#goldy theories

[shelvesofgold]

ok so i have a hazbin hotel theory (specifically about the vees) my friend brought to my attention that i haven’t seen anyone post about so i’m gonna do it here

ok so we have all seen the v tower, it is one of the only buildings in hazbin that is given significant detail and more specifically it is one of the ONLY CIRCULAR SHAPED BUILDINGS!!!

why is this a relevant detail you ask?? because the circular shape of the v tower looks EXTREMELY SIMILAR to the tower of babel!!!

for those of you unfamiliar w/ the story of the tower of babel, essentially the story goes that humans built a tower to try and reach heaven and as punishment for their hubris god cursed them all to speak in tongues aka babble!

the story of hubris perfectly lines up w/ the current attitude the vees have, especially towards powerful players like charlie and alastor. I think they will pay a similar price for their pride, especially w/ lucifer and heaven taking a more active role in the coming season.

the vees primary influence is thru their influence so if they were cursed w/ an inability to communicate or smth of the likes it would be a MAJOR HIT to their power!!!

everything in hazbin and the hellaverse are drawn vv intentionally! the heaven embassy looks like a church, the serephim are all depicted w/ three pairs of wings, the deadly sins are drawn based on biblical descriptions of them!!! this is why i think the v tower looking like the tower of babel is not merely coincidence!!

let me know what y’all think of this theory, i’d love to know what you guys have to say about this :)))

#hazbin hotel #hazbin hotel season 1 #hazbin hotel season 2 #hazbin hotel theory #hazbin hotel the vees #the vees #valentino hazbin hotel #hazbin hotel vox #hazbin hotel velvette #tower of babble #tower of babel #hazbin hotel alastor #lucifer hazbin hotel #charlie morningstar #charlie hazbin hotel #goldie thoughts #this is me manifesting #i hope the vees get smote fr

[begonefornow]

my first theory is about samispagetii2

#ask goldie #aga #ask goldie anything #theory

[irrelevant-iguanadon]

Amy Rose you would have loved the fnaf movie

#her fav is either goldy or glamrock chica #she thinks springtrap is hot though </3 #anyways her and blaze go see it together and amy screams when matpat shows up and amy just sits there like #“who tf is this random white man why are we screaming at him” #amy rose #sth #sonic the hedgehog #yeah but no amy is like a long time fnaf fan #shes been there since mark played the first game #she has a theory board

[averageartistamber]

Salmonid Servings, Entry 1

Okay, this is gonna be the "Salmonid Saturday/Sunday" thing I was joking about. I might not upload one of these every week, but it''s just something to do between project updates.

NOTE-Most of the contents of these posts are my personal head-canons and fan speculation. Of course, if Nintendo releases canon lore that contradicts anything I say here, my stuff will probably be disregarded. I’m not a super hardcore Splatoon lore expert, so there might be things I’ve missed (or I’m going off an inaccurate translation/odd localisation choice).

For the first Salmonid Serving, I’ll start with something simple(ish):

What’s the deal with Goldies?

There’s notably different from every other Salmonid type.

Goldies are a medium sized (by Salmonid standards, they tower over Inklings) variety that, like the name suggests, have golden scales with a shiny texture. They uniquely wear togas and jewellery, kinda giving the impression that they’re wealthy or important (the concept art shows one sitting on top of a Greek style pillar, which might be where the developers got the inspiration).

Goldies don’t have fin “hair”, but a “mane” made of scales that it looks like they can puff or flare (during the attacking animation I think you can see this). This calls to mind Cockatoos, which do a similar thing with their crests to communicate.

They’ve also got little barbels on their chins (which I think is unique to them) which in real fish help them find food in water where visibility is low (which looking at the ocean on the Salmon Run stages, checks out). On a more amusing note, they also seem to be the only Salmonid that has visible fingers.

