats her for a placental laceration and a haemorrhage. In The Begotten, Bashir treats Odo for a bad back - he also mentions treating Odo a week earlier for stomach trouble. He treats the baby Changeling too, first putting it through a electrophoretic diffuser to purge the radiation that was making it ill, and then later trying to save it when it is dying. Also, he briefly examines Kira (but he does not deliver Kirayoshi, as many claim, including Memory Alpha - that is the midwife Y’Pora who does). In For The Uniform, Bashir does not appear at all. 

If we compare what Bashir does in Rapture and The Darkness and the Light to what he does in The Begotten, there is a noticeable difference. The stuff he does in the first two episodes are complex. Furthermore, throughout these episodes he is gentle and reassuring to his patients. In The Begotten, we do not see that kindness. He jokes around with Odo, but in retrospect, there seems to be an edge to it. When he tells Odo the baby Changeling is dying, there is none of the vulnerability we see when he breaks similar bad news to Kira in Life Support or the crew in Tears of the Prophets. The most of the medicine he does is Changeling-related, either the baby or Odo. He only sees Kira briefly, and when he leaves it is abrupt, saying that he is very busy. When he leaves, we see O’Brien give him a surprised, maybe even hurt look. Perhaps he wanted his best friend around for this. As for his absence in For the Uniform, this too might be an attempt not to have to interact with people very much, as it could give him away. 

Bashir in The Begotten does not act like the Bashir we know. He removes himself from emotional and/or social situations quickly, leaving other medical personnel (Y’Pora) in charge. Overall, his bedside manner is lacking. Not only does he not act like the Bashir we know - he does not act like the Bashir in the previous two episodes. In those, he feels much more himself. 

Based on this - the chronology based on dialogue, Starfleet uniform customs and how Bashir acts like himself in two episodes but not the third - we can make the following timeline: 

Uniform change on Deep Space Nine occurs

Rapture (Actual Bashir)

The Darkness and the Light (Actual Bashir)

Circa three weeks later: Actual Bashir is abducted from a conference. Changeling Bashir returns to Deep Space Nine.

Circa one week later: The Begotten (Changeling Bashir)

Circa four weeks pass. For the Uniform happens during this time. (Changeling Bashir, but not seen on screen.) 

Circa four weeks after The Begotten: In Purgatory’s Shadow (Changeling Bashir on the station, Actual Bashir in Gamma Quadrant.) 

This means that it is the real Julian Bashir who we see in Rapture and The Darkness and The Light. The Changeling posing as Bashir does not turn up until The Begotten. 

Sources: 

Screenshots: Trekcore

Opinions and quotes of Christopher L. Bennett: Memory Alpha, article “Julian Bashir (Changeling)”. 

#julian bashir #star trek uniforms #the begotten #rapture #the darkness and the light #for the uniform #star trek #ds9 #changelings #meta #long post

[componentplanet]

How to Upscale Video Content to 4K, 8K, and Beyond

For the past three months, I’ve been working on what I’ve named the Deep Space Nine Upscale Project (DS9UP). The goal of DS9UP is to create a new, much-improved version of the show by applying modern processing techniques to the original DVD source before using AI-based software to create a higher-resolution version of the show. It’s had me thinking about upscaling and upscalers in general. Upscaling isn’t a feature we talk about much, but how your TV handles it (or, alternately, how you use the capability on a PC) can have a significant impact on how you experience content.

The word “upscale” generically means “to improve the value or quality of something.” In the video and PC space, it’s almost always a reference to increasing the effective resolution of a piece of content. There is typically an understood difference between upscaling and native resolution. If you upscale a 1080p video into 4K, it means you are taking a 1080p input and using a combination of hardware and software to create a larger image. This upscaled image will not be identical to a native 4K signal, but it should offer a better picture than what was previously available on your 720p or 1080p television.