Canon states that 1 in 10,000 Smallfries grow into Goldies (Though from just playing the game mode you can encounter them pretty frequently in decent numbers). Canon also stated that they’re longer lived and generally more intelligent than your average guy.

Okay, so real salmon live for about 5 to 8 years, so maybe we could translate your average Salmonid having a live span of about 50-80 years? (I think two of Omega 3’s members are about 40 and 50?). Goldies might live to somewhere around the 150 mark?

As for the point about intelligence, it’s possible that in Salmonid communities Goldies tend to be the default authority figures. There might be a small group of older Goldies that like, make decisions about how the place should be run and stuff.

I could see another role for Goldies being carers, attendants and servants of King Salmonids. They’d do stuff ranging from tending to injuries to acting as secretaries and envoys. (Might go more into this if I do and entry on Salmonid communities and King Salmonids).

I like to think Golden Eggs are specifically laid by Goldies, which is a large part of what makes them so valuable. Golden Eggs might have a few other interesting properties, that I’ll cover later.

Okay, the one last thing I want to address about Goldies is that, according to the “Find the Goldie” night wave, they can shrink. I’m not even gonna try to find an explanation for that one. Kinda makes me wonder if they eventually return to normal size or whether they stuck like that.

Feel free to comment or ask for future topics, if ya want.

#splatoon 3 #splatoon #splatoon salmon run #salmonids #splatoon headcanon #fan theory #splatoon theory #salmonid #salmon run #salmonid servings #goldies are weird little guys lmao #Don't take this too seriously

[sirlink360]

The Problems are Past Present and Future. Perrito Helps ground each in reality

Puss: Struggling with the future, the path forward, grappling with his own mortality.  He can’t see into the future, because without his lives, he doesn’t see how he could have a future.  Perrito reminds Puss that one life might be enough, that the future doesn’t so much matter as the life that he’s living right now/ possibly even giving him the realization that the future can really ONLY matter if he has one that he can treat seriously

Kitty: Struggling with the Past, unable or unwilling to trust others because of hurt that had happened to her prior.  Declawed, or left at the altar by Puss in boots, she feels she can’t move on from what she is now defined as.  Perrito helps kitty a little bit more indirectly, helping Puss overcome his doubts and his fears to open up to Kitty, but the end result is still the same; being able to move on from her past life and in the now with the cat that she loves and can trust.

Goldi: Struggling with the Present.  Goldi doesn’t see that her wish is right in front of her, she’s too focused on what she doesn’t have that she can’t see what she DOES have.  Perrito helps her see what’s truly important to her, and let’s her know that she “won the orphan lottery.”  She was too focused on the life that she wanted to live, that she couldn’t see that her present was already “just right.”

#puss in boots #Puss in boots the last wish #Theory #Past #Present #Future #kitty softpaws #Perrito #goldi

[lovelace-grace]

I am so sick and tired of people in the fnaf fandom dictating what theories about the lore are right or wrong.

Like, obviously, there are some canons set by Scott but the rest? That’s for your own interpretation. To have your own niche little fnaf universe. And I think that’s really cool.

And I’m not saying this only because I actually enjoy majority of fnaf theories that get hated on..but also because theories are just that. Theories. No matter how weird and silly they sound.

(This obviously doesn’t include the problematic headcanons of some..ex fnaf fandom members)

#five nights at freddy's #fnaf theory #fnaf freddy #fnaf bonnie #fnaf chica #fnaf foxy #fnaf cupcake #fnaf goldie #fnaf puppet #fnaf mike #fnaf william afton #fnaf henry emily #fnaf fandom #fnaf #I’m really tired of this #let people have their own theories #please #it’s okay. they’re just theories #:d <3

[fullscoreshenanigans]

I live for the Norman Ratri theory! Especially because I like to believe that Norman and Adam are related-- this creates a convoluted family tree LOL Think about it~! The Lambda facility was of great importance to Peter during his time as head of the Ratri clan. What would it take for him to think that a Ratri-- someone related to him-- would be the perfect building blocks for creating new children. Perfect children in his perfect system? Did a lady related to the Ratris (by marriage or worse) try to escape the lineage and Peter decided to disown her children in the worst way possible? By throwing one child into the Lambda system and another child to the cattle? Of course he would assume that the Ratri are perfect so if you want to create a new batch of children who would be the building blocks of his new world order-- well I guess use a Ratri, am I right? Which makes it even worse when Adam was considered to be a failure. Peter was probably the one who decided to send Adam to Goldy Pond.

(Continuing the discussion from this post by @emmaspolaroid. Also peep my Norman Ratri tag that will hopefully continue to grow as it's a fun theory to play around with.)

Prefacing this with something I've mentioned in tags before: I remember after initially reading the manga thinking the Norman Ratri theory was adding too much to Norman's deck. He was already special for being a genius capable of 100% tests at four-years-old that stumped kids twice and triple his age, so to then make him even more special by being biologically related to the Ratris in some way seemed like overkill in addition to everything having to do with him taking up the mantle of Minerva and having the conflict with Ayshe that was conveniently sidestepped. (Yes, Emma's origins are never a conflict for her, but with how often lineage is prioritized for men in media, it would leave me mixed how out of the trio, Emma would be the only one with nothing like that causing her some internal strife since Ray's biological relationship with Isabella clearly brought him grief.)

That said, outside the bounds of canon or if canon were expanded upon and tweaked to give each member of the trio an internal conflict of similar weight, I'm also very, very big on the theory lol

Did a lady related to the Ratris (by marriage or worse) try to escape the lineage and Peter decided to disown her children in the worst way possible? By throwing one child into the Lambda system and another child to the cattle? Of course he would assume that the Ratri are perfect so if you want to create a new batch of children who would be the building blocks of his new world order-- well I guess use a Ratri, am I right?

Despite being the one to unperson James and order his death before he even turned sixteen, I still have trouble wrapping my head around the idea of Peter knowingly and willingly doing this to a Ratri child on the basis of viewing them as an extension of the clan rather than as individuals, so it's almost like it's a worse reflection on him not being able to restore the honor of this wayward branch of it by "salvaging" the traitor's children and raising them "correctly." He places so much value in being a Ratri and displays such disdain when speaking of the cattle children as food, it's hard to see him sullying the line in any way by condemning a member to the fate of the latter as opposed to just outright killing them, even if said member was an infant. That's still Ratri blood—his blood—that would be going into the farm system, and he would never let anyone as lowly as food have any sort of claim to such a noble and prestigious status.

But maybe James' betrayal really burned him, and while he once wouldn't consider this, now he's more caustic, brash, prone to lashing out, intoxicated on his newly bestowed position as the head of the clan and using it to indulge his more volatile impulses, that he goes through with this idea.

However, I'm more inclined to entertain the idea of another family member taking advantage of their position as a Ratri to have a dalliance with a Sister candidate, as @officersnickers brings up in this post. It's not something Peter would ever approve of, but what's done is done, and importantly there was no explicit denouncement of the clan in this act, which I feel he would take personal offense to. There's nothing he can do to save these children—the one-drop rule thoroughly entrenched in his mind, and their blood is thoroughly tainted—but maybe their Ratri lineage will win out and they'll be able to rise above their pitiful status, so he does keep tabs on both as he approves of them being sent on their separate ways in the system.

Which makes it even worse when Adam was considered to be a failure. Peter was probably the one who decided to send Adam to Goldy Pond.

He probably approved this with a spiteful flourish too, insulted that his theory proved wrong, that Adam wasn't able to live up to whatever arbitrary, narrow standards they set for him to determine his value as a living being.