Keyword: “should.” Video scalar quality in TVs can vary widely between different product families. In some cases, you might be better off using a GPU to drive a picture than relying on the TV’s native rescaling capability, while other TVs have excellent upscalers. Manufacturers rarely disclose their upscaling hardware choices, but higher-end TVs should have improved upscaling capabilities. If you have a UHD Blu-ray player paired with an older or lower-quality 1080p or 4K TV, you might even get better results by running all video signals through the Blu-ray player rather than the television. Generally speaking, a good TV upscaler is considered to be as good or better than a GPU.

How the Scalar Sausage Gets Made

The most basic function of a video scaler is to take whatever image it receives — 480i, 720p, 1080p — and stretch it across the entire screen. Without this functionality, a 1080p signal would take up just a fraction of a 4K television’s display. This simple resizing is typically done by taking each individual 1080p pixel and creating four pixels out of it (remember, 4K is four times the pixels of 1080p).

But many TVs and Blu-ray players do more than just perform a simple 1:4 mapping. They also use video processing techniques to extrapolate what details ought to be present in the scene. How well this works depends on the type of content being

Image by DisplayNinja

In the image above, you can see how the upscaled 4K is much more nuanced than the simple 1:4 mapping in the second grid from the left. If you’re having trouble seeing the difference between the 1080p upscale and the native 4K, look at the left-side blocks in the very first row and the right-side blocks in the very last row. The native 4K image resolves into distinctly different colors than the 1080p image in R1C2 (That’s 1st row, 2nd column), R1C3, and R8C8. As the amount of available horsepower in televisions has improved, the quality and sophistication of their integrated upscalers have grown as well. Some modern TVs have sophisticated sharpening algorithms to reverse the blur created by upscaling and interpolation algorithms good enough to almost match the precision of a native 4K signal.

How does all this look with real content? A 2017 Rtings article can help answer that question. The first image below is from a 4K set displaying 1080p in upscaled 4K, while the second is native 1080p.

Image by Rtings

If you have trouble seeing a difference between the two images, open both of them in a new tab and focus your eyes near the center of the image. See the house with a brown roof near the center of the image, with three windows facing approximately south-southwest and a fourth pointed east? (All directional cues based on north being “up”, not the direction of the sunlight). Look at that specific spot in both images, and the roofs in the buildings immediately adjacent. The difference should jump out at you. In this case, even using TVs that date back to 2015, the 1080p upscale to 4K is better than the 4K image.

Image by Rtings

If you have an older TV or a budget 4K model, there’s one obvious method of improving your TV’s upscaling: Buy a better television. Unfortunately, it’s impossible to predict how well this will work without knowing exactly what you own now and what you plan to purchase to replace it. The older your current TV, the better the chances that a new set will deliver upgrades in all respects, but many of those improvements may have nothing to do with the way your upscaler handles <4K content.

If you aren’t happy with your current TV, can’t replace it at the moment, and happen to own a high-end Blu-ray or UHD player, you can also try running content through its upscaler rather than relying on the television to handle it. In some cases, a top-end UHD Blu-ray player may deliver a better experience than an entry-level 4K TV from a few years back. If you’re still using a DVD player to feed a picture to a mediocre 1080p or 4K panel when/if you play DVDs, and you can swap over to a high-end Blu-ray / UHD Blu-ray player instead, I’d try it. It may or may not help, but it definitely won’t hurt. What you’re trying to do here is route the signal through the upscaler that’ll give it the best quality kick.

Still need a higher-quality picture? You’re in luck.

Real-Time AI Processing

I haven’t tested the most recent Nvidia Shield myself, but there’s a demo you can actually play with on Nvidia.com to apply the effect the TV offers. Here’s a screenshot of the effect. I’ve positioned the slider over the lizard’s eye because it’s the easiest place to see the upscaler’s impact:

Left: Regular upscale Right: Nvidia Shield

Still not clear? Here’s an enlarged version of the same screenshot.

The image on the left is a traditional upscaler, the image on the right is Nvidia’s Shield when asked to scale up 720p or 1080p content to 4K (content below 720p is not supported for upscaling, at least not yet). The AI component of the upscaler obviously improves the overall image quality. In my experience with applications like TVEAI, this is a fair representation of the improvements that can be achieved.