#and then Adam's life dramatically improved after finding his found family in the Goldy Pond crew :) #but still‚ a jarring experience in getting there and adjusting for sure #vobomon #The Promised Neverland #Yakusoku no Neverland #TPN #Adam and Norman Twins Theory #Norman and Adam are Bio Brothers Theory #TPN Adam #TPN Norman #Norman #Ratri Clan #Adam Ratri #Norman Ratri #Mike Ratri #James Ratri #Peter Ratri #Norman 22194 #FSS Chatter #FSS Asks

[mayadoesfandomstuff]

I'm fighting God's strongest battles (having to answer the same three questions on a reddit post).

#mayaposts #im so tired man #i thought the reddit community would know lore better but apparently not! #how do they not know basic shit like marilyn pines or the shermie is not the baby theory or goldie married to ford/stan impersonating ford #how do they not know about travey and quattro??? #they don't even know about compy! #im tired #im so so tired #i woke up to 19 comments on the post asking the same fucking questions #im so tired

[keykidpilipili]

Rouge-based Dimension Idea

Western Saloon/Town owner and richest person in town Glittering Rouge is bored out of her mind. She has all the jewels the region could offer and could buy any other that would pop. Then comes in rowdy tincans and an even rowdier duo of hedgehogs. There is a new shiny rock that she can’t buy but still Glittering WANTS IT!

Cue daring chasing scenes across ravines, gun standoffs and small bombs!

#sonic series #rouge the bat #sonic prime #sonic prime spoilers #sonic prime theory #this is also a golden opportunity for Shadow to get a gun again #If you didn't know Goldie O'gilt in the Lives and Times of Scrooge McDuck influenced me greatly #Remember in 06 when Rouge had small bombs

[star-dust-n-astral-wind]

A Theory On The Puppet's Identity

Getting out way ahead of this one, because I think I already figured it out.

The Five Nights At Freddy's film follows a loose outline of the game's canon. Abby (an anagram of Baby) nearly gets put into the stomach of a clown-like animatronic, Mike's motivation is the loss of his brother (per Foxy-Bro theory), Vanessa is a "Reluctant Follower", and so on.

Another quick stop before the meat of this theory is the FNAF 2 minigame "Take Cake To Children", because it has something else that you may remember: the Puppet speaking, saying "S-A-V-E-H-I-M." This is very much the same to the closing moments of the film's credits, wherein we hear the Puppet's voice asking that someone "C... O... M... E... F... I... N... D... M... E..."

So, who do I think the Puppet is? Garret Schmidt.

Okay, bit of a stretch, but hear me out.

We know that Garret is taken by William Afton some years before the events of the film. We also know that Afton killed him ("First I kill your brother, then I kill you. It's like symmetry, my friend."), but we're a bit lacking in the details of the event itself.

There's no mention of Garret ever being found, not even his body. Well, the other victims of Afton that were never found were in the animatronics, so... why not again? Or rather: why not first?

Allow me to paint a picture: William Afton kidnaps and kills Garret Schmidt for reasons unknown, takes him to some distant location (possibly a branch of Freddy's located in Nebraska), and kills him. But it doesn't stick. The nearby security puppet (brand new technology designed by William himself) starts acting up shortly after the boy died. It doesn't take him long to work it out, to figure out that the kid's soul is now inhabiting the puppet.

This leads into the events we know of before the film, with him claiming the five victims that inhabit the animatronics. It also explains his control over them and his apparent assurance that he'll return from death: he's studied this phenomenon already when the Puppet got possessed, and again when he killed the other five kids.

But why Garret, why not someone else? Well, a few reasons.

Firstly: while it may just be him removing mention of Henry's contributions, both William himself and the training tape say "the owner of Freddy's", singular. So it's unlikely that Henry and Charlie are around to play their parts in this event.

Secondly, and more importantly: it would fit Mike's arc.

Assuming that Mike returns as our protagonist next time (maybe hunting down rumours about other Freddy's, trying to unravel the mystery?), then it's really the most logical choice to have it be Garret. After a lifetime of obsession, Mike has finally found peace with the past, has realised the importance of the present, and has really settled into being a guardian to Abby for the future. He's put it to rest, and accepted that he has the answers he's always wanted.

So what better time for the past to come knocking? Or, more accurately, what better time for the Puppet to ask that someone "COME FIND ME"?

If it is Garret, then maybe he's angry and bitter ("Oh, you could save her!"), or he could be happier about it ("At least you saved her."), or perhaps even just resigned ("You really think he's dead?"). Despite all his progress, despite how much effort he's put into letting the past stay in the past, it's come back to haunt him in a very literal way.

How does he react when the object of his obsession is really here and truly in front of him?

We'd also get some other interesting interactions with this, such as Abby meeting her brother, or Vanessa apologising for any role she may have played in Garret's murder.

So yeah, I'm putting my money on "Garret is the Puppet". Largely because I think it makes logical sense from an in universe perspective for it to be him, and also because I feel it would be the most emotional option for our (potential) protagonist.

#fnaf movie spoilers #fnaf movie #fnaf #stardust rambles #theory #“COME FIND ME” may be a phone call to Mike that kicks off everything? #Or could be taunting Afton (if he's escaped from Goldie)?

[jaymarigold]

Hey y'all my tv crashed while I tried to watch the wendigoon conspiracy theory iceberg video should I sleep w an eye or two open

#wendigoon #well s h i t #men in black time #if they come I'll just try to rizz them up it's fine #wendigoon conspiracy theory iceberg #I know it's probably because the video is just really long #but it's also just really funny to imagine the government #is currently hauling ass at scp096 speeds to my house rn #Goldie's Rambling and Bullshittery posts

[begonefornow]

hi im new i edit random people when i see whst happend and mske my own theorys im aga fan and ohter things ÷)

#ask goldie #ask goldie anything #aga #theory

[goldensunset]

oh i am SPOOKED

#and then his voice starts glitching and repeating after this… #it really does make it seem like there are prerecorded voice lines although that theory of mine has definitely been disproven at this point #which leads to my other theory that there’s some kinda monster impersonating him maybe? #sheesh #ok but even just the lines ‘hello; children. i’m sorry.’ are spooky enough #goldie’s pokémon violet liveblog #sv spoilers #video #sorry for so many video recordings today i just find it easier than screenshotting every dialogue line #also some of these scenes are just so good a series of screenshots won’t do justice

[castlingvanias]

im begging every "andrew posessed golden freddy in fazbear frights" ppl to actually read fazbear frights

#rodispeak #fnaf #like he barely ever gets connected to goldie?!?! #wtf are u on #and like the small link he has to goldie is so speculative and hc theory territory #if u ever say this u convince me u either never read fazbear frights or skims it to hell and back #andrew fnaf

[askcharaandfriends]

What do you think of demon Chara (how the geno end and most of the fan base see Chara, I personally just believe Chara would be a little brat but still nice)

I used to think Chara was evil (or some variation of that). But I dont anymore. It's all the player. [Neither Frisk or Chara]. however in a comic, obviously someone is to blame [and in most comics it cant be the player] and in that scenario, I think what works best is shared blame. Where both Chara and Frisk are responsible for what happened.

I think Chara being as dark as they are in AFAC [but notably not pure evil and actually very complex] is probably a result of early undertale fandom ideas of Chara (though I'm not TQ, so I can't say for sure) AFAC started very early [like 2015 early] so... yeah. And at least that Chara isn't a demon like people thought [but some askers definitely thought so]. And Frisk has partial blame.

Since then fans have had many in depth discussions on the nature of Sans, chara, Papyrus and Toriel (etc). And those of us who have been here a while have seen a change in how people view each of the characters. Mainly going back to the roots of characters and then adding from there.