Third-party reviews of the Shield agree. Slashgear writes that when it works, the effect is “fairly astonishing.” So far as I’m aware, the Shield is currently the only set-top or 2D box offering this kind of functionality.

Video Upscaling via Third-Party Software

Finally, there’s the option to use a third-party upscaler, like Topaz Video Enhance AI. I’ve made extensive use of TVEAI as part of the Deep Space Nine Upscale Project, and can confirm that the application is capable of yielding stunning results. One major limitation of TVEAI, however, is that it currently only supports Intel and Nvidia platforms for GPU-accelerated processing. CPU processing is available, but likely too slow to be all that useful.

Thanks to AI-based upscaling, historic sci-fi canards like the “Enhance” function are now a reality. It’s a truism in video encoding that no application on Earth can put data back where it never existed, and that’s still true today. The reason we can now “enhance” images to improve their clarity is that AI-based applications are capable of analyzing a video field and estimating what detail would exist if the image were in higher quality already.

One of the typical ways to train a video-enhancing application like TVEAI is to provide the neural net with the same image or video in both high and low quality. The neural net is then tasked with finding a way to make the low-quality source look as much like the high-quality source as possible. Instead of trying to teach a computer what lines and curves look like by providing painstaking examples, we’ve developed the ability to make the computer do the work of teaching itself. That’s why “Enhance” has gone from a complete joke to a plausible reality in a matter of a few years.

You may need to zoom to see subtle differences, but this isn’t an upscale comparison. It’s a comparison of performing my upscale work in separate applications and steps (left-side) versus ingesting the entire video workload into Topaz Video Enhance AI using the AVFS virtual file system and performing the entire operation at once. If you’re thinking “Wow, that’s a tiny difference, who would even care?” well, you may be right — but I wasn’t kidding when I said I was going to use the highest-quality source possible.

Applications like Topaz Video Enhance AI can cost several hundred dollars and they don’t run in real-time — the RTX 2080 appears capable of 90-110 frames per minute when upscaling 640×480 video to 2560×1920. The result of using these applications, however, is a vastly better picture than you’ll see from any other source.

DVD source on the left, upscale on the right.

I suspect we’ll see AI video processing and upscaling become more important over time as Intel, Nvidia, and AMD introduce their next-generation graphics processors. There’s an awful lot of old content orphaned on bad-quality source, and building specialized AI processors to fix it will likely consume some silicon for all of the concerned parties over the next few years.

Finally, I’ve embedded the current version of DS9UP’s opening credits for the show below. This is new footage that hasn’t appeared in a previous DS9UP article. There is no audio in this clip and you’ll need to raise the resolution to 4K, but I’ve created this file based on the DVD source with modifications in AviSynth, DaVinci Resolve, and Topaz Video Enhance AI.

Compare that to the actual credits ripped from the DVD and uploaded to YouTube by yours truly:

This is what the credits look like if you watch them on the source DVDs. The improvements from this version to my own are not small.

Upscalers are amazing and only getting better. That’s true no matter how you consume content or what technology you use to do it. Depending on the shows you like and how much time you want to sink into the project, there are tremendous improvements to be had… or you can just wait a few years, and buy a better TV. You can read more about DS9UP at the links below.

Now Read:

Deep Space Nine Upscale Project Update: Variable Frame Rate DVDs Can Burn in Hell

Deep Space Nine Upscale Project Update: ‘Sacrifice of Angels’

Upscaling Star Trek: Deep Space Nine Using Topaz Video Enhance AI

PCMag: The Best TVs for 2020

from ExtremeTechExtremeTech https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/310029-how-to-upscale-video-content-to-4k-8k-and-beyond from Blogger http://componentplanet.blogspot.com/2020/05/how-to-upscale-video-content-to-4k-8k.html

#How to Upscale Video Content to 4K #8K #and Beyond