Some things we know about Chara: they're a human. They came to the underground for an unhappy reason. They became best friends with Asriel. They knitted Asgore a mr dad guy sweater. They liked to mess with Asriel and make creepy faces. They baked a pie with buttercups instead of cups of butter. Asgore ate it and got sick. They laughed it off. They came up with a plan to break the barrier: they would eat a poison pie and die so that Asriel could take their soul and cross the barrier and get 6 more human souls. Asriel didn't want to, but Chara convinced him. They carried out their plan but when it came to the killing humans part, Asriel refused and so, humans killed them both instead. Chara wasn't the nicest person.

If Chara is the narrator [which is a theory with some solid backup such as "it's you" and "it's me" ] then they like puns! Just about as much as Sans Papyrus and Toriel. They have a lot more fun with the player during a pacifist run with what they say about the situation. You get the sense that the narrator [chara?] Prefers pacifist. The narrator [chara] cheers you on and makes the suggestion to SAVE your friends.

And then they show up at the end of geno. Claiming the stats as their own and taking control. (And then you get a scary face?) Or in a pacifist ending after a geno run you see they've taken over control of the body.

To me, all that is like "congradulations. You killed everyone. You purposely went around hunting everyone down for exp and gold. For the satisfaction of completion. Now is your curiosity satisfied? Cool cool. This body is mine now. You've lost your privileges to a "happy ending". You are not above consequences. "

All in all, I think Chara is a complex person. Also just a kid. I dont think they wanted to hurt anyone (at least monsters). They like pranks and puns and just plain messing with people. They like chocolate and Asriel is their best friend (sibling, friend or romantic partner depends on who you ask. As long as they are not siblings, I think romance is fine.) They're not always good, and they're not always bad (like us all). they like monsters more than humans and want the monsters to be free, and are willing to die (and kill) for that cause.

Goldy: To me, Chara is a brilliant deconstructive element that serves Undertale’s meta-narrative. Namely, they deconstruct the idea of a child protagonist saving the world. Firstly, on a realistic level, a kid doesn’t always think things through when they try to do something that’s out of their depth, which the main reason why their plan failed in Undertale. And secondly, when you saddle a kid with that much responsibility, calling them “the future of humans and monsters,” the weight of it- the pressure- is going to be felt in one way or another, and something’s going to give. It’s not a question of if, but when and how. 

I personally don’t believe Chara wanted to destroy humanity or even free monsters for the sake of freeing them, but rather, they simply just wanted to measure up to the expectations that they feel were placed on them. Don’t get me wrong: freeing monsters is probably something that they agreed with, but to me, the real root of their motive was just to prove their worth to Monsterkind for taking them in. Which is tragic, because the Dreemurrs’ love was unconditional. It makes you wonder: what has to happen to a child to make them feel like they can’t count on being loved unconditionally? That love is not real?

Even the fact that they call themselves a demon supports this: what would rather be remembered as after your big epic plan failed miserably? A great and terrible demon, or a total loser who failed miserably- grasping for accomplishment that was never theirs to want? Not unlike Icarus who flew too close to the sun. I think the whole “Demon” thing is nothing but an overblown pretense that serves to be self-flagellating and self-hyping at the same time. The fanbase latched onto it because everyone loves a legend, and in typical online-cringe-brand fashion, they fixated on Chara’s faults and possible mental health issues as “evidence” to support what ultimately amounts to a confirmation bias. 

We can make anyone appear evil, even a kid. Especially when we need a scapegoat for our choices in a game with a metafictional narrative.

#chara #characterization #og undertale #fan theory #is chara evil? #chara is not a demon #narrator chara #goldy says #character essays #long post

[goldiredstan]

okay like. I figured the reason I'm having trouble developing the swap AU is because I have no idea where to take it after Book One???

I have a rough idea of how Book One goes down in the AU, what scenes change and how that affects what. But after Book One???

To be honest I'm still conflicted on whether or not I still want Goldie to even stay queen after the events of Book One

#j's posts #wanted dead or alive (au) #goldie and red are also just. SUCH different characters in the au. there's also that. #hrrrrrrrn swap aus are fun in theory until you have to actually consider how they impact the overall story